Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

18 articles on this Page

BOROUGH MAGISTRATES' COURT.…

News
Cite
Share

BOROUGH MAGISTRATES' COURT. I MONDAY, MAY 19TH. I Before the Alayor, J. B. Murless, Esq., Dr. I Eyton-Jones, Jno, Jones, Esq., and J. M. Jones, E-q. DAMAGE TO GRA*jS. -PUBLIC PARKS WANTED. lnree boys named respectively William Jones, John Jones, and Alfred Lewis, were charged by Mr J. B. Murless (Mayor), with damaging gram in a field in the neighbourhood of the Dunks on Sunday the 11th inst. Mr Murless said he was reluctantly obliged to bring the case forward he would not have done so if he could have possibly helped it, but the trespass on his fields was so great that he was obliged to adopt what means he could to prevent it. Only on the pre- vious day there were about 70 people on a little piece of grass, about four acres in extent, and although requested to go off the ground they positively would not go. He mentioned this to show the necessity for bringing the present case forward. P.C. Robinson then stated that on the day in question the defendants were lyingontbegrass as complained of and did, he should say, at all events, three-pence worth of damage each. They, fliowevei-, went off the. grass when-spoken to. Dr. Evton-Jones said the defendants had been brought there by Mr Murless not on account of any great amount of damage they had done. but because they were encouraging, by their example. others to go upon the grass and destroy it. Mr Murless was obliged therefore to take these steps in his own defence. Personally he (Dr. Eyton- Jones) had great sympathy with the boys and the working-classes. In Wrexham they had no parks or places for people to amuse themselves, and they had therefore no outlet except to go into the country but whilst he was sorry there was no such placeb for the recreation of the working- classes, still they had no right to go on to other people's land. Under the circumstances, they would each have to pay 3d and 7s costs. If, how- ever, there were any other cases of a similar character, the offenders would not be dealt with eo leniently.—The Mayor, of course, took no part in this decision. DRUNKENNESS, &C. I Thomas Peters, Mary Ann Square, charged by Sergt. Hugh Jones with being drunk in Temple Row on Sunday week, was fined 5s and costs, or seven days in default. Defendant, in reply to questions, said three pints of beer wouldn'i mak-, any man drunk. Mr Jno. Jones remarked that ,that would depend on the beer he .should think, defendant adding that it must be a weak stomach to get drunk on three pints J (Laughter.)-Mary Lord, Coedpoeth, charged by P.C. Rowland with being drunk in Hope-street on the 12th inst.; fined 5s and costs.-R. Anderson, charged by the same officer with being drunk and disorderly in Turner's Court, Mount-street, on the 11th inst., was let off on payment of the costs, this being his first appearance during his 24 years'residence in Wrexham.—Edward Griffiths, also charged bv the same officer with a similar offence in Mount Pleasant on the same date was likewise discharged on payment of the costs, it being his fimt kupear- ance.-Harriet Davies, a married woman, who failed to appear, was charged by the same officer with being drunk and disorderly on the Mount Hill, on Sunday, the 11th inst., and there being 16 previous conviction* recorded against her, she was committed for a month without the option of a fine, P.C. McLaren stating that when he served the summons defendant told him she would be leaving the town that (Monday) morning.—P.C. Rowland next charged Catherine Hughes with being drunk in Turner's Court, the defendant, who said she had joined teetotal and hadn't had a spot for a month," being fined 5s and costs, or seven tUysin default.-William Williams, saddler, was charged by P. C. Lee with being drunk on Sunday, Ilth inst., in Brook-street. The defend- ant, who said he was not drunk, but excited over a family disagreement, was fined 5s and costs, there being several previous convictions against Mm.—Sarah Devonport, who said she belonged to Barnsley, was charged by P.C. Corbett with being drunk and disorderly in College-street on Saturday night. P.C. Pleavin corroborated, but the defend- ant, who had been locked up over Sunday was dis- charged with a caution. BEER AND TGR,TEIT.