Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

7 articles on this Page

 ?EN UNIONISTS' FETE.

News
Cite
Share

 ?EN UNIONISTS' FETE. I GATHERING AT !NeE. L"P-C-P, GATIIE RING AT INCU, ?? -— o,q-'E(,'IIES ON THE OOMING ISSUE. ——— FP REFORM AND IMPERIALISM. b <>1 the J il klndnœs of Mrs. Park Yates, tha Nok fjt ? ?"? Hall were on NVednw4ay the "th", Of 8,4 enjoy-able a?d successful fete givM? 44der tl1 ??P'cc? of tJw Eddiabury Women's ?th ? ???<-ia.tion by die presidents of the t4'. %?ht -A?, ?"ation by th- e. pre, i dK, -n-ts of the p t*k ,lIby Dunham, Hcoic and Hoolo -¡sQb ) OZ?, Attended by favourabe wea- Eat.horing was 01lù of the largest of ?.??'onists which have been heJd in the ?, ?y l.Its w hioh have boon ho d belcng- tQ Y dIVIsIOn, numœring arout 750 belCJJg- 149 the fR()l distrkte mentioned; and it ? ? Diking demonstration of the popu-  V^°ur of a movement that may be ,5kr dk,d "till in the mrly Etage of its de- ?'??' Funded as it was barely two yrs ? tt'"?' in oth?- parts of tho division, it ?rt ih"?llo me null y rapid in that i"e pe'riod? The steaoily increasmg number "? Qi tr.'r{:nt,s ? ?" ffketive answer to those "gELrd it as an ephemeral giowtb, ? ??U?j? ?? W<?1 for a ca?cr of grcst and per- ?'??ss. The FrGdqham and Helsbv ? ?? ?r)t< journeyed by sp:ci<a.l train, while .hœe ?'? Hco? Vitlag-, Bridge Trafford, k) ^/7 :a.fford <? Wimboid's Trafford came t '?<t ? brakes, Hoole alone- contdbuting '40qtl,, Mrs. Park-Y?fps, who is ??'? <? ] of tho Hoole and Dunhajn branches, l ? visitors on their arTivat, and  ?v?y facility of aOCces through the L?i? ?"? extensive g?dr-na, th? inspection C ?or?d the grcat?t p l cusurc. The ?k4t'-Ily tilnbc-red grotind?, c?oiiimanding a ?t))? y tll;nbcre-d ground", commanding a ?qq 11, -Nu?, VIW of the bioad waters of the r4l, rr0l11 Llv.rTVY.j,1 to Runcorn, '? I Ending from Liverpool to Runcoin, ?t?. ? '?a! s<cnc for the gathering, an in- ri'Pr' bre(-Y,,? adding t. h,? eni ,.Y. n ?"? ??r b. adding to the enjoyment to VlIt()r'K Music was provided by the 'I, Port Ohureh Band. Tea, partaken of I i ?a? ? t,t. was followed by a performH1o Xj £ *>unds of the Tariff H.form sketch, en- .il Brii!Mmi?" written SPMially A ? ?disbury Women's Unionist A-,??.ia- )4r,, Park-Yates, in conjunction with ??Shey Wright. ThK< !ta.s b:?n pr<?ottcd it'j  ? ?vcra.1 occasions, and it n"-d only ? b<???? tbwt ''? p?rform&ncc rt with ???? ?.d?!i?ht<?d reception that it has r? f? r?? oth er ?udionccs. The characters ? ???'?t<'d in oostum? by the following ?b?" whom better exponents couJd not H ? d<sir? Miss Maud ?k<U (Bnbn- Si'?? ?? Dickson (Free Track- Miss ? ??ur (MiFB Homeless), Mrs. Toogood N ,'?''m?r). Miss Gardiner (Mrs. Artiza), ?'? ? ??nc (Y*cs aitti Miss C'?"?? <T?iSf Reform). At th? con- g tltU](', Britannia!" was heartily sung, i\dc, hose present we"o Mrs. Ockbston ??r  ? ?c F)'o<kh::? bruich), Mrs. Jas. r(Dr,,id c?l t of t)? H?Isby branch), Mr. .?? ?- Lyt? Smyth (B?ri?wmore), Mrs. w2til IVTj-Dlinsoii n, tii(, Rev. F. G. IV. Sl?er (Inœ) tb." Rev. J. and Mrs. ^°80(vj '?msta.)!), M. Ma-?on uid Mrs. Geo. ?i?' ?ice-prpgident?. And Mrs. R. CeCIl ? t.?cr-Gta.ry of tJ? Hoo!e b:anch), Mr. and A liil'lt ^,r'ffith (Plas ,'ydd. Denbigh), Mrs. A4i,, "tt ri)i.??ad), th? Rev. and Mrs. C. hi■Q''ifRntt > ??- and M?s Ok<?! (BanoY"), the hr?t??" Ffoi)!kca (Ch?<M),Mr. R. T. B. li, (Chester), Mr. and Mrs. E. Hassall, w)i r (Churton), MrK Griffith (T&rpor- Vf nd'h Tu^r, Mr. and M'n. Ja.mM Taylor, V ?lti. ?' E. L'?ker, Mr., Mrs. and Miss it?'Whitchcad, Mr. and Mm Pwryn k 4?, 15ri H?I), the Rev. and Mrs. Oolegmve CSlj.JI' ??? the following members of the j?S'?!? ? ?? IIoola' br!U?: Mi&a Owen, ? ?