Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

22 articles on this Page

ENTHUSIASTIC RECEPTION AT…

News
Cite
Share

ENTHUSIASTIC RECEPTION AT THE MASONIC HALL. THE PROSPECTIVE CANDIDATE ADDRESSES A CROWDED GATHERING. Alderman Lewis Morgan, pursuing his campaign as prospective Conservative candidate for South Glamorgan, made his first public appearance at Barry on Wednesday evening last, and was accorded a hearty reception at a public meeting held at the Masonic Hall, which was crowded to its utmost capacity, a large number being unable to obtain even standing room. Councillor J. A. LovatFraser, chairman of the Barry Conservative Association, presided, and he was supported on the platform by a large and representative gathering of the Conservative and Unionist strength of the district. The Chairman, at the outset, referred to the imminence of a general election, and said the con- stituencies of the country would soon be called upon to cast their votes in favour of the represen- tatives of one or other of the political parties. In South Glamorgan, Alderman Lewis Morgan had been chosen as the representative and standard- bearer of the Unionist Party-a gentleman who was well known personally and by reputation, having last year filled most worthily the office of lord mayor of the only city in the Principality. ^Cheers.) He appealed for a fair hearing for Mr Morgan, who, at the close of his address, would answer any questions submitted to him in writing. (Cheers, and cries of "No paper questions.") Alderman Lewis Morgan was warmly received on rising to address the meeting. His remarks at times were met by good-natured interrogations, but the effective manner in which the candidate replied to the interjections of some of the audience was frequently greeted with the warmest applause. It was evident, Mr Morgan remarked at the out- set, that there were both 'friends and opponents present. Some apparently did not approve of "paper questions." Personally he was quite prepared to answer oral questions, and he would do so to the best of his ability. (Cheers). Enter- ing at once upon a critical treatment of the Budget, Mr Morgan said a serious financial responsibility devolved upon the country, and it was obvious that the Government were at a loss to know how to meet its responsibility. (Cheers, and cries of -1 Oh.") The action of the Lord?, however, in referring the Finance Bill to the country would enable the people by their votes to solve the difficulty. J Rightly or wrongly, Alderman Morgan said, the House of Lords had decided that before ,a they wouM accept -tlie Budget, or what was known as the Finance Bill, the people of the country should be consulted. (Hear, hear.) Why anybody objected to that he really did not un- derstand, aaid especially his opponents, when they said that the voice of the people: was re- presented by the present Parliament. If it was represented y the present Parliament, what possible risk were they running in referring this matter to the people, and if the principles which they defended in tfiat Budget were popular and represented the voice of the people, this present Government would be returned to powea: with the same, if not a larger, majority? This seemed to be so clear that he could not understand why their opponents got so excited over the action of Lüe House of Lords. The House of Lords had a right to refer the Budget to the people. Mr. Morgan quoted the opinions of the Lord Chancellor and1 Mr. W. E. Gladstone as dis- tinctly showing that the House of Lords were entitled to deal with the Fiaaince Bill in the way they had just done. Even the present Chaai- oellor of the Exchequer agreed that the flioUiSe of Lords had acted within its rights. The pre- sent Government, instead of bringing in a. Bill dealing purely with finance, had adopted the subterfuge of tacking on to the Budget three legislative measures which they had previously failed to carry through. Why didn't the Government .appeal to the country if they they thought they had the voice of the people behind them when their Education Bill was thrown out by the Lords? (Applause.) The Budget was nothing but a. clever attempt to get the Housa of Lords into a trap, but it did not succeed. It would have been a very serious thing indeed if the House of Lords had allowed this BiM, containing three legislative matters, to pass without appealing to the country for its voice. What, undoubtedly, was the present in- tention, of the Government was the abolition of .the House of Lords. If it was correct for the Government to include in the Finance Bill these three legislative matters, there was nothing to prevent it in the next Budget including 'Home Rule for Ireland, the disestablishment of the Church in Wales, the abolition; of the House of Lords, and the abolition of the Army and Navy. One complaint the Prime Minister had made was that the House of Lords had never before exercised this privilege in the way it had done with reference to the Bndgt. The reason was that they had never had such a. Budget .sent to the House of Lords before. There wafc abundant evidence that the present Government did not reflect the opinion of the country. An- other reason why this Bill was referred to the .people was because of its Socialist Character. There was 'no que.stion about it as to what the intention of tilro present Government was in taxing land. Mr. Lloyd 'George, speaking at IJlanelly in September, 1906, on land reform, said: It is no good until you nationalise the land. That must come, but you must proceed bv easy stages." Did not that prove up to the hilt what the intention of the Chameellor of the Exchequer was when he included the land taxes in the Budget? It was an attempt "by easy sitaiees" to get at the nationalisation of the land. He (the speaker) thought that the electors at the forthcoming elections would proceed by easy stages to put a. sprag in the wheel of the Govern- ment. (Laughter and applause.) He found that -e,very principle contained in the Budget