Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

11 articles on this Page

CRAY MANAGEMENTI QUESTIONS.I…

News
Cite
Share

CRAY MANAGEMENT I QUESTIONS. Council Debate them at Length. Mr. Dix sends in his Resignation., Aid- W. Watkins Defends Him. Mr. Martin's Indictment: Six Hours Debate. A "peciMi Council metting to consider the 11 of the resignation of Mr. H. A. Dix. Corporation's manager at the Cray Re- ■ieivoir Works, was held on Wednesday after- noon. the Mayor (Mr. Griffith Thomas) pre- sidim:. There was almost a full attendance. The following is the text of Mr. Dix's let. ter to the Town Clerk:—"Cray, 27th,—Dear sir,—Whilst placing my resignation in the hands of your Council and giving them three months' notice under the terms of my ap- pohitn.ent to relinquish the position. I beg to ask you to be good enough to have the en- closed tetter read out at your next Council nnt-ting, which is a statement of my replies to the criticisms and accusations which have recently been directed against me.—Yours faithfully. Hurry A. Dix." l i e Town Clerk submitted the minutes of th.. Waters and Sewers Committee, which st."t-. d "Resolved that the manager be asked to t.-nder his resignation." TIIP Mayor also read a letter from Mr. H. A. Dix, stating that although he had ten- dered his resignation to the Town Clerk, yet in1 th'- ught. in fairness to himself and his re- putation, a competent authority should te asked to make an independent inquiry into the management of the waterworks under- taking. Alderman W. Watkins moved the minutes Of the Water and Sewers Committee be adept': d. Mr. Roger Thomas seconded. 1 Alderman W. Watkins said he had seiiouaiv considered whether it would be advisable, .s chairman of the Water and Sewers Committee, ts be silent that dav. but he bad come to the conclusion that it would not be honest to hur-elf or the ratepayers, or Mr. Dix, to take that course. Therefore, he hoped they would be lenient with him. especially so as ltc, was not very well. There was an im- pulsion in Swansea that the Cray had been seriously mismanaged, and that more money ha-ri been spent than ought to have been. Now, so far as he knew, all they had to deal with that day tva-s since Mr. Dix had taken posses- sion of the place. Whether any money had be"ll spent or wasted before they had nothing t.) du that afternoon, but he ventured to say ir his opinion that since Mr. Dix had taken possession, matters were enquired into im- partially. Money had not been misspent, Fievious to Mr. Dix taking possession, the work had been badly managed and badly c rricd out. Previous" to Mr. Dix going there tiio work was out of level, in some places the tllnN 1 was much too small, and in other places three times too big—so far as the ex- cavations, so badly was it constructed, ine resident engineer then had power to see the work carried out properly, and he thought the blame should be saddled on the r;gLt shoulders. So bad had the work been carried out that the arbitrators argued that ot least £.5,000 would have to be SJ.1CI:t to 2.1j if v the blunders which had been com- mitted either by the contractors, or by the war.t of foresight by the resident engine). j here was not a tittle of evidence to .say or "nC" itS to more money hM beet! "Vllt at the Cray than ought to have bet'n There had been no evidence given fo prove that there had been any mismanagement or any expenditure of money which should not have been expended. He thought rate- payers should be informed that immediately Mr. Dix was appointed. the committee—wise iy. perhaps—o>r some of them, doubted the abiiity of Mr. Dix so fir as the detailed scheme and how lie intended to carry out thi work. Mr Dix was givt-n some time to do that work. and he brought a scheme forward. In the plat: lie cLew up he showed what rail- ways wer? intended, and roughly what cra-"es he required, ,:nd speaking from memory he (the sjteaker) believed the plant requird would be certainly from JB16,000 to £20,000 He i'junu that up to March 25th plant .