Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

11 articles on this Page

THE MINOR SOURCES OF LITERARY…

News
Cite
Share

THE MINOR SOURCES OF LITERARY EFFECT. Luther used to assign a very characteristic and unique a ,,se for the effectiveness of his sermons and A ritingi. I have no better wock,' he said, than anger (zorn) and zea: • for if I wish to compose, or write, or pray and preach well I must be angry (zoi-taiy) thea al! ttie blood in my veiiis is stirrc,i, lily ander,tandilig is sharpened,and all dismal thoughts and temptations are dissipa'ed No doubt the Doctor's word was intended to denote rather what we call "indignation" than anger; it is not any selfish resentment which beats in the pulses of that still vivid thought, but I noble scorn of all meanness and evil that seems to play through his writings, and scatter the miser- able cobwebs of the heart and brain. But his words have occurred to us as illustrating what is well worth notice with respect to much very able temporary literature, that the source of its peculiar flavour is by no means always as is supposed the intellectual power or capacity of the writer, but very often tho effect of very different elements in his charac- ter-sometimes weakness and sometimes strength. For example, anger itself, both of the nobler and the pettier kind, is often the secret of literary effect. It is, indeed, only a deep and moral indignation, such as Luther speaks of, which gives a permanent depth and force to human thought but for temporary literary purposes, mere hatred of the lower sort-in a word, temper-is a most powerful literary ingredient. An exceedingly small amount of intellectual power is sufficient to produce a very creditable effect if it be fi-ed by the gunpowder of a lit.le anger. Some of Dr. John- ion's most pointed sayings must be admitted to owe their concentrated sting rather to fraitk ill-humour than to any intellectual acumen; for example, that retort on some inopportune laughter, You dare to laugh, sir Could I suppose I had said anything you could understand, I 'should feel it a deep disgrace." And the same is true of a good deal of the able writing of every English journal. Which of us would be able to distinguish clearly when we plant wh it we think a good blow in au adversary's breast, how much of the effect is sci- ence and how much is hearty ill-will ? But analyzing at our leisure the sources of effective writing in others, we can often see that intellectual capacity forms little or no element in the result. When, for example, the other day, the Times, after his masterly fashion, reviled the Comte de Paris and the Due de Chartres for taking service with the American Government, no one who calmly analyzed the literary force of the article could resolve it into an)thing much higher than the kind of power with which a vicious horse stuns those who are unwary enough to approach it. The following, for example, was exceedingly effective writ- ing, and produced, no doubt, on anybody friendly to the young princes who may have lighted upon it unex- peotedly in their morning's paper, much the same cracking effect on the shocked retina as a vigorous blow on the fore- head yet whe can say that it is in any sense intellectual ? It was one thing for princes of the Royal House of France to bear their part in gallant actions under such men u Turenne, Conde, Luxembourg, and Saxe; it is another thing to study in the ignorant and bloody school of civil war under rode partisans, inexperienced generals, officers taken from the oounter, the desk, the shambles, or worse places, with men unwilling to submit to discipline; and, above all, with a press sure to make all the capital that can be made oat of persons of such high rank by endless calumnies and the most barefaced perversion and fabrication of facts." The same kind of literary power is not uiifrequently to be found, mingled with a great deal that is much higher and truly intellectual, in the trenchant invective of the Satar- day Review. The celebrated and able article on Biro. Beecher Stowe's Wounded Feelings," for example, drew all its inspiration from the well-directed resolve to make those wounds smart again. The effectiveness-and there was great effectiveness-in the article was entirely of the sort which oil of vitriol produces on a sordT>lace. The lady is held up to ridicule for being feminine, and she is pictured in a femine rage, and therein consists the barb of the paper —being effectiveness of exactly the same kind which the curious instinctive acumen of ill-will generally lends to the most illiterate man in a mood of contempt or disgust. A fretted mind is naturally awakened or concentrated on the Mint* cause, so that home-thrusts suggest themselves naturally enough, which, when beheld by impartial spec- tators without any such inward irritation to inspire them, have all the character and effect of intellectual force. Much of Swift's apparent intellectual strength was but disguised and malignant rage,-is Luther's consisted, by his own confession, in the pealing thunder of an exalted wrath. But anger and pique are by no means the only efficient substitutes for intellectual power in literature. There is scarcely any moral power or weakness which may not, under some peculiar condition-, become the defined fountain of literary ability. For instance, a very large portion of the most remarkable literary effects of the present day are produced by a certain cool audacity—sometimes, as in some of lr. lleade's novels, passing into impudence—which sets at hau"ht the conventionalities of customary speech. Thus some of the best things in the Saturday Review have owed their defined and pungent flavour to the courage with which the writers have expressed what half the world thought