Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

POST OFFICE LETTING.

News
Cite
Share

POST OFFICE LETTING. OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE. DISCUSSION AT THE COUNCIL. Swansea Town Council met on Wednes- day, the Mayor (Alderman Lee) presiding. The first business was the Old Post Office letting. Th Town Cierk submitted a, report of the correspondence arising out of the letting of the Old Port Office building, together with aii minutes, records, and incidents relative to the same. 'Hit. oarrespondeiice ranged from 1901 into 1902, when it deals with in- quiries trom Mr. W. J. Rees, the Town Clerk, and the Surveyor. In reply to a letter from Mr. Rees, dated October 6, 1902. asking for terms of letting, etc., the Sur- vevor wrote :—- EFFECT OF THE DOCUMENTS. The Property Committee desire offers far the above, on a. short lease of, say, 7, 14, or 21 years, or a long lease of, say, 99 years. In the casi of a short lease an amount would have to bo agreed to be expended by the 'ecc.ee on the premises for alterations, etc., which, no doubt, would be required, and for a long lease, when the whole of the buildings misiit be taken down, an amount would have to be agreed to be expended by the lessee on new buildings, at least equal lL1 value to the present buildings. The Cor- poration piy 10 the Duke of Beaufort an ac- knowledgment of Is. per annum for the ground at the north end of the buildings upon which the steps leading to the vaults below are constructed, ¡nd the Duke of Beaufort has a right-of-way, as shown on the plan, leading to the old Castle. I am having a number of tracings prepared, show- ing the property and its surroundings, to send to applicants, and one shall be sent to you.' Simitar letters, it is stated, vytre sent Messrs. S. Andrews and Co., Cardiff, and J. M. Leeder and Son, Swansea. No corres- pondence took place officially with the Metropolitan Bank, who, as has been so frequently and pointedly declared, were de- sirous of arriving at the exact terms of the letting, but with Ylr. W. J. Rees who acted for the bank authorities. The property was eventually leased to Sir Geo. Newnes, and the following letters of December last-a rnont'i ago—are the only official letters refer- ring to the property, and these were written after the Council had decided to havp all the officiai letters before them. Town Clerk to Mr. H. Thomas, London (formerly Corporation pjstate Agent) :—"I have been directed by the Town (Council to submit a statement of all reports, minutes. and incidents relative to the letting of the Old Post Office premises from the time the Postmaster-General gave up possession to the letting to the present lessee, Sir George Newnes, and I boj to enquire, apart from any reports in writing on the subject you may have made, will you kindly state what offers were ever made to you verbally or in writing, for t-he premises?" Mr. Howell Tho-n as (to the Town Clerk), January 4th- It is, of coy v\ difficult to call to mind everything that happened, ut I expect you may take it that my reports (which, however, of course, I have not be fore me) set out all the material points which arose as to a letting of iris property during the period I was Corporation Estate Agent at Swansea. I do remember ap- proaching Mr. Eddorshaw upon the subject, but I do not think he sufficiently entertained the idea to discuss anvthing like details as to figures. In fact, apart from th, temporary ar- rangements made during the King's visit, I do not recollect any offer being made, either verbally or otherwise, during my period of office until the negotiations were opened with Sir George Newnes, and to which I remember reporting over the tele- phone during a meeting of th-3 Sub-Property Committee when I was in London, and after having just interviewed Sir George Newnes thereon. I shall. be happy to p.fford any further information v. Inch* may be required. If your report to the Council is not a confidential on<- I should be very interested to EOO a copy." The r-iinrit^s of Property Committee, cl3J.j, to the Sir George Newnes letter, is .00 February 6, 1905, and is as fcri- ..s :— "Resolved that a of the Old Post Office premises be granted to Sir George Newnes for a period of 21 years from the 25th M*ivh last, at a rental of £350 for the nrsf fourteen years and £400 for the remainuer of tho term, the lessee to have the option to determine the lease at the expiration of seven or fourteen years; the rent to ,commence as from ihe 29th Sep- tem!