Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

37 articles on this Page

AMOFTGANSHLUE ASSIZES.

News
Cite
Share

AMOFTGANSHLUE ASSIZES. 0 IIERING OF CIVIL CASES. ifoie Mr j ° Clv'^ business was resumed— "I'll, on Crrt" ,be ToW° H* 1'1U: BOROUGH OF ABGRAVON.—DISPUTED TERRITORY. A.beravooS t0f boundaries of the borough ^ntmued' TV *he »Jurposes of rat,n&' n?!an Bav t' Was an aotlon brought) by the Corporat' '"P Company, Limited, against •e Urban 'eravon» acting as and being plaintiff ,an'ila'ry Authority for that district. L°fk« in Onoo\. as t',ie ovvners and occupiers of the Apru |. J0?' a"eged that on or about the 'hem 3 ^e'er,dant Corporation levied jiiah 'n re Peec of the said works a 'he ef lct! rate> while it was contended ithlb mPuny that their works were not «»V?D or fc-tLUI't9 the borough of Aber* "ln the rating district) of the [ rate, "n ancli therefore not assessable to the 0n"P*ytii« pors.tion, in consequence of the fa^ant of the rate, levied a distress st tlle P'-aintitfs' works for the sum £ Com.?' ,nci«diDg the costs of the distress. !Je,i*s, pa°y claimed £ 22 lis as damages for ti "is '!> connection with tbe levying ¿ d stress. The case for the I^>F»fcwWas to the effect tha.t the ^Sss denied that the land and pre- company V/QTQ noti situate tK borough of Aberavon or ey cW*'A ratiufT district of tho authority, ^'easabisf thak lh" plaintiff company were net 1 at t[je the said rate, and they further denied d or P lntiffs were not occupiers of any j°r tile rat" nr»*mises within. the said borough ^ation 'ns ^'str'ct. On the contrary the Cor- all maf°»tended th it the land in question was ''strict times within the defendants' rating ^to^ The niain pomt »t issue was *'St» "Mir the land on which the works were b^avon^p w'thin or without the area of the fc ,T*>raUoa, and therefore whether the A^bie v2,? Work« foim»d a portion of the ?• Ur»« of the Uioan District Authority. t>CtU:II)-;r of old presentments and other I '^itory In ere produced, as also a model of the k lh»* sit dl'P"te. the purpose of showing of the works wns and always had ~jurisdiction of the municipality of nV°Unse! for the'plaintiffs were Mr Abel \V 1H FOR MP • ALL(1 MR S T KVAN8- MP < T t!l^ defence th* counsel were Mr k'e*is, "Rowlands, Q O., and Mr Arthur pV^»en the Court resumed Mr s °as«fn ulan,,s addressed the jury, opening °Ggu h pfence* He contended that the rind that ?U"dai'V had been clearly expressed, 'imits had been stated by a Royal appointed to deal with the '>av» T boroughs in England and Wales, ^Olbil n wpH ascertained by frequent Jfea in • He also argued that tbe ea n ^u?st'on was in the borough of fc6sent° °bjection to the boundary as at «S»if]en claimed by the Corporation.— <a'^ hq ifWas then called. Mr John John, who Aberav been rate collector for the borough of late m "n for 16 years, producer! general district "Pontl B'n APri,< 1894- wbic'i was partly based tiffs 16 Poor rate of Baglan Lower, and plain- th« to pay. He did not) think •lesseg "ar]es as sutjprested by plaintiff's wit- did JVere correct. Cross-examined, he said he k°Unr? ltnow anything about the borough nr'es. Mr L. Davies, collector of rates for Of |D Lowpr> seated that since the erection tor ^nt.ftV works these had been rated ^id 8:'an I'Ower, and tbe rates had be^n W|thout protest until September, 1894. L ev'^ence in support of the defence was Of to "y Mr Wm. Williams, an old inhabitant p*ti |*S'an and formerly rate collector for that l"B ^°bn Lewis, 78 years of a§e, residing IJJ 'ton Perry Mr Thomas Evans, carpenter, 4 CoH res'dpnt of BagUn Mr David Rees, ery proprietor, and a late resident of Briton Mr Tennaut, town clerk of Aberavon lhe ■t> which parties' counsel addressed Sy1J',ry--—His Lordship having summed up the Of m6nce> t',a jury unanimously found in favour Ihgiy judgment was given accord- ?on ^e'C°urb then adjournpd till to-day, when the ■owing cases will be fcak^n :— HT7Unn p A CT>B"fTiT. JTIBV Metr°p°litan Ba»k of EnjrHnd and "Wale?, Ltd., v. Thomas and Charles Gaen. 1 WITHOUT A JURT. i ^"onipson and Shackell. Ltd., v. Veale. 1 itnklns v- Williams. V i^68 v- sc°tt. £ ^arda T- 'i'he Lewis Mertliyr, &e., Collieries Co. 16 Jenkins and Wife v. Thomas. The f 11 THE CIVIL BUSINESS. ir as 's cause 'I's'« anf^ the decisions as 1 TL.FL » I BEFORE A JURY. Af nf A K„ n Ba.y Tinplate Co Ltd., v. the Mayor, 5 r-V o3"1—S.J.—Judgment for plaintiffs. i- V. ?'rk v; Povfell—Setttled—C.J. V .,ar(is v" the Lewis Merthyr, &c.. Colliery Co., 4. Lee v. Hammett & Halford-C.J.-Judgment for defendants. "iu1he Gran(l Propevty Co., Ltd., v. Evan John, ^worgan John, and William John—S.J. Urt,e Metropolitan Bank of England and Wales, 1 Sh' v, b°>nas Gaen and Clt;irles Gaen—S J f. -Ju<W er"! Co;' ',td" v- Michael Keardon-C.J. Slade^Ement for defendants. ants> v" ^aen—S.J.—Money paid out to defend- In Pfeinua f?r'ce-C;j;. — Judgment by consent for S>edgvvicJ r £ 1^0 without costs. li ?unt (0f v- Mathews—C.J.—J moment for defen- Jenkin> ft&iount claimed with costs. ^Dd wife v. Thomas—C.J. IT TLLOH, WITHOUT A JURY. 1* v°5 an<i Shackell, Ltd., ▼. Veale. Wlowne v. the London and Provincial Bank, It it el Scott. ees v- Scott-Settled.

