Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

13 articles on this Page

-THURSDAY.

News
Cite
Share

THURSDAY. REED v. REES.—Mr. Glascodine appeared for the plaintiff and Mr. W. Lawrence for the defendant. The amount claimed was £:3 10s. The defendant was ad- vertising agent to Mr. Dillwyn, M.P. for Swansea, and as such ordered the plaintiff to insert in his newspaper an address of Mr. Dillwyn to his constituents. The address was inserted, and the plaintiff now claimed the price of it. In cross-examination plaintiff said that Mr. Rowse was not his advertising agent, neither was he (Mr. Rowse) the editor of the paper in which the address was inserted. A clerk of the defendant was called in defence, and stated that on one occasion he went to the office of Mr. Reed to pay his bill, when he was told by the clerk there to take the money to Mr. Rowse, of Castle-square. He did so and paid it. When he went to tbe plaintiff's office did not see plaintiff himself. The judge said the money ought to have been paid to Mr. Reed, and he therefore gave a verdict for the plaintiff. A JURY CASE.—BREACH OF COVENANT —Elizabeth Nott v. Arthur Nicholls. Mr. Benson counsel for the plaintiff, Mr. Brynmor Jones counsel for the defendant, a cabinetmaker, Heathfield-street, Swansea. The action was brought to recover the sum of jE50 for damages for an alleged breach of covenant for quiet possession under a lease granted to Mrs. Nott by Arthur Nicholls, the defendant, and also for damages for erecting on the plaintiff's wall a chimney which smoked and obstructed the light to her house. In 1869 the defendant gave to the plaintiff an under-lease of the house No. 10, D da- beche-street, Swansea, and covenanted for the quiet and peaceable enjoyment of the premises. The plaintiff de- posed: I own No. 10, Delabeche-street, Swansea. In 1869,1 took a lease of it from the defendant for the term of 98 years. There is a warehouse built by the de- fendant against my wall, from which rises a chimney The smoke from the chimney comes into my bedroom and into my sitting-room. In 1879 Mr. Dillwyn (under whom the defendant holds) compelled me to give up my lease. I paid £5 to Mr. W. J. Rees, the agent for Mr. Dillwyn, for a new lease. I had JE30 a year rent for the house before the chimney was erected. I am getting £ 28 now for it. The house is more difficult to let now than it was before. My present tenant states he wont stay. Cross-examined: I had a conversation with the defendant after I had the lease. I was in Ire- land at the time the warehouse was built. I did not make any complaint about the warehouse until after I got my new lease. I told defendant about it after the action was brought against him by Mr. Dillwyn. I told him the warehouse darkened my place. I don't know that it has been built for nine years. I have bad constant complaints from the tenants about the smoke from the chimney blowing i,lto the rooms. I have never seen it; I didn't live there. William Burgess, formerly a builder, of Swansea, said: The workshop is on the wall at the end of the garden. The plaintiff's premises are overlooked from the workshop. The chimney is near the house, on the wall, and I consider its position would do damage to the house while certain winds were blowing. I estimate the damage would be about £50 in the case of selling the lease. Cross-examined: Not in consequence of the chimney only would the value be diminished, but because of the loss of ground and the looking-over of the plaintiff's premises. The value of the premises might be £400. I have never practised as a valuer or surveyor. I say that the value has diminished because of the workshop and the chimney having been built. This closed the plaintiff's case.— Counsel for the defence in opening said that he should show, by evidence to be given, that the plaintiff had been told that a workshop would be built against the wall at the back of her house, aud that before it was built she did not make any complaint. He would also show that no nuisance arose from the chimney be- longing to the workshop. He then called the defen- dant who on being sworn snd At theltllne I granted an under-lease to the plaintiff in 1869 the walls at tae back were all up. I had a conversation with the plain- tiff about the lease, and I then told her I was going to build a workshop at the back of her house She did not complain when I told her that. The wall on which the workshop is built is mine. She has said that the housewasof more value now the wall was up than It was before. There was an action between Mr. Dillwyn and myself about this property, but it was compromised. Mr. Dillwyn was to give me a new lease for my pre- mises and a new lease to Mrs. N"tt for her premises, free of cost. I never requested Mrs. Nott to pay £5 for her lease. I have told her not to pay it. Cross- examined The top of the chimney of the workshop goes above the roof of the plaintiff's house. William WatkiDs, builder, Swansea, sworn: My firm (Thomas, Watkins, and Jenkins) built the premises in question The wall that is there now was built at the time the house was built. The smoke causing the nuisance to the plaintiff arises from a small grate in a parlour. The chimney is properlv built. The house adjoining the plaintiff's is let at £26 a year. Plaintiff gets £28 for hers now. The value has not diminished because of the workshop or the chimney. Counsel for both sides addressed ltbe jury, after which His Honor summed up. The jury then immediately returned a verdict for the defendant. Messrs. Leyson and Jones were solicitors for the plaintiff, and Mr. Beor, of York-place, Swansea, solicitor, for the defendant.

[No title]

THE BAPTIST UNION.

[No title]

[No title]

MONDAY.

[No title]

COALMINING IN WALKS.

. THE FLEET IN THti MEDITERRANEAN.

-------------------7 SWANSEA…

WEDNESDAY.

♦ LONDON GAZETTE.

■■-(Seneral ^uttlUgcncr.