& preliminary work had cost £ 18,707—he was no: particular to jBl or £2. The value of the materials—which Mr. Dix had nothing to do with br., mg and h? had made no hirge pur without the consent of the committee— already used On the ground was £ 17.424. The total wages paid there wait no evidence to prove that the total was in excess of what it ought to have been. The total wages paid w i$ £571,506. The committee had built since they toog over the w^rk 26 or 27 new huts, and considerable repiirs had to be made to the old huts, which was necessary. On huts the committee had spent bout £7,000. Roughly speaking, the estimated cost in his opinion for the completed woik, taking the Schedule, would be about £ 230,000. There- Schedule, would be about £230,000. There- fore, the expenditure up to March 25 and to complete would be £330,697. When they j''ducted from the value of the plant and cue sale of the same and materials at the they would get about £ J5^000—that would leave an expenditure of £ 315-697. Mr. Dix, he reminded the Council, was asked at the time not only to give a plan. but how he intended to carry out the work which had been approved of entirely by the committee and Council. Some gentlemen were not favourably disposed towards Mr DJX at that time, but they admitted, so far as the plans were concerned, they showed considerable ability, otherwise he would not have been able to design and show how he in- tended to carry out the work. Every parti- cular Mr. Dix had given the committee had beer; carried out. Mr. Dix had estimated the cost of the completion of the works at that time-and this had been approved by Mr. Hill—was £308,072..Fur extras there would probably be incurred £30,000, whilst a- big contractor would have charged £ 70.000. He (the speaker) calculated that there was £22.375 to the good provided the work could be. done and completed for the scheduled price, which he maintained. He had told Mr. Dix unless he could clear J650.000 on the previous estimate, he should iay he iMr. Dix) had badly mismanaged. He netted that there was no • vidence tiu-t Mr. Dix. so far, had mismanaged the under- taking, and aheged that when the manager was appointed, he went into a, hornets' nest. Undoubtedly the gentleman on the ground fully expected to carry an tha job themsieives at the time, and h~ knew it was said that "We are not .-satisfied, and we will make it warm for him." And so 'hey had. One instance Mr. W at kins narrated. He went to the Cmy at eight o'clock in the morning, and Mr. Dix. the^ manager, was s en coining along t!*e wo; k*, tlres^ed like a gentleman. For a me uieA. lie (Mr. Walking) was very indignant, wbtr his attention was drawn to Mr. Dix the words, "Yuu can see how that man miu- ages the work. He is coming out. like a gentleman. He taxed Mr. Dix about it. and he explained that he had turned out that rooming about sax o clock, hud gone to the tunu<?l and about the works and took bivuk- fast ;d 7.30. Expecting the committee that morni ig, he eliangde his muddy clothes. And hero I "am," added Mr Dix. He IMR. Wdt- kinvs) positive from observatic.'is made that there had been a. deep laid conspiracy on the part of some wicked men to ruin that man (lite manager). That was the reason why he had stuck to Mr. Dix In otlir i^inarka Mr. Watkins urged that ."t was admitted that the manager had been guilty of a little ovea sight in not ordering the last lot of cement- earlier, whde regarded the alleged iriMiiiiriency of "plums in the dam, no complaint wkateVi-r had < er been received fiom uithe-a- the J>o! ougb cn-mcer (Mr Wyrill) or the rodent en- gint.i- ¡)1r. Aitehingham) who hud on the ether ii aid b.en told by him (Mr. Watkins) to cio ill they could to save t/;o ratepayers' money. He did not think M1 Dix had been given a lair trial, and charac- terised a man who had given evidence against him as "30 scamp," whose statements could not- be trusted. A charge. sonittLiinr* "tent JB5, preferred against Mr. l)ix, was not proven, white many of the committee did not believe ;t, and a further allegation nt..de bv Ma-. Kitchingham was simply th It he (the i resident engineer) heard money jjngliug ml the room. That was th.e soj-t ot cvidencf-■ they bed had against Mr. Dix, but tbrc was no proof that- the allege.'Inns were trn.. j Mr. Hair s essayed to pot a question, where- upon Mr. W ::f]v.n.~ said, amid much 1 aught", j that ho -I'd ;;i>t wish to enter im<) ru.v uis- Mr. Harris' question was as to 'he* dufer- I euce in cbe oi-st by the suJvtimf.hn of eon- I cit te 11 si.i.ne for the dam. •Mh*. Watkins replied tliat Mr Dix's esti- mate was for a concrete dam. Answering further questions. Mr. Wat km? admitted that it was stated at the confer- en.ee at the Cray that the estimate was for a stone dam. He (Mr. Watkins) only found out the mistake subsequently, and ilr. Hill could not have rem- inUred it at the moment. At this stage the shorthand notes of the conference at the Cray were called for. and a long di.