Welsh Newspapers
Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles
26 articles on this Page
Hide Articles List
26 articles on this Page
IMPORTANT AMENDMENTS DISCUSSED.
News
Cite
Share
IMPORTANT AMENDMENTS DISCUSSED. 'th the e House of Commons has been engaged an (En ,Wee^ Committee on the Education wep n<* and Waes) Bill, and the following 11108t important amendments die- TO CONTROL THE CLERGY. Colonel KEXTON PLANET (U.. Shropshire. ,.n?oved to add to Clause 8 a provision "that Vol 10US ^n8truction should be given in the ^ntary schools in accordance with the a°Qr ot the provisions (if any) of the trust relating thereto, and should be under control of the managers." -■"lr "W. ANSON (U., Oxford University) cepted the amendment on behalf of the °vernment. It embodied the policy of the government, and made that policy more ex- P1*cit and clear. t Mr. VICARY GIBBS (U.. St, Albans) regretted 'lat the Government had accepted the amend- a ent'» "which was a perfectly unnecessary re- action upon the conduct of the clergy. ljord E. TALBOT (U., Chichester), on behalf "is co-religionists in the Roman. Catholic frurch, objected to the amendment as being •olutely contrary to the spirit of the Bill. Mr. BALFOUE did not think the nature the religious teaching in Eoman ^atholic schools would be interfered with, it was not likely that the four denomina- '°n^l managers would waver in their to their bishop. Lord HUGH CECIL (U., Greenwich) said amendment would give great pain n<* bitterness to many who were not ^treme men and who had done very Useful work. Various Unionist members opposed the a*nenrlment. «r. BALF0UE said he had listened with *°&ie surprise to the expressions of feeling v. i°h had come from the benches behind He had been in the forefront of the fettle for the Bill since its first introduction. Ministerial cheers.) He had not always Reived, he admitted, enthusiastic support Reived, he admitted, enthusiastic support rom those who were in harmony with the ^neral policy of the Government. There was time when they had looked very coldly at e Bill. The cry that the Bill was a measure five clerical control had been caught up y many supporters of the Government, and h« Would not attempt to estimate the number tetters which he had received from his tends saying, "This is a dreadful measure. n the guise of improving secular education really are fastening the yoke of the F*epgy upon our necks." (Opposition cheers.) rfw. as the Bill became better understood it "^cattle more popular—(ironical Opposition coeers)—but as it became more popular he Noticed this extraordinary phenomenon, that joose who had in the first instance most Rented the imposition of the clerical con- .r°l were now rising in their places and say- that the amendment was an insult to the ergy. (Opposition laughter.) It was not an ?58y thing to conduct, inside and outside the ~wti8e, a highly controversial Bill like that I'efore the Committee when one found that hose on whose support one had a> right to changed their tactics and trimmed their sails at different stages of the contro- (Opposition laughter and Ministerial ^heers.) However, he quite recognised that there was in many quarters of the House *here he counted for support on general prin- ClPlea a strong feeling with regard to the f^endment, and. therefore, he did not pro- Ose to make the vote on the amendment a ^vernment matter. For himself he should ^ost emphatically vote for the amendment, he trusted that all in favour of the general principles of the Bill would support I? in the division, (tfini&terial cheers.) _.The Committee then divided on Colonel -Sl&ney's amendment, there voting: — For 211 A-gainst 41 Majority .— 170 THE FINANCIAL QUESTION. Mr. M'KENNA (R., Monmouthshire, N.) moved Postponement of the clause on the ground ^hat the House ought first to be in a position discuss the financial proposals of the ^Temment. BALFOUR opposed the motion. The })<)hcy of the clause was quite irrespective of any decision which the House might come to With regard to the financial arrangements. Mr. LLOYD GEOEGE (R.. Carnarvon boroughs) supported Mr. M'Kenna's amend- ment, pointing out that the Government pro- Posed to add £900.000 a year for educational Purposes to the present grant. He suggested that the Prime Minister should allocate some £200.000 or £300.000 of that sum in order to build schools in the rural districts or in the poorer districts in the large towns in place of the miserable, squalid schools that now in many parts existed. The whisky money was pooled in Wales. That example could now be followed. The Committee then divided:- For the postponement 64 Against 115 Government majority 51 SCHOOLS FOR THE SECTS. Mr. TREVELYAN (R., Yorkshire. Elland) moved to leave out the words "or any other persons." his proposal being to put it in the hands of the local education authority to pro- vide all future new schools. As it stood the Bill, in his opinion, would lead to a rivalry among ministers of different denominations with the object of having in their own special districts their own schools in which their own dogmas would be taught. Mr. BALFOUR opposed the amendment. He held that the English board school system was absolutely intolerable unless it were tempered with the voluntary system. It was as clearly necessary to provide scope and room for volun- tary education to meet the needs of popula- tions which might arise in the future, a. it Was to preserve the voluntary schools already erected. Sir JOHN GORST (U., Cambridge University) said that such provisions as were contained In the clause would be absolutely unneces- I!a.ry. and the religious difficulty would dis- appear from Parliament and the platform- it had disappeared from the schools—if the House would consent to trust to the new local education authority the duty and power of taking all reasonable provision for giving to all the children of the coijntry such teaching as their parents should wish. (Opposition cheers:) Mr. LLOYD-GEORGE did not know how. in face of the recently-issued return on trust deeds, it could be contended that the religious difficulty was non-existent. Sir JOHN GORST said he had not denied the existence of the religious difficulty; his Contention was that it did not penetrate to the school itself, and did not interfere with the relations between the teacher and the scholar, or in the giving of instruction. Mr. LLOYD-GEORGE insisted that under this clause extreme Churchmen, either High and Low, would provide schools. That would raise strife with their neighbours, and amidst this rivalry the education of the children would suffer. So far as Wales was concerned, the Welsh members would close with the Prime Minister's offer if he would give them the Scotch system. He did not think that the control of religious teaching should be in the hands of the county councils, covering, as they did. considerable areas, but that that Power should be given to the parish autho- rities It was perfectly clear that the clause Under debate was not introduced on behalf of the Nonconformists, but siniply and purely I to promote a system of sectarianism which tfc»y protested against. Sir JOHN GORST said he had challenged the House many times to name an instance where a single Nonconformist child was excluded from the teaching profession", and he had never been able to find one. (Ministe- rial cheers.) Mr. LLOYD-GEORGE I have given repeated instances. Sir JOHN GORST: No. Mr. LLOYD-GEOEGE ad^id that the Govern- ment had brought in^fBill which not only legalised, but extended, sectarianism. This was a very dangerous and pernicious clause. The setting-up of small schools, as would happen nnder the clause, would be bad for education, and bad for the teachers, male and female, who would not receive (salaries of more than JE75 or £80, and ranging up to £120 a year. He should like to ask the Prime Minister if it was not possible under the Bill to set up independent schools with an attendance so small that the teachers could act receive higher wages than he had stated. Mr. BALFOUR said that a school might be 99t up in respect of 30 children. Mr. LLOYD-GEOEGE said: Then in that case Vne school must have but a small equipment, ratepayers a greater burden, and with tineatisfactory educational results. What did they find now in force in the Roman Catholic schools? Foreign monks brought over—men who could live upon next to nothing—to teach in the schools, and their salaries in the main went to their churches, so that Roman Catholics were in receipt of double endow- 'u^nf.s. This they had to guard against, yet the Bill would have this effect. (Opposition chr ers.) Mr. BALFOUE remarked that ttv> right hon. harouet shared with Mr. Middlemore the delu- sion that the effect of this clause would be t':o multiplication of denominational schools. The clause was insetted in order to give a liberty that at present did not exist, to build either board or denominational schools. He knew of a place where there was only a r;.omau Catholic school, although the majo- rity of the children were not Catholics. There leing sufficient accommodation in this Roman vViholic school, it was not in the power of 11" 'ocal school board to build another school. That was a most arbitrary limita- tion. (Cheers.) He (the Prime Minister) held no brief for extreme Churchmen. (Cheers.) The Committee divided, and there voted— For Mr. Trevelyan's amendment. 