—ALLEGED LARCENY. John ifatho was in custody on a charge of steal. inga bottle of beer and a bottle of porter, value Bd, the property of Messrs Summers and Fitch, wine merchants, Hope-street, on the previous Saturday. Robert Grindley, cellarman, in the employ of the prosecutors, said he fceew the prisoner, who came to the vaults now and then as a customer. On Saturday he came to the place and took a basket of empty bottles from the shop into the passage with out witnesses' knowledge or Authority. A boy was next called and said he found the bottle of beer produced in the place where broken bottles were pitched, but he didn't know how it came there. The prisoner here remarked that he had left the bottle of beer in the passage while he sre&t to take some bills out. A third boy, Richard Henry Williann, asid he was looking for corks in the mixen, when he saw the bottle of porter produced, and another boy said he would take it home. Did not know there was anything in the bottle till the cork flew ,out. Mr Parry, assistant to the prosecutors, identified the bottles produced as being the property of Messrs Summers and Fitch, and said he did not believe they had been sold that day. One of the previous witnesses had told him that the pnsoner wanted the bottle ot beer for his breakfast. The battles and their con- tents were worth 9d. Sergt, Hugh Jones proved receiving the prisoner into custody, and said that Batho had stated that he had simply thrown the full bottles with the empty bottles in a mistake. In reply to the charge, prisoner pleaded not guilty, and said he had left the bottles in question in the yard whilst he went for some bills, and that when he came back the bottles were gone and were afterwards in the cinder-hole. Mr Parry stated that many things nad been re- cently missed from the premises hence the pre- sent proceedings. After consultation, the Mayor said the Bench did not consider the case had been clearly estab- lished against the prisoner, who would accordingly have the benefit of the doubt and would be dis- charged. SINGULAR CHARGE OF ASSAULT AGAINST A POLICE OFFICER. EXTRAORDINARY CASE.—IN A POOL FOR THREE HOURS. Thomas William Pleavin. a member of the Borough Police Force, was charged by Gomer Jones, laborer, Mount-street, with assaulting him under the following circumstances. Complainant said he was a laborer, and worked occasionally for Mr Thomas Rowland. Between twelve and one o'clock on the previous Friday (mid-night), he was in bed, when he heard a man shout murder He took no notice at first, till he heard voices talking and a sound as of someone pulling down a wall then he heard a voice say, Hold on! We'll get him out with a rope. Think- ing someone had got fast somewhere, he and his boy dressed themselves and went out in the yard. They proceeded up towards the Mount-hill, but could hear nothing. Neither could they hear anvthine in the street g and he (complainant) then remarked, The murder must have been over in Mr Walker's yard or Mr Soames' we'll go home again and go to bed On going down the brow of the hill, however, he saw someone standing up against a wall, quite straight, and when he said good morning." the defendant Pleavin struck out from the shoulder and knocked him down, when another policeman (Lee) immediately joined in, and they kicked him as hard as they could—kicking him in the ribs and hips, Pleavin kicking him in the head. It was a dark night, but there was a light from the lamp near the Dolphin Inn, and when he asked what he had done, the defendant replied, You scoundrel, if you're mot off home I'll give you more It seemed that the man who was shouting had got over a wall, and the defendant must have 1, meant mischief," because he let him (complainant) come up the hill quietly, but started on him suddenly as he returned. Cross-examined by Mr Ashton Bradley (who appeared for the officer) This was between twelve and one o'clock. Had not been asleep, and had been in bed s-ince about ten o'clock. Had been during the evening at Wilding's, the shoemaker's, in Bank-street. Had had nothing to drink that night. Was not exactly a teetotaller, but no one had seen him drunk for the past five years. There was a pool at the back of his house, and a wall with a drop of a considerable depth to the pool. Did not know what reason these policemen could have for abusing him. They attacked him without any provocation whatever, that he would take his oath of Heoniysaid" good