Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

12 articles on this Page

THE CHURCH FINANCIAL. I

News
Cite
Share

THE CHURCH FINANCIAL. I More Eye-Openers for Welshpool 1 Parishioners. Sidesmen's Duties: Fast and Present. SPECIAL TO THE EXPRESS," BY T. A. BENNETT. I have received the iollowing letter from one of the churchwardens of Christ Church, and append my reply:— The Grammar School, Welshpool, May 21st, 1909. "Dear Sir,-My attention has been drawn to a paragraph of yours in the Montgom- eryshire Express,' which reads: 'I notice that the Christ Church poor contribute El to its choir, which does not appear in the subscription list.' This reads to me very nastily, and I trust you will, in like manner, and in justice to Christ Church wardens, state that all collections for the poor are at '+Jn.ce given to the Vicar to dispose of as he thinks fit.—Yours truly, T. HILES." T. A. Bennett, Esq." The Cottage, I Welshpool, 23rd May, 1909. Dear Sir,—The object of my articles is to try and make our church officers realize their responsibilities more thoroughly. "Your name is appended to the printed statements of accounts at Easter, 1906, Eas- ter, 1907, and Easter, 1908, and in all of theni there is the same item under Christ Church alms expenditure, Choir fund, £ 1.' ■Naturally the public must imagine that you 0,0 not allow your name to appear year by year at the foot of accounts of which you do not approve. However, as you seem to think your let- ter to me is a satisfactory explanation, I forwarding it to the Montgomeryshire f^xpress' for publication, together with *his, my reply.—Believe me to be, yours obedient servant, THOMAS A. BENNETT." The more I think about this poor account the more amazed I am. I wonder whether it is pure accident that collections are asked for THE POOR, that the magazine publishes the amounts COLLECTED FOR THE POOR, but when the statement is printed at Easter the account suddenly changes its name, and becomes "St. Mary's Alms" or "Christ Church alms." There can be no question about their being the same accounts, be- cause month by month the magazine gives the amount for "Poor Fund," and the Printed paper shows the same amount for each month under the title "Alms." Mr Hiles, in his letter, you will see, calls these Monies Collections for THE POOR," and (lod knows that the really poor are not difficult to find in Welshpool. Every penny collected under this head should be spent on the poor. The usual formula here seems to be, "Mrs Pope? Oh, she doesn't deserve anything, she's a bad lot." "Why?" drinks." If Mrs Pope does drink, it 18 probably because Mrs Pope and her children are dying for .want of food, and takes drink as vinegar and gall to yea.den her anguish at the thought of it. it is wrong, it is sinful, and it makes mat- ters worse in the end, but it is human. jou remember our Lord was offered such a urmk to deaden His pain. The poor are the church's special charge, and always have been, and in ages past Mrs Pope would have been given a little sympathy, a little timely help, possibly temporary shelter in some abbey, and in the end Mrs Pope would be a reformed character, and if SUCH LUXURIES AS RINGERS and choir funds had to be helped, it wouldn't be from funds set apart for God's Poor. Oh, the good old times of England! ere in her evil » ay' «rom their Holy Faith and their ancient rites her People fell away; When her gentlemen had lands to give, and her Yeomen hearts to feel; And they raised full many a bead-honse, but never a bastille; And the poor they honoured, for they knew that He, Who for us bled, Elad seldom when He came on earth, whereon to lay His head. But times and things are altered now; and English- men begin To class the beggar with the knave, and poverty with am. So wrote Dr J. M. Neale in 1843. Now let me suggest that this account be divided into two, and one be called the "Out-of- pocket expenses account" (for that is what the alms account seems to be). Let it be given out in church as such, bcfrdly put in the magazine with this designation, and finally printed under this heading. People tnight be inclined to give more liberally to the poor, especially in times of distress, than to the expenses of any special preachers, however poor the preachers hught be individually. There is another matter worth considera- tion. I see no statement anywhere of the alms contributed at private sick commun- ions. I imagine in this parish they may amount to perhaps E25 or £ 30 per year, and the churchwardens, as the custodians of all ALMS, should let us know what be- comes of them. Perhaps some of our quest- men may like to look into this. I was asked to suspend my articles, by one whose right to ask I fully admitted—a Priest of the parish. He suggested that I should try and arrange for a meeting of church officers, and lay my criticism before it, instead of giving them to the general Public. This I agreed to do, if I could have a meeting at once, and the whole of the sidesmen summoned to it. WHAT WE WANT IN WELSHPOOL is a parish council of churchmen, which could take up such matters as those I am oing into. I made an attempt to obtain such a meeting, and the following copy of a letter which I wrote to the Vicar's warden Will explain why I am again taking up my Pen The Cottage, Welshpool, 23rd May, 1909. Dear Captain Westby,—I am afraid you 0 hot grasp the fact that it is not I who ain asking a favour, but I who am con- Celng one. I am certainly not going to wait until the matter can 'be put beforel the Vicar and wardens at their next meeting -early in June.' I therefore withdraw my suggestion for such a meeting between us, and consider myself free again to continue thy articles in the public press.