111 \gainst 225 amomwast mtiotity .— 11449A A NARROW DIVISION. Mr. HERBERT ROBERTS (B.. Denbigh, W.) moved to omit the words giving to "any ten ratepayers in the area for which it was pro- posed to provide the school" a right of appea to the Board of Education. Sir WILLIAM ANSON opposed the amend- ment. contending that it was only reasonable that the ratepayers who knew the needs of the district should have a voice in the matter. On a division, taken at 9.10, the amendment was rejected by 87 to 70. The result was received with loud Opposition cheers. RIGHT OF APPEAL. Mr. M'KENNA next proposed to limit the right of appeal to a. majority of the rate- payers. Was it reasonable, he asked, that the ratepayers should be enabled to hang up the work of educational progress for an indefinite period? Mr. LLOYD-GEORGE said that it was exceed- ingly unfair that ten ratepayers-it might be ten out of 10,000—should be able to stop the machinery of education for three months. It was simply playing into the hands of men who had no interest in education at all and were trying to thwart it by every possible means. (Opposition cheers.) In the result the amendment was negatived by 176 to 95. GROUNDS OF APPEAL. Dr. MACNAMARA (R., Camberwell, N.) next moved to limit the appeal to the Board of Education to the ground that a school was not required to meet any deficiency in school places. He thought that new schools should only be allowed to be provided because of educational need and not on account of sectarian claims. Mr. BALFOUR pointed out that at the present moment a Nonconformist district might be served exclusively by a Roman Catholic or an Anglican school and an Anglican district exclusively by a board school. In the view of the Government that system wanted such elasticity as would be given to it by the clause, and which the amendment would deny. Mr. LLOYD-GEORGE said he made no charge of proselytising against the Roman Catholics. As a rule, they would find that the children attending Eoman Catholic schools were Eoman Catholics, but in hundreds of parishes the vast majority of the children in Anglican schools were not Anglicans at all. It was within his own know- ledge that these Anglican schools held out inducements which were not spiritual to Nonconformists to quit the faith of their fathers and become members of the Anglican Church. He knew that in some Welsh Anglican schools this had happened. What was required was efficiency of education. If each sect was to have its school, would some five or six sects, it may be in a parish, each have its own school, while the whole parish was only large enough for one school? Mr. BALFOUR, amid cries of Is this the Scottish system?" and much laughter, moved the closure, which was carried by 187 to 88. Dr. MACNAMARA'S amendment was then negatived by 183 to 82. Mr. BALFOUR followed by moving the question That Clause 9 stand part" be now put. whereupon the Opposition raised cries of Shame," and Put the whole Bill," to which the Ministerialists replied with shouts of "Agreed" and laughter. The closure was carried by 181 votes to 81, and the clause passed by 176 to 78. Progress was then reported, and the House I rose at 12.25 a.m. REGULATING THE SUPPLY OF SCHOOLS. Mr. M'KENNA (R.. Monmouthshire. N.) moted to leave out all the words of Clause 10 after the word not," thereby leaving it to the Board of Education to decide upon the meces- sity of a school without any direction as to the conditions to which they should have regard. Mr. LLOYD-GEORGE (R.. Carnarvon Boroughs), in vindicating the necessity of the amendment, pointed out that if economy of the rates were considered denominational schools would always of necessity have an immense advantage over board schools, because the building for a voluntary school would be provided by the denomination. As to the wishes of the parents, how were they going to be ascertained? Was there going to be a public inquiry, or was the clergyman to get up a petition and hand it in? The inspector who went down to inquire as a rule had preconceived notions with regard to these things. There were two different opinions with regard to education—one was that the most important thing was secular instruc- tion the second was that of the gentlemen who got up the petition, and they would say they did not want to give their children this dangerous weapon of reading and writing, as a canon of the Church had described it. What they wanted was to give them religious doctrine, which taught them to be "humble and lowly to all their betters," and explained to them that their betters were the canons and prebendaries and curates of the Church. (Laughter.) That was their opinion of education. (Ministerial cries of No no," and Divide.") A largo number of thepe inspectors were clergymen them- selves, and they were the very gentlemen who for years and years had tolerated insanitary buildings purely and simply in the interests of. sectarian education. The inspectors would hold secret inquiries and go to the managers to ascertain the wishes of the parents, and not to the parents themselves. The Committee divided, and the voting was— For the amendment 109 Against 203 Government majority. 94 IMPORTANT CHANGES. Lord E. FITZMAURICE (R.. Wilts, Cricklade) moved to substitute "the local education authority" for ."any council," in order to bring the clause in conformity with the Technical Instruction Acts. which the Government declared they had taken as their model. Sir WM. ANSON explained that the. effect of the first amendment standing in his name would be to make the clause run as follows: Any council having powers under this Act shall establish an education committee or education committees, constituted in accordance with a scheme made by the council and approved by the Board of Edu- cation. As to the rating powers, they would be omitted, but would be re-introduced at a later stage. Section 2 of the clause would read as follows: — All matters relating to the exercise by the council of their powers under this Act shall stand referred to the education com- mittee. and the council before exercising any such powers shall consider the report (if any) of the education committee with respect to the matter in quesion. The coun- cil may also delegate to the education com- mittee. with or without any restrictions or conditions, as they think fit, any of their powers under this Act, except the power of raising the rate or borrowing money. The amendments would distinctly modify the relations between the council and the com- mittee as they appeared in the Bill. There was no doubt that as the debate had pro- ceeded a desire had been evinced in the House and in the country that the local education authority proposed to be established should be a popularly elected body and directly responsible to the ratepayers. The Govern- ment desired that that should be so, in spite of all that had been said in discouragement. After further discussion the amendment before the Committee was withdrawn. Mr. JOSEPH A. PEASE (R.. Saffron Walden) proposed to omit all the words in the clause after the second word "education." His object was to get rid of the schemes and all the conditions imposed. He believed the county councils were perfectly competent to manage their own educational work, and it was not at all necessary to put these local education at all necessary to put these local education authorities under the Board of Education so as to be always in leading strings. The Committee divided- For Mr. Pease's amendment 119 [ Against. 241 Government majority 122 Sir WILLIAM ANSON moved to add the fol- lowing proviso with regard to councils dealing only with higher education under Part 2 of the BillProvided always that if a council having powers under Part 2 only of this Act determine that an education committee is unnecessary in their case, it shall not be obligatory upon them to appoint such a oom- mittee."