morning," and then they rushed at him. Could see it was Pleavin by the light from the lamp near the Dolphin. Had had no row with anybody that evening, and had not pitched anyone over a wall—he was quite sure of that. No one who was with him had said, I wonder whether he's there now," as they went up towards the pool. There was no one with the two policemen—was quite sure. DidWt see any man- there was no one there. He (complainant) didn't make a rush at anyone himself, and didn't see a man named Cooke there. It was Pleavin, not Lee, who touched him first, and then they both got him down and began kicking him. He (complainant) had never had any difficulty with the police at all. By the Bench A lodger and my little boy were with me at the time. Edwin Roberts said he worked on the railway and lodged with the complainant. On the Thurs- day night they went to bed about ten o'clock, and about half-past twelve the complainant woke him, and said Do you hear that row?" He listened ,and heard someone shouting "Murder!" and Help Complainant said, Let's get up and give him help, will you?" and they then both got up, hearing a great row all the time till they got out of the house into the street, when everything became perfectly quiet and they could hear nothing I Complainant said Let's go back, there's nothing the maA er.! but as going up the Mount Hill the defendant Pleavin came up suddenly from the wall and struck the complainant, afterwards kicking him, as also did the other police-officer Lee. Lee subsequently said to Pleavin You oughtn't to have kicked him like that," Pleavin raplyingf How did I know they weren't strangers Cross-examined: There is a lamp by a public- house in Mount-street, but there's no lamp on the Mount Hill. On going out of the house, I didn't say I wonder if he's there now ?" Hadn't any- thing to do with putting the man in the pool. Have never had any difficulty with the police at all. Heard one officer say to the other that he fA oughtn't to have kicked him like that." A boy named Samuel Jones (son of the com- plainant) said be saw the officer strike his father. He had not seen the man in the pool. The Magistrates' Clerk.: As far as the evidence goes, Mr Bradley, the man in the pool seems to be a myth Mr Bradley We don't show our hands all at once, sir The Clerk Do you produce him ? Mr Bradley Yes. The Clerk The man in the pool ? Mr Bradley Oh, yes. Continuing his remarks, Mr Bradley said this was a most extraordinary case. A hat their Wor- ships should be asked to believe that the officers would attack a weak, sickly-looking individual like the complainant was almost too much The evidence he should put before them would, he thought, be more preferable than that adduced for the complainant, and the facts were these-Pleavin, who was on duty with Lea, heard shouts of Murder and they both go into the Mount Yard, and on looking over a wall they found a man in a pool of water. The man in the pool tells the officers that he has been thrown over the wall into the water, and they ultimately succeed in getting him out. Whilst in this place they hear men approaching, and a voice saying, "I wonder whether the b-- is there now ? The officers therefore naturally imagine that these are the people who have thrown the man into the water, and on coming away from the pool with the man they had rescued, they meet the complainant and his companions, and as one of them exclaims, There the b- is—now for him," they make a rush for the man who had been got out of the pool-a man of the name of Cooke. The officer Lee didn't touch the complainant at all, but Pleavin did prevent the man rushing at Cooke, who stated that he was thrown into the pool by some one or other-he doesn't know who-and he (Mr Bradley) submitted that the whole story as to the assault was preposterously absurd. It was simply ridiculous to think that the officer would make such an unprovoked attack upon a poor, sickly individual like the complainant, without even a word being said. If it were true, of course the offender should be severely punished, but he submitted that the whole thing was a fabrication. P.C. Thomas Lee was then called, and said he was on duty with P.C. Pleavin as stated, when they heard some one shouting murder," and on going to the Mount Yard they found a man in a pool of water about 15 feet from the top of the wall over which they looked. Witnesb