Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

6 articles on this Page

GLAMORGANSHIRE QUARTER SESSIONS.

News
Cite
Share

GLAMORGANSHIRE QUARTER SESSIONS. (Continued from our Sixth Page.) FIRST COURT. [Before Mr. R. O. Jones. Mr. C. W. David, and Mr. G. Phillips.] FRAUD BY A SWANSEA GROCER. Thomas Lloyd Thomas, 35, grocer, was charged with obtaining by certain false pretences from one James Griffiths certain goods, to wit, one dog cart of the value of £21, with intent thereby to cheat and defraud him of the same at Swansea, on the 26th day of June, 1880. Mr. B. F. Williams, (instructed by Mr. Jellicoe, Swansea, for the Treasury) appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Bowen Rowlands (instructed by Messrs. Smith and L iw- rence) for the defence. In opening the case, Mr. YVil- liams said that it was out of the ordinary run of cases of tho sort in the way in which it was carried out, and in the nature of the false pretence, because a considerable amount of skill and cleverness had been displayed by the prisoner, and he had no doubt the prisoner flattered him- self that he had not brought himself within the pale of the criminal law. It appeared that the prisoner at one time carried on business at Swansea as a wholesale grocer •—at any rate, he called himself a wholesale grocer. As early as January, 1879, in got into difficulties, and there were then a great many executions out against him which could not be satisfied. In the November of 1879 he was what was popularly called" sold up." From the middle of May, 1880, no business had been cirried on at his shop, and the shutters had been kept up. This being the state of things, the prisoner, on the 22nd of June, sent this letter to the prosecutor, who was a coach-builder at Ludlow: Have you got in stock a. strong dog cart ? If so please let us know, having seen your name in Hay Show, and oblige, &c. This letter was written on a form containing a printed heading, such as was commonly used by tradesmen, and it was evidently intended to convey that the prisoner was in a sucsessful way of business. The heading was:—"Thomas LloSd Thomas, aud Co., 64, High-street, and 43 and 44, Mariuer-street. Telegrams to be sent to Mariner-street." Some correspondence took place, and the dog-cart, together with a set of harness, was sent to the prisoner, who also asked for a wagonette and a business cart. The prisoner offered both the dog- cart and the set of harness for sale before they arrived, and subsequently he put them up for sale by auction. It was obvious he did not rtquire the dog-cart and harness for his own use as he had no horse, and the inference they were compelled to draw was that he obtained them simply in order to turn them into money. Thomas Lewis, chief bailiff of the Swansea County Court, deposed to having sold the prisoner's effects in November, 1879. From the sale he realised jSlO 4s. He had had eleven executions against the prisoner since, but none of them had been satisfied, because there were no goods to levy upon. James Walker, yeast merchant, said the prisoner wanted to sell the dog cart to him for £10 or £12. Prisoner's stock was of a very varied character—he obtained articles from all parts of the country, and advertised them for sale at about 10 per cent. below cost. He cheated hundreds of people before he cheated prosecutor. He often called at Thomas's shop to see the great swindles that were being transacted." (Laughter.) E. Crapper, auctioneer, said that prior to his July sale he received a letter from the prisoner asking him to enter a dogcart and harness. He knew that the prisoner had nothing of his own to dispose of, and he beleived he threw the letter into the fire. The prisoner did, however, bring the dogcart and harness, and they were offered for sale. The dogcart was to go for £2:), and the set of har- ness for £6, but no purchaser was found. Wm. Usher, money-lender at Swansea, said the prisoner's stores in Back-street, were taken down twelve m JUths ago. This concluded the case for the