WELSH RADICALS AND THE EDUCATION…
News
Cite
Share
WELSH RADICALS AND THE EDUCATION BILL. PRIVATE MEETING AT THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. The Welsh Radical members are evidently not enamoured by the optional clause in the Education Bill. At a private meeting held on on Tuesday evening in the House of Commons they decided, after a long discussion, to request Mr. Brynmor Jones and Mr. Humphreys-Owen to draft a clause embodying a proposal to make all Welsh county councils the dominat- ing and controlling authority, acting through committees of its own members, which would be responsible, to its own members, and also providing that the same authority should superintend the county governing bodies appointed under the Intermediate Education Act. Sir Alfred Thomas presided, and there were also present Messrs. Brynmor Jones and Her- bert Roberts (secretaries), and Mesers. Chas. Morley, Lloyd-George, Bryn Roberts, Hum- phreys-Owen, Wynford Philipps., and Abel Thomas. COLONEL KENYON-SLANEY'S AMENDMENT. Writing to a correspondent, Lord Halifax says that if any protest is made against the amendment to the Education Bill proposed and carried by Colonel Kenyon-Slaney in the House of Commons on Friday, sueh protest will have hi* cordial rapport.
WAGES IN THE COAL TRADE.
News
Cite
Share
WAGES IN THE COAL TRADE. JOINT COMMITTEE MEETS AT CARDIFF. Tuesday's meeting of the joint committee authorised to negotiate for a new wage regu- lator for the South Wales collieries had been looked forward to with considerable interest, partly because the negotiations have already been postponed so many times, and partly owing to the expectancy as to the change in the personnel of the leaders of those negotiations. The workmen's repre- sentatives met at 10.30 a.m. in the committee- room of the Engineers' Institute, the meeting being really one of the executive committee of the South Wales Miners' Federation, which includes several representatives who are not also members of the sliding-scale committee. The employers met separately in their own room, and it was nearly mid-day when the two sets of representatives met jointly. When the workmen's representatives, at the invitation of Mr. W. Gascoyne Dal- ziel, entered the joint conference room. the meeting became what was subsequently described as the first meeting of the new Con- ciiiation Committee of the South Wales Coal Trade. That meeting was held in the board- room of the Engineers' Institute. Cardiff, under the presidency of Mr. W. Jenkins (Ocean Col- lieries) and the vice-presidency of Mr. W. Abraham (" Mabon "), M.P., but the question of the election of permanent chairman was not settled; and the circumstances are these:—The workmen's representatives raised the question of the chairmanship, contending that at this junc- ture "Mabon's" services entitled him to the chair, but "Mabon" himself, as usual. abstained from putting forward his claim. Air. W. Jenkins, of the Ocean Collieriea (who was in the chair presiding over the deliberations of the coalowners' representatives, when the men's representatives entered) occupied, the chair of the joint committee pro tern. The employers insisted upon the right of the coal- owners' representatives to select the chairman from among their own side, but stated that they were not able to name the chairman that day. Then the workmen's representatives declined to accept the nomination of any chairman without knowing who he was going to be. and contended that whoever was appointed must be a man who would have the confidence and respect of both sides. After a lengthy discussion, the matter was deferred, Mr. W. Jenkins continuing to preside. CONCESSION OF WORKMEN'S DEMAND FOR INCREASED REPRESENTATION. Now, on another point—the claim of the workmen to have twenty-four representatives— an important step was taken. When the twelve representatives of the workmen entered the room they found about sixteen of the owners' representatives present, and the first point that was raised with regard to this matter was the application of the workmen to increase the number of their representa- tives from twelve to twenty-four. After a brief discussion, Mr. Jenkins. th3 chairman, said the employers' representatives had no objection to that application. They simply thought a. committee of 50 would be rather unwieldy, but as soon as they understood tha.t the men's representatives were all authorised representatives of different districts they agreed to receive the twenty-four, and to appoint four more on their own side to meet, them. As an indication of the spirit in which the negotiations were opened, it is worth noting that the remaining twelve workmen's representatives then entered the room, and the business was proceeded with. REPLYING TO THE OWNERS' QUESTIONS. It is not generally known that a circular was. nine or ten days ago, sent to the work- men's representatives by Mr. Dalziel, on behalf of the employers' committee, asking a list of questions as to the men's intentions, and suggesting a written reply. Now the points in that circular cropped up. and first of all came the explanation why the replies were not sent in in written form. It was mentioned that such a procedure was novel, but very full and liberal explanations, without dis- cusgion, were now given orally by "Mabon." Mr. Jenkins asked the necessary questions on behalf of the employers, and Mr. Abraham, MR. WILLIAM JENKINS. who acted for the workmen, answered all the questions put to him, but there was no dis- cussion upon the points involved. One ques- tion upon which the employers wanted a definite answer was the length of the agree- ment, but Mr. Abraham replied that it was the usual custom to determine the length of the agreement after the agreement had been made, but, no doubt, he added, the length of the agreement would to a great extent depend upon its nature. THE FACTORS IN THE REGULATION OF WAGES. Upon the very important question of the basis upon which wages might be regulated. there were questions in the list referred to. and the replies may be summarised into saying that the state of trade, the volume of trade. and the prospects of trade would be the factors proposed. Upon the question of contracts, it was suggested that, probably, there would be no change in method of signing and arranging between managers and work- men. As to the general regulation of wages, however, the workmen's representatives sug-1 gested that they would like the employers to join the general conciliation board of the federated areas. The employers were very anxious to know all the details, so as to take this matter into consideration No counter-proposals were made by the employers, the proceedings being then adjourned until Saturday week, at 10.30 a.m. It is expected that meetings of each side will be held separately in the meantime. The men may have a conference; the employers may have a meeting of the coalowners' asso- ciation. OFFICIAL REPORT. The following official report was suppiied to the press by Mr. Dalziel:- "There was a joint meeting to-day between the committee appointed by the South Wales and Monmouthshire Coalowners' Association and the representatives of the workmen to consider, the demands of the latter in refer- ence to the regulation of wages as from the 31st of December next. There were pre- sent on the owners' Bide: -Messrs. William Jenkins. J. Boyd Harvey. E. B. Martin, Henry Davies, T. H. Deakin, H. E. Grey, F. L. Davis. W. Ma.claren, Henry Lewis, William Smith, Clifford Cory. F. Cleeves, William Evans, C. H. Eden, anjl W. Gascoyne Dalziel (secretary). On the workmen's side there were:—Messrs. William Abraham, M.P., W. Brace. Alfred Onions, Daroawy Isaac, W. Harris, J. Kemp, John Davies. D. Watts Morgan, Ben Davies, Thomas Evans. David Beynon, William Vice, James Winston, Vernon Hartshorn, Thomas James. Thomas Manning. Evan Thomas, Enoch Morrell, W. E. Morgan, Thomas George. Thomas Thomas. C. B. Stanton, John Wil- liams. John Thomas, and Thomas Richards (secretary). "Mr. William Jenkins was appointed by the owners' committee to act as chairman, Mr. Abraham being in the vice-chair as represent- ing the workmen's side. "The question of the chairmanship of the joint committee came up for consideration, and was adjourned for future discussion. The workmen's representatives referred to the reply given by the owners to the request that for the negotiations there should be 24 repre- sentatives from each side. The owners were of opinion that the number should be confined to twenty on each side, but after a brief dis- cussion the owners' representatives agreed that there should be 24, and the workmen expressed their thanks for this concession. "In reply to the owners' side, the workmen gave their assurance that they were duly authorised to represent the workmen at the associated collieries, and to enter into any arrangement that might be agreed upon. A general discussion followed, the work- men's representativee explaining in detail the basis of their proposals for the new arrange- ment, and ultimately the joint meeting was adjourned until Saturday, the 15th inst., at 10.30 a.m." SIR W. T. LEWIS AND THE CHAIRMAN SImP. We understand that Sir William Thomas Lewis intimated to Mr. Dalziel, secretary to the coalowners' association, on Tuesday morning that he regretted his inability to entertain the request of the coalowners that he should accept the chairmanship of their committee. MR. W. JENKINS ELECTED CHAIRMAN OF THE OWNERS' COMMITTEE. We understand that Mr. W. Jenkins, gene- ral manager of the Ocean Coal Company, was on Tuesday morning selected chairman of the owners' side of the committee to conduct the negotiations with the workmen's representa- tives. This at present does not involve the question at the chairmanship of tÀa joint oon- oiUatinn £ Mnmittea.
