Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

NEW SERIES.

News
Cite
Share

NEW SERIES. ited by the R*V. FRANCIS SANDERS. M.A., and Mr. WILLTAM FKKGITSSON IRVINE.] Local Gleanings, Historical and Antiquarian bating to Cheshire, Chester and North, Wales, from many scattered fields. C let me teach yon how to knit again, This scattered corn into "lIe mutual Sheaf. Titus Androut-cus. Act Vr., fc-cene 3, Line 70. ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. 13Q2] COTTON LETTERS. (Combermere M.S.S.) (Continued from No. 293.) [Arr. Brereton to Sir Robert or Thomas Cotton, Sept ye 3rd, 1708. > J wish we could be assured as to ye Lane by ye *1tack tho bounded by ye Coppyhold yt it be not S^cell of ye wast belonging to ye freeholdrs of j^'enbury cu ffrith tho to me according to its nothing is plainer yn yt its [i.e., it isl of Newhall Ldship. but Its [i.e., it is] good •&E satisfied in ye plainest matters. had some discourse of ye waterco[u]rse by find Hassall is a proud sawcy lyeing & spite- A fellow & deserves to be humbled, but those '"TEA are extremaly Chargable. Mr. Savage has «°mised to get me wt evidence he can to prove it Auncient watering place [for cattle] and yn if »011 please I desire he shall hear from me who *01 Sr Your most obliged humble Servt UBEARDME BRERETON. Pparently a note by Thos. Cotton to Mr. Brereton.] ?4..r. James Baily (1), Mr. Wilson (2), Henry vJ°olrich (3), Tho Woolrich (4), Mr. Larden (5), Sr- Caldecutt (6), Mr. Wickstead (7), yourself (8), iXf- Starkey (9), and John Sproston (10) [are] ^"arterers in Wrenbury cum ffrith. ■A-Unciently Sr. John Wrenburys whose Ishue ^8 failing, by a Daughter & heire match'd to pother family which failed also ye males, so 3 %ighters were Coheires, one marri'd Starkey, father Minshull of Erdeswicke & and ye 3d jjjiird, to Newton of pownall all whose heires sold Prticular persons as Mr. Wilsons, Coll Massies r^estors, one Wade, & others. My Grandffathr ye remainder of Minshulls, & my ffather uke from Newtons from their Heires. So if were any Royalty (which never appeared) 2+v. darkey can only claim a 3d [ third] part & my ther ye other two. [Sir Robt. Cotton to Thomas Cotton •K Septembr ye 7th 1708. Son< N' discourse you lately had with J: S: [John WVAGE] of Mr. Starkey's being reputed Lord of II Reubury recalls to my remembrance a Complaint was made [to] Sr Tho: Main waring [of JJ^DILEYJ who gave me notice of it, to ye end I JRJFJHT Joyne with him in restoreing an auncient I20F woman who lived in a Cottage on ye wast in FT^BURY ffrith (as I take it) not far from John J*°LBORN'8. Her complaint was against one Wade to EEholder near yt Cottage, who had taken V^EBLE possion of ye sd Cottage of which she was TFEABLY possessed of, & kept her out by force. G^PON this a Warrant was sent to ye Sheriffe to a Jury before Sr Thos. Mainwaring and me, TRF IU Cognisance of the same, & make return TAN* R verdict as ye Law directs. Accordingly I TO Wrenbury at the time appointed & found to Wrenbury at the time appointed & found JURY or many of them there, but Sr was gone to view ye Cottage, which that ound locked up, & none in ye house answered to open ye door; of which Sr gave me notice att his coming into (?C^ETTS house in Wrenbury the place apointed, INYE Sheriffe & Jury to appear; which accord- Y they did; & ye Sheriffe made returne of ye &c. After some discourse Sr Thomas W^PER'D me in ye eare & told me he believed would send ye key, being advised yt if he Of Y d to abide ye extremity of ye Law, it would be )ttllch charge & trouble to him, besides his being ■JI0UT of possession, & ye poor Woman restored, dureing all these transactions there was not TO^ENTION of Mr. Starkeys haveing any pretence Cottage, or Intack, or any other Royaltie in wnbury, tho' as I remember he was presente. JJ; or his ancestor purchased from some of ye LLS- 1 took ye oath of a Justice in Cheshire TL.,UT 47 years agoe: this was some years after, ^OT many; so that I fancy JO: Savage may W^^BER something of it, at least by report; he fe) t allwayes enquisitive, tho' you knowe his trimiag way. e) Trimming, that is time-serving. The word was then a new word. George Savile, marquis who died in 1695, is said to have I V°ii.ned the word trimmer. » IEVE YE Coppyholders wth ye ^freeholders M may have time out of mind Inter Comoned OER.5 BUT I take the soyle of ye lane between MW °Pie-holde to be in Newhall