obtained a wire clothes line, and with this he and Pleavin tried to draw the man out, but failed. They then began to pull down the wall, telling the man in the pool to make a noose in the wire line and put his foot in it, and by this means they managed eventually to get him up out of the water. Then they heard voices and someone saying, I wonder whether the b- is there now ?" and immediately afterwards three men, of whom the present com- plainant was one, came up, and exclaiming, There the b- is-now for him," the com. plainant made a rush at the man Cooke, but struck him (witness) instead. Witness then gave com- plainant a push and he fell down. He distinctly denied kicking or abusing the complainant as stated neither did Pleavin kick or strike him as described. He (witness) had given the complain- ant a push simply to guard himself, and it was not such a push as would send a man down unless he was drunk. Had never said to Pleavin, You oughtn't to have kicked him like that." There was a 15-feet drop from the wall in question to the pool beneath, and had it not been for the water, which was up to the man's middle, Cooke, when thrown over, must have been either killed or injured for life. Thomas Cooke, a farmer living at Worthenhury, and who said he farmed 124 acres of land, was next called, and stated that he remembered Friday morning when he found himself in the pool." He shouted out, and the two police officers came to him and got a wire rope to assist him out of the water. After being got out he heard some one coming along and a voice saying I wonder whether the b- is in there yet ?" He then saw three men coming, and the officers went on one side and told witness to stop where he was till the men came up. As one of the men approached he said Come on, Ned-there he is," and the com- plainant then made a rash at him (witness), but P.C. Lee stepped in his front. Did not see the officer Pleavin either kick or strike the complain- ant at all, although he saw Lee push him (com- plainant) back. By the Magistrates' Clerk I live under Mr Howard, of Broughton. On the Thursday I came to Wrexham Station for some calf meal, and after- wards walked about the town and through the markets till about five o'clock in the evening. After five o'clock, I was with the Salvation Army where they go, and remained there till about eight o'clock. After that I went to the Wynnstay for my topcoat and umbrella. Didn't have anything to drink there, that I know of. (Laughter.) This would be about half-past eight, and I then went to the Seven Stars in Chester-street to see for a man who was going home and would give me a lift, but he was gone. Had some peppermint at the Seven Stars. Had nothing in it. Had only 2d of brandy when he left Bangor in the morning. It was now after nine o'clock, and I started off home, going past the Wynnstay down Yorke-street. Don't know where I went after then-it was getting dark. Thought he went straight in the direction of Worthenbury, and kept on the side of the street- The Clerk Now, where did you get to ? Come I you must say. Witness: I can't tell the place now, no more than the dead (Laughter.) The Clerk Did somebody get hold of you ? Witness Yes. The Clerk: A man or woman ? Witness: Three men. The Clerk What time was this? Witness Getting on for ten o'clock. The Clerk: Where was this-where did they get ho d of you ? Witness: In Mount-street. The Clerk In Mount-street ? Witness: Yes. The Clerk Where did they take you ? Witness To that place. The Clerk: What place ? Witness To that pit. The Clerk Were you sober ? Witness: Yes. The Clerk Quite sober ? Witness Yes. The Clerk What did they do with you ? Witness Pitched me over the wall! The Clerk What time was that ? Witness: Ten o'clock. The Clerk How long did you remain there ? Witness Till towards one o'clock in the morn- ing. The Clerk Now, did somebody else get hold of you before these men? Come, you must tell the magistrates all about it! Witness: No, sir. The Clerk: Nobody else got hold of vou ? Witness: No. Mr Jno. Jones: Where did they get hold of vou ? Witness: I don't recollect, It must be some- where near the place. Mr Jno. Jones: Was it near the Bridge House ? Witness: No, we hadn't got that far. Mr Jno. Jones: What did they say to you? Witness I don't know. Mr Jno. Jones: But you say you were quite sober ? Witness Yes, but I was stunned by the fall. By the Clerk