ONE OF THM ABERTYSSWG HEROES…
News
Cite
Share
ONE OF THM ABERTYSSWG HEROES KILLED, No. 1 M'Laren Colliery. Abcrtysswg, the scene of the recent explosion, was the locale of another accident on Monday morning, which resulted in the death of Mr. William Taylor, surface overman at the colliery. Mr. Taylor was superintending the working of a machine called the "tippler," by which trams of coal are tipped into trucks, when he was caught in the machinery and sustained such serious injuries tnat he died before he was conveyed to his residence. Mr. Taylor was one of the oldest end most respected of the officials of the company. Previously to being transferred to Abcrtysswg he held a responsible position at Bedwellty Colliery. On Saturday, the 25th ultimo, he was the recipient of an address of thanks, a silver watch, and £5 by the directors of the company in recognition of his gallant conduct in rescuing the men on the occasion of the explosion at No. 1 Colliery. He was the first to descend the pit after the explosion, and had bef n recommended for the Albert medal for bravery.
FATALITY AT MERTHYR.
News
Cite
Share
FATALITY AT MERTHYR. Mr. R. J. Rhys. coroner, held an inquest on Tuesday at the Merthyr General Hospital upon the body of Thomas Edwards, aged 21, of 8. Libanus-street, Dowlais, who died at that institution on Saturday from injuries sus- tained on the previous Wednesday whilst pur- suing his employment as a rider in the South Tunnel Pit, Vochriw. Mr. Gray, his Majesty's inspector of mines, was present, and Mr. D.W. Jones, solicitor, watched the proceedings on behalf of the Miners' Federation. It appeared that the aecident happened in the Little Vein Drift. On Wednesday morning the electric wires became deranged about the middle of the drift, which is 1.100 yards in length, and after they had been set right Edwards. who was on the ground, gave the signal for a journey of ten trams to go out. When the journey came opposite to where he was it was travelling at a crawling pace. Edwards walked alongside it. and in trying to get on the shackle between the first and second trams he missed his footing and fell in the centre of the road. the other wagons crushing him as they passed over.—Mr. Stuart Martin, the general manager of the Dowlais <>llierie8, put in a tracing of the workings where the mishap occurred, and Nursr Pound having described the fatal injuries—which consisted of general paralysis caused through a bleeding into the spinal canal—the jury 0 returned a verdict of "Accidental death."
THREE PERSONS BADLY INJURED…
News
Cite
Share
THREE PERSONS BADLY INJURED AT FORTH. A trap accident occurred between four six o'clock on Monday evening in the Ceme- tery-road. Porth. A milk cart. owned by David Lewis. Salem Chapel Cottage. Hannah- street. Porth, was being drawn from Tre- alaw, down a steep incline, when it collided with a wagon, the three occupants of the cart being thrown against a. wall and sus- taining serious injuries to the head. The driver of the wagon and others who were passing at the time at once rendered assis- tance, and the three, David Lewis and two boys about thirteen years of age. named Thomas Lewis, 9. Argyle-street, Porth, and DaviJ Morgan Jones. 75. Primrose-terrace. Porth, wfre taken to the Forth Cottage Hos- pital. close by. The boy Lewis had his fingers almost severed from his hand. and at the hospital it was found that the three persons were suffering from concussion of the brain. The telephone was at once put into opera- tion. and Dr. Joyce and his assistant. Dr. Paxton (Porth), Dr. Morris (Tylorstown), Dr. Evan Davies (Grovefield), and Dr. Thomas (Pentre) hurried to the spot. They found it necessary to perform an operation on each of the patients.
MAESTEG MAN'S DEATH.
News
Cite
Share
MAESTEG MAN'S DEATH. An inquest was held on Tuesday by Mr. Cuthbertson, coroner, at Caerau Police- station on the body of William Re2s, 54, collier, Caerau.—Dr. Harris Jones stated that he was called to the deceased a fortnight last Saturday. He was suffering from dislocation of the shoulder and injuries to the other joints. He then informed deceased that his shoulder could not he put right unless he was given an anaesthetic. This deceased consented to. and he (the doctor) arranged a time for him to be at his house for this purpose. He also gave him instructions not to overload the stomach. Deoeased called, and Dr. Davies, his (Dr. Jones's) assistant, administered chloroform, after which deoeased vomited, which proved that he had not taken the pre- cautions which he (the doctor) had impressed upon him to adopt. When deceased recovered from the effects of the chloroform he was seized with syncope, which, no doubt, was the reeult of the stomach being overloaded — After hearing the medical evidenoe, the jury returned a. verdict of Death from mis- adventure."
ACCIDENT AT NEATH.
News
Cite
Share
ACCIDENT AT NEATH. Mrs. Gwenllian Davies. a widow, of GIas- road. Cilybehyll, was driving into Neath on Monday with her adopted son. when the horse shied, and the occupants of the trap were thrown out. Mrs. Davies was caught by one of the wheels and dragged along the road until the trap overturned. She was seriously injured, and was removed in an unconscious state to a. neighbouring house. The boy was not hurt.