-er;ssion ensued over an amendment to the effect that the meeting stand adjourned till these notes be printed and circulated. Mr. MerreUs It will cost a penny rate. A rnembt r If it y, ill cost a shilling rate we should hive it, as it may save a man's reputa- tion. Mr. David Davies urged that in justice to the public, who were seeking for the truth, the debate should not be left with the ex parte statements hitherto made. Aid. W. Watkins said when he entered the Chamber that afternoon he had no idea that any amendment would be moved. There had been no evidence taken on the other side. Mr. Morgan Hopkin urged that members of the Council should have records to refer to. and he asked wdiv should the, be dominated by 19 members of the Council? Before the verdict was pronounced. Mr. Dix was en- titled to every fair play, and that could only be obtained by the printing of the notes. Mr. D. Harris said he wanted the notes read fully there that day. There were 400 or 500 men at te Cniy. It was nenr the summer. and it was essential that a decision should be come to. In the interests of all concerned a definite result should be arrived at. Dr. Hawrngs said he had expected an illuminating discussion which would enable him to give a vote according to the evidence, He thought to break off the meeting now would be must unfair. (Hear, hear.) Nine voted for the amendment, which was lost. ^l1" C*AT'lyni Morgan thereupon called for the reading of the notes. Mr. fatton said he wished to speak on the mam question. They started on the matter on the Sunday, when a. written document was s*gned by Mr. Tarr and Mr. Solomon. That document was prepared and written down by whom he did not know. Mr. Solomon I took it down. Mr. Tutton said at that time there were three persons in the employ of the Corpora- tion and one who was not, but who was still hanging about the work. They were either a father aad two sons or three brothers. The quarryman had received Hot ice on the pre- vious Friday, and on Sunday W met Messrs. iarr and Solomon, and made the statement, which the latter had taken down. With all due deference, Mr. Tarr and Mr. Solomon could not in the ordiuarv course of things know quite so much as those who had been connected with the work from the beginning. The quarryman, as he stated, was then hang- ing about the works. The man í-<.Iid he had nothing to show on which he could base his statement. He relied upon his memory, and tatter enumerating some- of the things, said, 'That is all. Something else was named, and then the man remembered it was so. It was strange that the man could fix upon ab- solute quantities and place the price upon the same- after the length of time. and he should like to know whether t.he man did not re- ceive some assistance in working out those figures. Mr. Tutton proceeded to remark that when the work was taken over from the contractors, every scrap of anything in the shape of account was destroyed, so that it was impossible for anyone to accurately state the cost of the bungalow, in respect of which it was, he thought, strange that this should cost more than the 27 huts M". Dix had erected. If that was *0 who was to b1ame? Again, one of those men who were accusing Mr. Dix of not only laxity but a.bsolute wrongful and wasteful ex- travagance a„nd incapacity, was before the committee. He referred to Mr. Harvey, and aithough he stated that he had \r ir>cd Mr. Dix, the funny part of it wa^ that the sub- ordinates were immaculate while the head man was vulnerable. It was not usual for the head man te be bought practically for a song, while the subordinates were not to be sc bought. That, again, way another of the elements upon whieh they were asked to prac- t ira Uy ruin their manigcr. He was not tak- ing that position because of any special ad- miration for Mr. Dix, whom he had brought to book in committee as much as any other member of the committee pnxsent. Mention had been made of the unworthy suggeston or Mr. Kitcliitigham in reference to the charge of bribery, and Mr. Tutton reminded the Council that human nature was human nature all the way through, and that at the wofkj it was supposed that Mr. Kitchingham was to be the new manager, that was if the Council did not decide to adopt Mr. iiill's suggestion f.nd