I had over f3 when I came to Wrexham, and when I was in the water I had the same amount there. and my watch. The Clerk Then you were not robbed ? Witness No. Mr J. M. Jones asked where the witness got stunned by the fall, remarking that it could not have been when he fell into the pool, because he fell into the water. Mr Jno. Jones (to witness): Do yon want us to understand that three men met you in the street, seized hold of you, and threw you over a wall into this water ? Witness They must have done, or I shouldn't have got there The Clerk Who spoke first ? Witness I can't recollect. By the Mayor: I got into the Mount-yard—it was so dark—and I thought I was going home (Laughter.) By the Clerk Don't often come to Wrexham, but know the proper road out. The Clerk There were plenty of lights in the street that night? Witness Not that I saw. (Laughter.) Dr. Eyton-Jones: Are those cottages in the Mount-yard still occupied ? P.C. Lee: Yes, sir. by a bad lot. Dr. Eyton-Jones Ah, and they have been for years! There's more behind this than we have heard yet. (To witness): Did you go into any of those houses down that yard? Witness: No, sir. Dr. Eyton-Jones Nor nobody enticed you ? Witness: No, not that I know of. (Renewed laughter.) By Mr Bradley Saw no kicking on the part of the officer, and it was Lee, not Pleavin, who pushed the complainant. After being got out of the pool, he (witness) walked home to Worthen- bury. Three men threw him over the wall, and he fell on his head, and his hat—[pointing to it)-was dented in. By Dr. Eyton-Jones The water was over- head, and I fell in on my head to the bottom. I Mr J. M. Jones Do you mean to say that although these men took you there, and there was a light in the street, that you don't know I the men ? Witness: No, sir. Mr Jno. Jones Did you shout? Witness Yes. Mr Jno. Jones What? Witness Murder Mr J. M. Jones From ten o'clock to one? Witness: Yes. (Laughter.) By Mr Jno. Jones: Didn't show fight" because they got hold of me all at once. Complainant, in reply to the Clerk, said he had nothing to ask this witness, whom he had never seen. P.C. Lee said he heard the shouts about half. past eleven o'clock—he could hear them from the bottom of High-street i By the Clerk The man was sober when we cot him out-I don't know how he was before-he was wet through. Dr. Eyton-Jones And you think that ducking might have sobered him ? (Laughter.) Lee Yes, if he was drunk before, it would be likely to make him sober enough ? Sergt. Jonathan Bound said it was the duty of the officers Pleavin and Lee to report themselves to him. They did so about one o'clock on Friday morning, and they were then quite sober. By the Mayor The majority of the houses in the Mount Yard are occupied by bad characters. Inspector Lindsay said the two officers were ordinarily good men, and there had been no com- plaint against them Mr Bradley said this was an important case as affecting the defendant, and his brother officer. The evidence of the witness Cooke was not satis- factory, he admitted, but this was a case of assault between two parties, Cooke not being one, and he was therefore not bound to tell the magistrates how he made a stupid of himself, but he submitted that the evidence he had given corroborated the testi- mony of the officers, and conclusively proved that they were both sober, and not drunk as had been alleged, and that this assault with which the de. fendant Pleavin was charged had not been com- mitted by him. In reply to the Bench, the complainant said if the officers were not drunk they were mad Their worships then retired, and after con. sultation, The Mayor (addressing the defendant) said Pleavin, the Bench have come to the decision that in your case the assault is clearly proved against you, aid you wi 1 be fined £1 and costs. I SCHOOL BOARD CASES. Several persons were summoned by Mr Lloyd -Se ve?eltl Board attendance officer, and fined I for neglecting to send their children to school. I ALLEGED ASSAULT. A woman named Barnes was summoned by Bridget Doyle for assaulting her in the Market, I but the magistrates did not consider the case proved and dismissed the summons. I CHARGE OF ABUSIVE LANGUAGE. John Owen, Crescent Place, was charged by Mary Jane Cooper, a neighbour, with using abusive language towards her on the previous Monday, the case being dismissed, and the Mayor advising the parties to try and