SERIOUS FRACAS AT CARDIFF

- DEATH OF A NEWPORT HOTEL-KEEPER.

THFI TRAGIC AFFAIR AT FONTYPOOL.

Advertising

POACHING CARDIFF FOOTBALLERS.

THE VISITOR INTERVIEWED.

YESTERDAY'S MATCHES.

CARDIFF v BLACKHEATH.

THE OLD AND THE NEW.

A THIEF IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING.

- THE DIVINE SARAH.

--'ARRY AND 'ARRIET. -

Advertising

LATEST MARKETS. .

AN EARLY ULADfcTONIAN PROBLEM

Advertising

REGULATION OF CARDIFF! CASUALS.|

..-------------..---ST. ANDREW'S,…

SWANSEA SCHOOL BOARD.

LOCAL WEDDING,j

Advertising

OUR COUNTRY COLUMN.

-------A STRANGE HIDING -…

--------PRINCIPAL MICHAEL…

STREET BETTING. !

---__-THE IRON TRADE. --..-

-------THE QUEEN'S SOLICITUDE.

|A FEW HOME TRUTHS.

FIRST REHEARSAL. -

---| FAIRS FOR NOVEMBER.

Advertising

SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. .

NEWMARKET TRAINING NOTES.

HUNTING APPOINTMENTS.

SWANSEA COUNTY COURT.

--------------THE DRESSMAKER'S…