ontei' :te another contract. That was the position at the works at the present time. Those things had been alleged by those three men, Shand, Harvey, and Kitchingham, and others as well. He did not want to extend it too far, but he could extend it to such a considerable distance that might possibly open the minds of some of them. Coming to the work done. I Mr. Tutton raid he did not pro- pose to read the whole of a statement that had been handed him in his remarks brief or otherwise. Mr. David Davies Otherwise. (Laugh ter.) Mr. Tutton Very well, we can shake hands across the table. Oh yes. I am even willing to give in to you. (More laughter). Mr. Tutton proceeded to say that the work done by Mr. Dix was admittedly excellent, and that the manager's faults were apparently faults of omission in reference to the. "plums" in thedamandthestockofcement. Regarding the latter, that only occurred after the pre- sent allegations were made. while the* need of 40 per cent, of "plums" was only men- tioned when Mr. Hill was on the ground for the purposes of the recent enquiry. Up to that time he did not think anv specific pro- portion of "plums" had been named, though the evidence was that Mr. Dix had increased the quantity from about 25 to 29 per cent. In regard to the ordering of cement, it was tj16 Mr, Dix did not do evervthing. did not go through the cement sheds him- self perhaps.^ A baker looked after his oven, but he didnt like to go into it. The man who was charged with the duty of reporting to Y ■ Dix quantities was one of the men 11., had men-ioned Shand. Another com- plaint was with regard to the sand. It was quite possible Mr. Dix mav have been "had" over the one cargo, but they had made a re- duct iop of 9d. per ton. Probublv anyone else would have made a mistake. Another thin<r aga ilist him was because he did not send a rusty little tap to be in two places at once, and for that :md the other things it was said thev should deal drastically with the man. As re- gards the bungalow it had been admitted that all the me-a were at work. Asked if all the morit v charged for was worked for, the man! who made the complaint said "Yes." One thing seemed wanting at that time—a closer allocation of the monev. as men were drawn from the bungalow to do other jobs on the w. rks. In the face of the statements made, it would only be just to consider the matter thoroughly, and not rely altogether on the testimony of men who ought not to be on the work. If the work were given to a con- tractor, depend upon it he would not finish the j< b for the love of it. Mr. W. Tarr said with regard to the state- ment taken down. he warned the man before he made it. and he wished to assure the Coun- cil that neither he nor Mr. Solomon faced t h:- matter with any prejudice. Mr. Tarr refer-ed to the "phIIllil," and spoke to examining the explosives book when the quantity r f gelignite l^v the quarter was seen to be'850 lbs., as against 40 tbs. before. In consequence of ill Ir, there could be no gainsaying the fi't that the matter was a serious on.1 aiid wcrthv of consideration. Mr. H. CI. Solomon said the statement- was read over to the man who made it two or three times. Asked if he had. nnvthing to add, he said, .o; I am prepared by all I 'ljye said. So far as he was concerned, he had not spoken to Mr. Dix twice iii hI" ti-fe. Then it had been said that a shed was not put up for the masons. a.nd that some 30 hours per day had been lost in consequence; but surely that was It watter-and so were all others but the ;11- leged £5--of management, and did not reflect upon Mr. Dix's honour. Mr. Solomon could only assume, after the signed statement, that some members of the committee were inclined to accept the word of a. highly-paid official as ag;riist that of the workmen. He could read i an honest man when lie saw one, and it was! b*'cause they firmly b -Sieved in the signed statement against Mr. Dix that he anrf Mr. Tarr had been parties to sending the allega- I tions to the sub-ciiiiimittee. They had been told by .llr. Watkins about the bricks, but i •;hey \«":v not toll that jus' after that quan- tity of brick" had been condemned by Mr. j Kitchingham, they were sent back, eventually to be found in the end of the works towards the tunnel end. 