>-r j'.e^t." The- v"* of Mr W. J. Rees al) asked for the of letting which, however, were not i-: .v • The property was originally ad- t September, 1902, and applicant were r< ,-rcd to the Surveyor for informa- tion. NO :7r;.TL\VIENT FROM MR. TUTTON. Mr. H'1fkin thought Mr. Tutton should make aI, ..tplanation. He did not know be was charged with any offence. (Laughter.) But certain remarks had been made inci- dental to the property. (A voice: Woe*?") Continuing, Mr. Hopkin though-, r. statem-ent should emanate from Mr. Tuii-.i. Mayor: If Mr. Tutton does not desire to raake a. statement you should not encourage him to do so. Jth. Hopkin I don't. The Mayor called upon Mr. Tutton to mov^ the minutes of the Property Com- mittee. MT. flopkin: '• oh, no." (Laughter.) I am n allow it to go through in ttot fzncer. Proceeding, Mr. Hopkin said t present at the committee when .Mtf-T was raided, therefore everything ;Jta.1 to the letting was perfectly new ;i1. He had read caret ully through the -.vondenoe, and in the whole of the re- to Mr. W. J. Rees' application property they had been of an evasive Mr Rees had frequently asked for >ria on which the property' could be j • .dt vMr. Rees had never been able to (.01, "-inns. In one of the letters which a sent to him he thought it was tr-1.t Mr. Tutton was authorised to i Mr. Giynn Price and to endea.vour fcjotiate with hun for a lease of the j- rs interest for the Pogt Office. Noth- i ad transput" in the whole of the ne- gate ions to encourage Mr. Rees to take the property or give terms and the speaker thwybt it was due to the c c.,1 to ask Mr Tutton or the Mayor vrhv it was Mr. Rees was refused and never could obtain for the taking of thA E-roperty. The only t mg they found was when the negotiations wi h the Thike were at an end, through the intervention of the Local Government Boajd, who refused to alhw the Corporation to the pro- perty, they found Mr. Tutton enecting a letting to Sir George Newnes. It was fair to Mr. and his client-—AND the speaker did not think Mr. Rees would waste his time to write a.bout property unless he meant business—and the pubnc to know whY Hees w-is refused the terms for which he asked. The speaker (Mr. Hop- kin) was not making „ charge against any- one <-ny • It was dear Mr. Rees never obtained ten-ms for ^he property in question. Mfr. Buthen referred to details in the cor- respondence, and said that in the of tia he. thought lr. Kees had before him, .ro^rliK speaking, for severai years, at least before the final let ting- Mayor: Five years. MT. U nth en •• The terms upon which the property could be obtained. h, Dd. Davies: What was the rent? lT. R-uthen replied that the rent was not asked only offers, and he took it that ihe whole matter was well advertised, and it was no good anybody in Swansea saying that they did not know that the property was to let. He did not wish to refer to the '"airman, for when a matter was con- is-dared by the Sub-Committee and by the Council, it was not ri t to charge nY member He nlC" this Council finds in the docu- men\.<; pi that the old Post Office bviidi/^s were advertised to let, both by 'Oewspaperj and notice boards, and offers >s?r s*aie and that, or any other sum was received until the final ietting was effected." Mr. Livingston asked whether they were fighting the election over again and sug- gested tha-t they would be wasting a lot of time by doing s*. Mr. Ben Jones seconded. The Mayor was about to put the motion when MR. DAVID DAVIESt OBSERTATIOS. Mr. Dd. Davies rose and said he was expecting the Chairman of the Sub-Com- mittee to make a statement, as he (Mr. Davies) had brought forward the matter, and suggested that something wrong had been said or done, and that the matter should be dealt with in a report. He (Mr. Davies) therefore expected Mr. Tutton to stand up and show how in the slightest I degree the documentary evidence was not a complete justification and vindication of the statements that he (Mr. Davies) made during the election. Proceeding to show how misapprehensions arose over the cor- respondence, Mr. Davies pointed out that it was not till 1904 that ME. Howe] Thomas was appointed, and he (Mr. Davies) was dealing with matters from 1901. In the first piac* he wanted to make it clear that he was not there to answer for anything he had not said, or for implica- tions which, he did not intend to convey. His contention throughout had been that in the Post Office letting one kind of treatment was given to the Metropolitan Bank author- ities, and another kind to Sii George Newnes. There was no personal imputation in that at all and he was not called to justify personal imputations. From first to la.st, and it was his statement to-day, he was suM that if the Metropolitan Bank had been dealt with in the same spirit as Sir George Newnes that property would have been let in 1901 and the Corporation vould have been in receipt of rent and rates for that letting during the three or four years the buildings were vacated. The Mayor I do not see where you say there was no offer made? Mr. David Davies