Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

15 articles on this Page

....-.--.--.....----.-.---------------'---_._-(…

News
Cite
Share

( CO X TE 1'0'M ;? v OPINIONS. THE PUNISHMENT OF DEATH. One of the prominent absurdities of all a'urd people is to i.na^ine that th.>y are wiser than all the world besides; and one of the trickeries of tricking people i-; to turn tho«.> absurdi- ties to th 'ir purpos.. In ewry miscellaneous community (II the earth, and most of ;>fi in this bnstlin^r,. turlii!, .tnnjiluie, !iio :e\ :;n\sp;n? community of England, tln-re are myriads w ov svh< !e existence consists in duping, or being d lined; all, of conrse. under the loftiest d-signations. The whole are pitriots, til- whole are philanthropists, the whole are iovers of peaee. the iv'iole are haters of punishment, the whole *» cravers 5»r notoriety, and the whole feel that the essential elcnent of their !iv." is vulgar aqit-ition. 1,. is to no purpose that their objects are a hundred times shown to be impossibilities, that their arguments have been shown to he nonsense, that their pretexts have been shown to be hypocrisy, and that their principles have been shown to be rnin. Still tt>y rue the fresher for their fall, the more trnru- phant ror being trampled on, the more solemn for ptÓlic ridi- cule. If such m-n descended from the piliory, they would come town its'steps the prouder tor the pelting; in short, nothing can convert them but the sight of the judge and the bhck can, as nothing can silence them but that scaffold to they have a very natural aversion. The topic now is capital punishment. All the silly senti- ment with which novels teem, and which tavern halls can echro, is mw poured noon the public; and we hear nothing I but the cruaity of punishing plunder, the barbarity of fetter- ing violence, and the criminality of putting obstacles in the way of cutting throats. There are to be, in fact, but twn clashes in society—those, who are made to he robbed and mur- dered, and those who are made to rob and murder them. Mr. ."ermy and his family w<*re formed only to be shot by Rush tnd. if th«* philanthropists had their way, Rush, instead ot iiihng a ruffian's grave, would at this moment be comfortably fathering his crops in Australia, if not regularly resiored to bis harvest home, find laughing at the burlesque called justice within the eates of Potash Farm. Death h:rs been the punishment of murder for the six thoij- san t ye»r« during which the globe has rolled. It has be<n inflicted by the most civi!ised nations, hy the wisest men, and '»«? purest and loftiest code ever possessed by man. But ev-ry rabb'- haranguer ss wiser than them ail; and a coterie ot philanthropists huddled together in taverns, not one of whom would su'Fer the loss of a pocket handkerchief without an outcry at a police-officer, and the transmission of the pil- ferer to a dungeon, have discovered th.it all the world but theif own little group have been and are at orice blunderers and barbarians. Is there wo case in which death is necessary? Are th.-re not fifty in which it is the direct consequence of self-defence ? The soldier shoots his tnemy in battle; the citizen shoots the invader oi hia country the householder shoots tfie inidill,%t' burglar; the traveller shoots the highwayman who demands h's money or his life." Has any man oat of a lunatic hos- pital ever denied the right of death in all these iitstances ? Yet, not one of those instances has to allege the gravity of trial, the formalities of judge and jury, and the anjrious and fair inquiries ot law. If the individual is entitled to defend himael-, must not society he entitled to defend itself? It is appointed to be the general defender: must it defend nothing? It :s the established protector of those who have not the power to protect themselves, and is the protection to mean only impunity? There is no more palpable and necessary ru/ht in all society, none that has been transmitted from an earlier origin, none that has been found more essential to the control of evil in all stages of the world, none that has been established on more sacred authority, than the right of removing from life those criminals who are dangerous to the lives of their fellow-men. As to the correspondence in some of the morning papers im- piltmg to public justice the grossness of the Rcenes at public executions, the only observation which this outburst of sen- timentality deserves is, that those who arc to see the vulgarities of the mob should be the last to blame if they saw what they went to see. Those who will give their guineas and spend their nrght in the luxury of laying up images of disgust, to be finished by images of despair, who order the low carouse of tavern suppers in the haunts of rabble, merely that they may have the most certain opportunity ot seeing the horrid process of a fallow-creature's death in its most perfect particularity, -those who can toss off their champagne in front of the scaffold, and enjoy the sights and sounds of Horsemonger- laue. have no reason to erect themselves into moralists over their cotolette, arraign the degeneracy of the age, or remon- strate ajminst that brutish avidity for sightseeing which ra:Jses ruffians (lInt of the lower class alone) enjoy public exe- The cutions. The true question which those cognoscenti of the rope must answer are, what took them there? what else c,,n'd they expect than rtifflaiiism ? or, for what actual purpose could they have prepared to sit out a night -but to see the vilest exhibition of the vile, to hear obscenity from its re- gular prolessors, to plunge into the lowest depths of debased human nature ?