FATAL ACCIDENT AT THE ROATH…
News
Cite
Share
FATAL ACCIDENT AT THE ROATH BASIN. Mr. E. B. Reece held an inquest at the Town-hall, Cardiff, on Monday, on the body of George Coles, sailor, aged 59. who acciden- tally met with his death at the Docks on the 1st inst.—Thomas Griffiths, 68. Caerphilly- street. pilot, stated that about five o'clock in the afternoon he was on the pierhead and saw Coles climbing from one step to another in the Roath Basin, with the idea, as he believed, of getting ashore. Witness and two others procured a ladder and went on one of the ships, and he himself descended by that means, and, without getting into the water. caught hold of Coles, who was hauled up by the dock police in an unconscious condi- tion. An hour-was spent on the ship in trying to revive him. and when he got better he Was taken to the Hamadryad. —Dr. Hughes deposed that deceased on admission had a slight wound on the left side of the forehead, and was unconscious from partial drowning. He was conscious the next morning, and said he was about to go on a ship, whose name he could not remember. when he fell. He died from double pneumonia —the result of the immersion on October 30.— The jury returned a verdict in accordance with the medical evidence.
ACCIDENT AT SWANSEA DOCKS.
News
Cite
Share
ACCIDENT AT SWANSEA DOCKS. A seaman belonging to the schooner Jacinth, of Plymouth, was drowned in the North Dock. Swansea, on Tuesday. He waa engaged on the jib of the schooner when he slipped, and his head probably struck the veoscl, for he did not rise to the surface. After the body had been recovered artificial respiration was tried, but was unsuccessful.
PAINFUL FATALITY AT DOWLAIS.
News
Cite
Share
PAINFUL FATALITY AT DOWLAIS. A young man named James Owen, living at Penydarren, and employed at the Old Works, Dowlais, as an outside fitter, was on Monday evening caught by a hook in his neck. near the jugular vein. He bled pro- fusely. and expired within a few minutes. He was about 33 years of age, and lodged with a married sister.
BURNING FATALITY AT CARDIFF.
News
Cite
Share
BURNING FATALITY AT CARDIFF. Olive Agnes Parsons, aged three years, died on Tuesday afternoon at 158, Penarth-road. Cardiff, from shock, consequent on burns received about the head and body last Sun- day. An inquest on the body was held by the Cardiff coroner (Mr. E. B. Reece) on Wednes- day afternoon. The father stated that the child, with two other children, was in her chair in the kitchen when he was attracted by screams, and, running to her. he found her clothes ablaze. He took off his coat and wrapped it around her to extinguish the flames and called in medical aid. —Dr. R. J. Smith, describing the burns on the lower part of the child's body, said that she was delicate. Shock had resulted in death.— A verdict of "Accidental death" was returned.
ANOTHER FOOTBALL FATALITY.
News
Cite
Share
ANOTHER FOOTBALL FATALITY. John H. Richardson, of Whitehaven, a half- back. who played for Whitehaven Recreation. was assisting Cumberland County against Yorkshire at Leeds on Saturday, when he col- lided with one of his own side in running to take the ball. He went off the field, but subse- quently returned to play, but only to be again obliged to leave the field, and eventually he was removed to the Leeds Infirmary suffering from an injury to the groin. An operation was performed on Sunday, hut the sufferer rapidly became worse, and death took place on Monday.
ACCIDENT AT PORT TALBOT.
News
Cite
Share
ACCIDENT AT PORT TALBOT. William Edmunds, aged 18, of Aberavon. was killed at the Port Talbot Iron and Steel Works on Monday by being drawn into some machi- nery.,
WORKMAN CRUSHED TO DEATH.
News
Cite
Share
WORKMAN CRUSHED TO DEATH. A shocking accident occurred at Preston Docks. A number of men were breaking up the liner Alaska, and had exploded five charges of gelignite in the engine-room in the course of their work. A workman named Joseph Davison was laying another charge when the cylinder overhead collapsed and fell on him. killing him instantaneously. Another workman. named Ambler, was seriously injured, and was removed to Pres- ton Infirmary.
SHOCKING LOCOMOTIVE ACCIDENT.
News
Cite
Share
SHOCKING LOCOMOTIVE ACCIDENT. A shocking accident occurred at Keyham Extension Works, Devonport. on Monday morning. The gauge glass of a locomotive engine blew out, and a fireman named John Barrett, in jumping from the engine to avoid being scalded, had his leg caught in the wheels, with the result that ills body was terribfc* j&axxgled.
BRITISH CONVOY REPORTED CAPTURED.
News
Cite
Share
BRITISH CONVOY REPORTED CAPTURED. A bazaar rumour was current in Aden on Monday night to the effect that the Mullah raided an advanced outpost in the vicinity of Bohotle, capturing an important camel trans- port.— Reuter. Bohotle is a town in Italian Somaliland to which the British force retreated after the unfortunate affair near Muddug. It is under- stood that the force is still at Bohotle. recu- perating and awaiting orders. Colonel Swayne is at Aden or Berbera. The capture by the Mullah of a camel transport or convoy suggests that the British camp supplies are in peril. The news comes by way of a bazaar rumour," and is uncorroborated, but these bazaar rumours, well known in oonnection with mili- tary operations in India and Afghanistan. have repeatedly proved to be accurate.
SERVICES OF INDIAN TROOPS…
News
Cite
Share
SERVICES OF INDIAN TROOPS DISCOUNTED. An Aden telegram of Monday says :-Colonel Swayne has been re-called to act temporarily as adviser to the Foreign Office, and General Manning has assumed supreme command over the movements of the Somaliland Expedition. The immediate advance has been deferred pending the arrival of the African troops. The latest reinforcements for the column are expected to arrive on the 27th inst. It is pro- posed that the reinforcements shall land at Illig, on the eastern coast of the Italian terri. tory, and his Majesty's cruiser Pomone is pro- ceeding thither to survey the facilities for disembarkation. The general advance will commence about six weeks hence, when it is expected that Colonel Swayne will have re- turned to his post. The plan of advance favours the creation of bases both at Berbera and Illig The services of native levies and African Protectorate troops will be utilised as much as possible, in preference to those of Indian troops, who may possible be entrusted with the duty of holding the lines of communication. General Manning wishes to dispense with Indian troops wherever possible on account of difficulties connected with transport, climate, camp followers, Ac., espe- cially affecting them. By the 27th inst. or thereabouts the available strength of the force will be approximately 3,000 men. The employment of a large force is discoun- tenanced. The exclusion of the Indian troops which will arrive before those from East Africa. involves delay in the operations, affording the Mullah opportunities to assert his influence and to visit various tribes in order to propagate the doctrine of his supe- riority. Moreover, the season is now favour- able for the advance of the expedition. Gene- ral Manning returned to Berbera to-day to organise the expedition. Details of field artil- lery and some special service officers are pro- ceeding at once.—Press Association Foreign Special.
ILITTLE MISS CARNEGIE.
