Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

11 articles on this Page

=-"""'" IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.…

News
Cite
Share

=- IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. f (Continued from our last paje.) HOUSE OF LORDS.—MONDAY, JULY 15. The Bank of England Charter bill was read a third time U i ¡>assed.. 'J ole LORE Chancellor then moved that the COMMONS' amend- Mmts to the Dissenter. chupeU bill should be agreed to, a 11 depreeated an opposition, which he understood was to be I GIVEN to the 11 ENSURE at a st:ige when no such opposition •O.I^HT to he RIIML to the principle of tbe bill. Tue only ■qn-stion tor consideration WAS the propriety oi' the aiuei.d- UIEAU, and it WAG unprecedented for any n»ble lord to seize • ven an opportunity FOR tiiscrts»mg the principle. Siuh a ç )u;e would be a slight UPON the House 01 Commons, in WHI .A he trusted their lordships would not acquiesce. Tne Bishop of London admitted that the COURSE h? "-as abmt to PURSUE could only. be justified by the EXTREME ur- I L G OCY ot tUe cage. la OPPOSING the bill in that, its last S,.age, ih might be DEEMED pertinacious, but when he found that the opposition to the fundamental principles bill were-wboiSy unanswered, he could not help teciing th IT pertinacity BECAME a virtue. The right rev. pre'ate spoke at considerable LENGTH RGAIUST the till, and concluded by A'vingm,an amendment, that the amendment* 0: the Ccni- m .M SAONID BE taken into consider.!tioa that day three K ntlra. TM B;Lsh,,p of Durham viewed the measure as one crJcu- to do justice to all panics, and had no fear that any evil eff cts woaid result from i:. .I,.OTd Brougham snij it was admitted by everybody, that timm meats oi the Commons were oil the a/' *e t7C uot» therefore, understand upon what rea- gte mmii thoy could refuse to agree to then:. Norwich sis;.ported the bill, which bad 1.U UNJOR^I.E.APPROTATIUR!, in accordance WITH the principle of L F otherti a, he WOUW he done TO 'BV theiii. • ILR? I. AR VI contended that this oil!, if it shon'd pass E J UPON the sututehook, which would be here- «:R REGRET. He little thought, some five or •T W W'WN HE wit upon the opposition benches, toge- iiited present -LNRD Chancellor, with whom he wa» I .10 OPPOSH)G a measure of spoliation, known to their 'P* 88 THE appropriation c!au>e, that the day would so _ARNVE *heu a measure far beyond the appropriation V AS A iteascrc of spoliation, would be brought forward who called THEMSELVES Conservatives, and with he had so long acted in that character. \ottenham CONTENDED that lire measure was strictly "L»-»FERT'LLLNL ,N principle, J'I,R ITS object was to preserve to W"'T0 ™D FAR A LONG-TIME enjoyed it the nropeny which 7 RC 1,1 POSSESSION O& N»NFTER TPOM Lord Teynham, the Earl of SLND LORD Lytticton, THE house divided, and the *5 joritv OTS/U^S OF LONDON was negatived by a nin- 1 he < ommons amendments were then agreed to, and the Bouse adjourned. '^DAY, J ULY 16. rd lonteag.E KID A bill ON tbe table to lega!iz« art unions. ° TO ,LE circumstances which led to -« N' ^R- O'DHscoll from the commission of the N^<ON« WK.-1 .C",UN.:Y and askvd what were the ► aJntian .• 't ,tu> I-rd t.'h;mcfDor of Ireland to restore a '"•N U ;1° NA<L '« UIIIIIIIFKTED BIG unfitness for the duties or a MAGISTRATE ? /VRT^ ^^RNCTIFFE W*»C'd not defend tbe conduct of Mr. r.scod which HAD led to his removal, though manr of the "NC'TS °T {ialliation, and all had been much I J A ^WIAL, signed by the lord-I:eutciiant WI-IAIITRNTAK T ?VB.10T'LER noblmnen, by A large number of :U I. —^40 persons of opposite opinions in TIG nd po.itics. had been presented, praying for his R*J° £ I!0N • TH? LRISH WD cLncellor, leellng that he H3D BE^N kUfficiently PUNISHED bv his degradation fnn.I the l^reitoralALMN^ S"C moutbs, considered that lie ought to A lively debate ensued, turning mainly on personal points, *U "VR^VP'RL T|),E, ^1RTLU,S of Normanby, (who intimated •* TK twice dismissed from the coin- nissjon, e I awpns of Clanricarde. tbe Earl of Bandon, \M>RU-»«;AI.C»UU.K OI tee (•* C >r I nr.! K °L N WI^KLOW' RADNOR, AND MountciwheH,' and > Chancellor, (who defended Lord Chancellor Sug- WAR) when tje motion for the production of any carrespond- eree or papers relating to the case was AGREED to. The remaining business was of a routine nature. HOUSE OF COMMONS—MONDAY, JULY 15. The Hee of Commons sat at 12 o'clock, tor the purpose of proceeding with THE committee on the Poor Law Amend- ment Bill. FJATTFE, Mr. Christopher URGED the espeai?hey f establishing in each MION workhouse a ward for those Houseless poor who were journeying in quest of employment -or of their parishes. Sir J. Graham was favorable to this suggestion, though he considered it not to be strictly connected with the clause in 'discussion. At present it was noV unusual to commit these Wanderers to prison but he thought it much better to pro- vide them with a temporary asylum than to send them to £ aoi. Three or four of these asylums, in well-selected locali- 1ieø, would enable the police to bring such persons where tbey might hare shelter for a right, cr even reiuge tor three OR four ciays, AND due care in case of sickness, L&'uch an ,U- rangement would Fuitil the duties of Christianity and humanity, which he feared were neglected under the present system. 