answered that the bank avthorities refused to make an offer-and other people did the same—because they said it was not the way to do business, for as owners of property the Corporation should set a value upon it. But when Mr. Tutton met Sir Geo. Newnes he set the value upon I it and gave £350 as the rent, and why wat; I nx that same value, and the same proce- dure adopted in the case of the Metropoli- tan Bank? He would give the facts: Ihe Metropolitan Bank authorities had informally made overtures for the Post Office build- ings as far back as 189^7, not to the Corpor- ation, but to the Post Office people, who, at ,that time, had the option of extending their lease, but were contemplating a surrender. The Post Office people were asked if they would transfer their interests in the lease and they said No," but that when the time came for them to surrender they would do so to the Corporation. In March, 1901, the Post Office authorities intimated that it was their intention to surrender the pro- perty in September of that year. Mr. W. J Rees, who not an official of the bank, but who had been engaged to act for it, wrote the Town Clerk: You will doubtess remember my speaking to you some 18 months or two years ago as to my desire to negotiate on behalf of a good client for a lease of these premises," An acknowledg- ment followed, and in subsequent corres- pondence it was stated that the matter would be laid before the sub-committee. In June, however, fr. Rees wrote asking if the mat- ter has sufficiently progressed for further negotiations," and the reply said the Sub- Property Committee had deferred the con- sideration of the matter. As soon as any- thing has been decided I will let you know," wrote Mr. Bell, the surveyor. That was in June, 1901, and the next jump was to Jan. 1902. nearly a year after the first let- ter. Mr. Rees t hen wrote saying that he would be glad to know whether the com- mittee were now prepared to discuss terms either for a sale or a lease of the property. If they are not prepared to entertain it," I wrote Mr. Rees, I think I may, without discourtesy, ask you to favour me with a de- finite reply, so that I may turn my atten- tion to other for my clients." Then I the surveyor replied that the matter had been referred to the chairman ajnd himself to go into and report, upon, as certain pro- posals had been made. On the same date Mr. Wheat-lev. the Corporation assistant so- licitor, wrote Mr. Rees that he had seen Councillor Tutton, who desired him to say that the Corporation were prepared to let the premises, and to receive from yon any of- fer which you may desire to make on behalf of your clients." Mr. Tutton Continue that. Mr. Davies: Very well. (Reading): "The offer I need hardly say must, represent sub- stantially the value of the property and if made will be considered by the Property Committee on Wednesday next. Mr. Tutton That's it. Mr. Davies: That is hot important from my standpoint. Then there came a pause, went on Mr. Davies, and nothing happened except a consultation between Mr. Rees and the Sub-Property Committee. The Chair- man pressed Mr. Rees to make an offer, and when Mr. Rees mentioned £250, Mr. Tutton retorted with, Suppose you say £500 to start with." That was the only mention of a figure made by Mr. Tutton during the whole proceedings, so far as the Bank authorities were concerned. Mr. Davies, proceeding, said he had a distinct recollection, being a former member of the Sub-Committee, that the reason why the letters were evasive in character, and why people were not. encouraged to become tenants was because Mr. Tutton said he had an in- finitely better plan for the property. Mr. Tutton convinced the speaker, for one, that he had a better plan, and that Avas to ac- quire from the Duke of Boa ufort all the land behind and make it a big site. And in connection with that Mr. Tutton at the time stated the Council could do much bet- ter by means of that plan tha.n anv other. Later on that plan was adopted by the Sub- Property Committee, and subsequently by the Council, although Mr. Solomon moved an amendment thev should not proceed with it. That amendment (of Mr. Solomon's) was defeated bv 22 votes to 12. On that occasion Mr. Tutton opposed the amend- ment because he said this was one of the moet magnificent sites in Swansea, and so the scheme was adopted by the Council, and embodied in the Bill which the Corporation promoted in 1904. It was submitted to a town's meeting and the scheme was approved But it was subsequently struck out of the Bill. Yet from the moment the scheme was adopted by the town's meeting there was no public intimation of any kind given why it was that the scheme had been abandoned struck out, or that anything had happened to The reason why it was withdrawn oy the Parliamentary