News
Cite
Share
I LITTLE MISS CARNEGIE. MARGARET CARNEGIE. Thoto by Rockwood, New York. The a.bove is a picture of the little daughter and only child of Mr. Andrew Carnegie. Heiress to an embarrassment of millione, she recently asked her papa. to buy her "the biggest and hairiest-headed lion in the world," not for her- self, but to give it to the Zoo of the Bronx Park for the benefit of the little New York children. Mr. Carnegie once said that his little daughter "is the only one of my treasures that I want for myself." He also said that she "should not be cursed with great wealth." She is. nevertheless, reasonably well secured against future indigence.
COLLIERS IN TROUBLE. ,-
News
Cite
Share
COLLIERS IN TROUBLE. REFUSE TO OBEY ORDERS OF THE HITCHER. At Abercarn Police-court on Thursday an important prosecution under the Mines Regu- lation Act was heard. The owners of the Cely- nen Steam-Coal Colliery, Newbridge, summoned Prank Pidgeon, John Browning (his assistant). and Edgar Tranter, three colliers, for a breach of Special Rule 57 in refusing to ol>ey the orders of the hiteher on October 16. Mr. W. J. Everett conducted the prosecution, and Mr. T. S. Edwards defended. Tne case had been adjourned from a previous court. It appears that on the date named the defendants went to the cage at the bottom of the pit. of which Thomas Newman, the head hiteher, had charge, and suggested that they should go up to the top of the pit. This was at 7.40 p.m.. they only having descended about six o'clock the same evening. They were re- fused. At nine o'clock they returned again to the cage. On this occasion the eight hour men were due to descend, and. consequently, the cage would have to ascend. The signal was given to the hiteher below to send up the cage. and the defendants entered it. They were requested on two occasions to leave the cage by Newman and the lamp keeper (Caled). They refused to do so, and they were told that they would have to take the conse- quences. The special rule in ques. tion sets forth that a man must. at the request of the hitcber or bankman, leave the cage when ordered to do so.-After Thomas Newman, bead hitcher. had given evidence, Mr. Edwards urged. for the defence, that when these men went to work there had been a fall from the previous shift. They were prepared to clear it away for extra money, but the foreman would not come to any understanding. He (Mr. Edwards) contended, therefore, that. under Rule 56, the men were entitled to leave work.—The defen- dant Pidgeon said he asked the foreman for a note to go up, but he refused.—Cross- examined, be said it was not part of his duty to clear up the leavings after another shift.- The Bench considered that a breach of the rule had been committed, and Pidgeon and Tranter were fined 1 each. The case against Browning was dismissed. A similar case was heard against J. S. Davies, collier, Cwmdows. The defence was that he was ill when he left, and a medical certificate was produced, which stated that he had been suffering from lumbago.-He was. however, found guilty of the o offence and fined 10s.
SUPPLY OF "KOSHER" MEAT
News
Cite
Share
SUPPLY OF "KOSHER" MEAT INTERESTING CLAIM AT CARDIFF COUNTY-COURT. At Cardiff County-court on Wednesday an interpleader action was heard, in which James Tucker, of Carlisle-street, Cardiff, was the execution creditor, H. Parsons and J. Kro- tosky were the defendants, and J. Robinson was the claimant. Mr. A. Parsons appeared for the claimant; Mr. G. F. Forsdike for the execution creditor. J. Robinson said that he was a cattle dealer, living at Marshfield. He sent a beast to the Roath Market to Krotosky for the purpose of being used ns Jewish meat." The arrange- ment was that if the meat was "kosher" it would be the Jews' meat. but if it was not kosher" it remained his (Robinson's) pro- perty. The meat was not passed as kosher," and when Rcbinson went to the market he found that the carcase had been placed under a levy at the instance of Tucker. In cross-examination, Robinson admitted that the beast was entered on the books in Krotosky's name. and be (Robinson) had not paid any of the dues at the market. In answer to the judge. Robinson said that m eases where a beast was not kosher he re-paid the dues to Krotosky and eold the meat to other butchers. Max Morris, rabbi, said that he rejected the beast because there was something wrong with the lights. Krotosky said that he was for some time in partnership with Parsons, who sold in the market meat that was not passed as" kosher. The arrangement that he had with Robinson was that if the beast \n question were not "kosher" Parsons would sell it in the market to Gentiles. Any profit was divided between Parsons and witness. The partnership had leased for the last six months. He did not mark the beast in question, nor did he pay the tolls. The Manager of the Market stated that when the beast was taken to the market it was entered in Krotosky's name on the market books. The animal was marked K," which was recognised as Krotosky's mark. His Honour ruled that the claimant was entitled to his claim, and entered judgment lAQNrifautiy..
AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATION.
News
Cite
Share
AGRICULTURAL CO- OPERATION. THE PAST YEAR'S WOHK IN WEST WALES. The quarterly meeting of the Carmarthen- shire Chamber of Agriculture, held at the Boar's Head Hotel, Carmarthen, on Wednes- day afternoon, was largely attended, and the proceedings were most interesting and in- structive. After tho usual dinner. Mr. Augustus Brig3tocke, Blaenpant. read a paper on the progress of the agricultural co- operation movement in West Wales. They now had had a year's experience to work upon, and it was not. there- fore, a difficult matter to point out the weak places and to suggest how they could be strengthened. For the sake of simplicity and clearness he would try to put before them what could be done by educational methods, by closer methods of organisation, and by Practical work. There was an immense amount of EDUCATIONAL WORK to be done, so much. in fact, that it was quite appalling to contemplate. He received a letter from a tenant farmer on Saturday last (one of many which he had received almost daily from farmers during the past year in connection with the movement) in which the writer said: "There are large num- bers of farmers who know nothing of co-opera- tion and its benefits, notwithstanding your eloquent and lucid letters. Something should be done o reach those who thus live in dark- ness. I believe that a small committee should be formed in each parish to wait upon and enlighten this clasB." That suggestion was one that he should very much like to see acted upon, and he' thought that. as a preliminary step, a. conference should be called together as soon as possible at Carmarthen to decide what could be done in this direction. (Hear, hear.) His experience was that the Welsh farmers were comparatively easy to organise -if anyone would take the necessary trouble. I (Hear. hear.) It was the quiet and persistent workers they really wanted. Surely in every parish in the county half-a-dozen men could be found, if they looked for them. who would see that something was done to reach the farmer on his farm. Those who wanted the movement to succeed must go to the farmer, and not expect the farmer to come to them. (Hear, hear.) In the course of the next few months he hoped to see published (both in Welsh and English) a complete guide to agri- cultural co-operation, explaining the whole scheme from beginning to end, which would at any rate make it easier for local workers to take up the educational propaganda which he was suggesting was necessary to be carried on. (Hear, hear.) If the county councils did not teach the farmers what were the modern conditions of the agricultural industry, which was rapidly being revolu- tionised by co-operative methods in every branch and in every direction, how was the farmer to find out these things for himself? Fortunately, the finger-posts had been put up. and in the report of the county council dele- j gates (which was to be published in fall as eoon as possible) they had all the informa- tion cut and dried for many years' work. (Hear, hear.) He hoped to see appointed by each of the joint councils an agricultural committee, who would make it their special business to carry out, one by one, the recom- mendations which, no doubt, all of them were now familiar with. (Hear, hear.) To sum up his suggestions under the head of educational work, considerable progress could be made in a year if they had district com- mittees and the county councils working in harmony. (Hear, hear.) Next as to organi- i eation. By organisation he meant, in this instance, the starting of agricultural co- operative societies, and—where they were demanded-the STARTING OF CREAMERIES. They would note that he said where creameries are demanded. He did not believe in trying to force creameries on the farmers. The time would come—it would not be very long. either—when the farmers would have to take Hobson's choice, for they would either have to give up making butter alto- gether or take to creameries. Could anyone present give him a single inetance in which raannal labour bad been able to compete against machinery in the long run? Why, then, should