was found nearly word for word in the report of the ninth annual conference of the Labour party-a Rarty for whom Ire had the greatest possible resnecfc as he was the son of a working man aK of tjie people. (ClK*r».) Hte did Jot object at all: to Mr. Iiryd <>««« «omnlti»e tlie Labour party's book, but why should it be pretended that the Budget was the outcome of what the Cabinet bad done? It only showed that the present Government had been captured bv the Labour party, and, t,he,refore, instead of looking after the interests of the whole elector- ate, they were looking after the interests of one particular class. Where were the 250 Radical peers when the division in the Souse of Lords on the Finance Bill took place? He, for one, believed in the Reform of the House of Lords, as it would have the effect of getting a stronger class of men in the House. The issues the coun- trv would have to decide were (1) Tariff Refoæm or the Budget; (2) reform or abolition of the House of Lords; and (3) whether they were going to be ruled by Socialism or not Mr. Morean repudiated the allegation which had been made that if the Conservative Party were returned to power it was their intention to repeal old age pensions. They had the assurance of Mr Balfour himself that the Old Age Pensions Act would not be disturbed. (Cheers). In the Finance Bill there was no provision whatever to deal with unemployment. True the Government had decided to establish a system of labour ex- changes, but that would nob solve the difficulty, for not a single penny was provided for in the Budget to give the unemployed a shovelful of work. This was a most serious question. Hunger knew no politics; yet the Government, whilst providing means for ascertaining to what extent unemployment existed-though this was already done through the trade and labour unions—would not attempt to cope with the evil, If was work, and not doles, that the honest working man of employment wanted. (Cheers.) In their attempt to tax the rich for the sake of the poor, the Government had provided a weapon which would inflct equally cruel hardship upon the poor them- selves. By taxing the acres of the dukes, the burden would devolve equally upon the many thousands of poorer people who possessed their small holdings and instead of introducing this new impost it would, he maintained, be better for the community if the Government had made some provision to enable small owners to secure the freehold of their holdings. (Cheers). The remedy for the existing state of things, he suggested, was Tariff Reform. (Cheers and counter cheers.) This was the definite policy of the Conservative Party. Personally he was a free trader but the free trade he believed in was not what they had in this country, but universal free trade. (Cheers.) No country, not even our own Colonies, had followed tha example of Britain in her policy of free trade, and the time had, he believed, arrived when the old county should scrap its one-sided policy, and adopt instead a real free trade-the universal system—which would be for the benefit of the whole community, providing work for the unemployed, increased capital, increased wages for the workers, and increased prosperity all round. (Cheers). At the last election, Mr Morgan added, one of the promises made by the Liberal Party was that of the big loaf. What was the position to-day ? The 4-lb. loaf that could then be obtained for 41d, was sold to-day for 6d. He did not think the promise of the" big. loaf" would appeal to the supporters of the Liberal Party at the pre- sent election. (Cheers, and a voice, "What about the Fusion Bill ?') Very well, replied Mr Morgan, you shall have my explanation. You are aware that last year, when the Fusion Bill was before Parliament, I occupied the position of Lord Mayor of Cardiff. The Corporation of Cardiff passed a resolution in favour of the Bill, and I was deputed to carry that resolution to Parliament. As a man of honour, occupying the position I did, at the request of the corporation I gave evidence, in accordance with that resolution, in favaur of the Bill. If there is any one present who is of opinion that I did wrong in pursuing the course I did under those circumstances, then all I have to say is that I would not give the snap of the finger for the vote of such a man. (Loud and prolonged cheering.) Question time brought some disorder, and at the rear of the hall a person mounted a chair; and attempted to address the audience. Amongst a number of questions, Mr Morgan, asked how taxation would raise revenue for national defence and social reform, if foreign goods were kept out to employ home labour, said an impost on imported manufactured articles would increase employment ten-fold. "Shall the peers or the people rule?" Mr Morgan replied that the peers had already told them they wanted the people to rule, by referring the Budget to the opinion of the country. Alderman Morgan said he did not see why, on the same basis as men, a woman should not have a vote in Parliamentary as well as municipal affairs. (Cheers). Mr F. P. Jones-Lloyd proposed a vote of thanks to Alderman Morgan, and the vote was accorded amid cheers and counter cheers. In reply, Mr Morgan said he was disappointed at the attitude of some of his opponents that evening. At the same time he looked forward with great pleasure to visiting Barry again on an early date. (Cheers.) A vote of thanks to the Chairman concluded the meeting.

ALDERMAN LEWIS MORGAN AT WENVOE.

IAT CADOXTON CONSERVATIVE…

THE CANDIDATE AT THE WYNDHAMI…

[ PUBLIC MEETING AT LLANTWIT…

Advertising

TREORCHY ROYAL CHOIR AT BARRY.

[No title]

MEETING OF THE HOSPITAL COMMITTEE.…

Tj HEALTH COMMITTEE.

.-PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMITTEE.

BOOKS SELECTION COMMITTEE.

FINANCE COMMITTEE.

Advertising

! MRS. GRUNDY'S JOTTINGS

DEVELOPMENT OF BARRY ISLAND.

THE RECENT FIRE AT MR EMERSON'S…

BARRY DOCK POPULAR CONCERTS.

Advertising

BARRY LABOUR REPRESENTATION…

REVIEW OF PUBLICATIONS.

Advertising