— Britannia. SCOFFS AT SCRIPTURE. That a Radical meeting of rambling harangners is not the "place where we should expect to hear rational opinionsonany sublet is acknowledged. But, whatever may be the folly talked at the Bridge-house Hotel meeting on capital punish- ments, all right-thing men must regret that this folly ventured to tresspass on Scripture. Not having any wish -to increase the vexations with which the clerical speaker there possibly looks back on his performance, we shall advert no further to him than to give his statement in his own words: — "The Rev. H. Christmas, of Zion College, in seconding the resolution, declared that there was no command in the Holy Scriptures to take a man and hang him up to a beam. The word. much relied, Whoso sheddeth man's blood, bv man shall his blood be shed,' were a mere prediction— (Hear, hear). He never heard that Cain was hanged— (Cheers and Jaughter). When Moses killed an Egyptian and hid hint in the sand--after looking very carefully about- to iwe no pniicemen were there—(laughter)—he committed a murder but he was not hanged for it. In the same way, when Simeon and Levi committed a wholesale murder in cold blood, they were not hanged. Upwards of 500 of the clergy were in favour of the immediate abolition of death the Archbishop of Canterbury said it was a matter requiring much consideration the Bishop of Winchester thought it woald be all the better for a little ventilation while the Bishop of St. David's cordially concurred with the advocates of abolition, an opinion which had been shared by the late excellent Bishop of Norwich." That Adam should not have taken justice into his own "hands (even if we could conceive it the office of a father) is sufficiently accounted for by its being already in the hands of the Judge of all. We have even no evidence from the Scriptures that Adam had known the murder, or seen the body of Abel. The question of God iI, Where is Abel, thy brother ?" This implies that the act was hidden. The answer is. Am I my brother's keeper ?" The murder is then directly charged The voice of thy brother's blood crieth tinto me out of the ground." The body had evidently been buried, and was unseen by the human eye. There is no reason to suppose that Adam ever saw Cain from the moment of the crime. The next argument, that murderers were not put to death in Egypt because Moses was not put to death, is not merely irrevalent but contradictory to Scripture. The history is, that when Moses, then mighty in words and deeds," had determined to redeem Israel from slavery, he slew an Egyptian who was assaulting one of his countrymen. In that bold act he was seen, and, on the next day, was up. braided with it by some of the Israelites whose quarrel he was attempting to reconcile. On this charge reaching Pharaoh, the King gave orders for his seizure and death. Moses then fled into the desert, where he became the son-in law of the priest of Midian, was a keeper of sheep, and remained rorty years. And this is the sort of argument that is to prove that Moses would not have been liable to death for killing a man, the narrative stating the direct contrary. That Simeon and Levi were not hanged for the murder of the males of Shechem is next alleged as an evidence that murder was not punished, or rather not punishable. But who was to put them to death ? Where was the tribunal Jacob was at the head of an independent body of si-ttlers in Pales- tine. Was their father to be their exec-ittioner ? It is even probalvle that the murder of the Shechemites would have been held justifiable by the laws of Shechem itself, for the offence of the Prince of Shechem was one which, even to this day, excites Arab vengeance. Arid on this grmind Simeon and Levi actually made their defenc-■ when charged with the act by Jacob: And they said, should he deal with our sis- ter as with a harlot ? Even then the charge of Jacob is less one of guilt than of impolicy "Ye have troubled me, to make me to stink among the inhabitants of the land and I, being few in number, they shall gather themselves together against me and slay me, and I shall be destroyed and my house." And on this he immediately left the land. But, in the subsequent prophecy of Jacob, morality is vin- dicated and their guilt is marked and punished :— Simc-on and Levi are brethren (alike in crime) instru- ments of crwlty are found in their habitations. Cursed be their anger flr it was fierce; and their wrath, for it was cruel. I will dlvitie them in Jacob, and scatter them in Israel." As to the general declaration, in the speaker's subsequent letter, that many "great and good men have been called un- believers." we cannot admit that any great and good men ever were unbelievers. That some of literary and scientific fame have been infidels is well known but we can have ii-i hesitation in dellying their tit!e of goid, if morals were to give the title and of great, it the title were to be conferred on an honest search for the truth. Christianity offers a force and fulness of evidence absolutely irresistible hy ;wy sound understanding. But fune and indolence combined, ignr-rnnce that had no desire-to be enlightened, and vice that could nnt endure to be controlled, formed the temptation of the Euro- peah infidels, irom Bolingbroke to Paine. Another age of il1!iti..