Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

13 articles on this Page

Burning Tragedy at Rhyl.

News
Cite
Share

Burning Tragedy at Rhyl. ANOTHER FLANNELETTE VICTIM. WOIIAN" BRAVERY COMMENDED WHERE FIRE CUARDS ARE A RARITY. Another distressing tragedy, necessitating the holding of a fourth inquest in the district within a week, occurred at Rhyl last Friday, when William Morgan, the five-year-old son of Mr John Morgan, carter, 28 Ernest Street, succumbed to a burning accident. The child, it appears, came downstairs at about 8 a m. in a flannelette nightshirt, and was having his breakfast in the charge of his eight-year-old sister, Sarah Ellen, when his mother went out to do some shopping. Soon after Mrs Morgan had gone out the little girl went upstairs and in her absence the little boy's nightshirt in some way or other caught fire. Hearing her brother's screams, the girl hurried downstairs and both rushed into the yard to a neighbour's. The wind made matters worse for the little boy, but notwithstanding his being enveloped in flames he was pluckily seized by Mrs Parry, 24 Ernest Street, who at great risk to herself pulled off the burning clothing and afterwards dressed the child's injuries with sweet oil. The case was regarded as a very grave one from the first, and the child died a few hour s after his admittance to the Royal Alexandra Hospital, where he was attended by Dr G F R Smith. An inquest in connection with the sad occurrence was held by Mr J Roberts Jones, deputy coroner for Flintshire, in the Rhyl Council Chamber on Saturday afternoon, when some pathetic circumstances were disclosed. The proceedings were watched by Inspector James. N.S.P.C.C. The jury consisted of Messrs Fred Wallis (foreman), E Angel, T R Williams, Edward Morris, C F Wilders, Ernest Jones, T Wills Jones, Percy Johnson, F Goldstraw, H Francis, Richard Jones, E B Bellis, Thomas Lewis, Zachariah Price, F J Teviotdale, and P L Chilwell. Evidence of identification was given by P. S. Patrick Dempsey, neither of the parents of the child having seen the body since death. The little girl Sarah Ellen Morgan, the eight-yeaf-old sister of deceased, was called, in the hope that she might be able to throw some light upon the accident. But although inter- rogated by the Coroner in both English and Welsh, she did not appear to appreciate the situation, and seemed too shy to answer any question. Mrs Ellen Parry, 24 Ernest Street, stated that at about 9 10 on Friday morning she saw deceased running towards the back door of her house all in flames and screaming 44 Ellen Parry Ellen Parry I" He was followed by his sister Sarah Ellen, but the latter seemed very con- fused with regard to what had happened. Witness tore off what remained of the little boy's burning clothes, and in so doing burnt her fingers. She then applied sweet oil to the child's body, that being the only thing nearest to her which was likely to give the child any relief. The Coroner—I don't think you could have got a better thing. Witness, continuing, said she used a pint of oil on the child's body. He did not scream or make any complaint at all after the flames had been extinguished. All that he said was to ask witness for a banana which she had promised him the night before. He seemed quite unconscious of any pain. Recognising the seriousness of the case, witness sent for the child's father, who bad gone to his work, and Dr Smith was also sent for. Having wrapped the child in a blanket, she carried him to his home, and from there he was taken to the Royal Alexandra Hospital. When she saw deceased in flames all that he appeared to have on was a flannelette nightgown, as though he had just come from bed. She understood that he had fallen in some water the night before, and that he had been kept in bed a little longer because his clothes were not ready for him. When she took the child home she found hardly any fire in the kitchen. There was no guard before the fire, although the child's parents had previously had one. There was just a low fender and an iron stool in front of the fire. A juror (Captain Wilders) asked witness whether she could give them any idea as to how the child was set on fire. Witness replied that she thought that deceased on coming downstairs went and stood with his back to the fire, as he was very fond of doing. The Coroner-You have seen him doing that, have you ? Witness-Yes. Evidence was next given by the deceased child's mother, who appeared with an infant in her arms and seemed very distressed. She stated that on leaving home to do some shop- ping at about nine o'clock on Friday morning she left deceased, who was five years of age in March last, and his sister Sarah Ellen, aged