'Yr. Solomon thought the Council should have been told the whole <f that. Then they were told that Mr. Kitch- tngham mii.t h;v listened, at the door to hear the money jingling in Mr. Dix's room. Nov. on the following morning the committee met on the following morning the committee met Mr. Harvey, who told them that Mr. Dix had tdd /1'\1 lie would not pay him for ctrtain of the ciuslud stone, and further, that he could finish up that night. The com nittee went up to .see Mr. Dix, "anj the first thing he -J." Mr. Solomon went on. "was there Mr. Solomon sps.-ke in a whisper). llon t I speak too loud the man can hear in the next 'I oince. -\Ir. Solomon contended, thereto e, that Mr. Dix s knowledge of the office was such that He knew there would be no need of Mi. Kitchingham having to listen at the door. inn was next made by Mr. Solomon of ¡ toe tact that. on this occasion M" Dix oro- duced a box of cigars, which the • ommittee accepted, and very good cigars they were, ) ««r;- —Mimas—but that L'" a detail. Some- hing else was offered, but that was not ac- cepted, ancl Mt\ Dix. questioned about Mr. Han ey s dismissal, said he did not want the man to h-ave- that night, but could work rut the month. It was quite evident, therefore, tliat fMfr Dix had spoken t.o the man to that extent. Mr. Tutton He had a month's notice be- fore that? Mr. Solomon Yes, sir, on the Friday, and I on th Monday morning Mr. Dix went down to the quarry and stopped one or two lot., of these stones. In conclusion, Mr. Solomon I said he would be glad to get a reply to the whole (If the allegations made against Mr. Dix. The only reply that had been made so far was the one that had appeared in the I newspapers, and that an ided about 75 per cent, of the allegations. Personally, he had no an.n.us aga-nst Mr. Dix. and should nly '"•1o'1f< d if the Council found tTiey M \r able to give him it ,olear discharge. Mi. Mentis said the beginning of the 'Y. i ,e^an 'orne 14 or 15 months ago over tl.'<l 'f' #°u f°me fa mo us—the bungalow, alterations to which the com- P970 tP' t(u Tnnild ire about £ 260 or Thl t c n thtT.e vas a lor'S interval, and Th 5", or <1?ht ago Mr. Roger u comm^ieP put a question as to j ) Purfhflses of sand. Mr. Dix replied he had ^ot a few hundred tons, and then Mr. ''f'' hilS haud in his pocket-, and puthng out a sample, asked. "Is it anything .'rlr U+u i ''Certainly not," adding that lus was different to that Aid. Lvans Far better than that. Mr. Merrells Yes. far better. At any rate that was what Mr. Dix intended to convey. He (Mr .Merrells) expressed surprise that such gand should go to the Cray as it was not fit tor the work. Mr. Dix then distinctly said that he had not received anv bulk of it at the Cray, but he (Mr. Merrells) knew that a week previously 200 tons of it left Swansea for the Cray. He regretted he did not at the time go to the Cray to verify the manager's state- ment. At the next meeting of the committee the mat.fr was mentioned again, and then k i to,11 the committee that he had tn ought t o the notice of the contractor? the tact, tnat the sand was not up to sample, with the lesult thlt they had reduced the price from 4s. 3d. to 3s. 6d. per ton. The facts as ascertained on the ground were that Mr. Kitchingham had said the sand did not sieero tit for the purpose intended, and that only a truck or two should be ordered on trial. In- stead of carrying out those instructions, Mr. Dix a few days afterwards had no leRs tlmn 200 tons sent up to the Cray, the manager ad- mitting that he was tied to the contractors, and could not refrse what ilr. Merrells now described "as an apology for the sand." He ¡ (Mr. Merrelb) contended that without the authority of the committee Mr. Dix had wiven these contractors an open order for the supply of sand at a cost of 4s. 3d. and 4s. 6d. per ton. I as against 4s. delivered on the ground as per offer recently made from a Swansea contractos to supply sand from the Swansea docks. If it was only upon the question of sand alone. Air. Dix had deliberately misled him. and whatever might be the position of the manager in the future, he (Mr. Merrells) had lost "all confidence in him. It could never be re- stored. Mr. Dix had deliberately misled the committee on the bungalow and the sand questions, and the man who could do that openly could never hope to retain their confi- dence. In his letter the manager stated there were thousands of tons of stone on the ground. When he (Mr. Merrells) was last at the Cray I there was scarcely a bit of crushed stone on the ground. Then Mr. Dix said he was fully prepared