1ú. Cochrane expressed his delight at the speech of the ^FRT^Y of State. He doubted whether anything was saved by the present Poor Law the rates now showed a tendency to gradual increase. There was a division upon the 36th clause, which was ABSTAINED by a large majonty. "he next C anSe gay? risc to more objections in the cottroe of WblCh, Mr. H. Fitzroy observed how little the conduct of mem- bers was calculated for encouraging the ministers to introduce measures of improvement. He disliked the existing Poor JLAW, and w.)u)d support this bill as a mitigation upon it. The sort of resistance showed who were the real friends of the poor, and who were the flashv speechmakers. seeking only to reported IN THE NEWSPAPERS: \F" ii haying made another speech, V a V_UTTON. '"E absence of Sir James Graham, who naa been se*t for to a committee of the House of Lord.-), 12°o^clf>ck a^^0llnuaeili <-• taomiitteu to We at I The house then ros«, to reassemble at five o'clock, when, after some other business, Mr. \V yse made a motion for a committee to inquire into the circumstances connected witth the formation of the jury list upon the Kite Irish trials. He said that there were petitions trem nearly a mi lion of the Irish people for such an inquiry. lie demanded it for them, on the allegation that the trialllM not been a lair one. He enterd into a disquisi- tion upon the public feeling in Ireland with respect to repeal. He went tfirough a. long series of technical retails as to the jury-hsts, imputing partiality to Mr. Magrath, the officer employed in the business of the jury revision under the Re- corder of Dubm). He charged the government with having been themseives the founders of Mr. O'Connell's importance, and finished with some warm remonstrances and admoni- tions to the government. Lord Ehot argued that this motion ought not to succeed, nmess it could be shown that there had been some frudulent tampering with the lists, whereov some unjust effect had been produced against the traversers. But any such fraud was distmctly negatived by the affidavits. If mere error J1?"' "?™XERROR A'N,OST mevitable in the transcription of or 6,000 names, were to be a ground lor setting aside A RR :V proceeding in Dublin would ever be I here had indeed hpen contradictory statements as to some of the tacts ct the caM, but what elucidation would be obtained irom a reference to a committee of that house, wtufh committae had no power to administer an oath ? The TN^ersers, if they thought the city jury unlikely to give them A tair trial, MIJ^HT have applied for a trial by a jury of the county. But, after all, had the verdict been contrary to the eTtdence ? It would not be contended that any English jury, X>N that EVIDENCE, conpied with the court's direction as to the law. would have found any different verdict. The validity of the challenge TO tlic array was at that moment under the consideration ofthe highest legal tribunal, and could not be ad equate iy or EBEC t: V C V decided by the House of Commons. yi T. -1. J -O ConneLl hoptwl that this important inquiry was,n<\ £ "YStrated merely because the session had then KaC e^Ji ^»ly. Addressing himself to the details j connected with the formation of the lists, he pointed out those circumstances which he considered as suspicious. Thev were circumstances which would not be- disregarded in Ire- land nay, even in England, be as was the period ofthe session, he doubted whether they would be so totally disre- garded as ministers flattered themselves. If government had any regard for tueir riend the Recorder of Dui.iin, they enght to grant this inquiry for the right hon gentleman's character. It tne decision ui the House ol Lords shonfd be favourable to th verdict, you would, indeed, have established the legality of your proceedings; bnt even then von would not have I satisfied the purdic that justice had been done. *'e ?oiicitor-General thonght, that at this late period of the session, and after the long debate of last February, it was y lneun'&ent on a member, now n:-(i(>ening the discussion, to V at leagt advanced some new facts as a foundation fori his motion. It was a motion mischievon* to the administrar tion oi justice. A great public peril had impended. The ^overarjeiit had put it down without other aid than that of the then existing hw the law had vindicated its supremacy and