Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

8 articles on this Page

BOROUGH PETTY SESSIONS. S

News
Cite
Share

BOROUGH PETTY SESSIONS. Mon pay.—Before the Mayor (Dr. Eytou-Jones), and T. C. Jones, KSIj. ¡:XTEXSJ lOX OF HOClèS. Mr Lovatt, of the Old Swan, Abbot-street, applied for an extension of hours to half-past twelve on the occasion of his annual dinner, in celebration of the festival of the Patron Saint of Wales.—• Granted. ITBLlc NUISANCES. Alfred Rogers, residing at 11, Pictoh-torraco, Tut tie-street, was charged by Mr David Hag-gins, Inspector of Nuisancer, with having permitted a nuisance to exist on his premises. The Inspector stated that on the 11th of February he visited the house, and. in a yard only 10 feet by 11 feet, he found a donkey, which was kept there. There was no stable, or even a cover for ? shelter, while a considerable portion of this limited 1 yard was occupied by a privy and ftshpit. In order £ to cet to the yard, the donkey had to pass through l two rooms in the house, and a nuisance was a thereby created. The proper notice, served on the 11th of February, had not been attended to. The defendant admitted the charge, and excused C liiuiself by stating that he eould not obtain a more v suitable place immediately. e Edward Mitchell, residing at No. 1.1, in the saur- t terrace, was charged by the inspector with 1. f cis-Ty similar offence. Ihe yard was in;^ 3tate> r and in each case a nuisance w created. alike j injurious to the inmates the honsesancl the neighbours, and to the public heaLt'n proper had been served on the Litb of Febnmry, but they had not been attended to The defendant said he could not find another place ill in a moment." The donke** jiad been removed f", premises in the Beast ? market, and brought again to be fed. Defer^ant had kept tlu" 'bnkey in his yard about five y .ars. The Inspect" womd llot recommend Mitchell to keep his doi'Mv in place ra the Beast Market he had named, although larger than trs own premises, it was The Mayor • ,r.id that in 1875 an Act of l'avlia- ment had passed for putting an end to nuisances, r,} this and other descriptions. The Cor- poration 'had appointed a paid inspector, and are bor_.ua to carry out the provisions ot the Act. These and all other nuisances injurious to the public health must be removed. In the cases before the court, each defendant would be allowed. a fortnight in which to remove what was complained of. If, at the termination of that period, they failed to do ;o they would be further treated according to law.. Disease always followed filth, and it was to prevent t his that the Act had been passed. Ea ch defendant would now have to pay 8s 6d costs. REMARKABLE BOOS. Cttlierine L-dwick was charged by Mary Hum- phreys with having used abusive language, towards )UComplainant^saiS" that the defendant brought home a bit of beef for her husband s dinner. 1 hey ln.lu-od in her house. Complainant s little dog i +n rret hold of the beef, carry it off. and managed to get u"'11 J ate it The defendant then became violent and abusive called her fttil names, and threatened to peiso- the do-. Instead of giving the nmirnl a good thrashing, which she was welcome to do. A day or two subsequently the little dog fell down dead in the street. The defendant said the complainant was most abusive to her, and used language (which she repeated) that is not fit for ears polite. The com- plainant had two dogs, and they were regular poachers, both in the fields and in the house, for in the latter they would actually steal the meat out of the pot, while on the fire, in boiling water (a laugh). The "ladies" would have fought their battle over again in court, but they were cut short, told they were six of one and half a dozen the other, and the case was dismissed. DltUNK AND DISORDERLY.—UNFOUNDED CHARGE AGAINST THE POLICE. Mary Huxley, a married woman, residing at Pentrefelin, was charged by Police-constable E. G. Jones with having been drunk and very disorderly on Saturday night week, at Pentrefelin. The officer remonstrated with her, and advised her several times to go home quietly, when she became outrageously violent, made use of very bad language, defied the police, and said she neither cared for them nor the magistrates. She was con- sequently locked up. The case was adjourned from the preceding Monday for the production of wit- nesses on either side, the defendant having stated that the officer struck her on the nose and caused blood to flow. The defendant said that her husband had been illtreating her in her house, and that was her reason for declining to go home. She was not drunk, although she might have been excited. She re- peated that the officer, while taking her to the lock-up, struck her on the