¡ity is beginning among us and, as -of old, the Bpoks of Moses are the first object of assault, i The bastard science of ollr time, geology, scotfs at .their bw-H .y tory. The bastard theology of our time, rationalism, scoffs at their revelations. At this moment there is, perhaps, not one It pretended philosopher, from the itinerant lecturer to the eu- do wed professor, from the dabbler in roving sciolism at. a shilti.^s a head, to the dabbler in settled sciolism talking [ bha4Iow,-jess at tIterate nf thousands a year, who d<}es„.pojt.i •B«er at :he Mosaic aiini(t«. With some the sneer goes- fur- t her still, and extends through the whole Jewish history; wuh some titozoeer spreads downwards to our days.^ pod Christianity, in its origin, its lirii)cipit-s.. and its progress, is the object uf an unbeliefj which but for its impotence would • be tirofatiess, and but for its silliness would he scepticism. Can we wonder tlmt a dreary laugh, to vary the dulness of al Radical meeting, should be made out of the Pentateuch, when the whole volume of the inspiration of God has so long been insulted with impunity ? liii. THIC CABINKT AND ITS POLICY. In one of those able articles on economic poticy which the Morning I'nst has been in the habit of publishing for the last three month's, it is inferred by the eloquent writer, who has evidently peculiar sources of information, that Ministers will at the meeting of Parliament he prepared to recommend some measures in favour of home industry :— f'liere is evidently a commotion in the free trade camp. Efforts are making to revive the zeal of partisans, and to mis- lead the public i" to the belief that the cause has not suffered rinv loss or adherents, and that a return to protection is im- possible. They who see below the surface — they who have: 'I y accurately watched the course of reasoning pursued by the t-vw p-irli-, who have observed the signs of the times, x')d haye the means of knowing-accurately which »ay the popular 'feeling-and which way the convictions of intelligent men, whose Opinions are tbe beacons by which others are guided' have turned, and are fast turning, are well convinced of the contrary, AI.! tfw" have for sou.e time Ceased to entertain A an)" doaht that the next session of Parliament will see a --change rtf policy, aiftfurflu Y. on corn. with Other measures of j the"4ithie:kitti1, cnfculaied to protect home tndustrv. and to prevent the transfer of the trome market to producers who contribute nothing to the state i the way of taxation, pro- posed tht-pr«*rfkt Wbijf-e.ri'i L. "'ra! fi«vernihent,. When •ci'4 talks .hi¡ a partisan rf that Government 1l;)!1!! the sub: ,jeet he g»v^» ",ni rc;.i-in» f.>i yW.iirg s-*nesh:i.g to t'n- strong ¡ teelitig uxpressed throughout the caiuitry. Government, he' \vi;j[ rti! you, is nothing br.t a succession of compromises of Ofmlion fuc the [r»irp"se of conciliation, which is now a reoog- »!*wt part at state p ilicy; and then one is gravely t .Id thjit LOIJ^S Phijir»pe fell becauseH" did not kno^v how or when to V'.ei "to th- vteofig-v-exp re.-srd wishes f)t those who pursued a puWie.iihju-ct mi!a. disinterested Jteal. A Whig fto\cni-- ffleut should tiitf U»t r-jsiat any strong exure#.sfjn oi v- k t o nn;.>!i,ir fvhng snch n« that they witness. Well, wec«r. little to what we owe the concession, if only wh-:t we ask a" r (joire t-e piv-n but we acknowledge we had rathei owe the chanpe of policy thus promised to a tbor.HJgh .ron- viction of its wisdom and its necessity, based on grounds f acuments and s'ate policy cuch as were stated as the ren sons for trying the free-trade experiment, and hav, ,,ow to be recognise.I as delusions and we do think that we have inr.whed such grounds in the exposition of principles t< which we have devoted ourselves for the past three months, and in the utter failure of every attempt, by whomsoPvl r made, to answer any one of the points we have laid ourselves out to establish and maintain Still let us have a duty on corn and other measures of the kind to secure British marked to British taxpaying producers, and let the duty proposes only be sufficient for the purpose, and our object and the ob- ject of the country is gained." Rumours to a like effect have long been in circulation, and we hrute even heard those members of the Cabinet named who are decidedly in favour of pmu-Aive duties on agricultural produce. Whether the report is mereiv put forward as a Ministerial ruse to throw the .Protectionists off their guard, and prevent them from forming a closer junction, by throw- ing out a hope of Ministerial concession, or whether a divi- sion in the Cabinet does really exist, we shall not pretend to determine. But the fact of the rumour is a straw in the air and the ready reception it meets witn is an indication of the current in which public opirtion is setting. Still. the Protec- tionists may be assured of this, that their only sure course to obtain substantial justice lor the industry of the country is by the formation of a party Shich in character, inflnence^ and talent shall be strong enough to assume the Government when the voice of the country has declared in favour of their pri iciples. — Britannia. THE AGRTCLLTT R.TL AND T" COLOXI.