Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

6 articles on this Page

IMPERIAL PAR' IAVICNT

News
Cite
Share

IMPERIAL PAR' IAVICNT HOUSE OF LOKUS. — L HUKSDAY. Lord INCHIQUIN gave notice that he would lay on the table of the House to-day a Bill to amend the law3 relating to the Irish peerage. The LORD CHANCELLOR then brought in a Bill for the amendm"nt of the Irish judicature sys- tem. He explained the proposed changes in detail, and concluded by stating that, while one additional judge would be appointed, the separate office of'he Probate judge, the Admiralty judge, one judge of the Court of Ex- chequer, and the office of Receiving Master would be done away with. Having specified the salaries proposed to be paid to the several judges under the amended arrangement, the LORD CHANCELLOR announced that he proposed to take the second rea ling of the measure on that day three weeks, and the Bill was then read a first time. Earl BEAUCHBIP, in reply to a question, said that on Tuesday week, when he proposed to take the second reading of the United Parishes (Scotland) Bill, he would be prepared to give full information as to the scope of its operations. Their lord- ships adjourned at a few minutes past six o'clock. HOUSE OF COMMONS.—THURSDAY. Replying to a question, Lord JOHN MANNERS said that after the close of the present year arrangements would he adopted by the postoffice for the convevance of American rnaits similar to those which had been adopted by the United Sta'es authorities for the conveyance of mails thence to Englani-i.e no cont.ract were made, but mails were sent by vessels proved to be efficient, aid the owners paid by weight. Mr BOURKE nirl the Dutch Chamber had refused to ratify the sugar convention of last year, but nego- tiations were going on with other powers to secure the same obj-ct. Mr HARDY said the mobili3 tion of two corps dartuG: would take place in July, but he could give no further information yet. Answering Mr Whalley, the HOME SECRETARY said so-called affidavits had been received from the relations of Arthur Orton, but-, they were not judicial documents in any sense, and he had not thought it worth while to notice them. On the motion for going into committee on the Royal Titles Bill, the Marquis of HART- INGTON movei, as an amendment to the Bill. "That, while willing to consider a measure enabling her Majesty to make an addition to the Royal stylo and title which shall include such dominions of her Majesty as to her Majesty may s-em meet, this House is of opinion that it is inexpedient to im- pair the ancient and royal dignity of the Crown by the a"- sumption of the style and title of Emperor." He spoke of the repugnance and distaste with which the measure bad been generally received by the people of England, who had l'amed to look on the King and Queen of the nation as the heads of a constitutional system that had no parallel. He hoped the time would never come when the Sovereign would be called by any other title than that which the people hod so long known and loved. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER contended that the opposition t) the Bill was simply the fruit of a senseless panic lest some despotic change was intended by it. The title of Queen did not ac- curately represent the ? sition of the British Sovereign as Sovereign paramount in India. Sir W. HARCOURT%P- ported the amendment. Aft; r a spirited del-M.A a division was taken, when there were for f?oing into c mmitt^e 305 and for the amendment 200; majority for the Government! 10o, HOUSE OF LORDS.—FRTDAY. The Royal assent was given by commission to severil Bills; and the Crossed Cheques Bill having been read a third time and passed, the Marquis of SALISBURY moved tnia second reactitig ot ttie U uncif of India (Prefo,si-)n il Appointment) Bill, the object of which is to c mfer for the TtJt of pensions to inembers of the Indian Council holding professional or other pecuniary anoointments Lord LAWRKNCE pointed out that the s;rant of pensions to one set of members and not to another would be very ob- jectionable, and aft r a brief discussion the hill passed its second reading. Lord INCHTQUIN then brought, in a bill for the amendment of the laws relating to th" C Irish Peerage, founoed upon the reco nmendations of the Select Committee on Scotch and Irish Peerages, and their Lordships ad- journed. HOUSK OF COMMONS -FRIDAY. At the coiiimuiiCcmaiit of business, Mr MUNTZ cave notice that when the vote for the expenses in connection with Mr Caves mission t) E;ypt was before the House, he should ask for explanations. Mr GOLHSMID, in moving for a Select Committee to enquire into the organisation and management of the Telegraph Department of the Post Office, complained of the gross disproportion between Mr Scudamore'.s estimate of the cost of purchasing the telegraphs when taken