nose, which bled con- siderably. Police-constable Robert Jones said he was present. The defendant was very violent, in fact she was like a mad woman. No one struck the defendant; of that he was quite sure. A female witness, on the part of the defendant, said she had seen the officer strike the woman on the nose, which bled. Defendant did not appear to her to be drunk. By the Bench: Supposing the defendant had been struck, as stated, do you believe it was done intentionally or accidentally, while taking her to bridewell ? Witness: The woman was crying a good deal; she was not too noisy (a laugh). [The witness fenced giving an answer to the direct question from the Bench]. The Chairman said it had been satisfactorily proved that the defendant had been violent and disorderly. If the woman had been struck as stated, it was in all probability unintentional on the part of the officer while conveying a disorderly person to bridewell. There surely would have been no occasion for two strong men to illuse a woman of the defendant's size. If her husband had ill-used her, she had her remedy by summoning him. She would be fined Is., and costs 4s. Gd., or in default, seven days. REFUSING TO QUIT. Jatues Connor, of the Moss, was charged by Bridewell-keeper Thomas Vaughan with having refused to leave Mr Edwards' vaults, Hope-street. on Saturday night, having been repeatedly requested to do so. The officer stated that he had been sent for by the barman. He found the defendant there in- toxicated, and persisting in drinking other people's beer. He requested him to leave several times, in vain. The defendant took hold of the officer by the collar, said he should "like to wrestle with bobby, and tried to throw him down. He was a strong man, but he did not succeed in his efforts. and was ultimately ejected and locked up. The barman had gone out of town that morning, and there were no witnesses. The Bench wen- "f opinion that in such cases the barman or s:>tr,< connected with the estab- lishment should be in attendance to give corrobora- tive evidence. The defendant, while not denying the charge, took the cue from the magistrates' remarks, and said there was not sufficient evidence to convict him. The Chairman, however, said the court would endeavour to teach these gentlemen who come to Wrexham from the Moss" that they could not in- dulge in such conduct with impunity. He had rendered himself liable to a penalty of £5. He would be fined and costs; and, in default, one month's imprisonment in Ruthin gaol. He was removed in custody. DRUNK AND DISORDERLY.—ASSAULTING THE POLICE. George Williams, a powerful man, who said he worked at the Moss Colliery, was brought up under the following circumstances :— Police-constable R. Davies said about ten o'clock on Saturday night he was on duty in Hope-street. The defendant, was there drunk and creating a disturbance. He went over to the hot potatoe machine and endeavoured to upset it. A large: crowd collected. The officer endeavoured to get him away by persuasion, but in vain. The defen- dant struck the officer in the face, and scratched him, inflicting the bruises and marks apparent on his face. Assistance came, and ultimately the man ■ was carried to the police-station, thence to b.ride- well, and locked up. Police-sergeant Lindsay went to Davies's assist- ance; two men got hold of the defendant beneath the arms; Mr Weaver, who was passing at the time, took hold of one of the man's feet; and while the Sergeant was stooping to get hold of the other, the defendat tricll to kick him in the face, and took the skin off his upper lip; and it. was a narrow escape that he was not seriously hurt—probably his teeth might have been knocked out of his mouth, and his face severely injured. The defendant said Police-constable Davies struck him over the head with his staff, inflicting a wound which bled a good deal. Police-constable Davies: I had no staff in my possession and I did not strike you. The officers stated that no more violence was resorted to than was absolutely necessary to carry the man to the station. Inspector Wilde said the defendant had been j twice previously fined-l Os in Wrexham, for being drunk and disorderly and £1 for assaulting the police at Ruabon. The Chairman said that he appeared to be an old offender, and sent him to Ruthin gaol for two months' hard labour, without the option of a fine. TRANSFER OF LICENSE. The Hat Inn Beast Market, from Mr John Rowland to Mr John Williams, lately landlord of the Britannia Inn, Bronygarth, Shropshire.

'---/ WREXHAM TOWN COUNCIL.…

-------------DENBIGHSHIRE…

-----CORN MARKETS.

THE CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT BANK.

VACCINATION.

! TRACTION ENGINES AND PUBLIC…

; THE PROVINCIAL INSTANCE…