butter-making by machinery be an exception to the general rule? In the county in which he lived (Cardiganshire) he had been asked by farmers in three different districts to see what cculd be done in start- ing creameries. The farmers in those dis- tricts were becoming alarmed about their butter. Why? Because some of the principal butter merchants in Glamorganshire had recently intimated that they could not buy any more butter from the local butter mer- chants unless they could send it of uniform quality. in sufficient quantities, and unless also a guarantee was given that the per- centage of water did not exceed the legal limit. What was the consequence? Three well-known butter merchants in the Cardigan districts, knowing perfectly well that they could not possibly comply with these condi- tions. as things were now. had. like wise men. abandoned the business, and the farmers were left without their local buyers. Agricultural co-operative societies should be started in every district in the three counties as eoon as possible. (Hear, hear.) That was a con- venient time to tell them what had been the experience in working. THE VALE OF TTVY SOCIETY, which had Cardigan for its headquarters. and he hoped that the experience there would be of some help to others. The Vale of Tivy Society was registered last February. They had made plenty of mistakes, and had a few hard knocks, principally through want of experience and lack of closer organisation. But they were gradually filling up the gaps. The result of their trading showed a net profit, so far. of at least JE153. all of which went into the pockets of the farmers. (Hear, hear.) Each member took one £1 share, fully paid up, but in order to encourage small holders they were making a graduated scale of shares as follows:— £ 1 for ordinary tenant farmers. 10s. for those holding over ten acres but under twenty acres. 5s. for those holding under ten acres, and 2s. 6d. for those who held no land at all. The object in having 2s. 6d. shareholders was to induce farm labourers and others to join, to reap the benefits of cheap culm and coal. Mr. Brigetocke pro- ceeded to give, in detail, the position which this eocietj bad attained, and said that it already had on foot a stock improvement scheme, which in a few years' time would, no doubt, grow by leaps and bounds. As goon as possible they intended, too, to make their stores at Cardigan an egg-collecting depot, and contemplated buying an egg-grading machine, so as to meet the present requirements of the egg trade. At the rate the society was grow- ing, this modern appliance would coei the members under Is. each! And. as an impor- tant part of this egg business, they were about having over from Ireland a stock of the best winter layers, and this was to be the baiie of a stud poultry farm, so as to get the right quality of eggs in the immediate district. (Hear, hear.) He appealed to one and all to try and do something towards Bilving tho most alarming question of the day—the decay of British agriculture and the depopulation of our rural districts. (Applause.) Agricultural co-operation might not be able to cure all evils, bnt he affirmed that the history of the co-operative move- ment. beginning in the year 1844 with the Rochdale pioneers, and since then extendinc: its beneficent work to every quarter of the globe, proved beyond controversy that it was a tremendous power for good, and for this reason he asked them to work for it. (Loud applause.) The president (Mr. E. Stephens. The Grove, Llanstephan) conducted a very interesting dis- cussion on the paper. Professor D. D. Williams (Aberystwith) said if co-operation was not going to take root in Wales, then Welsh agriculture must go to the dogs. Several other gentlemen participated in the dogs. Several other gentlemen participated in the discu«3ion. after which Mr. Brigntocke announced that Mr. Hanbury, president of the Board of Agriculture, who was a strong sup- porter of the principle of co-operation, would addresa a meeting at Aberystwith on Decem- ber 1st, and it would be a good thing if that chamber were to invite him to address a meeting of farmers at Carmarthen. (Hear, hear.) On the motion of Mr. H. Jones-Davies, seconded by Mr. D. Hinds, it was decided to eend a formal invitation to Mr. Hanbury to address a meeting of farmers at Carmarthen, and to procure a copy of the Irish deportation's report for ea-ch member of the chamber.
THREE GENERATIONS IN THE DOCK
News
Cite
Share
THREE GENERATIONS IN THE DOCK Three generations were seen in the dock of the Cardiff Police-court on Wednesday, when Matilda M'Donaid, a youthful married woman, with a tiny baby at her bieast, stood side by sid-e with her mother, Xora Myers, 13. Godfrey- street, jointly charged with the theft of 50 yards of "Welsh flannel. The flannel was in roil, valued at .£3. and had been missed from the shop of Evan P. Lewis, 290. Bute-street. Soon after it was missed the younger woman was detained on suspicion, as she was attempt- ing to pawn a part of the roll. Then she said her mother had sent her to pawn it. but that she did not know it was stolen. Another part of the roll was found by Julia Harrington under peculiar circumstances. A few days ago Mrs. Myers asked Mrs. Harrington if she might pass through her house to get over the garden wall home, as she and her husband had quarrelled, and she did not want to go by the front door. That rermission was given, but Mre. Myers, after being at the back of the premises which adjoin her own for about fifteen minutes, decided not to cross the wall. A few minutes later a part of the roll was I found in Mrs. Harrington's back kitchen, covered by a sack. She and a friend "pitched it over into Mrs. Myers' backyard.Both prisoners were committed for trial to the sitoiii
SUFFOLK MURDER CHARGE. . —…
News
Cite
Share
SUFFOLK MURDER CHARGE. — ) A SENSATIONAL TRIAL AT IPSWICH. At Suffolk Assizes at Ipswich on Thursday Wm. Gardner. 36, a foreman carpenter, and superintendent of a Primitive Meihodiet Sun- day School at Sibton, was placed upon hit trial. charged with the murder of Rose Ann Harsent, a domestic servant. Mr. Dickens, K.C., who appeared for the prosecution, said the parties resided close to one another at Peasenhall. In May of last year the prisoner. a married man with a large family, commenced (said counsel) immoral relations with the murdered girl, which raised a scandal in the church. An inquiry was held. and thte minister pointed out to Gardiner that he had certainly been guilty of indiscretion, and that he should be more careful in bis conduct. The intimacy, however, continued, and the girl got into trouble. The time came when this fact could no longer be concealed, and the case for the prosecution was that prisoner wrote a letter making a midnight appointment with the girl when he murdered her and tried to destroy her body by fire. The crime took place in the kitchen of the deceased's mistress's house, and the remains, much charred, were not dis- covered till next morning. Learned counsel mentioned that in May last year, before the murder, accused and deceased were seen one evening to go into Peasenhall Chapel by two men, who overheard a remarkable conversa- tion. The girl. it was said, remarked that the previous Sunday she had been reading in a Bible about what they were doing, and chapter and verse were mentioned Th.g. counsel argued, showed the parties" relations. Prisoner and deceased sat together at the chapel, and on one occasion Rouse, who was in the rostrum, noticed Gardiner behave in what he considered an improper manner. Mr. Rouse wrote to the prisoner about it. and suggested that the deceased should sit in some other place. Counsel then described the circumstances of the crime The girl's mistress heard a stifled scream and a thud in the night, but as a storm was raging she did not take any notice. Next morning deceased's body, clad only in a night- dress. was found by her father, who had called to see her. A man named Morris saw marks of rubber shoes in the mud leading from prisoner's to the deceased's place of employment and back again, and -Amongst Gardiner's possessions were a pair of rubbei shoes. The deceased's wounds consisted of a stab in the left breast, and her THROAT WAS CUT IN TWO PLACES. Beside the body was a burnt newspaper and tablecloth, and deceased's nightdress was partially burnt. There was also a broken medicine bottle, and this had contained paraffin, which had been sprinkled about the noor. The medicine bottle was supplied by a local doctor in the previous February for an ailment for the prisoner's children. Traces of blood were found on Gardiner's pocket-knife. When arrested the prisoner denied all know. ledge of the murder, or that he wrote a letter making a midnight appointment. Experts would state that the letter was in prisoner'^ handwriting. Superintendent Andrews stated that the distance from the prisoner's house to the deceased's was 208 yards. There was a back staircase to the girl's bedroom. William George Wright, wheelwright, spoke to seeing the deceased and accused go into Peasenhall Chapel one night in May last year and to hearing the conversation referred to. Alphonse Skinner, another wheelwright, corroborated. ° The case was not concluded at the time of going to press with the first edition.