it ,ss 'I'he tenacity with better to assume without expressing. Ihe tenacity with which it has preached the doctrine that any sensible man will, in choosing a wife, be quite justified in guiding his mffeotions by his pecuniary interests, and will find no difficulty in so doing, is dn example of what we mean. Thousands have thought what the Saturday reviewers have simply and boldly put down on paper. They have ably stated and courageously justified what we call the anxiously common-place view on almost every subject, and the literary effect has been really great. Naked common- place, stripped of all cant and vigorously set forth, has had all the effect of a deeper intellectual viev. Yet very often it has represented a perversely shallow intellectual view, Md the only real p" ower has arisen from tnn (1-.prprnl' and tbe only reRl Jo v":¡8e( a reputation. When, <&r instance, he tells us that people felt a certain conviction in their secret souls and pockets-excuse the tautology," we smile at the impertinence of the man, and feel that the sentence is not without an impudont vivacity of its own but certainly it is not intellectual power of any sort which constitutes that vivacity. Again, how rich a source of one kind of literary effoct; has been the preponderance of a certain simple species of frankly confessed vanity and egotism in men of otherwise no marked imaginative or intellectual capacity. It may be said to form the fundamental substance of the prattling school of German and Danish sentiment represented by Goldschmidt and Andersen, and to mingle not a little in German, French, and Irish works of real genius. Rousseau owed much to it, Goethe much, Sterne and Goldsmith much; and, we may almost say, that a common order of intellect and imagination is frequently raised into a great literary power by a free admixture of egotistic candour. It is even the soarco of the extraordinary charm in all the detail of Gibbon's Autobiography." The well-known passage in which he recounts his fathet's interference to prevent his marrying the penniless young lady who after- wards became Madame Necker-" I sighed as a lover, I obeyed as a sori,owes its effect as much to the unconsci- ous egotism which plays through it as to the stately histori- cal style in which it is conveyed. Indeed, almost any peculiarity of personal temperament is capable of becoming a source of literary fascination. Nathaniel Hawthorne has no slight literary powers, but, after all, his great success could not be ascribed to them alone it is to the curdling of quite opposite states of sentiment in his mind, the ten- dency, evidently inherent in him, to dwell on highly morbid contrasts of rival feelings, the mixture of holy and unholy passions, the contrasts of physical taints with mental purity, and Se) forth, that his works owe their peculiar and rather unhealthy fascination. And the same is true in even a rree of the mSdne and often disgusting horrors o! &dgsr Poe. Literary effect, then, has a thousand subsidiary and minor sources besides proper intellectual power-besides that largenegs of faculty-whether reason, fancy, or imagina- tion-which is it" natural and normal cause. We may say, in fact, that the sublimest literature the earth has ever seen owes its greatness far more to the kindled conscience than to the mere imaginative faculty of the world's greatest poetl. There is very little reason to suppose that the rebrew imagination, if isolated from the springs of moral inspiration, was in itself of remarkable scope. The best proof of this is that while we have had great Jewish thinkers like Spinoza, musicians like Mendelssohn, with not a few statesmen and generals, as Mr. Disraeli reminds us, and financiers, private and public, there has not appeared a single great poet that we can remember, exoept Heinrich Heine (whose marvellous poetic faculty is a variety, though a very fresh variety, of the German genius), since the writer of the Apocalypse ended the strange and pathetic music of those solemn words in which he painted the new heavens and the new earth lighted only by the love of God. We all remember Coleridge's expression of astonish- ment that the Hear 0 Heavens, and give ear, 0 Earth" of Isaiah, and the "O'cto of Holywell-street, should both be characteristic key-notes to the same national _L_ I' cuaracier in aitrerent stages 01 its development. And even if the antithesis be a little more striking than sound, no calm intellect will deny that the Hebrew genius was identified, as no other national genius has ever been, with a personal vision of the Eternal Righteousness and Will. Literary effect, then, if it is sometimes due rather to temper, eccentricities, and incapacity, than to great in- tellectual capacity, is never so great as when it arises from that which is deeper than either our incapacities or our capacities-that which is altogether beyond human sound- iog-lines the moral of which discussion is, that literary effect, for itself alone, is a very worthless and often really unworthy affair, and should be analyzed a little more carefully than it usually is, before we go into captivity to it all most of us do. When it is, as it often is, a result of shallowness or temper, we may laugh and pass on when it  from courage and candour, we should pause and thmk; when from deeper moral and intellectual insight, we Ihould study; on'* w^en it springs from what is deeper than nn.i suffer ourselres to be carried away.- 8poeWor. ? "? o.rselTM to be carried away.-

MR. DILLWYN'S RECENT SPEECH.…

EMANCIPATION OF THE SERFS.…

I'-I TAKING THE SCHOOLMASTER'S…

THE NEXT TORY CRY. 1 I

I - -DEATH OF Slit JAMES GRAHAM.…

¡- ' THE EFFECT OF TIIE NEW…

POLITICAL GOSSIP.'ill

[No title]

! WEEKLY CALENDAR. gtb, *

? I.111,I ........,...,...,…