\?? 8ht, Mrs. Homby, Mrs. Knight, Miss ??l ?wa.rd?. Miss Musgra.w, Mrs. R. G. V MA/r iss M?!?ha.1! sjid Miss Davies in addi- ? Q M ? Allan Morris. Mrs. W. Williams, ? i ? ??'. Mm. Baxter, Mrs. Nevitt Ben- 1SS ik Mrs Gmha.m, Mrs. Arnold, {? p?? ??d Mrs. J. T. Ball. Mrs. Powell ??'? Villago branch), LjS *8- Pr?e,id,n t of tit,, Villa.-o braii,,h), C? bb?3 P-K of the Dun- ?-P?j???"'? )4 V?"Osby ami Mrs. Jolliffe b,-f ÜJû Ho?I? branch) were un- to be nPeSHint" -A- small platform had b"eH ?'y aj.r ??? on the grassi ?lop?. and edged ? cv?- A w?i L' over'r^8' i^t"r lho P'ay, Mrs. Pa.rk- ? t<? k t-h<, c h a i r, A.,Tr- ?< (wif thc, ohair, supporl.d by Mrs. ,k4i"?t?l ("if, th? MKnibr for Ilampstead), ? Lon?Mr. Wool), of the United 0)ub, ?Atc.t"?? !ad Mr- H^L ? ?? a':es' lri opc-ning the meeting, CX- ?"? he ?? '? opc-ning the m<?pting, cx- rt ,Pl"asuro at seeing the members of ?.?Ooi?'?" asscmbkd in Ruch large num- O'Rlit +]S le Save tlKn; a hearty wdM'm<'? She li gf,,tk'y 9Jl IN? proud of ??'' associa- ?' ?t' ?umb?rs continued to increase,   yt"? ?'' a <?P?ning interest in tho work, L'? a))?? ??'- women w<jr? t?ing an intc'- (? '? 1? ?f ?? in ? gov?rnm?'nt of the coun- ? n. ??" in ?? colim? of his speech ?n?t?" ?''monstration, said that every man )?.? tJ 't every man It ? ^jlr' ?"? work their hardest if t?y ?'f? h-» w ari:'c Pmsen* state of affairs. < t.h? ? n.?oessary. Iiowev?r. for her to ????''s to work, because' that was  had ba.nded thwlV('s to- iy^Ortx^i f must not bo k'd away any moi-e i4q4,, ??? ? c"??P°r ?a.f, but rather to p v<3rnment by 1hir legisiativc re t b- (An  ?e'y <lhctclgl.nd, in a wmt address, rcmarkfd Wiey %rd her speak so many timc8 ??? tdn 1 ?? would conk-nt Lmsdf on t?is  ?i?  ??' fcw??t p<.xsiMo words. ? ?? T? o<  to take a great interest in poli- they had jn? seen must mimu- t? tt Itr I,t .,t in Tariff R'form, and she WM I ? ? t?"'? Women w?p& not going to be !pd ??by t.??"?'shj?ot?s of M's8 Froo Trade ? ?' ?? Wf.r?, sixty y?a.?g ago. (Hear, heaT.) '.?? h? W?? "P their minds that what they ? t,, L4 Ta-?iff Reform, and they were go- ? h ? ??v L? ? (A 'I 'nMy wore going V> t} pp,ause.. üey WDrc gomg t\1!1 Ui K)js to vate in what they be- ? ). ? right.. way; because at the \? ?<'? ?'on they did not know how to vote, 14? d it ??? ?? time ?ornen a h .c'wf' d them how. 4h qUIt time women showed them how. ???t- ?? h<?r, hear.i Tari? Reform would L Ile I A SURE REMEDY I disease of unemployment from ? \V *^ltj n?-)?? ? Was at present suif?ring, because ^le *°° P'ent''inUoduotian of IS ?Ur ?nd foreign ?oods. through which N, 'I (A our country were at pivoent V (Applause.) Xiir £ iHST; w'r, m the c?our-4? of a practical and \?sr),, ?? Tariff Rt' f otrrn, rc f<'rro d at the '^to t^ 00*1 <m Tariff Refcxrtn, rcf'rrod at the \?? tb??? ?c'nt Ft<? 'J'¡'a COI1, which bY m?ny m0n from Piotcaion' t't svi'svs ;:iv gcnt.kroan who came fZm ?(.?«., ?) '"?' ?'? ?'? to b- the most œmo- V?? '? ?"? wmld, had ?tated that they I \;¡ti Pl? g'("t ''?? P?<*P? tjM ? to )isbcn to Free ?? ??c?? ? ?hcy wtTconfirmed b?Hevfrs in ?t?. '? "? ?"? Pi?f?ion. Of comae the j ??f ?-? ?spccia.Hy the American work-  ?v? ?? ?o??. The d°?a.t<)s might ''?? ?-  to talk about <h? sea serpent v<}  ?t) ?'*??' ?'' both ?"?''? no?