Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

14 articles on this Page

ftoctrp.

ftortfolxo.-

■♦-SWANSEA POLICE COURT.

News
Cite
Share

■ ♦- SWANSEA POLICE COURT. SATURDAY. [Before Dr. J. G. Hall and A. H. Thomas, Esq.j THE SWANSEA STABBING CAsE.-James Woodland, the young sailor who is charged with cutting and wounding Edwin Ensmearen, at the Sailor's Home, was again placed in tbe dock. — The police applietl for a further remand until Saturday, wilen it is expected that toe prosecutor, who is now very much better, will be able to attend and give evidence.-The Bench granted the application, and prisouer was remanded accord- ingly. MONDAY- [Before J. C. Fowler (Stipendiary), T. Cook Davies, and L. Tulloch, Esqrs.] HER 59TH APPEARANCE.—Dorcas Carr, who had been locked up before 58 times, mishehaveJ herself attain in the Strand, on the 29th November. She wished to be imprisoned, and P.C. Smith (it) gratitied her desire. The Bench cornmitteJ her for a month. Prisoner, on leliving the <:oek, said" Thanks. n A DANGEROUS -.}latthew Thomas, haulier, Grorseinou, was convicted un the evidence of P.C. Burnett, for being drunk while in charge uf a horse and cart in High-street, on tuo 29th X ovember, anJ was tilled £ 1, or 10 davs. DRUNK AND DISORDERLY.—James Hassett, labourer, Strand, was charged with being drunk and dis"rLlerly on the platform of the Grea'' Western Railway Station, High-street, on the 29th November. Prisoner, it was proved, was very riutous in his conti net, and kicked Robert James, a town porter. PIned 106. illduding costs, or seven days.-Emilia Smoulding (5.2), Tontine-street, was charged witl1 being drunk and disorderly iu tbe Strand, on the 20th November. P.C. Smith (71) proved the case.-Fined LOs. including eosts, or seven days.-David Francis (221, J1>mes-street, was charged witb a similar offence in Waterloo-street, on Sunday. P.C. Lloyd gave evidence, and prisoner was iiued 10s or seven days.J ohn Harris, labourer, I 31, Orchard-street, was charged by P.S. Gardner with a like offence ill St. Helen's-road, on the th November, and was fined IUs. and costs, or seven days. HEGGING.-Edward Miles, a stalwart young labourer of 19, was charged with begging in Watkin-street, on the 29th November. P.C. Rosser said he fOlllld 7jd. in the prisoner's possession, The man said he had been employed at the Mannesman Steel Works, and he was remanded until to- morrow for enquiries to be made. A BAD ME:\IORY.-Wm, Murray, 37, Brynmelin-street, had no recollection of being drunk in Walter-road, on the 21st 50vember, but P.C. Reardon eame to tbe assistance of his memory, amI the Bench fined defendant os. and costs. A SAD CASE.-Albert Powe. confectioner, College-street, was chargell with assaulting Eliza, his wife, UIl the 22nd November. Mr. Slater appeared for the eomp1ainant; :\1r. Leeder defended. Complainant said that on the day named she went to the next public-house but one (the Whyndham Arms) for a bottle of lemonade, and on her return to the shop she came in contact with her husband who struck her across the shop, inflicting marks upon ber filce. and also Upùll her arms, which she beld up in self-defence.-By Mr. Leeder My husband has cautioned me about leaving the sbop. He has not warned me against going into We Whyndhain Arms. I have not been in the habit of going there at all hours of the day. I know a young mall named" Harry," aged 17, living at tbe Whyndham. On Thursday week I met him as the Pavilion I was in a box with my servant, and" Harry" came into the uox. I have been out since with him and the servant. I told my husband I had been to the" Fulton." I admit that was not true.- By Mr. Slater I made no arrangement to meet" Harry" at the Pavilion. I went to the Whyndbam for refreahruents.