Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

27 articles on this Page

Trounces Lord Rosebery.

News
Cite
Share

Trounces Lord Rosebery. PEER QUOTED AGAINST HIMSELF. CHALLENGE TO THE TORIES. Great Enthusiasm at Glasgow. Mr Lloyd George's visit to Glasgow on Mon- day evoked, demonstrative enthusiasm in the northern city. lie addressed two great meet- ings, and amongst hia points were the foUow- ing:- Poor old Tariff Reform, with its work for all, has been packed upstairs to the nursery.1 because one or two of the new arrivals in the Tory Household cannot stand its childish prattle. Bel erring to Lord Rosebery's remark that if the Liberal majority was reduced by five the Liberals could not proceed with the Veto Bill, the Chancellor asked Is it not time this sort of insolence was put an end to?" Xord Rosebery, in 1894, at Devonport, advo- cated the very proposals the Government are now submitting to the country's judg- ment. 2$0 responsible person on the Tory side had proposed to abolish the hereditary prin- ciple. They had merely proposed to reduce the number of hereditary Peers. Lord Rosebery knew perfectly well that Lord Lansdowne had never proposed to abolish the hereditary principle. JSe challenged Lord Rosebery to point out a single proposal emanating either from him or from Lord Lansdowne, or from Mr Balfour, that would give the Liberal party a majority in a reformed Second Chamber. Liberalism up to the present has been able to encounter all its difficulties and overcome them by securing the combination of all who suiier wrong in every quarter. It is the only hope of Liberalism. Let the people of every class rope themselves together, and they will be able to march through the avalanche of vested interest right up to the summit of justice. Tariff Reform Packed Upstairs. Forbotb of themeetings which the Chancellor addressed a limited number of tickets were issued to ladies, but every precaution was taken to prevent suffragettes from gaining admission. The St. Andrew's Hall, which holds 6,000, was the first place of meeting, and here all the seats were occupied quite an hour prior to the opening of the proceedings. When Mr Lloyd George appeared on the platform in company of the chairman (Prof. A. F. Murison, of London) the whole audience rose and cheered again and again, afterwards utnging For he's a jolly good fellow." The Chairman intimated that a message had 'been received from high quarters requesting them not to allow Mr Lloyd George, in his enthusiasm for the public welfare, to overtax himself. The Chancellor of the Exchequer said he had come there under some difficulty, because he regarded this as one of the most momentous elections in the history of the democracy, to 'whose cause be had devoted his life. What were the issues ? Not Tariff Reform. (Laugh- ter.) Poor old Tariff Reform—(laughter)— with its work for all, had been packed upstairs to the nursery because one or two of the new arrivals in the Tory household could not stand its childish prattle. (Laughter and cheers.) So it was temporarily put out of the way. But the great issue which the constituencies would have to try was this—whether the time had come for removing long standing obstacles in the path of progressive and Liberal legislation. (Cheers.) They wanted to remove the obstacles created hy the congestion of business in the House of Commons. Above all they wanted to femdve the obstade created by the presence of an unrepresentative hereditary chamber,whose ration was opposed to every principle of jfriberalisxn and had, throughout the whole of its career thwarted every Liberal measure. -time Such Insolence was Ended. If they wanted to know how serious that obstacle was, and how unregenerafce those who constituted that assembly still were, in spite of Stts apparent repentance, they had simply to tead a speech delivered on Saturday at a non party gathering—like the House of .Lords. (Laughter.) The electors were warned that even if they were alecided upon a certain course and gave a Liberal majority, unless it were a majority swhich that nobleman from his attitude pointed out, he would not recognise it. (Laughter.) lPeradv-entur,e! if there be but nve down, the City is saved "-five down in the majority. Bo said Lord Rosebery. Now, really, what qsfere we coming to ? The Tories got a jnajority of 40, 50, and 60, and they could carry anything. No need for a second election. No Ileed for a second appeal to the country. They Jbad not even submitted an issue to the country. The power was absolute. But the liberals most have a second election. Now they had the doctrine that a second election .wopld not suffice. In the second election it was suggested they most have a majority which wertopped the fust. That-was a new doctrine. as it not time this sort of xnsolencee was put an end to? (Lcxud-cheers,and Rub ft in.'