prosecution, and Mr. Bowen Rowlands intimated that he did not intend to call any witnesses for the defence. Mr. Williams then addressed the jury, and called attention to the remarks of Baron Pollock in the case of the Queen against Cooper. Those remarks applied to the letter written by defendant in the case, and were as follows —" As a whole, it is a letter of a man who desires to convey that he is what he is not, namely, a substantial dealer, able to take this large quantity as a sample. Words could not, he added, have been framed more applicable to the circumstances of this case, a.nd he urged that the jury could not avoid finding that the prisoner had been guilty of the offence of fraud by false pretence. Mr. Bowen Rowlands, in addressing the jury, submit- ted that the case of the Queen against Cooper was different in material points to the case now before the court. If every person was brought within the ejopa of eiimiual law who left the impression by his shop front. hIS billheads, &c., that he was in a successful way of osiuess, there would be a much larger number in the position of the prisoner than there was at present. It was because such persons did not come within the ciiminai ]a^ tkat Bankruptcy Acts had been passed, and provision introduced whereby it was made criminal for a man to oraer goods on the eve of his bankruptcy, being aVl f debts. The mere representation of t 1 y Pay at some future time was not a false pre- nce, however immoral it might be, and, he contended, p sonai- had cot made any absolute misrepresentation in ThpaplaC^°ni with the prosecutor. co il Chairman, in summing up, said that if the jury hima if the prisoner was not that which he represented if the-- F° w.as guilty of false pretence, aud then, that ih that it was on account of this false pretence crimr. 6 Pl'osecutor sent his goods to the prisoner, the rp* Wo d be complete, and it would be their duty to Th Vei'dict °f guilty. t-bow ^ound the prisoner guilty, and added that cauTinnol1 f* IfBtbs did not take the ordinary pre- T- ™ e sendir,g tho goods. ^jie Chairman I think you are quite right. i- Pri8°ner when asked if he had anything to say, %?Va ?he native. you -Vla*rm^u then said The jury have rightly found nefari^ ^on 'lave apparently been carrying o:i a that ifQS 8 Pvocea<iings, and tho Court are not agreed five vo W?1 ""k have been their duty to send you for ais Peial servitude, but for the previous chaia tar month "m'J iT°i korne. You will be sentenced to 13 s iiard labour in the Queen's Prison at Swansea. rP>F „ SECOND COURT. IL.fore Mr. J. C. Fowler, Mr. M. O. Jones, aud o Major Lee.] SDI-U^EX?ES- 1 Sen^Dce was passed upon Rachael senten™ with stoaung a rug at Cardiff, whose be im • J*1 elj > au<^ s'le '•'as now ordered to labo^rP11Sn?i? ^°r tvveij,° calendar months with hard ste&lln rr pll^°"er' Charies Asgar, indicted for fowl hard kfbour ay' Wa3 sentenced to twelve months' SPIRITS AT SWANSEA.—Martha Thomas, a hnv o W0IQan, on bail, who appeared with a babv in a nn lUr\' Was ^n^'cfced for stealing three pint bottles and irin aU^X brandy, one quart bottle and a quantity of n an? on? P'nt bottle aud a quantitv of sherry, tho bnn Gla,;e Evans, the Willow Tree public- T> ^ansea, on the 21st of December, 1880. Mr. W. harl K11 prosecuted. It appeared that prisoner abp 1 efCfn^eC,V!^h0 b-ar of Prosecutrix's house, and after nn i.i u bottles in question were missed. Subse- quently she was seen carrying bottles of spirits and Jine and when the police got to her house she was 0 ^'Ur^ recomrnended her to mercy on account of her condition, she having been confined three weeks Sentenced to six weeks' imprisonment without hard labour. THE PONTYPRIDD WOUNDING CASE —Edward Evans, 41, fitter, was indicted for unlawfully and maliciously bounding Fanny Lawes, at Pontypridd, on the 16th No- etnber, 1880. Mr. Griffiths prosecuted. Fanny Lawes li^ri u Was °f William Lawes, from whom she naa been separated daring the last two years, During Tvtl u6 had been cobabiting with the defendant at 1 • if 8^e recently left him also, and went to the house of Henry Elliot, Station-terrace, Ponty- pridd. On the day in question the defendant made his house Elliot was not there at the «n i "e*en<lant asked her to make breakfast for him, !wifn«^WM?8 asked her t0 So upstairs with him. She rautht (i,«niproceeding to light the fire when he shefelt 8om»fK- °/^ei' face with bis light hand, and 1-rdfe in defendan £ .