-Mr. Leeder admitted the assault, anJ sought to justify it. On the (jay in question his client was in tbe Market, and was informed tbat his wife was ..ut, and. hall left tbe shop to take care of Høelf. The hlJ8fiud entered the shop at .5.;)0, and finding no one there, he went for his wife, who presently came in, aud It was clear to him that she had been drinking. This had all been brought about by jealousy. Defendant had reason to suspect the fidelity uf bis wife, whose conduct nad become commou property with a certain class of people. However, defendant deuied having struck her with his tist. Complainant was the mother of five children, and this was how she conducted herself. -The Stipendiary said this was a sad case of a wife in a good position accusing her husband of chastising her. Such chastisement was not to be thonght ùf or tolerated, and was inexcusable, although the"e might be palliating circumstances. Defendant, in this case, W 'uld be fined £ 4, or 21 days. CHARGE OF SUNDAY DRINKING.—WM. Harris, Brewers' Arms, Orange-street, was summoned for selling intoxicating drinks on Sunday, the 23rd November. Mr. Bennett (Deputy- Town Clerk) prosecuted Mr. Slater defended.-P.C:s Burnett and Lewis gave evidence. The constables visited tbe house at 12.50 p.m., and found in the smoking-room ten men, four of whom were described as lodgers, and tre others as travellers, but the police, after making enquiries, were not satisfied as tu their bona jides.-Mr. Slater, referring to the cases of three men who had been summoned for illegal presence, saiJ the police had acted properly in reporting the case, but he had an explanation to offer in defence, If these men had entered their nawes in the travellers' book, and had also g1ven to the landlord the information tbey gaveito the police, he (the landlord) would have served tbem, bnt owing to the police coming in quickly, the men were not served. The eencl:1 ruled that the onus rested.upon the landlord, who was called and saill the taps leaked during the night, which accounted for the liquor found by the polk-e on the counter.-The Bench considered tbat the defendant haJ not used reasonable and proper precautions, and fined him 50s. and costs.-Richard Jeffreys and Wm. Davies, Cwmbwrla, were then summoned for beiu" upon the premises. P.C. Burnett said these men refused to give any account of themselves. They were fined 20s. each including costs. THK BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT.-Elizaloeth Evans, landlady of the Imperial Hotel, Plasmarl, was summoned for permitting drunkenness upon her licensed premises, on the ::2nd ult.- Inspector T. Jones stated that on the evening in question, at 25 minutes past ten, he went into the room at the back of the bar, and found there, asleep, very drunk and almost incapable, a man who lived about 100 yards from the house. The land- lady, on being spoken to, said she was very sorry, and it should not occur again. She also added that she was leaving the house shortly.-Mr. Robinson Smith, for the defendant, argued that as the drunken man went into the house intoxicated, au,1 was not there supplied with drink-he entering unawares- defendant cou1d not be properly charged with this offence.- John Thomas, a young labourer, living at 1,135, Neath-road, the man found upon the premises, was summuned for the offence. He said he was served at other houses than the Imperial, and passing that house, homeward, and hearing singing, he entered and fell asleep.-This defendant was fined 10s., including costs, or 7 days, and with regard to the landlady, the Bench gave her the benefit of the doubt, raised by the statement made on her behalf, and dismissed the summons. CHARGE OF PERMITTING DRUNKENNEss.-WilJiam Parkin, licensed victualler, Shades public-house, Salubrious-passage, was summoned for permitting drunkenness on his licensed premises, and also for selling intoxicating liquor, on Sunday 23rd ult.-P.C. Lewis (69), said that on visiting this house he found in the bar parlour, four men with glssses before them, and these men said they had come from Aiorriston. In the bar he found two men, Smith and Adams, both of whom were drunk, especially Adams, who was helpless and asleep, and both had pint measures upon the table before them. Witness drew the landlord's attention to seven men in the smoke room, whom the landlord described as old travellers." They had before them pints, blues, and glasses containing beer. The landlord put Smith and Adams secretly out of the snug door. -P.C. Burnett corroborated.-P.S. Bowden said he had been unable to serve summonses upon the men found without reasonable excuse, upon the premises, they having given false addresses.