INTERESTING CLAIM.
News
Cite
Share
INTERESTING CLAIM. RESPONSIBILITIES OF A COLLIERY MANAGER. The scope of responsibility of a colliery manager was involved in an action—John Brown against W. L. Llewellyn—heard by his Honour Judge Owen at Cardiff County-court on Thursday. It was a counterclaim for £50. that being a nominal figure to enable this case t) be heard in a county-court. Mr. C. H. Eailhache and Mr. A. Parsons (instructed by Messrs. Payne and Chambers) represented Llewellyn, who was the owner of the Pen- twyn Colliery, Caerphilly, and Mr. J. Sankey (instrurtr-1 by Messrs. Roberts-Jones and Ever?: nppeared for Brown, who was the manager of the colliery, the output of whioh WM 12j U>ns. The counterclaim was for alleged negligence in taking out coal which should have been left for support, that the roof was insufficiently supported, and that the airway became blocked by a preventible fall. Mr. Bailhache: What we say is that where a colliery manager so works it as to allow the airway to collapse and close up, and where the headings are insufficiently timbered, and who. although he has the applianoes for the purpose, allows the mine to become flooded, is either incompetent or negligent. His Honour: In the ordinary case the over- man would be responsible for neglect of this kind. Mr. Bailhache: I should have thought that the. man responsible was the certified manager 011 the spot. His Honour: If he delegates authority to au overman he has to see that the overman does his work so that it comes back to the manager. Mr. Sankey said that the manager's wages had been paid for six months without demur, nor were there complaints in the mine report book. Mr. Bailhache: That is scarcely ingenuous. for the report book was kept by the manager. Evidence of the state of the c .llkry was given by Phillip Lewis, who stated that owing to flooding they had been unable to raise enough coal to keep the pumps going. He defied that the "long wall" system of work- ing was responsible for the falls of roof, and that rhe timbering had been poor. nor were the pumps inadequate to the work, for they had since cleared the water. Mr. Llewellyn, in his evidence, said that it was quite right that a cheque of his to Brown wa« dishonoured. He kept it a long time, and the fact became known that the pit was flooded, with the result that he was pressed on all hands. Mr. Bailhache: As a matter of fact. this period of management hae been disastrous to you?—It has nearly made me a bankrupt. I got four writs and three or four summonses in one week. Hie Honour: There are some people in the country who paper their smoke-rooms with writs and summonses. (Laughter.) I am glad you haven't so many. In further examination, witness said he lost about.E1.500. Mr. Brown gave evidence to the effect that the pump was defective, and was frequently stopped, and. owing to other causes, they could not get a supply of coal to keep it it going, and all the other defects came from that fact. Yr. Llewellyn a&ked him to go back again as manager. His Honour, in giving judgment, said be recognised 1 hat it was a serious matter for "r". Brown. It seemed to him a. serious matter tnat the colliery should have been so worked. Brown had acted negligently or carelessly. or, perhaps, he did nbt know the kind of working at the colliery, and his Honour gave judgment for the amount claimed, £50. with costs, which was no compensation for the damage caused.
|LOCAL DIVORCE SUIT.
News
Cite
Share
LOCAL DIVORCE SUIT. ELOPEMENT OF A STATIOUMAF- TER'S WIFE. f' In the Divorce Division of the High Court of Justice on Wednesday, before the presi- dent 'Sir Francis Jeune) and a common jury. the case oi Lambert v. Lambert and Wardie was heard. This was a suit of Mr. Albert James Lionei Lambert, a stationmaster~at 1 Arkwright Town, Derbyshire, formerly of Neath, for a dissolution of his marriage on the ground of his wife's misconduct with the co-respondent. Mr. Joseph Wardie, whose position was not disclosed, and from whom damages were claimed.-Yr. Newson^ who appeared for the petitioner, said that the marriage took place on the 25th of January. 1895. at Neath Registry Office, and the parties lived at Neath for a time. and then removed to Arkwright Town. Derbyshire, where 4ho -petitioner was a stationmaster. Thete Jpks no issue of the marriage. Everything went on well until March this year. when the- co- respondent. without the knowledge of the petitioner, took the wife to a theatre at Sttef- field. The petitioner, on hearing of it. was very much annoyed, and wrote a letter-to the co-respondent telling him never to cotitae to hit) house again, and the wife promised to have nothing more to do with him..In the following month the wife told her fins- band that she was going a ehort railway journey, and they parted on affectionate terms. She, however, never returned. Peti- tioner made further inquiries, with the result that it was discovered that the respondent and co-respondent had stayed together at a hotel in Newcaetle-on-Tyne. Counsel said that. subject to the approval of the court, the co-respondent had agreed to pay JB260 damages.—Petitioner gave evidence in sup- vort of counsel's statement, and a chamber- maid from the hotel was called to prove that the respondent and co-respondent stayed at the hotel as husband and wife in the name of "Mr. and Mrs. Lamb."—Tbe jury found for I the petitioner, and assessed the damages at £ 250.—The President granted petitioner a decree nisi, with costs against the ce-*MnMk