Committee of tlie Swansea Council was because they were led « believe the Local Government Board would resist the clause. At the meeW five weeks ap there was no one who couhfi Sow'S !ronie °f know' Mr Ruthhe of Swansea to Know. Mr. Rirthen had said the property had been properly adverti^ t+ l y 1902, but never al J W3S » vertised it had been publicly discussecT tb t the ability to let the premises in its exist ing state had become impossible by the adr>»" tion of the scheme referred to. The op- scheme made the advertisement worthiest and from 1902 that property, Was never ad. vertised. The Mayor said the property had been ad- vertised on a board outside. Mr. D. Davies said that may or may not be correct, but he should like to know who took that board down. His point wa. that. if the board was continually kept up ever since the scheme was adopted the advertise- ment became worthless, because something had happened to prevent a letting in that condition. That was the state of things up to February, 1905; in the meantime the premises were unoccupied and the rental and benefit of the rates had been lost. On Feb- ruary 13th, Mr. Tutton came down and made a statement to the General Purposes Com- mittee, and this was the first public intima- tion thai the property: bad been ia the market since the previous scheme had been adopted. The Mayor asked what year that was. Mr. Davies replied: The year 1905, and neither he nor others knew of the fact. Mr. Tutton said at the meeting re- ferred to that he had met Sir Geo. Newnes and suggested that the property should be let at JS350 for the first seven years, £375 the second, and £4DO for the remainder of the period. Sir George said he would do practicaJly as h. Tutton advised him, though he would like the terminable at seven or 14 years. Mr. Davies's com- plaint was what was done to Sir George Newnes should have been done to the oank authorities in 1901. The bank had been paying heavy rates for years and up to the purchase of the newspaper Sir George was not a ratepayer at Swansea. Why should not an equal opportunity have been given to other in the town to take the property? Why, for example, was not the opportunity given his (the speaker's) own company to compete, if so disposed, for ths property? A high official in the Metropolitan Bank had informed the speaker that the Bank were prepared to pay .£400 in 1901. And that gentleman was willing to. repeat it to tlie Mayor or anyone else sel- ected—the speaker would furnish the name and in confidence the gentleman so ap- pointed could tell Mr. lutton the resu-l- of the conversation. Mr. Tutton: Uh, no. Mr. D. Davies said he did not hlame r- Tutton for suggesting any possible lessee, but why M as not the same treatment give!^ to the .vietropolitan Bank four years before. As regards the extract trom the "Daily Lea.der," which the speaker read from (in which it was stated that "I (Mr. Tutton) meL Sir Qeo. Newnes and suggested that tlie property should be let a<t X>6b0 !°r first seven years," etc), Mr. Tutton ia never challenged the absolute accuracy o that report. If the Estate Agent commenced ( uüe business and carried it through, then the statement was not true. 11 It true, then Mr. Tutton and not the Ls ate Agent broached the subject to Sir reo- Newnes, and submitted to him the •erms. Let the Council look through the corres- pondence, and they would not find a suvgle minute fixing the letuag value. i no speaker did not know actually who lix^- it. It seemed though as if Mr. Tutton had un- bosomed him>elf to Sir Geo. Newnes, and gave him information which the Bank authorities had been trying to g2t .for years. If there was any misunderstanduig as to the source from which Sir George Newnes received the information Mr Tutton was responsible for it himself. Mr. Vivian, at the last meeting, said at the time of the letting Mr. Tutton came down to the Council Chamber with some pride, as if he were entitled to 'kudos"—an in- teresting word, to which objection had been taken—or congratulation. If Mr. Tutton had done that four years before he would have been so entitled. What was there to justify Mr. Tutton in offering Sir Geo. Newnes a fixed rental and withholding the same information from another? In con- clusion, Mr. Davies said he wanted the Sub- Property Committee to be a real committee, made up of independent men, and not an echo of the Chairman. And he wanted in the Estate Agent-if they had not one they must get one—°ne on wliom they could rely as regards the values of property, and that the same should not be altered by any mem- ber of the Committee; Mr. Tutton had been aocustomed to deal with the public estate as if it were his own, inasmuch as he as- sumed the power and authority. Mr. Tutton said Mr. Davies "had no right to make that