Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

18 articles on this Page

COUNTY COUBT-

News
Cite
Share

COUNTY COUBT- Friday, July 23rd. Before His Honour Judge Bishop. "Till GWALIA MARINE INSURANCE CO. V. DANIEL. The Gwalia Marine Insurance Company sued Mr iJaniel, Aberdovey, for the sum of >850, defendant's Contribution to the company. Contribution to the company. Mr Evan Evans (Messrs Roberts, Son, and Evans) appeared for the company, and Mr Vatcher, Cardiff, for the defendant. Mr Evans, in opening the case, said that the defen- dant was on the committee of the society. He had at one meeting proposed that the losses should be tmid out for the past two months. Mr John Owen said he acted as secretary to this Company. Capt. Daniel did not ask for a policy tofcil the end of 18Si. He did not ask for a policy when he attended the April meeting in 1884, nor at the meeting held in December. The committee, at the end of 1883, decided not to issue any policies, as the time was so skort. Defendant was not present at that meeting, and no resolution was passed on the point. This society was not carried on the next year, as there was not sufficient capital. Witness, cross-examined, said he could not remem- ber that the chairman told him he ought to have sent the policies out. The committee did not blame him. lIe was a grocer. He had not been secretary to any Other society, but was partly insured in the old com- pany. There was some delay in getting the policies from the printer, and therefore it being so late it was Decided not to send them out. Mr D. C. Roberts said that he was a merchant, Carrying on business in the town, and a member of the Town Council. He was present at the meeting When it was decided not to send the policies out. Mr Vatcher: I have nothing to ask the town Councillor. Defendant said that he was on the committee of the Company. He had asked for policies, and he told the secretary that the company would not be regular if there were no policies granted. He received a Receipt from them in 1884, which he had not in his "ssession, as some time ago he had his shop burned out. Defendant, cross-examined, said that he knew there Were no policies issued when he attended the meet- ing in 1884. By the Judge He attended several meetings after iie knew there were no policies sent out. Mr Vatcher having made an address, The Judge reserved judgment until the next court. CLAIM FOR MONET LENT. Mr Thomas Jones, London, carpenter, sued David Jones, his uncle, for 27, money lent. Mr Griffith Jones appeared for the plaintiff, tlaintiff said that he lent defendant the money in June, 1880. He then promised to pay them back in a fortnight. He met defendant about Christmas time in London, who then asked him for more time, as the times were very bad. He promised witness to Vay X2 in Wales, which he owed, and then defen- dant would owe him X5. Defendant did not pay this < £ 2. Judgment for plaintiff for the amount claimed. CLAIM TOR RENT. Thomas James, butcher, Bridge-street, sued Wm. Ede, formerly of this town, for the sum of .£2 2s 6d, kalanee due for rent. Plaintiff said that he rented the building to him for £ 3 10s, as long as he did not want it. He had paid Some of the money, and there was now £ 2 2" 6d Glance. Judgment for the plaintiff for the amount claimed. Mr Griffith Jones appeared for the plaintiff. CLAIM FOR GOODS SOLD. Jenkin Jones, Bronant, sued John Jones, Blaen- lpennal for the sum of £ 15 4s for goods supplied. Mr Griffith Jones appeared for the plaintiff. Plaintiff said that he was a shopkeeper, carrying Ibli business at Bronant. He sent bills to defendant on several occasions, on some of which notice was given that interest would be charged. Defendant said plaintiff owed him 16s for work one. There was lis 6d to come to him and his daughter for thatching plaintiff's house, and 4s Bel to iis wife for rising turf. Judgment for Xll 12s 8d was given for the plain- tiff. The sum of 10s a month was accepted. A PROMISSORY NOTE. Mary Jones, Llangwyryfon, sued Isaac Thomas for X7 10s on a promissory note. Mr Hugh Hughes, jun., appeared for the plaintiff. Plaintiff said that she lent the sum of £ 10 to liefelidaalt, who had paid J22 10s with interest, and Zmw the amount claimed was the balance. It was a person named Thomas Evans who wrote on the back Of the note that the balance was £ 7 10s. Judgment for plaintiff. CLAIM FOR GOODS SOLD. Sarah Evans, grocer, North-parade, sued Gabriel Davies for the sum of 17s lid for goods sold. Mr Griffith Jones appeared for the plaintiff. Plaintiff said that she was a shopkeeper, carrying en business in the town. Defendant received some goods himself, and his wife and children came for goods. Some two years ago she sent him a notice, and he went to her and said that it was his married daughter who had received the goods. Witness told faim that it was for