-Defendant was called to give evidence. He said bis wife was ill upstairs, and he (witness) was attending to the business. He gave explanations as to the presence of the men m tbe house, and tbe barmaid, Miss Stephens, corroborated. They swore that all the visitors were asked whether they were bona fide travellers or not. and that every reasonable precaution was taken.-A lodger in the 8hades, named William Clarke, was called, and denied the allegation that Smith and Adams were drunk.—P.C. Lewis (re-called) said Adams was helplessly drunk, and Smith staggering drunk.-P.C. Burnett (re-called) said he also had not the sllghest doubt as to the drunkenness of the men.-The Stipendiary announced that he would give his decision to-morrow (Tuesday) morning.-Mr. Miller (deputy- town clerk) prosecuted in this case, and Mr. Robinson Smith defended. TUESDAY. [Before the Stipendiary, Thos. Freeman (ex-Mayor), W. Stone, David Jones, and W. Watkins, STEALING CLOTH.-A respectable-looking man, named Howell, was found guilty of dtealinlt a piece of broadcloth, of tbe value of 17s. 9d., the property of Mr. Edwards, draper, Oxford-street. The man was employed on the premises from which he stole the cloth, antI afterwards pawned it, which act led to his apprehension. The defence was a very lame one, that he had bought the cloth of a man in Wind-street.- Defendant was sent to prison for one month with hard labour. DI80RDERLY.-Joseph Jarvis, of Cwm-road, was fined 5s. for being drunk in High-street on the previous evening.- Elizabeth Moss was fined 2s. 6d, and costs for being drunk in High-street. ABU8IVE LANGUAGE.-Annie Hatherton, a respectable married woman, was summoned by Elizabeth Hicks, of St. Thomas, for using abusive language towards her. The parties were neighbours, and the language used was alleged to be very gross and disgusting. Defendant was fined 20s. and costs, or ten days. Defendant, who strongly denied the charge, elected to go to prison. WAGES CLAIM.-A painter named Freeman Martin claimed a sum of £ 1 17s. 6d., as wages due to him from John Morris, Loughor. After hearing the evidence, the Bench ordered tha amount to be paid with costs. CAUTION TO NEWS Boys.-Elias Tolly, of Pottery-street, was summoned for allnwing his boy, Richard Tolly. Uyears of age, to sell newspapers in the streets, at a late hour, on the 22nd November. P.C. 15 proved the case, statinl that the boy was shouting in the streets as late as nearly 11 o'clock. The mnther appeared, and promising that the boy should not do so again, the lad was reprimanded and discharged, the Stipendiary warning those parents who sent their children out late at night to sell papers that they were subject to a penalty of £ 5, FALSE PRETENCES.—Reginald Gent (34), seaman, was sum- moned for obtaining 2s. 6d. from Benjamin Thomas Williams, with intent to defraud, also with obtaining a quantity of liver, of the valua of 9d„ from Messrs. Eastman, also with intent to defraud. Committed for trial to the Quarter Sessions. CAUTION TO LANDLORDS.—Wm. Parkin, landlord of The Shades," was summoned for a bre.ich' of the Sunday Closing Act, and with permitting drunkenness on his premises. Tile case was gone into the preceding day, and only adjourned for the Stipendiary to consider his decision, who now said that the two Alen spoken of were drunk, and that tLe other men, or most of them were not bona fide travellers, except the two sailors. l'he defendant had not taken proper precautions, aud kept no travellers' book. For permitting drunkenness, the defendant was filled £ 4 and costs, and for keeping his house open, £1 and costs—a total of £7 3s. For being unlawfully present, two of the men were each tined 10s. WEDNESDAY. [Before Drs. J. G. Hall and J. Paddon and Colonel Morgan. JuviNILE THEFT.—David Jones, aged 12, living at the Graig, Morriston, was charged with stealing a Waltham silver watch, and gold Albert chain, valued at £ t>. from the waistcoat pocket of Gwilym Morgan.-The complainant, a youth, said he lived at the Swan Inn, Morriston. On Monday he was playing football in Llewellyn Park. He took off his coat and waistcoat to play. Up-m the waistcoat was a watch and chain. Presently, complainant went to put on bis clothes, and missed the watch and chain. Witness saw prisoner near his clothes. The same evening he went to prisoner's house, but failed to find him.