Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

8 articles on this Page

Industrial History, OR THE…

News
Cite
Share

Industrial History, OR THE DIFFERENT FORMS OF LABOUR PROCESS. FKOM THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE ROMANS TO ANGLO-SAXON FEUDALISM!. (By MR. GWILYM JONES.) I The feudal-system is a system of social polity, of which lordship and vassalage are the essential features, and of land tenure in which owner- ship inhered in the lord, and the use of that tenure belonging to the grantee. Traces of this system are found in nearly every country, but the rise of the feudal-system, distinct- ly called, was in those parts of Europe in which the Teutonic Tribes or con- querors of the Romans acquired power. Four distinct forms of the develop- ment of the feudal-system have been traced. (1) The land was granted, if not resumable for pleasure, was so on the expiry of the grantee's life. (2) Then it became tended to a cer- tain limit of extent hereditary, and was called a feud. (3) It beame completely hereditary and finally (4) the order of descent was settled, and regulations were made -and obliga- tions fixed between the lord and tenant or feud. The feudal-system, according to Paul Lafargue, "appeared to be the hierarchical organisation of authority, nothwithstanding it was the growth of a society of equals, but equality could never have brought forth despotism but co-operation." Under the feudal-system, the lord or the feud had obligations, the sys- tem in its essence is of reciprocal services, the feudal lord only held the land and possessed a claim on the labour of the serfs on condition of doing suit and service to his superiors and lending aid to his dependants. In return for these services of military character, the tillers of the soil had to render services of a pro- ductive character, in the shape of a portion of land and tillage. The lon- ger this state of things prevailed, the more unfitted became the cultivators to take up arms and defend them- selves, while on the other hand, the more powerful and offensive became the chief and his military band. Ultimately, what had been first a voluntary and mutual arrangement became an imposition; the formerly free and independant cultivators were converted into dependants upon their former freely-elected chief, now a feudal lord, to whom they had to ren- der compulsory services, and to whose estate they were bound. That is one way in which the feudal-sys- tem arose. It arose also directly through con- quest, the conqueror either posing himself as a feudal lord or one of his fighting band or permitting the chief of the conquered community to be a lord dependant upon and ersponsible to the conqueror. The feudal labourer or serf, like the chattel-slave, in the liomaii period, was not free. But he was not bought and sold like the chattel-slave, he was bound to the soil, part and parcel of the estate upon which he was born. There was a division in the work- ing day of the labourer, that is, the feudal labourer. Like the slave, the serf received no wages. He had, however, in common with the slave a share in the product, a share be it noted in his product. As far as we can see the feudal- system had its origin in village col- lectivities, these village collectivities were always quarrelling with each other, and the consequence was that every village elected a village chief or a chieftain to defend them. The chieftain's dwelling-house was considered a shelter in time of dan- ger, and the members applied them- selves to repair it and to fortify it, also to build walls and dig trenches around it. An important point to note is that originally the function of the chief was subsidiary to the social group. This function in its judicial character was made necessary by the development of agriculture, and by the increasingly more complete rela- tions within which agriculture was carried on. The function of the chief in its military character was made necessary by the condition and the need of the agriculturists for protec- tion against the different bands that roamed throughout the country. The greater the need for protection the more important the chief, and the more easily was the latter permitted, with the assistance of armed men, to transform himself into a feudal lord, and the agriculturists into villeins. After summing up, the feudal-sys- tem was this: It was rural, based upon tillage of the soil; property takes the form of real estate; indus- try was overwhelmingly agriculture; form of exploitation—services in labour and kind, commuted later into money payments; and the oganization of feudalism was military. Such were the conditions prior to the Norman Conquest.

The Relation of Religion to…

CUT OFF BY FIRE AT SWANSEA.

LLANDILO RAILWAYMEN'S NEWI…

Amman Valley Schools.I

BOYS CHARGED WITH STEALING…

[No title]

Tit-Bits and Rare-Bits of…