then an attempt was nade to persuade the public that > law nad not been attended by justice. Throughout that im-! portant pnceCtting there had not been one singie circumstance nn&irnesg on the part of the Attorney-General for Ireland W pitjof of which the Solicitor General went briefly through the applications and occurrences which preceded ^^trals). Why had there been no application for a trial a :oanty jury? Why, becsnwe the traversers' counsel, not really of opinion that the city jury was an unfair kit thought it expedient still to keep a grievance in th:ïr bo.nde.. He proceeded to vindicate, in main, the sti ni- jj™8»p of the Lord Chief Justice adding the observation, IT onlJ- °ne lonr judges, all of whom •»»d L* ^bey question the pro[>riety of any thing thi, f° address the jury themselves. To yield to feet, ')e t0 lnake an ajlmission, contrary to the i.n these proceedings been some fraud or •hip. wfaiea tiie traversers bad sustidned some hard- T ^R- *V. Ju»ticei aiU' BOTI* ai>imadversions on the Chief] *S&inst muc'} 88 regretted the occurrences rather see directed, he would j Ute }j,w Waj( ?^ewed than behold the injury under which The great irom the recent perversion of it. j ts.,Olautof C%i er which r J't:,m.i had so long snifered was now ^*n<* tathe i^w. Catholics and Protestants fj ~en made Cfn1 tooting, and some reforms Safet^V?ecewaiy eoli £ inor J^ ^^cUoui*; but in order to if tW Irish p22T*ce iaw' mi,ch remains to be allrS rquaI Iianirj3Ii" ,ond rif justice, and „ ? £ rn?lan(t. would administer it as efj'ectu- twinccied would an Englisman feel, if, tr^fc 7 JN,7 irom rello'°«8 Party, he were to 1 e P ^FCRY Protestant had been 2L0TT*AN opposed the „ I »!. ATVV*. L.-i: A! BNEn eniflamed DOCUMENTS in the possession of her Majssty's Government. The nohle LORD introduced his motion h. a speech, in which he iauded out the steps taken by the late Government, with a view to the suppression of the slave trade, intimating that the present Government, ill following out the same ouject, was beset by dilhculties oi" its own cR»«tion, though itil avenue to feme was sti-L open to them it, notwithstanding those difficulties, they could put an end TO A traffic denounced by every friend to the welfare of the human race. Sir li. Peel had not expected such a display of rhetoric from the noble Lord, as a consequence of the harmless notice he had placed upen the matter. The noble Lord appeared to have roused hiiuseti at that iate period of the session to make an attack on the government, by means of oneof those ingenious d-vices which saved him calling tor any test of tbe teelings ofthe iiou»e-. lie quite concurred, howvvvr, in all the repro- bation which the R.O' le Lord bad poured upon the slave trade ana two countries alone, Spain and the Brazils, were resp'msi le hr aU the horrors consequent upon the perpetua- tun) of the traffic, and without their cordlai CG-CP-RNTIOU it would be impossible to SUPPRESS it eff-H-tualiy. While he gave full credit to the noble Lord for his exertions when in urfice, he yet claimed for himself and colleagues quite as much earnestness to etlect the same object. The right hon. Baronet then replied to theto'.irious points urged by Lord Pa:merston, ASSURING the house-that the present Government was prt-j.ared to avail itscli of the nniy avenue to fame which the noble Lord said was open to them, by taking advantage of every opportunity to suppress the traffic in slaves. lie had no objection to the production of the papers, which he had alreai'.y given directions to have prepared. After some observations from feir C. 'Napier, Mr. BortTi- wick, Captain Pechtll, and Lord Palmerston, in reply, the motion was agreed to, with an additional return suggested by Sir R. 1'eei of the number of slaves liberated in Sierra Leone and other places, between the years 1813 and LF!44. Un the motion of Mr. II uine, an address to her Mpjestv was agreed to, for the appointment of a commission to inquire into the past and present state of the tidal harbours, ports, and creeks of the United Kingdom, for the purpose of ascertaining the state, of the navigation, &c., with a view to future improvement. Mr. E. Deniaon moved for an account in detail of the sums cf money received and expended by the Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England. Mr. Elphinstone wished to have the return enlarged so as include the actual amount paid to the bishops. Sir James Graham agreed to the motion, but opposed the amendment, which, after some discussion, was defeated by a majority of 5.5 to 27. 'L"he remaining business on the paper was then disposed of, and the house adjourned;

. | SOUTH WALES TURNPIKE TRUSTS…

RELIGIOUS INTELLIGENCE.

[No title]

TO CORRESPONDENTS.

[No title]

[No title]

[No title]

♦— HAVERFORDWEST LUNATIC ASYLUM.

[No title]

9 CARMARTHENSHIRE SUMMER ASSIZES.…