eight years, having their breakfast in the kitchen. The kitchen fire at the time was very dull-there was hardly any at all, as it was not witness' practice to have big fires at any time. She had never seen deceased playing with fire or matches. His life was not insured. On Thursday night he fell into some water, with the result that he had to stay in bed longer than usual on Friday uutil she got his clothes ready for him again. She bad not time to dress him before she went out, and as he had begged not to be sent to school, he sat at breakfast in a flannelette nightgown. She had not been away ten minutes when she heard about the child being on fire, and she would have gone to him at once, but owing to her excitement and distress at hearing the news she was detained in a shop for ten or fifteen minutes. On her arrival at home she found deceased pillowed on two chairs, his burns having by that time been dressed by the last witness. Deceased was able to call her "mam and to speak about his father, but he did not eay how his nightgown caught fire, and she could not think how it happened. =A juror (Mr Johnson)—Was it not an elder brother's nightshirt that the child was wear- ing ? Witness—Yes, but although it was rather too big for him he could walk in it all right. Further questioned by the same juror, witness replied that she left deceased and hia sister Sarah Ellen at the kitchen table and not by the fireside. She had not head that either of the children poked the fire, or that a cinder fell on to deceased's nightshirt. The Coroner-Do you know that there is a law with regard to fireguards ? Witness-We had a fireguard some years ago, but the children are growing up now. The Coroner—That is not answoring my question. Witness—The children are getting big now. The Coroner—Do you know that there is a law requiring you to provide a fireguard to pro- tect your children from fire 1 Witness Yes. Dr G F R Smith stated that he received information with regard to the accident at about 9-30 on Friday morning, and at once cycled to 28 Ernest Street, where he found that very efficient first aid had been rendered by Mrs Ellen Parry. He ordered the child's removal to the Royal Alexandra Hospital, and there he found that the whole body, back and front, was burnt. The groin and the inner sides of both thighs and the outer sides of both arms, and especially the hands, were scorched. Despite every attention obtainable in the hospital, the child died from shock at about 2-30 on Friday afternoon. Witness added that he was surprised that there were not more cases of that kind in Rhyl. It was a rarity to find a fireguard on the other side of the railway. The foreman of the jury-Is it the duty of the police or the inspector of the N.S.P.O.C. to see that fireguards are provided ? The Ceroner—That is not a matter for the witness. I will tell you later on what I can on that point. Sergeant Dempsey, in answer to a question, said that, from what he was able to gather from the little girl present in court, she was upstairs when the accident happened and rushed down on hearing her brother's screams. When she went upstairs he was sitting on a low stool by the fire. The Coroner, in summing up the evidence, said they had again to reckon with that dan- gerous material flannelette, but there was nothing in the evidence before them to show that there was any criminal neglect on the part of the child's parents. A part of the Children Act provided for heavy penalties in cases where life was endangered or lost, and if the parents in this case had bioken the law another court would deal with the matter. The evidence clearly pointed to accidental death from burning, but it was open to the jury to add a rider to their verdict calling the attention of the police to the matter. He had been very much impressed by the way in which Mrs Parry had given her evidence (hear, hear). The doctor had testified that the aid she rendered was per- fectly efficient, and he thought she deserved great commendation (hear, hear). The jury, after a few moments' private deliberation, returned a verdict of death from shock caused by accidental burning. At the same time they wished to compliment Mrs Parry upon what she had done in connection with the sad affair. The Coroner, calling Mra Parry forward, said he heartily endorsed the jury's reference to her services, and on behalf of the court and the town he thanked her. Mrs Parry briefly acknowledged the tribute,

Wild Flowers of the Rhyl District.

The Question of Health.

Advertising

Women's Gossip.

[No title]

Advertising

---Some Details of the Chester…

Wishing.

Holywell.

Advertising

,Denbighshire QuarterI ISessions.1

The Question of Health.