Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

8 articles on this Page

BRECON BOROUGH TRIBUNAL.

News
Cite
Share

BRECON BOROUGH TRIBUNAL. Absolute Certificates Withdrawn. There was a large audience at the weekly Viecting of the Brecon Borough Tribunal held on Thursday night at the Council Chamber, when the Military Representative applied for a review of the certificates of exemption granted to several single men. In all the cases the Tribunal withdrew the certificate and substituted temporary exemption. The Mayor (Mr G. T. Jones) presided and Other members of the Tribunal present were Alderman E. A. Wright (who did not sit in all the cases), Messrs James Morgan, Edwin Da vies and John Da vies. Mr C. W. Best was the military representative. The Clerk (Mr G. Hyatt Williams) at the outset, asked Mr Best to explain to the Tribunal why he asked for a review of the eases. Mr Best said they would find in the book OB the administration of the Act that it was open to the Military Representative to apply for a withdrawal or variation of a certificate of exemption, and he was there that evening with the full support of the Advisory Com- mittee. The whole of the cases in question were in respect of single men in certified occupations, but the Tribunal were aware of the fact that being in a certified occupation was not of itself sufficient ground for exemption. Prima facie it was, but it was open to the Military Representative to ask the Tribunal to consider whether it was necessary in the national interest that the men should continue in those occupations. It was for that reason that those cases were brought before them. As they were aware the married men were being called up and it was in the judgment of his committee manifestly unfair that any single man should be left out without having his case considered. The Chairman said that was quite sufficient and satisfactory and they would take the cases singly and then retire to consider each case. A SHOEMAKER'S CASE. In the case in which Mr S. Garratt had successfully applied on behalf of Augustus Brookes, a shoe maker, Mr Best said there was a married man working on the premises and four boys, and the proprietor himself was a practical man and quite able to do the work if necessary. Under the circumstances, and having regard to the need of the nation, he maintained that it was no longer necessary that this man should be retained is the occupation. There were plenty of other repairers in the town and there would be no difficulty as regards the needs of the place, even if it was necessary to distribute the work. Questioned by Mr Best, Brookes said he attested in November and he had the intention of serving when he did so. What holds you back ?-I have been doigg my duty in civil life for my employer. M r Garratt said he appealed in the first place because they were doing military work: the man he was also in a reserved occupation. Brookes was the only practical man he had except the manager, who attended to other duties. He was also teaching the boys and it was impossible to get other men to fill vacancies in the boot trade. He thought his man was doing more useful work with him than if he was at the front. Mr Best What military work do you do ?—Regular work for the Yeomanry and some special work for the Barracks: and this is the only practical man I have to do it. Two of my men have joined the Army. I have a contract with the Yeomanry to do the work of repairing the boots. Mr Best You have another attested man in the trade ?—Yes. And the other attested man who is married intends appealing ?—Yes. And' therefore it is a question between this man and your manager ?—Yes. A BUTCHER'S ASSISTANT. The next case reviewed was that in which Messrs Elston and Co., butchers, had been successful in gaining an exemption for an assistant named Mitchell. Mr Best (to Mitchell) When did you attest ?-In December. And you attested with the view of serving in the Army ?—1 thought I was indispen- sable to my master's business. You were not aware at the time that a slaughterer would be in a reserved occupation ?-I did not know at the time. You are willing to go now if your master can let you ?-Ob, yes. Mr T. Elston spoke of the work which was carried out at the shop and the inconvenience which would be caused if the man was taken away. They as a family bad made some sacrifices and his brother, who managed the business, was now serving abroad. This man was the only practical or skilled man they had on the premises and as he (the speaker) had to do more of the W' management of the business now it would 'be very awkward if the man were taken away. He left the matter entirely in the hands of the Tribunal. If the Tribunal thought that the man was more useful in the army he asked them to give as much time as possible before he was called up till after the May fair possible. Mr Best said he was quite willing to consent to a temporary exemption to the extent. A MILK VENDOR. In the case of Cyril William Bufton, milk vendor, who had been placed in a reserved occupation. Mr Best said there was a younger brother at home who was under 19 years of age, and it was thought that there was no necessity for two men to be kept there. On the previous occasion Mr Bufton, sen. told them that he was employed by the Tredegar Estate and did no work on the farm. He (Mr Best) now understood that Mr Bufton was only a part time man on the Estate. In reply to Mr Best, Mr Bufton said he did no work on the farm and the boys had to look after the dairy work, which was regular work be could not attend to. Questioned by Mr Best. Cyril Wm. Bufton said he attested in January last. Did you attest with the intention of serving ?—With the intention of appealing. Mr Best You are one of those who wanted to be patriotic on the cheap. (Laughter). Mr Edwin Davies (a member of the Tribunal) asked Mr Best if he had any returns that he could place before them of the men in the different trades in Brecon who had joined the army.

Advertising

Advertising

CLYDACH.

Advertising

ISCHOOL MEDICAL INSPECTION.

Advertising

BRECON BOROUGH TRIBUNAL.