to by the Governmtnt, and the actual amount which had been required, and aLo of the fale estimate as to the increased business which would accrue under Post Office management. He contended that the proposal to revise the scale of words and to increase the Press tariff, in violation of a distinct understanding at the time of the transfer, were indications that there was s mething radically wrong in the organisa- tion, and constituted a retrograde step that neither the House nor the country would sanction. Dr. CAMERON said the arrangements for the acquisition of the telegraphs had not been sa3isfactory, the rights of one company not having been purchased, who were thus in the position of being entitled to compete with the Government Colonel ALEXANDER suggested a more extended employment of the KojM Enginers in the telegraph department; and Mr NORWOOD spoke highly of Mr Scudamore'e services, though he regretted they had not yet been rewarded by a financial success. To obtain this, the area and facilities of supply should be extended, and the department should be more carefully administered, i*Ht-»d of resorting te an increase in the charges. Mr GOSCHEN said the purchase was effected far too hastily, and the country had had to pay for it. If Government refused the committee, he hoped the clearest explanation would be afforded of the causes which had led to the enormous difference between the estimated and real rTLJoHu ^AI™S defended Mr Scudamore, and Tv fc beral j-1^ministration were responsible ZZh* Ken dT m way of carrying out the pur- chase of the telegraphs ra-her than the Conservative Go- vernment. As to the sucCtfH of the department, that was not to be judged of by the results of the first few years. 1 he organisation was ow in a satisfactory condition. and ine nnanciai aeticiency tor the current year would be very trifling. Ultunately on the suggestion of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the motion was withdrawn, it being understood that Mr Goldsmid should confer with the Post- master-General with respect to the app )intment of a Com- mittee. Mr HANBURY TRACY asked the First Lord of the Admiralty if the wages of the seamen and marines of the flying squadron in attendance on the Prince of Wales had been paid in English or Indiai currency; and if paid in Indian currency, whether it was his intention to compensate them for the loss thereby incurred ? Mr W. HUNT replied that he understood the wages of the detached squadron were paid partly in British in I^dirn :u, ri;IC" and the rate at which the rupee should be issued in such cases was under consideration, HOUSE OF LORDS,—MONDAY. Lord STANLEY of ALDERLEY asked whether, in the in- structions to be issued to Laval officers respecting fugitive slaves, the same measure of protection would be extended to fugitive coolies.—The Etrl of DERBY, in reply, said he was not aware of any fugitive coolies having sought refuge onboard British men-of-war, and, pending the report of the Royal Commission, he did not think it advisable to issue any fresh instructions.—Lord DE MAULEY moved a resolution regretting that the policy of the Government was not directed to the suppression of the slave trade in Africa in its recent transactions with the Khedive. The Earl of DERBY said negotiations had been carried on with the Egyptian Government on this subject, which he hoped would lead to a more effectual suppression of the slave trade. He had no doubt as to the goodwill of the Khe- dive.—The Earl of CARNARVON, in reply to a question, stated that the negotiations with the French Government for the cession of Gambia were at an end.—Their lordships adjourned at 6 20. HOUSE OF COMMONS.—MONDAY. After the preliminary business had been got rid of, on the order of the day for going into committee on the Royal Titles Bill, Mr DISRAELI said that, finding there was con- siderable misconception as to the title, he wished distinctly to state that there never was any intention on the part of Government to advise her Majesty to substitute anv title for the superior and supreme title of Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Eritain and Ireland. He was sure that under no circumstances would her Majesty assume the title of Empress in England, nor would she be advised to confer any title upon her children to denote the Imperial connection. The Marquis of HARTINGTON expressed his satisfaction at the announcement, but regretted that it had not been made earlier. Lest, however, the new title should gradually come into use in this country in connection with official documents, he suggested that there should be some record on the proceedings that it should apply only to India. Mr LOWE and Mr GLADSTONE having spoken, the House went into committee on the Bill. Sergeant SIMON moved an amendment extending the power proposed to be con- ferred on her Majesty to the Colonies. Mr DISRAELI pointpd out that the Colonial and Indian relation- ships were entirely different. Mr FORSTER was sorry that the Prime Minister did not see his way to accept the amendment.