Lordship & 0116 SIDE is copyhold the other ffrehold, I BETTOR VE ye middle of ye lane to be ye boundarie Th?eMhem. ttel:' s all writt before ye post brought yor Pl'el\ll Wlth Mr. Breretons, whose letter to me I seen. I pray give my thanks to ^e.t°n for his care in enforming himself in & oo .lree> and desire him to continue his care tart-08,8*011 offers. I approve of ye motion Mr. taakes to have these differences JHAU by a reference, as Mr. Brereton mentions, & Vnr,agree to refer my concern to Mr. Maisterson a Earned Gentlem & Councillor at Law of rePutation in all respects & a Neighbour to l>t0J^lrties concerned, who[m] I desire you, at a iijjj .time, to moove, to take yt trouble^ upon I very affectionate respects to him. ^r0rn^ume Mr. Starkey will discover his Charter Aing Charles ye 2nd, if he have any such, as U^i* ^rereton mentions which may reduce ye ffs in dispute to a narrower Compass between fink r- ffletcher says my Ld Cholmondeley has a I? final] grant of like nature but I will not tijj, 6 you any more on this occasion at this leaving this to your consideration yo UfF- ?. concerned as well as I who am yor E°tionate ffather, JI EOBT. COTTON. > Tho. Cotton, Esqr (O Pray communicate ys to Mr. Brereton & what tie did Wade set up ? [Sir Robt. Cotton to Thomas Cotton, Esq. Undated but probably between the 7th and 11th Sept., 1708.] [Dear Son,] As to what I write of wades forcible entry, there was no dispute of Title, only complaint before Sr. Tho. Mainwaring and me as Magestrates, llt old Mr. Starkey [i.e. Arthur Starkey] was RESENT, & made no pretence to any title [to thai G°ttage nor any Eoyaltie in Wrenbury, this RJJ^AKE of my own Knowledge in answer to John ^AGE, who said he was reputed Lrd. of Wrenbury out of mind, had such an entry been made on waste in Newhall or Wrenbury in my R^ENEE, do you think yt. I or any man would not taken notice of it, & as to any Cottagrs. or I take them Generally, to be in ye lderacie with Mr. Starkey, they paying 6d. or F&F A YEARE for an Intack or house worth a noble ST,- 8d.] OR 10s. a yeare, & their wives as Mr. «EY contrived it to have 2 or £ 3 out of INQP.°ORE Dole, So yt. I take it, the being too <WNL8itive among them is but ffishing for Evi- TAV^ST my selfe, but if they tell you false J?AV V ENcloseing or erecting any Cottage they ^^ID disproved by neighbours &ct and their may Invali/de. but I leave this to your ERation on further advice, but I am still of (jba.l'n Yt he has no title—neither from King N°R nobody Else. # and my wives Blessing to yo and my ^DA F** & ye Children with Bobb & Catties Duty ► T0QL Y°UR affectionate ffather ■S.I T F EOBEKT COTTON. AS A ancie Croxton may be as likely to tell you ,^OSE encroachers of ye wast if you A °QI M>6 OL111 FULLY, before be have his lesson • Mr. Brereton will do well °f ^HEATHER Mr. Starkey has any thoughts STIORT E^RENCE. I WOuld have you only take a N of wt any of them say's for a lnto ^OME which may bring other things tnetnor elUory which may likewise help my y. (To be continued.) W03T1 NOTES. A STRANGE LEGEND OF A LANCASHIRE H -7 CHURCH. 0 Y?>&T8 ago when riding from Rufford ^FNSKIRK, to Aintree, I heard a curious 1 fancy of a character not altogether ?«UTCJ,ILUO,RITNON) touching the old chapel or I.0' Aughton (pron. 'Afton'),by Orms- EIJJI. ^AS not more than ordinarily interested ,LAITIES and folk-lore, at that time—MY rather vigorous exercise—so did not VFUTICULAR attention to the tradition, but a good old Eoman Catholic joke. I £ SelVLTHAT> on some very ancient day, the during its construction was for some 0LLStantly pulled down over night, by the t'lt ntil, of course, at last some divine 1ttll- lOn caused its erection on a neighbouring should perhaps say in a valley ?—the THEID^'SPOSE^ of, in Rome romantic manner, ^'0US P"iest. It occurs to xne that ?WTE?S 'HOLLY; of Liverpool, could give a ^:CEOUNT of this altogether uncanny S8? T. H. 8to egend here related is closely allied to ^TERN0,RY of TLIE Winwick pig.' On the :tI.a.t' ■UR wll of THE tower of Winwick Church, is still to be seen a small P'I.l'ishf of A plg. The legend IS that the THE FLFTF°1NERS to build the Church down on SAJAND' but as fast as they built it by SPAI^+? pulled it down by night, until in commenced in an altogether new {KPFEDAT- ^°P THE hill, wlien the nightly I I J°?8 CEASed, and the pig has ever since in special reverence by the inhabi- tants. Both Aughton and