Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

17 articles on this Page

- iMPtlHlAL PARLIAMENT.

News
Cite
Share

iMPtlHlAL PARLIAMENT. Jhe House of Commons reassembled on May 27, after the hitsuntide holidays. On the motion of Mr. Monk, the Alteration of Diocesan boundaries Hill was read a first time. Mr. G. Onslow presented a petition from inhabitants of 'he Isle of Wight, which he moved should be read by the clerk at the table. The document was accordingly read by the clerk, and it was to the effect that the petitioners were Wormed that Thomas Castro, otherwise Arthur Orton, other- wise Sir R C. D. Tichborne, Bart was to be prosecuted for forgery and perjury by the Crown, and that they, therefore, Prayed the Hou e to take due precaution that no advantage "hall he afforded to the Crown prosecution which is not in hke manner afforded to the defendant. Mr. Bouverie wished to ask the right hon. baronet, the jhernber for Devonshire, a question of which he had given "ton notice. It appeared that the right lion, baronet the wfiek before last made a speech at Exeter in which he was re- ported to have used the following expn:8siolJS with regard o the Commissoll at Washington ;— Why I say our position personally has been one of great delicacy and embarrassment is this—two questions have been raised, one the personal question as to what was the under- standing between the Commissioners at all events, and per- haps between the two Governments, at the time the treaty Was concluded; the other as to the general merits of the Viestion which has been raised with regard to what are called Consequental Damage?, or the Indirect Claims. Mow with regard to the personal question I will only say this—that we, the Commissioners, were distinctly responsible for having represented to the Government that we understood a promise to be given that these claims were not to be put forward, and "ere not to be submitted to arbitration." lie wished to a-k whether that was an authentic statement, and, if so what was the understanding respecting this affair whicli the right hon. gentleman mentioned in that speech, what were the circumstances under which it was come to, and with whom was it come to ? SirS. Northcote said the right hon. gentleman had given him notice of this question, and the hon. baronet the ttn mber for North W ilts had also given him notice of a 8itnilar one. With regard to the quotation from his speech Which the right hon. gentleman had read, he could only say •hat it was quite correctly reported. He thought it right to say what he did for this reason—he had just seen an announcement that the despatch of Mr. Fish, of the 16th April, was published in America, and would shortly be pub- lished in this country, and it appeared to him that from that dispatch, any person reading it must infer that the claim for consequential damages had been formally pre- sented to the Commissioners at Washington, and that they made no objection to it. He, as one of the Commis- sioners, thought it was not right to allow such an impres- sion to go abroad, and he took the first opportunity of con- tradicting it (Cheers.) He made use of the expressions whhh he did without any previous concert with any one, in order to state on his own authority that that Was not, at all events, the view which the Commissioners took of the matter. With regard to the other question, he thought the right hon. gentleman and the House would See that he was in a very delicate position (cheers). He was one of the Commissioners, and, although he felt himself en- titled to Epeak as he did at Exeter, he did not think he should be justified in going into a full account of what they did at Washington without an invitation from the Govern- ment and c mmunication with his brother Commissioners, Specially with Loru Ripon, who was now absent from town toi attendance upon her Majesty (hear, hear.) Mr. Bouverie asked whether the understanding referred to in his speech was immediately comcunicaterl to her Majesty's Government by the Commissioners. (Cries of "No, no,") SirS. Northcote I think I can answer the right hon. gen- tleman if he will give notice of the question. Mr. Disraeli, afttr expressing surprise that the Govern- ment had not made a voluntary statement, put some ques- tions as to the present position of the negotiations. Re- calling the circumstances under which the Prime Minister had appealed to the House before the recess to refrain from dfacussing the question, he pointed out that the sacrifice the House then made at the earnest entreaty of the Government, and which he at the time entirely approved, was ren- dered useless by the publication of the Supplemental