?) Lord Rosebery, in a glowing peroration, said fie came, there that his countrymen might Realise the truth. He was telling it to them, ()ond he said he wasa man who never deceived Ahem. *n analysing that speech and giving Jx>rd Rosebery^ idea of the truth, he (Mr XJoyd George) would not use language like that of Mr Balfour, because in a mere Liberal that sort of thingr would be vulgar. (Laughter.) What Lord Rosebery Said in 1894. Lord Bosebery spoke of Irish dictation, lmcked by foreign money. -What was the fact ? Mr Redmond went to America to his own kith And kin, men and women driven from Ireland by cruel laws, and collected a. sum of money to resist him in emancipating his countrymen finally from the influence that drove them into exile. Besides, the money was not collected alone in America.. Scores of thousands of dollars came from Canada. That omission by Lord Rosebery was very important. The suggestion Was that this was a sort of Irish-American plot to blow up the British constitution. (Laughter.) But Sir Wilfred Laurier was not a gentleman who would be likely to enter into a plot agains' the British Empire. Lord Rosebery said b never changed his mind about the House 11 Lords—{laughter)—and he led them to believe qe had always been in fa Four of some sort of alteration of the House, but had always opposed anything in the nature of the destruc7 tion of the veto. He must have forgotten his own past; for when Liberal Prime Minister he said, We desire so to readjust the rela- tions of the present Houses that the deliberate will of the House of Commons should not be overborne by the House of Lords "—(cheers)— and he also said, In our opinion the time has come when the right of the House of Lords to impose an absolute veto on the wishes and legislation of the House of Commons is forthwith to cease." So when Lord Rosebery said he had not changed his mind on the subject, he forgot the speech he delivered at Devonport in 1894, when lie went down to advocate the very proposals the Government were now frubmjtcfing to "the country's judgment. Unpardonable Misrepresentation, The most unpardonable misrepresentation of all was that in which he left the impression that the House of Lords and their leaders were only too ready, too eager to abolish the hereditary principle and set up a demo- cratic Chamber, and that the one obstacle in the way of doing so was the proposal of the Government. That was absolutely inaccu- rate. (Cheers.) What were the facts ? No responsible person on the Tory side had proposed to abolish the hereditary principle. They had proposed to reduce the number of hereditary Peers, and to choose a more select body, but whatsort of body would they choose T Would they so choose as to leave the remotest chance of a Liberal majority ? No. What was the difference, then, of being beaten by a majority of 200 or of 400 in the House of Lords ? Lord Rosebery knew perfectly well that Lord Lansdowne had never proposed to abolish the hereditary prin- ciple. On the contrary, Lord Lansdowne said in the House of Commons—(laughter, and sevecal voices, House of Lords" )-well.went on Mr George, laughing at his slip, I hope to see him in the House of Commons at no dis- tant date. (Laughter.) He would make a very creditable a.ul influential member of Parlia- ment. One of the arguments in favour of the abolition of the House of I.ords is that it keeps raen Kke Lord Lansdowne boxed up in an obsolete assembly. (Much laughter and cbcers.) Lord Lansdowne, he went on, said that the resolutions adopted were quite con- sistent with the new House of Lords being composed entirely of hereditary Peers. Lord Rosebery most have known that, and he (the Chancellor) asked him how he could reconcile it with his conscience to go to Edinburgh and say he never deceived his countrymen, and yet create the impression that the proposal of Lord Lansdowne was to abolish the hereditary systera altogether. A Challenge io Tory Leader. Loffi Rosobary asked what the Colonies would think of us if the present proposals of the Government were pursued. Well, in the Colony ^J?v\jwties and all parties had an -1 trii,' equal chance 0."e^cvuriug a majority, and he challenged Lord Tiosebery to point out a in: e proposal flmanatingeifcher from him or fromLo, d Landsdowue. or from Mr Balfour, that would give the Liberal party the slightest chanc of securing a- majority in their reformed Second Chainbcjp. The Liberal party were at the present moment composed of a majority of the people. The elections on Saturday proved it, and the elections of the next few days would pwvc that the majority of the people were Liberal. Lord Rosah'ery had admitted that. Well then was it Tvot-fcur that the people who, after all "were mora than half of the people of this country—: h0 industrious, thrifty, hard working half—should have the sa-tne rights of citizenship as anyone else. (Loud cheers.) Lord Rosebery paid We will give you a refer- endum." But stop a bit- If it was to be a referendum it must be a referendum aJ! found Mr Batfour said he was willing to wubmit. the principles of Tariff Reform. Why, remarked the Chancellor, it bad no principles. (TOlld chcors.) It was purely a question of log-rolling between a number* of contested totcresm. Lord Roscbery, judging from his speech, had never made the slightest tngpiry about the mieren-lum. He did not know what it would cost, how it would work, what the effect would be, or the experiences of other countries. He had just picked it up, the first brick he could find in the street, to fling at the head of Liberalism. The cost was impor- tant, and. in spite of what Lord Rosebery had said, he (the Chancellor) maintained that be had given facts to support his estimate of two millions. Lord Rosebery had given no esti- mate. He had not inquired. He bad advocated revolution without investigation. That-showed the sort of adviser he was in a crisis. The Hope of Liberalism, Liberalism had up till the present been able to encounter