-?x intent ;¡, .I ??' f'roteetion for a thausand y<"?rs, r?? ?? ?hing it had bc?n for us, but '? ?o ? change in our Fiscal policy 63 hillg ha.t had ?' ??'" ?'"S? We had ?. P't),?. ? ?otcction, only we had  'TIlE FOREIGNER > THE FOREIGNER u*W (Applaue.) For 63 years ? :s the forMgrjer better oommercial )???8t.h?? ? ?'? pœ. As a shopkeeper J?S ??.h ?? had b?n p&yins the rent, N 4N t? ? their esta-?Hshm?nt to keep ?t?J? ?t j? '?ct in the world, wh?h we had ??? ?1??'?'?n?r to use for nothing. Wae t pRe, °? ? ? pay tbe rent of the f?t?? n?. ?t the foreigner to keep the ?-! ?r1 'Ji eman had said that Protec- A,'Wlllkingnun had sa.id th= Protec- ?4?? 'OR t<:tJy like a ??° placed round a   Poted the cow from eating 0? ?b!o.. We had the patch ?? the Lt??t?L?? 44t ?e b"li ? t.he fenoe round the cow ????? --d I-it open ?? ?bag? patch ,.}lt1(\' We owed our pr?ejit scarcity k w^ yni6Xntit ° F ree Tra d e. Protoctod 00 un- C t  t- Trade. n?.t,td C OlAeuned ? rent of the shop from ? !° the ?r?oer. If we wanted to tll *?? they demanded a tariff ? ? ?nt. '?d for pianos they imposed a q eaut. 1 -Ind for pLaa<)6 they imposed a er ?."< ?"?d o?r"??? ??''? ? ?' ?s??y ? ,k ntr,- were not 80 heavy as ??t?t'°*? once wrote aDd owd that she did not apparently know that in Germany they were groaning under taxation. To this she replied that if Germany was groaning, England must be screaming, because whereas in Pro- tected Germany they paid 8s. per head in taxes, in Free Trade England we paid something like 18e. per head. Work-ingnien who declared that they paid taxes would discover how seriously they were mistaken if they would only reflect upon the proportion of the cost of their tea, sugar and tobacco which represented taxa- tion. (Hear, hear.) Tariff Reformers were charged with attempting to tax the poor man's bread, but their aim was really to reduce and not increase, taxation. They wanted to broaden the bacie of taxation. A workingman had said, "I am the basis you are going to broaden. You are going to shift the taxes from the rich and put them on to us workingmen." She replied that their aim was a better one than that, viz., to relievo the poor man of his taxes by putting them on tho foreigner and he then Mid, "If that is what you want, I'm not so sure 1 am not a bit of a Tariff Reformer myself." (Laughter.) She had never found anybody who was not a Tariff Reformer when he knew what Tariff Reform meant. (Hoar, hear.) Free Trade was THE MOST SELFISH CREED I that ever waa invented; it bad never done this country any good, and the sooner we swept it away the better for ourselves. We were told that Free Trade was adopted because of the "hungry 'Forties." It was true that the 'Forties were hungry, but it was not the price of food that made them hungry. The country was hungry from want of Protection, becauce we had not pc-sasosod real Protection. Free Trade encouraged merchants and traders to be- 1 come as rich ae they could, to trade where they liked, and not to consider any of their fellow- subjects in their own country. Protection, on I the other hand, said "Go and get a<s rioh ac you can but you must never take your trade in any direction where it will do da,m to your fellow-subjeete at home. We had not got Protection in the hungry 'Forties, but we had got taxation. Tariff Reformers were not taxers. A tax was something we had to pay out of our own pocket; a tariff was something that was levied upon the foreigner. She would not dwell upon our decaying industries, but we had got a Government who did not think it worth while in the King's Speech to mention the unem- ployed-a question which moot required men- tion. The reason was that they