\L INTERESTS OR FIUST FRUITS OP FJW*- TR4PB. Two integral portions are isolating themselves from her—o«e:;the other by re- bellion. Under the most fostestermg system of protection and the highest monopoly prices, the ren-ts charged for the best land in Ireland could' with difficulty be paid whenprm- tection is entirely withdrawn, and the competition of thV whole world is let in tft reduce jmcei-to the average of lands paying one sixth part of those rerits, and one* tenth part of the taxes, it must he clear to all that rent in Ireland cannot he paid at all. The results that are taking place, therefore, in the sister country can surprise no one who considers the subject coolly and dispassionately. Ireland is ruined: the farmers are running away: land can be neither let nor sold • and the right hand of England is paralyzed, and. as it were, afflicted with an nlcerons complaint, cafculnted to spread' and not to he healed for many generation*. Ireland, therefore, may be said to be lost to England ^SyRuin. Canada, on the contrary, is likely to be lost to us by Rebellion. Free-trade has deprived Canada of the exclusive advantages she formerly possessed, and being so, deprived of all benefit by the laws of the mother-country, she is seriously mooting whether allegiance at a loss ought to be lodger con- tinued. The United States, much too wide awake to encour- age or even permit unrestricted foreign competition with the agricultural producers, tax the Canadian growers of corn some i2 or 15 per cent. on every quarter they send across the bor- der. Were Canada joined to the United States, she would not have to pay this tax; and her sister states would be her ready money, next-door neighbour customers. England to Canada appears at best but a step-mother, and a hard one while the adjoining states offer a paternal alliance, with all the advantages they possess themselves. The late George the Third pronounced America to be the brightest gem in the British crown and some hundreds of millions of money, and hundreds of thousands of lives, were unavailingly sacrificed in the endeavour to keep it there. How much and how nrany would it be necessary to sacrifice for the retention of Canada, were Canada to fling herself into the United States, and add another to the stars and the stripes of that mighty Repa lie ? Yet how little would it cost te restore to Canada the protectidn she frtttnerly possessed! How little to give to the whole of our colonies the advan* tages which children have a right to expect over aliens and foreigners! Really, the ruinous results of unmodified, unreciprocated, and ill-considered free-trade are rushing upon us with an accelerated pace and force. Out of upwards of forty colonies we possess, there are not a dozen which do not in some way or other complain of it, and become more or dess dissatisfied, discontented, and disloyal, in consequence. Our home farmers, a most important—if not the most .importat,t- class of the wh-ole kingdom, are injured and angered almost to a man. It is true there are no fears of their disloyalty nothing can ever induce them to forget their duties to God and their country. Chartism and scepticism, rebellion and revolution, can find no congenial-soif where Mey are. Still they are men, and must feel others, and they must sigh for the prospects ot their children citizens, despairing for the fate of their country neigh bours deploring the ruin of each other fate of their country neighbours deploring the ruin of each other Is it yet too late ? Can no alteration take place to wed Canada by something like the old links of mutual interest to the mother countr}* ? to preserve Ireland from the ruin and wretchedness that awaits her? to conciliate the whole of the discontented colonies, by attending to their interests, and not mixing them np with the common herd of foreigners? to restore to the tenant farmer—not all the prosperity, but soine of it-Ilot all the hopes, but some of them—which free-trade .has annihilated or is annihilating ? Surely it is not yet too late to put these important questions. There is one way, and only one. which woul 1 clearly effect the whole of these objects. Let free-trade be confined for a certain number of years to our colonies and those countries only who will reciprocate with us. Time would thus be given for the great change to advance, by gradual Fteps, that must i e»'8t,k'K interest8' being persisted in all at once, n^i ]>y n1!!?d »lfll«ence of the agricultural and colo- he e->r^ ^,n-P,ri.,iUnent' some of this description mav fr; JTnl rmnR ensuing session. At all events let it be comnk^nf' ,n evpry aKricult"raI circle within the compass of the mother country.— Mark-Lane Express. I*

[No title]

[No title]

[No title]

MURDER NEAR ROSEMARKE T.

PEMBROKE COUNTY COURT.

[No title]

[No title]

CORRESPONDENCE/

PLACES OF WORSHIP.

THE BISHOP OF ST. DAVID'S…

[No title]

TRANSCRIPT OF THE SENTENCE…

--NOTICE TO CORRESPONDENTS.…

TERMINATION OF TH# HUNT MEETING.