him the goods were sent, and that she was willing to wait for some time to see if he would pay. Sometimes his married j daughter came for goods she was then living with ter father, and she told witness that her husband was in America. Among the goods served to them **as tobacco. She did not know defendant's son-in- law. Defendant (to Plaintiff) Do you remember me Coming to your shop some two years ago to pay you -El for goods supplied to my children ? Plaintiff I do not. Defendant: Did I not then tell you not to give -t-iy Credit to them again ? Plaintiff: You did not. Defendant here asked the judge to adjourn the Case for an hour, so that he could bring his wife there to give evidence. The Judge consented. Plaintiff said that defendant came to her shop to why she did not give credit to her children for He was in his shirt sleeves at the time. Defendant said that he received a bill two years I and when he received it he was in his shirt Sleeves at the time, and went straight to the shop, as he was in a hot temper, he having on other occa- sions told plaintiff not to give credit to his children The case was adjourned. CLAIM FOR WAGES. John Jones, Rhydyfelin, sued Edward Evans -for a sum of money due in respect of wages as farm I 4servant on defendant's farm. Mr Hugh Hughes, jun., appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr Griffith Jones for defendant. lYr Hugh Hughes, in opening the case, said the plaintiff was in the employ of defendant as farm Servant. One day, while plaintiff was harrowing in the fields, defendant came to plaintiff, and just then the harrow broke, and the man, who was rather hot- tempered, told plaintiff to leave his employ at once Which he did. Plaintiff said he went into defendant's service in February of last year. He was there until the 25th of June. It was at defendant's house that they made the agreement that he should go to work on defen- dant's farm. He was told to leave, and did not go Ilway on his own account. Witness, cross-examined, said that he was in the field at Caerquarrel when defendant came to him. A cross bar was broken when he was harrowing. De- fendant said that it was broken by one the horses stepping on it. Witness told aim that it was broken while the horses were pulling. Defendant wanted witness to pay for it, which he VOUICI not, and he told him to go home. Defendant's "•rife nor his son asked witness to go back to do his Work. The amount due was £ 1410s. Witness, re-examined by Mr Hughes, said that there was no one besides themselves in the field at the time. Plaintiff's mother said that she went with her son to Wileirog to get her son a place. The amount aBreed as wages was X14 10s. ..Witness, cross-examined, said that it was not X14 that was agreed upon as wages, but X14 10s. Edward Evans said that when he saw that a part ot the harness, called a cross-bar, broken, he asked Plaintiff how it became so, and plaintiff asked defen- dant if he thought that he (plaintiff) had broken wilfully. Witness told him that if he was going to F° home he would make him pay for the harrow that -i,'°ke some time before and the cross bar. Witness, cross-examined, said he did not tell him he would have to pay for it until he said that he was going home. It was about 10 yards from the field gate that this conversation took place. There "as no one present at the time. He had a dispute ¡ "ith another servant at the last Tre'rddol petty Sessions, when the man received his wages and costs, -e had no quarrel with the man who had left last year. year. John Evans, son of the defendant, said that he was ^ith the calves in the fields about 20 yards from Cae- yWarrel. There was a road between the two fields. *ie heard a row between the servant and his father. in l ^eard the servant say that he would not cr0ss bar to the smith, and that he would er S<? home. Witness heard his father tell plaixi- to take the horses to where lie had them if he TVas g0mg llomo, lo^fl^ess.cwss-examined, said they were talking lion-vY- i8,, ■^er was n°t much excited. He did not el^ plaintiff that he would have to the rmf cross bar.^ Witness then went round to Mr*w' and t0^ to £ ° on w^h his work. -kvans said that the wages agreed upon were X14, and room to set about a hundred weight of potatoes. When defendant came for his box witness asked him to stay. Witness, cross-examined: She told him to go to work about two days after the row, when he came for his box. He came to their service at their farm for P,14 a year. Judgment was given for defendant.

THE CHURCH AND CONSERVATISM.

[No title]

YSTRAD MEURIGr.

Advertising

THE ABERAERON POSTMARK.

ENGLISH ENGLYNION.

MIDDLE.

AUDI ALTERAM FAKTSM.—HEAR…

CONSERVATIVE PARTY ORGANIZATION.

LIBERAL UNIONISE ORGANIZATION.

CARDIGANSHIRE ELECTION.

TALSARLSRj

AN "OLD MAID'S" TROUBLE.

BOROUGH MAGISTRATES' COURT.

MARKETS.

GO GIN AN.

Advertising