knew they could not find work for the people unless they aban- doned Free Trade. Instead of talking about the unemployed they offered many nico things, such as the feeding of children at the cost of the rates. She wished those present had seen the roomful of workingmeu rise to their feet and declare that they did not want. the public feed- ing of their children, but work. Old-ago pen- sions also would not satisfy people who de- manded work and wages. The people required to be warned against a certain class of so-called reformers who professed to have a remedy for unemployment, which was Socialism. Other countries had in the past put Socialist doctrines into praotioe, and found them a failure. The universal experience was that there was no tyranny on earth greater than the TYRANNY OF THE SOCIALIST. I (Applause.) Socialism brought France to the Revolution, and instead of making equality and prosperity for everyone, it was responsible for the death of one million of working-people from starvation in the streets of Paris. If for no other reason than to prevent the growth of Socialism Tariff Reform ought to be supported. -4 111) p<) r te-cl (Applause.) To those ministers of religion who declared themselves to be Christian Social- ites she woukl say that no individual could be a Christian and *a Socialist, because the whole creed of Socialism was dead against Christianity. If the women of this country knew t.he horrors of Socialism, how it threatened to destroy domestic life, she believed they would call for Tariff Reform tomorrow. Tariff Re- form, however, would not do much good with- out Imperialism. They had an opportunity to-day that the women of England never had before in the making of a great and imperial nation. Every woman in this country had to be an Imperialist. The problem of the future was, how were we going to get bread for our increasing population, markets for our pro- ducts and raw materials to work with? The answer was contained in the single word "Em- pire." (Applause.) We had one-fifth of the whole globe to supply our wants; we had the great wheat.fields of the world waiting to grow corn for us when we had Tariff Reform and gave a preference, to our Colonics. COLONIAL RESOURCES. I We had countries waiting to supply us with raw materials and to take our goods, and they could not do this satisfactorily until we abandoned Free Trade. Canada could grow as much wheat as we required to food everybody in this coun- try, and yet we were ruled by men who openly eaid that the sooner we got rid of colonics like Canada the better. Did they honestly believe that a 2s. duty on wheat would increase the coat of bread? If we could buy all the wheat we wanted at 35e. a quarter it was ridiculous to suppose that the foreigner would demand 37s. When the price of bread was rising in this country, bread and wheat in France, with a 12s. duty on every quarter, were cheaper than they were here, because France grew such a quantity of wheat that she did net want to buy of the foreigner. She wished to impress upon women that almost more important to them than their husbands' wages was the need of Imperialism and the hastening- of the coming of Tariff Reform. (Applause.) Mr. Wooll said he kUê'W the good work which the Women's Unionist AiaiiOl: was doing for Unionism in tho villages in that part of Cheshire., for ea-cli mem I km- was an apostie of Empire. When the Radical Government cantc into pawe-r they claimed" to have been returned to office as the embodiment of the national wis- dom