Winwick were in the original diocese of Chester, so they may quite properly be referred to in the Cheshire Sheaf. Another tradition gives the origin of the name as from a bird (a Pewit' or Jewit') which flew over the place all the time the church was being built, crying Win-wick, Win-wick' Tue-up, tue-o, a merry note, whilst Joan doth keel the greasy pot'! THE EDITORS. [304] THE NAME OF PARKGATE. (See Nos. 170, 204, 255, and 280.) I always understood, from one of the seven- teenth century maps I think, that a 'New Quay' of Elizabeth's day formed part of the site of Park Gate, and it was afterwards named, Park- gate—' all on one side, like Par' Gate,' as for ages they called it. Probably the Park Gate or Park Yate, was a local name long before the New Quay was ever thought of. I forget whether there is any evidence in the neigh- bourhood of a Royal Chase, Warren, or Park (such as evidently Peckforton once was). Long before this century Park Gate was of course a famous bathing place. I suspect it became 'popular,'as such, centuries before that. In the last century up to about 1779, 1 know it was, from some amusing letters I once saw of a direct predecessor of my own, who for many years used to sojourn there every season; while about the year 1759 his in- tended wife, in company with several other spinster ladies, were walking together far out on the sands—perhaps with the intention of crossing to Flint!—when they were suddenly surrounded by the incoming tide, and would certainly have been drowned bad they not been rescued by the last Mr. Starkey of Wrenbury- whose death about the beginning of this century extinguished that ancient branch of the Starkeys of Stretton. It used to be a regular exercise to walk the sands to the Welsh side, at low water; and I believe many people, every century, lost their lives in the attempt. With reference to Note No. 280. Towards the middle of last century it took 4 or 5 hours to ride from Frodsham to Parkgate and in driving a pair it took 6 from Kingsley. On occasions it took 8 hours; and 5 or 6 from Helsby to reach Chester in the autumn, or winter ? T. H. [305] BIDSTON IN 1785. In an advertisement of a performance at the Theatre Royal, Manchester, which appeared in Harrop's Manchester Mercury for Tuesday, March 1, 1785, the following occurs. To conclude with an exact Representation of the Vessels coming round the Rock [of] Bidstone Lighthouse.—The Ceremony of the 11 y Signals.—A View of the Fort and River Mersey.—With the landing of Harlequin at Liverpool.—Yrs. X. [306] BELFRY RHYME AT DARESBURY. I think the following curious specimen of belfry rhymes is worthy of preservation in your interesting and valuable notes published weekly in the Courant. It takes the form of an acrostic of the ancient Cheshire Church of Daresbury. D are not to come into this sacred place A 11 you good ringers but in awfull grace R ing not with hat, nor spurs, nor insolence E ach one that for every such offence S hall forfeit hat, or spur, or twelve pence B ut who disturbs a peel, the same offender U nto the box his sixpence down shall tender. Rules such no doubt in every church are used Y ou and your bells that may not be absused. PETER PAWSON, 1. Wardens, JOHN OXELL, 5 1730. W.L. QUERY. [307] THE BELLS OF CHESTER CATHEDRAL. I would like to ask if there are any inscrip- tions on the new bells of Chester Cathedral, if so, what they are and the weight of the tenor ? Also the number of the bells. W. L. Birkenhead. [308] PARISH REGISTERS OF ST. OSWALD'S, CHESTER. 1620. John Teylierand Elizabeth Worrall, April 16 John Harsom (?) and Anne Thewlyn, April U3 Nicholas Welsby and Jane Andros, April 23 Evan Jones and Mary Sutton, May 1 James Shurlocke and Anne Halliwell, June 17 Harry Wartonne and Margaret Wettnall, June 24 William Lea and Elyzabeth Fletcher, July 18 Hugh Probyn and Anne Percie, July 29 William Charles and Dority Brooks, Nov. 2 Thomas Bennet and Elizabeth Williams, Dec. 2 Edward Style and Blanch Bell, Jan 9 John Jackson and Anne Gruffyth, Feb. 4 Jacob Carter and Jane Fasakerley, Feb. 13 Richard Rabon and [ J, Mar. 15

ond (ioiicniment ottings-

! DISTRICT AND PARISH COUNCILS.

Advertising

TERRIBLE SHIPPING DISASTER.…

CHOLMONDELEY.

. MALPAS.

. CLOTTON.

TARPORLEY.

Advertising

LITTLE BUD WORTH.

. NANTWICH.

GRESFORD.

EASTHAN.

. HELSBY.

. TARVIN.

| NORTHOP.

. ELLESMERE PORT.

«. FRODSHAM.

- NESTON.

Advertising