for the summer. He (Mr. Merrells) was very pleased to heat it, but at present he could hardly believe it. ilr. Tutton had said that the evidence against Mr. Dix was 1 that, of "tainted tnen. Now Mr. Harvey signed hi: statement that he gave Mr. Dix £5, that he gave, the timekeeper 10s.. and that he offered bribes to Mr. McKenzie (Mr. Dix's deputy), and Mr. Shand, the former ganger, both of which offers were refused. Mr. Dix totally denied it. and said it was a wilful and deliberate lie, but Mr. Harvey, when brought before the committee and asked whether lIe adhered to his written statement, said, "Em- phatically yes, every word." The time- keeper had unfortunately left the works, but Mr. McKenzie was sent for, and he corro- borated the statement that he had been offered by Mr. Harvey a bribe. This was about two weeks before last Christmas, and Mr. AlcKenzie added valuntarily. "It seems r to bto a general custom on this job." Mr. Of-eri el'.s referred at some length to the quarry transaction, and said at the time Har- vey took over the quarry there was a certain amount of loose stuff already worked, which lie gave to Harvey in his contract. The paes- tion had l>een asked as to the value, and the reply had been gmn £ 10. Mr. Dix admitted giving JB10 worth of stone to Harvey, and if it had been lOJ. the principle would have teen tho same. Ml*. MerrelU explained the quarry had been carried on day work. A certain am Hint of stone was loos.- upan the ground, and only re- quired loading up. Instead of that loose stuff being taken into account and measured i p, and Mr. Harvey only having to pay the cost of loading up, this man was paid the cost as if he had quarriel it in the first instant-. Harvey said Dix told him there was JC25 worth of stone, and it was worth JE10 to him. Harvey had further stated that the second day after lie received the first pay he gave £5 to Dix, which was entirely denied. Was Dix competent to nnuiage the works? He (Mr. Merrells) had fi?i ined the opinion emphatically that he was not. It did not -require an expert to see whether \\ork was being conducted on c&iuir.on-.vnsc lines and common-sense organ- isation. Mr. Hill had said. "There should be bigger plums. To-day the plums were so smaJl they wtiv .'<ei:rcely worth calling plums. "I have pointed it out to Mr. Dix three months ago." J t was also a fact that, al- though Mr. Dix had been ordered to order cement three weeks in advance, lie had but 95 tons in stock—enough to last three da vs. Further, MT. Hill had called iltr. Dix's at- tention to the absolute necessity of getting crushed material in excess of what he was then using to have in stock. Wli<-n the com- mitlee went up on one occasion, said Mr MerreUs, the v was not. a stone in excess. If anything happened to two small Txxrtable en- gines the » .:ole work would be stopped. Since last Thursday the whole concrete at. the works had been stopped, and was likely to be stop- ped the whole of the week and a part of the next. Mr. Dix had tried to wriggle out of that by putting the blame on a foreman. Ah I regarded th charges of corruption against! Dix. lie would not put much stress upon that. It any further pivxif were wante I of the m-, capacity of Dix. he had proof from the chair- man of committ e. who stated, II we had • had Mr. Hill every day to Inook after tho job, we would be thousands in pocket." Alder:nan W Watkins said he meant what he said, but. Mr. Merrells had mwj mstraed his statement. Mr. I'. 'Miartin said the opinion he had ar- r'ved at a.ft-r careful investigation as to the condition of things at the Cray, was that tha Bianagement of the works was unsatisfactory, and that it was lacking in forethought and ffhcieMy; and further, what was even woree than that-, the work, in his opinion, had faded to secure the sympathy of the men on the job. He was not going* to follow what had been said with regard to the charges of corruption. He had before him the letter of Mr. Dix, which he 11.U1 written no doubt after careful coii^/deration, ami in which he put. i everything that could be stated Wore them! in his favour. Dealing with Paaagraph, 2 in ilr. Dix's let tor. ilr. Martin said the writer tried to go behind what -eallv d¡drd bdong to kll1.. That was the quality'

Advertising

MANORDILO.

Advertising

[No title]

MORRISTON MEMS.

=----,.-----' lilSlfOP If…

Advertising

---IRAILWAY RETURNS,

Advertising

CRAY MANAGEMENTI QUESTIONS.I…