- Mr, Jacobs, pawnbroker, Plasmarl, deposed to handing the wiitch and chain (produced) to P.C. WiHi tms. The articles were brought to his shop by a lad who gave the name of Samuel John, and said he had been sent by his brother, who was outside, and who turned out to be the prisoner. Prisoner, in replv to questions put to him, said the watch belonged to his father, who could not come to the shop, as he was ill. Witness retained possession of the watch, and instructed prisoner to fetch his mother. He did not return, however, and witness handed the articles to the police.—P.C. Williams gave evidence as to the arrest of the prisoner, who made no reply when charged with the theft.—He pleaded guilty, and was ordered to raceive ten strokes with the birch rod. ALLEGED ASSAULT.-John Gower, rollerman, Morriston, was summoned for assaulting Watkin Owen, on the 26th inst.— The parties had a dispute in the Midland Works, at which they are employed. Complainant appeared with a scar on his face, which it was alleged was caused by defendant striking him with a pair of tongs.—The Bench, after hearing the evidence, dis- missed the case. TRESPASSING UPON CLYNE COMMON.—Gwilym Davies and Andrew Thorne, Bishopstone, were summoned for havin¡¡;, on the 16th ult., unlawfully committed a trespass in search of conies upon Clyne Common, the property of his Grace the Duke of Beaufort; they were also charged with trespassing upon lands adjoining in the occupation of Wm. Graham Vivian, Esq.-Mr. Robinson Smith prosecuted Mr. G!asbrook Richards defended.—This case was adjourned for the summons to be amended from "in search of game" to "in search of conies." —Mr. Robinson Smith, referring to the remarks of Mr. G. Richards on the last occasion, as to the claim of defendants to he copy-holders of the m nor in which the Common was situated, said he did not know what the defenæ could possilJly be, because it was a matter of common knowledge that commoners hMI a right only to the herbage, and never to game or rabbits. —Frederick Gulliver, Mr. Graham Vivian's head gamekeeper, repealed his evidence, wllÎeh was to the effect that he saw defendants, with sticks in their hands, kicking the gorse, from which they disturbed a rabbit, and then sent after it a lurcher dog. Clyne Common belonged to the Duke of Beaufort, and Mr. Graham Vivian had the right of shooting over the Common. —Further evidence, given by Mr. Vivian's bailiff, showed that defendants refused to allow Gulliver to search them, or to receive tbeir names. They said they had as much right as Mr. Vivian to shoot over the Corn mon.-Mr. Glcisbrook Richards, for the defence, maintained that defendants had a right to be upon the Common, and denied that they went there on purpose to get rabbits. The dog was not with the defendants, but with some children, aud there was nothing iu the nature of search- ing for conies. The case was a paltry one, as defendauts wer", only looking after their cattle upon the Common. The dog, which was alleged to have ran after the rabbit, was brought into the Court, and at the suggestion of Dr. Paddon, was placed upon the table for the magistrates to have a closer inspection. Mr. Glasbrook Richards contended that the dog was used as a sheep dog, and would not catch a rabbit. Mr. Smith thought differently-that the dog was a lurcher, and the magistrates' clerk said he would be sorry for a rabbit that came in its way. Mr. Richards would lay six to four on the rabbit. Mr. Smith said it the dog was his, and would not catch a rabbit, he would shoot it. (Laughter.)—Two brothers of the defendant Thorne gave evidence for the defence. Their father was also called, and said that on this day he sent out his sons for the cattle.—The Bench, atter a short retirement, decided that the case had beeu proved, and fined defendants is. each, with costs, Jei 4s. 3d.

.a STRIKES AND THEIR COST.

-♦ WANT OF VENTILATION IN…

Advertising

MEETING AT THE SWANSEA TRAINING…

jSWANSEA BOARD OF GUARDIANS.

MEMORIES OF OLD SWANSEA.

Advertising

THE EX-MAYOR OF SWANSEA ON…

ithnietie5, 4cc. --..------.....-......--_-........------------------....

+ REVIEWS.

Advertising