—Yours sin- cerely, THOMAS A. BENNETT." Had it not been for the amusing account III this paper of MY DISMISSAL from the ranks of sidesmen, I should have I nown nothing about it. What an excellent „ curtain" could be made-out of this episode ^r Act I. of a blood-curdling melodrama— age dark, slow music in the distance, trong lime on the blanched cheek of the v^agnate with the fountain pen, groans eard off, peal of thunder at the words "tis done," etc sal Suits my PurP°se to accept my dismis- I am no longer a sidesmen. It frees hand, and eventually, I trust, will j*?gthen the position of those I leave hiarilnC*' fancy can my own *n Sat l c*lurch discussions, even though rele- ^tor P°siti°n a mere parishioner. church reforms are never brought °f tYt by those in authority, but in spite ~tinn^eP3' aiic* we owe most of our purifica- Wt-to the rank and file. ti^p t is the origin of a sidesman? At one when a bishop visited a parish in his I diocese, he used to examine on oath certain inhabitants concerning the condition of the church and other affairs relating to it. Later these inhabitants became standing officers called synodsmen, and when the cus- tom arose, as it did about the 15th century, for the parishioners to repair the body of the church, these juratores synodi (or sworn synodsmen), as they were called, were expected to KEEP AN EYE ON THE VICAR AND WARDENS, to see that no vandalism was being per- petrated. You may be quite sure that in those days the wardens were constantly looking out for squalls, and would consult the sworn synodsmen (especially if they had 27 of them) before they would dare to remove every possible stone out of a por- tion of the tower previous to calling in a plasterer to cover up all defects. I fancy in those days the power would lie with the spies, for such they were. They were often called questmen, men seeking for irregu- larities. Compare this position with that of a synodsman or sidesman at Welshpool to-day. Here he is simply used for window dressing, or, shall I say, door dressing pur- poses. He is consulted about nothing; if he attempts to quest his questions are con- sidered impertinencies, if he speaks out, a pen is produced and his name is crossed out "on one side," or "in error," or "only slightly erased" (accounts seem to differ). My duties as printed on the historic card were as follows: To stand during June at the main entrance,. and in October at the south-east door. For what purpose is not stated. I don't imagine it was to regulate the vast crowds seeking admission, neither do I think I was intended to obstruct the traffic. I rather fancy it was to make me imagine I was a great man (which I didn't, because I knew I was not), or to intimidate me into KEEPING MY MOUTH SHUT (which seems equally to have proved a dis- mal .failure). Gentlemen, I want you to rise above this sham position, and insist upon being 'con- sulted'; if you are not, you must quest, in any case you must break down any one man rule amongst the wardens. The St. Asaph Diocesan Calendar says: "It is a mis- take to think that the churchwarden nomina- ted by the parishioners is alone responsible for the accounts. One cannot act without the consent of his colleague." The calendar also has the following note under "charities," ecclesiastical:—"The trustees must, on or before March 25th in each year, send to the Charity Commissioners an account of endowments belonging to the charity, also a full account of all receipts and payments during the year ending December 31 of all monies owing to and from the charity. A copy of these accounts MUST BE PRESENTED at the Vestry meeting, and a copy be in- serted in the minute book of the Vestry. Any person may demand a copy of these accounts on payment of two pence for every 72 words or figures (18 and 19 Vic., c. 124, s. 44)." We are, therefore, acting within our rights as parishioners of Welshpool in demanding from the trustees to see "a full account of all receipts and payments" of the ecclesi- astical charities. The trustees in most cases are are the vicar and churchwardens. Amongst payments we should be told who were the recipients of charity, and the amount, whether in kind or money, given to each. Received F,4, spent C-4, is not, surely, a full account of all receipts and payments. I asked at the Commission office if they required the accounts audited, and