^v" ,She als0 saw the blade of a throat was about threnf V Tile wouu<1 on her through, and there was Wood'on 11' H^asked" °Ut to the pantry with him, but 8he caught hold of his^an l^ asked him to put down the knife, and said, You inte.'d to kill me." Ho said, No, I don't want to kill you I want to make friends with you. She then asked to be allowed to go and put water on the fire, and he con- sented, so she left the house and did not return. Defen- dant now said he was in such a condition that he reraeru- bered nothing about what had happened until next day. The Chairman remarked that he saw no giound for con- sidering the case as a common assault. The jury found the prisoner guilty, and the Bench sentenced him to 12 calendar months' hard labour. CANNIBALISM AT FKRNDALE.—Richard Evans, a J ng man, on bail, was indicted for unlawfully and maliciously wounding Ebenezer Jones, at Ferndale, on the 6 th 1880. Complainant and another man left the Dutiryn Arms, Ferndale, after stop-tap on the night in question, and in the course of a row which took place the com- plainant and defendant fought, and the defendant bit a piece out of the complainant's lip. Defendant was found guilty, and sentenced to eight calendar months' hard labour. WOUNDING AT CARDIFF.—Lucas Georgias, a Greek, was charged with wounding James McCarthy, a bailiff, ^?l'diff- The complainant went to defendant's house, 18, Bute-terrace, Cardiff, to levy, under a bill of sale, for T^^a^eig' Sentenced to twelve months' hard labour. • "Rischargiei>-—Frederick John Hill, a boy, on bail, was indicted for obtaining by false pretences from Esther Jones 5s. 3d., the money of Ellen Burnell, at Swansea, on the 28th of September, 1880. In consequence of the ill- ness of the principal witness for the prosecution, the case had to be abandoned, and the jury being directed t) bring in a verdict of Not guilty," the boy was dis- charged. THEFT OF CLOTHES AT CARDIEF.—William Johns, 29, fireman, was indicted for stealing a bundle of clothes, the property of John West, at Cardiff, on the 31st of Decem- ber last. Mr. Fyffe prosecuted. He was found guilty, and a previous conviction having been admitted by him, Qe was sentenced to fifteen months' hard labour. LARCENY AT SWANSEA.—Frederick Hoskins, 32, fitter, was indicted for stealing one 141b. weight and one 211b. Weight, the property of John Dyer, corn merchant, Swansea, in the month of May, 1879. It was stated that the prisoner was employed by the prosecutor to cut the letters" lb." on the weights in use. The prisoner did work on 25 weights. When he left the two weights were missed. Prosecutor gave information to the police. The weights were subsequently found by the police at the whop of Mr. D. Lewis, College-street, Swausea. They tore the initials of the prosecutor on them, and they had teen sold by the prisoner, who was then undergoing an Imprisonment for felony. When released from prison he Was apprehended on this charge. The defence was that the assistant of the prosecutor had lent them to him. This was denied. Prisoner was found guilty, and a pre- vious conviction being proved, he was sentenced to nine months with hard labour. WOUNDING WITH A POKBR. AT CARDIFF. William Mitchell, 26, labourer, respectably attired, was indicted for unlawfully and maliciously wounding Mary Mac- kenzie, at Cardiff, on the 20th of November, 1880. Mr. Jeffries prosecuted; Mr. B. Francis Williams defended. Defendant was found guilty, and sentenced to eight months' hard labour. This ended the business of the sessions.

OPENING OF PARLIAMENT.

Jacal Intelligence.

--------------NEATH AND 1'1\3…

Advertising

[No title]