statement. Mr. D. Davies said it was his opinion. Mr. Tutton: I have allowed this mem- ber to go on with all this stuff, which is absolutely false. When you make a state- ment of this sort it is time I stopped you. Mr. D. Davies: He is. not entitled, to stop me when I express my' own opinion. Mayor: Yes he is. Mr. D. Davies said was his exper- ience, though he wished it to be clear he was not reflecting upon Mr. Tutton's personal character. Mr. Tutton You have done that long enough. Mr. D. Davies said Mr. Tutton had been g authority which was unfair to other members. And here there was an ex- ample; there was no authority in any minute for Mr. Tutton to go a.nd give that information to anyone. Mr. Tutton fixed the t letting value and the speaker complained that equal treatment had not been given to other ratepayers as had been given to Sir George Newnes. Aid. Solomon said in ApriL 1901, a re- solution was adopted by the b-Property Committee and adopted by the Council to confer with Mr. Glynn Price with a view of taking up the lanlat the hack. When the Property Committee were in a position to make any recommendation it was embodied in the Parliamentary Bill. It was only natural that any possible clients then should be put off and told the matter was deferred, and that attitude ap- peared to be th; position adopted by the Town Clerk and Mr..Bell in all the correspondence. Mr. Howell i homas con firmed the statement made at the last meeting of the Council, that it was not Mr. Tutton who made the letting, but himself (Mr. Thomas). Mr. Tutton Qnite so. Aid. Solomon as regards the sub- committee being an echo of the chairman, he would point out that that sub committee now consisted of seven Progressives and five Municipal Reformers, and if the gentle- men appointed on the sub-committee wiuld attend more regularly, would have a food opportunity of ensuring their wishes eing carriod out. Mr. Corker t-aid, so far as he could roo collect, Mr. Tutton said hp had an interview with Sir Gorge Newnes in Swansea, and the suggestion of the £350 rising as stated was suggested by Mr. Ti. tton. The nego- tiations afterwards vvre carried on by Mr. Ho wall Thomas. Mr. Tutton aid he did not think he need trouble to answer anything to the will statements made by Mr. Hopkin. as the latter had admitted he knew nothing about, 't. Bnt as regards hat Mr. Di. Twice-- had said, it was a grave statement to say the !lan,C a"thon'tiep we^e "cine behind our b«:ks to ■our tenants to trv and get a lease through fheni. Mr. Davies had said tho spec kpr had fixed th, valne That was absolutely untrue. It I- s verv significant that whilst the gentle- man in high authority referred to said the Bank were prepared to give £ >00 a year f fhp nronertv that that gentleman houW nofS, i-ructrf Mr W. J. r! ihpv ,vnTe prepared to i-ive that sum. Mr. R«r. to thai iie?t; if that <ha' ss? srs £ wjf^ f? speaker suggested £ 500, so that erne coul.1 start from one end and the other from the other. The suggestion was not, made to fix the rent; it was with a view of bringing the points together. They knew Mr. W. J. Rees well enough to know that he was quite aware of the drift of the matter. Mr. Tutton then recounted how he met Sir George in Castle-street and the conversation that place, the result of which was that he sent for the Estate Agent, and thon hirmelf kept out of the way. The speaker did not fix the rent. Mr. David Davies Did you say you did? Mr. Tutton: Don't you cross-examine me you can make any statement you ake. He'knew statements were made, but he dared say Mr. Davies knew that all tn statements in newspapers were not correct. Mr. Tutton referred to a statement made publicly, which afterwards on the face of it bore :m impress that. would not bear a second thought, and so it was scored out," and the statement was "For 3l years that property was unremunerative, and yet at the beginning of that period the Metro- politan Bank were prepared to pay JB400 a year rent." What was intended by that— that we knew they were prepared to pay. If that fact was locked up n the recesses of the "high officials" mind, Mr. W. T. Rees did not know it or did not state it. The committee would gladly have accepted any arrangement from that quarter as they did from Sir George N-ewnes at any time. Then it had been stated, "Why was pro- perty for which £400 a year could have

Advertising

Advertising

STEEL DUMPING BEGINS.

U>tfI!..:s......."''£:''_\i---.;...""…

[No title]

TEACHERS' SALARIES.

SWANSEA MILLERS'' STRIKE.

|MEETING OF TIl: MEN.

Advertising

ARBITRATION iFFEEED.

"WILL NOT BE~ACCEPTID."

-------TAKE THIS TO-DAY

ly[. C. C,'S HEAVY DEFEAT.

IATAEMLKG INCIDENT IN SKETTY…

GIVEfi aWRY.

THE AMERICAN HOLOCAUST.

- LLANELLY DIVORCE.

Advertising

POST OFFICE LETTING.

|MEETING OF TIl: MEN.