and the national conscience, and as the only true f 1 icri-d of the Biitish workingman. The bye^e'ections since, liowt-ver, had shewn tlisit the country was beginning to find out the Government were not what they claimed to I- (Applau-se.) Thc-y had effected a Parliamentary alliance with the Labour p:u ty. who were avowed Social isle. The modern Liberal party acted con sistent.lv on the assumption that the majority of the electorate were dishon :st; hence their produc- tion of such measures as the Education and Li C*,r""Tig Bills. The most attractive feature of the Socialist programme was the repudiation of tho National Debt, but the scheme was not 00 attractive to the working-classes when thoy realised that more than half of the National Debt was tho possession cf the working-classes, no less a sum than 420 millions sterling being hekl by savings banks, friendly societies a.nd trade unions. If the Socialists, therefore, were Able to induce the country to repudiate the National Debt, not only would England lose her oiiedst, but the working-classes would be- rob- bing themselves. (Hear, hear.) Socialism was a. cieed which would gain ground in this coun- a eikio d w h e l i wou l d g try woro it not for the activc propaganda car- ried on by the Unionist party in favour of Tariff Reform, The Education aii4 the Licen- sing Bills shewed to what extent the Govern- ment really icpre-Ajit-ed- the national conscience, for both were attempis of UNADULTERATED ROBBERY. I The lormer was an undisguised attempt to rob the Church of England of her eohoo's without compensation, but a feature still worse than its dishonesty was the immoral bargain which the Governmemt had made with tho Roman Catho- lics. If the Licensing Bill were calculated to diminish drunkenness, Unionists would support it, but they opposed, it because it was both use- less and unjust. Proceeding to examine the Government's cJaim to bo the sole representa- tive of workirig-class interests, Mr. Wooll urged that all they had done for the workingimn had been to offer an Old-age Pension Bill, under which no one would benefit until he reached the remote ago of seventy. The people who most required the pension were the survivors in an industrial comm-unity, and the workers did not reiach tbo age of seventy; but apart from that, the Government had made no a.r- nangeinout as to tbid source from which the pen- sions were to be paid. Tariff Reform was the only system of national finance which afforded posalblo method of defraying the cost of old- age pensions, or of increasing the amount of those pensions, or reducing the age limit. It was monstrous of a Government which derived no less than £65,000,000 a year from food, (kink and tobaeoo taxes to talk a.bout the wickedness of Unionists in wanting to tax the workingman. (Hear, bear.) The Unionist party were to bo congratulated upon having a positive and con- structive policy, and he hoped they would do their best to make it known. (ApplauseJ On the proposition of Mr. Edwa.rd II assal I, seconded by Mr. R. T. B. Atchecley, a hearty vote of thanks wa-s passed to the spealrors, the lady performers and Mrs. Park-Yates, the sing- ing of tlie Empire Song and the National An- them concluding the meeting. The day was brought, to a close with dancing in the grounds, which were illuminated: with Chinese lanterns and fairy lamps, tho Ellesmere Port Church Band providing the music.

_BUNBURY -SHOW, j

[No title]

CHESHIRE 1HiJiNT PUPPY ) SHOW.J

THE ARMY. a——

Advertising

Advertising