all its difficulties and overcome them. How? By secnring the combination of all who suffer wrong in every quarter. It was the only hope of Liberalism. You had one man that was enduring do injustice. You had another who had been trampled upon by an ,oppremor. And you had another who was enduring some great social evil. Let them fight separately and they were hopelessly beaten. There were powerful vested interests enthroned in wealth—power, privilege, social influence, everything thn.t wields the sceptre of might and authority under the existing condi- tions of things—and they asked a man—poor, stripped, hopeless, without influence, without wealth, without power, and without a friend— they asked him to go up with his sling and his stone to fight these armoured giants separately. Let Us All Rope Together." There they were—brewers, landlords, Peers. all these Well, he was nearly saying all these had been preying upon the people. Well, they invited people to come up alone. But, in climbing dangerous mountains it was advisable for the climber to be roped. I tell you," proceeded the Chancellor, what the Liberal party wants us to do. Let all the people, from every interest, every corner, every quarter, every class, let them rope together, and they will be able to march through the avalanche of vested interest, right up to the summit of justice. Do not let us be taken in by this insidious crafty attempt, to separate the people into little regiments, battalions, and camps, each marching its own way, and each detachment being cut up in turn." (Cheers.) turn." (Cheers.) Great reforms, he proceeded, never came alone. If they abolished the veto of the Lords there would be such a crop of reforms as this country had never seen. (Cheers.) So he was opposed to the referendum because, first of all, its cost was prohibitive to the democracy and it would give an undue advantage to wealth, and he was opposed, above all, to it because it separated the in terests of justice, divided the people, and killed the first essential to the success of any great progressive and democratic movement. Lord Rosebery's Melodrama. Lord Rosebery had said, Once you have a single Chamber in this country there is only one corrective for it, and that is physical force." (Laughter.) He (Mr Lloyd George) was not at all alarmed when Lord Rosebery indulged in this kind of melodrama. He had done it too often to cause any fright. When a statesman indulged in a sort of neurctic extravagance, his advice did not count for much in a great crisis. (Laughter and cheers.) Lord Rosebery said that if the Government carried their reso- lutions it meant the domination of a single Chamber, but no Government, however popular, could carry a foolish measure in the teeth of the protest of the country. But what about the Tories ? When they were in power it was absolute single Chamber government. Lord Rosebery asked what there was to pre- vent Liberals carrying a BiU to perpetuate their own existence. What, asked Mr Lloyd George, was there to prevent the Tories doing it ? Lord Rosebery complained of the Liberal system, although they interposed two years, but be had not a word of criticism for a sys- tem which could carry Bills through without any interposition or obstacle or any delay. What," asked the Chancenor," is the reason ?" This is the reason. Lord Rosebery trusts the aristocracy. He has lost his faith in the democracy. Look at his speeches. He distorts facts in order to nullify Liberalism. He attacks the Liberal leaders, criticises them oneaiter the other but not a word is there about the Tory leaders, who have flangout one Liberal Bill after another. The real trouble with Lord Rosebery, exclaimed Mr Lloyd George, is that he is a Tory. (Loud cheers.) A Polished Chatterer. Lord Rosebery said he could not see either a. Mirabeau or a Cromwell in the Liberal party. Lord Rofiebeiw might thank his stars for that. (Laughter and cheers.) k4 You can well im- agine," went on the Chancellor. what either or both would think of the kind of polished chatterer—(laughter)—who never accomplished anything himself, but is always criticising and baffling "those who attempt to do something. (Loud cheers.) Supposing Cromwell had' stepped into the King's Theatre on Saturday nrght—-(laughter)—and heard Lord Roseberv's speeds. He would have said, Oh, Lord Rose- bery, the Lord deliver me from Lord Rose- bery.' (Great laughter.) Lord Rosebery talked about Britannia being invited to throw her helmet away, but Lot-d Itosebery had mis- taken the clatter of the in etaf upon the pave- ment. It was not the sound of Britannia's helmet, it was the sou id of Britain striking off her shackles." (Loud and prolonged cheering.)

CARDIFF DREDGER'S VALUE.

HEREFORDSHIRE^ EDWARD VII.

AVIATOR AND "FIANCEE.

iSIR W. T. LEWIS' GUESTS.

__----------=-.. THE MAN,…

Asked to Resign. . ':..

----J.---MAYOR OF MERTHYR'S…

LOSS OF THE S.S. WiMBORNE.

----_------YOUTH & HIS" SUCCESS"…

------------.--------BARRY…

---Stolen Silver Unearthed.,…

i WHO OWNED" BESS" P

FARMERS AND AVIATORS. ----.

------------H BANDITS" IN…

WHILE HE PRAISED LLOYD GEORGE.…

H o me Secretary i n. t h…

STRUCK ON THE HEAD.

FLOUR MILLS DESTROYED.

,WESTON HOLIDAY.

----I Alleged Theft of R700.…

__---------Balloon Adventure.…

--------WHAT GERMAN MINERS…

-----'---ST.MELLONS ARSON…

---------___---WASTE THROUGH…

ik LORD LANSDOWNE AT CARDIFF.…

-------=--_-104 APPEARANCES.