—Mr GLADSTONE, while ncorn mending the withdrawal of the propped addition,SUC-TI sted. as a preferable course, that the wording of the Bill should be made gemral, so as to give power to the Government, as they saw fit, to advise the Crown, upon their ow res- ponsibility to include the Colonies in the Roval title.- rhe amendmmt was withdrawn.—Mr OSBORNE MORGAN moved the addition of words providing tha' the new title should not have any precedence overlth" Roval style at pre- sent appertaining to the Crown. This amendment was debated, and was also withdrawn.—Amendments y Serjeant SBION and Mr NEWDEGATE having been withdrawn, Mr PEASE moved that noi hing in the Act should be taken to authonzj the use in the United Kingdom of any title of her Majesty other than that at present in use as anp i taining to the Crown.—The CHANCBLLOR of the EXCHEQUER op- p wed the amendment. —MR MUNTZ suggested, a-i a w,ty on1 of the difficulty, that the title should be Em| r-^s iri In/Fa instead of Empress of India. —The Marquis of HARTINGTON an appeal on behalf of the amendment.—Mr (lis RAELI opposed it, and it was In!'t, as were several other", aod the Bill was ordered to be reported without amend- ments. HOUSE OF LORDS—TUESDAY. The House met at five o'clock.—The patents for the In- ventions Bill and the Telegraoh (Money) mil went through Committee. The Council of I"din. (Profession il Appoint- ments) Bill passed through Committee, with an amend- ment inserted on the motion of the Maiqnisof SALISBURY with the ,bi-, t of placing the three councillors elected fin- professional qualifications in the same position as the councillors appointed by the Act of 1858, who held office during good behaviour.—Their lordships rose at twenty minutes to six o'clock. HOUS" OF COMMONS—TUESDAY. The Speaker took the chair at four o'clock. Mr B. COCHRANE gavennticethaton an early day he would call attention to the Russian occupation of the Khanate of Kh,)I;aiicl. -In reply to Mr \sliley, the CHANCULLOR of the EXCHEQUER stated that there was no Act of Parliament prohibiting the Bank of England from purchasing the; rez Canal shares; but their charter forbade trading, and this they were legally advised would prevent their making such purchases.—Considerable time was occupied in discussing the circumstances of the exptdition of the Talisman to Peru. HOUSE OF COMMONS —WEDNESDAY. The second reading of the Sea Coast and Deep Sea Fish- eries (Ireland) Bill was moved by Dr WAllO, member for Galway, who explained that the Bill would authorise the appointment of a Board of Commissioners sim iJar to that in Scotland. The mot important provision was one which authorised the Commissioners to make advances on loans out of a sum to be provided annually bv the Treasur y. The hon member pointed out that since 1816 the number of boats engaged in the Irish Fisheries ha.d diminished by one third, and he urged the House to adopt the Bill in order to rescue an important national industry from ruin. Mr BAX TER, while regretting the melancholy condition of the Irish fisheries, contended that it was no part of the duty of the Government to fo3ter particular industries at the public charge. Sir J. McKenna, Sir George Bowyer, the Marquis of Hamilton, Mr Yeainan, Mr Bruen, and Mr Lowthian Bell supported the Bill Sir J. KLPHI.VSTONE ur¿'t>rl that the Irish fishermen should ftlllow the example and energy of the Scotch fishermen. Mr A. PEEL pro- tested against su bsidiing the Irish fisheries. Mr BUTT said the question was, could Parliament give to Ireland the system that bad raised the Scotch fisheries to their unexampled prosperity, and enabled them to beat the Irish fishermen in their own markets. It would, he said, create an unfo/tunate impression ira Ireland if this bill were defeated solely by the votes of English and Scotch numbers" Sir M. H. BEACH, Chief o.cretary fur Ireland, s .id the Government felt it necessary to do something to arrest the decrease in the population engaged in the itish Fisheries but the question was how this was to be done. He pointed out that the prosperity of the Scotch Fisheries was mainly due to the energy of the men. The system of advances on loans was a new prop sal, and was not found in Scot- land; and he th-.ught that while jt would involve a large imperial expenditure, it, would fail to imnrove the condition of the Irish fisheries. He moved that the hill be read a second time that day six months. On a division, there voted for the bill 131, against 215. The bill was therefore lost. The House adjourned sh rlly before six "Vlock.

--------CHARGE OF STEALING…

[No title]

THE DENBIGH REREDOS CASE.

[No title]

Advertising