was told no, but that some required vouch- ing for. I asked to see one; the voucher was "Ivor Davis," I don't complain, of course, Mr Davis is of age, and an honour- able gentleman, and he, no doubt, went through all the details; but what I do object to is that the detail was not shown on the account. I was told at the Commis. sion office that all these accounts should be submitted to the Easter Vestry. Then I consider that periodically (say once a year) the churchwardens should inspect the securities held for invested charity monies, for, as I have previously noted, two were missing at the Government inquiry in 1837. Sentiment should have nothing to do with it, it is simply a matter of business. Had the sidesmen been consulted about THAT CURIOUS TRANSACTION in 1899, I don't think a majority of them would have agreed to it. I have before me a Return to an order of the Honourable the House of Commons, dated 14th Febru- ary, 1900." I bought at the King's printers for 2td. I find that an inquiry was held into the parish charities on 30th June, 1837. The charity moneys were then invested in securities bringing in 4, 4J, and 5 per cent., and certain of them grouped together brought in £37 Us per annum. The next inquiry was held on 8th February, 1900, when it was found that this group of chari- ties had been re-invested at 3 per cent., and was then only bringing in E26 8s, a reduction of £ 11 3s per annum, although "The Lady Harriet Herbert," the Town Clerk said, was still at interest at 4 per cent. Now I cannot think why the church- wardens of the day consented to such re- investment at so much lower rate of inter- est. The wardens were trustees of all the charities in the group. I will now quote verbatim from the return which the House of Commons ordered to be printed 23rd January, 1902, to show in what the tSSO representing the capital of this group of charities had been invested ( £ 20 "from church offertories" was added to make the sum up to £900), and there I will leave the matter for this week: ENDOWED CHARITIES (COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY). PARISH OF WELSHPOOL (OR TRALLWM), (Page 9). "By indenture of mortgage made the 27th March, 1899 (not enrolled in chancery), be- tween the Rev David Grimaldi Davis, vicar of Welshpool, and Sarah Jane Davis, his wife, of the one part, and the said David Grimaldi Davis and Edward Jones, town clerk of Welshpool, of the other part, it was witnessed that in consideration of the sum of E900 paid to the said David Grimaldi Davis and Sarah Jane Davis by the said David Grimaldi Davis and Edward Jones out of moneys belonging to them on a joint account, the said David Grimaldi Davis and Sarah Jane Davis did thereby covenant with the said David Grimaldi Davis and Edward Jones to pay to them on the 25th September, 1899, the sum of E900 with in- terest thereon in the meantime at the rate of 3 per cent. per annum computed from the date of the deed now abstracting, and also so long after that date as any prin- cipal money I:> remained due under the deed now abstracting to pay to them interest thereon after the same rate by equal half- yearly payments on the 27th day of Sep- tember and the 27th day of March in each year; and it was also witnessed that for the consideration aforesaid the said David Grimaldi Davis and Sarah Jane Davis as beneficial owners did thereby convey unto the said David Grimaldi Davis and Edward Jones all that messuage or dwelling-house with the garden, orchard, and several pieces or parcels of land thereunto adjoin- ing called the Henfaes, situate in the parish of Welshpool, in the countv of Montgomery, containing by admeasurement 25a. lr. 24p. or thereabouts, to hold the same unto and to the use of the said David Grimaldi Davis and Edward Jones in fee simple, provided always that if the said F-900 with interest thereon should be paid on the 27th Sep- tember, 1899, according to the covenant in that behalf, the said premises should at the request and cost of the said David Grimaldi Davis and Sarah Jane Davis be reconveyed to him or them." Affixed to this deed is a sheet of paper containing the following statement: "We, the undersigned, the Rev David Grimaldi Davis, vicar of WTelshpool, and Edward Jones, ol the same place, town clerk of Welshpool, do hereby acknowledge and declare that the principal sum of E900 secured by the indenture bearing date the 27th March, 1899, and hereunto annexed, is not our money, but belongs to us as trustees for certain charities for the benefit of the poor inhabitants of the parish of Welshpool, and we will hold the same in trust for the said charities and the interest thereof as it becomes due from time to time. Witness our hands this 6th day of April, 1899. David Grimaldi Davis, Edward Jones. "Witness, Edward L. R. Jones, solicitor, Welshpool."

THE "OHARLES HOWELL" MEMORIAL.

"A FARCE!"

[No title]

The Siege of a House.

Advertising

GOLF GOSSIP.

[No title]

Homeless Workingman.

Finders, Keepers.

Polities" and High Rates.

High Praise for the Yeomanry.