Article a few days afterwards in the United States. Inviting Mr. Gladstone to give some explanation of the circumstances Under which this had occurred, he asked him whether it Was true that the Senate had accepted the Supplemental Article with modifications, whether the Government Was in possession of those modifications, and also Whether Parliament would have an opportunity of expressing an opinion on the Supplemental Article before the Queen was advised to ratify it. Remiudmg the House further that the time for presenting our arguments to the Arbitrators would expire on the 15th of June, he asked Mr. Gladstone to state what precautions he had taken to pre- vent the Arbitration failing if we did not present our argu- ments in time or, on the other hand, to preserve us from fceteg committed to the Indirect Claims:if we did present .them, ,• :<Mr: Glanstone said that with reference to the appeal made by tbeGovernment to the House of Commons before the holi- days, it was founded upon considerations of general prudence, a'n\}lfrl making it the motive was, in his mind, that the pub- lication of it would he injurious in America. He was Jiot surprised, however, that they should have felt morti- at the matter having been so shortly afterwards divulged by the Government of the United States, but -the grounds en which the English Government made • the appeal was that the Article was of a confidential nature, .and he could not consider that they were to blame for ■ its having been made public. The Article had been agreed to by the Senate with certain amendments in its teims, and the Cabinet had met and discussed it this day, but they had Dot yet disposed of the questions raised. The modifications Ptoposed by the Senate had not been made public in America; they were regarded as confidential, and could not with prudence be published in this country. He thought it would be permature to take into consideration the pro- ceedings at Geneva before they had concluded the business which they already bad in hand with respect to the supplemen- tary engagement. The Government, however, were fully aware ot the element of time in this matter. lIe would not enter into the question of the arbitrators being able to deal with the question of time, because the necessary power could be given to them by the agreements of both Governments, and until they were sure that they could not deal with the question without an enlargement of time, it would be premature to discuss the matter. Her Majesty's Govern- ment would, however, lose no time in making their reply to the Commissioners of the United States Government. Mr. Horsman wished to know whether the modifications in the Article would be submitted to Parliament before any decision wa3 come to upon them. The right hon. gentleman had not said anything on that point. Mr. Gladstone sa d the modifications proposed were with reference to an article which, if agreed to, would form a treaty between the two countries, and therefore he would prefer to answer the question when it was put upon the paper by the right hon. gentleman, the member for Bucking- hamshire. In reply to Sir G. Jenkinson, Mr. Gladstone contradicted the report that the Fenian prisoners are to be amnestied and Mr. Otway and )1r. Mundella gave notice of questions with regard tothe transportation to this country of destitute French Communists. The House spent the rest of the evening in Committee of Supply on the Navy Estimates, and the following votes were agreed to: £174,824 Coastguard and Naval Reserve. £ 9-7",9S3 Dockyards at Home and Abroad. £ 08,344 Victualling Yards at Home and Abroad. dE59,926 Medical Establishments. £ 1^,728 Marine Divisions. £678,311 Military Pensions and Allowances. £309.185 Civil Pensi ns. jei56,700 Conveyance of Troops. The vote for the dockyards at home and abroad was dis- cussed at some length, alid an amendment by )Ir. Rylands to reduce it by £100,000 (which was not pressed to a division), afforded an opportunity to the members of present and former Boards to fight uver again the old battles as to re- ductions in the dockyards, the respective merits of their shipbuilding programmes, and other controverted points. The other votes led to nothing more important than the tisftal desultory criticism *Fhe other Orders of the day were disposed of, and the Rouse adjourned at a quarter to 2 o'clock.

" MESNE PROFITS."

A ROMANTIC WINDFALL.

THE TICHBORNE CLAIMANT.

[No title]

[No title]

DEATH OF THE DUKE OF BEDFORD.

[No title]

THE EMPEROR NAPOLEON AT SEDAN.

RAILWAY REFRESHMENT ROOMS.

PARLIAMENTARY RETURNS.

SLOW POISONS.

IMORE EXECUTIONS AT VERSAILLES.

[No title]

[No title]

EPITOME OF NEWS,

THE MARKETS.