live together in a friendly way, I NO MOVEMENT LICENSE. James Pugh. Farndon. was summoned by P.C. Corbett for bringing a calf into the Smithfield on the last fair day without a movement license, the defendant, who said he did not know he was trans- gressing the law, being let off on payment of the costs. I WILFUL DAMAGE. Henry Williams, in the employ of Messrs W. and J. Williams, Town Hill, was summoned by Charles Perrins, 26, Mount-street, for throwing stones at and breaking his (complainant's) door on the 26th April. The defendant, in reply to questions, said the reason stones were thrown at the complainant's door was because there was always a lot of bad women in the house. Inspector Lindsay That's about the truth. (To complainant) You know very well Perrins that you have a lot of prostitutes lodging in your house. Complainant No, sir, I don't know but what- ever I am. I must have protection. The Mayor recommended the complainant to I keep a respectable house. Mr J. M. Jones The fact that you keep a dis- reputable house doesn't justify the defendant in throwing stones at your door. At the same time- The Mayor (to defendant) Well, the decision is that you are fined Is and 7s costs, and if any more are guilty of a similar offence they will be severely dealt with. As to the complainant, if the man keeps a disreputable house, the police will look after that-it is not your business-and if the man does keep such a house, that wont justify a lot of lads throwing stones at his door. TumDAY.-Before the Ex-Mayor (Y Strachan, i Esq.) CHARGE OF STEALING STRAW. A labourer named John Lloyd was charged with stealing a quantity of straw, the property of Mr A. T. Jones, from a stack in the Cae Shack field, Ruabon Road, on the previous evening.—A witness named James Kendrick proved seeing the prisoner take the straw, and a man named Enoch Jones stated that he bought the straw off the prisoner for 9d.-Lloyd was then remanded till Monday. WEDNESDAY.—Before T. C. Jones, Esq., and Y. Strachan, Esq. A VIOLENT SON. I Patrick McDermott, Yorke-street, was charged by his father with smashing his sitting-room and other windows, and doing damage to the extent of 22. Complainant stated that on the previous evening the defendant was drunk, and broke a number of paries of glass in his (complainant's) house. This was about five o'clock, and the police were sent for and he went away, returning, how- ever, later on, and smashing two plate-glass windows in the sitting-room. The defendant was not blind drunk," but mad drunk," he had been drinking through the week, and his mother had ordered him out of the house on account of his misconduct. It was a great pity that he (com- plainant) should have to appear in this way against his own son.—Inspector Lindsay said about 9.30 on the previous night he was sent for to Mr McDermott s house, and the complainant showed him the broken windows, and said that his son had broken them. After a little search he found the defendant at the bottom of Yorke-street, and told him he had better not repeat what he had been doing, adding that he ought to be ashamed of him- self to take advantage of a poor weakly man like his father, and that if a strong man had been there with a stout stick to put across his back, he wouldn't have done what he had! Defendant said Would you have done it ? given him the stick-to which witness replied that he certainly would, when the defendant showed fight, and witness then collared him, and was taking him to the lock-up with the assistance of P.C. McLaren, when he begged off, and was allowed to go on promising that he wouldn't go near his father's house again. He, however, sub- sequently returned and repeated his disorderly and violent conduct as already described.—Sergt. Hugh Jones proved receiving the defendant, who was given in charge by his father, into custody, and in reply to the Bench, Mr McDermott said he was sorry to say his son was often drunk, and was then very violent.—The defendant said he was drunk, and that was all he knew about it," Mr T. C. Jones remarking that that circumstance only aggravated the offence. He was then committed for a month's hard labor without the option of a fine. TO-DAY (FRIDAY).—Before T. C. Jones, Esq., and George Bradley, Esq. A DESERTER. I Grimth Hughes, aged 25, a young man and liberally tattoed on various parts of his bodv, was in custody, having given himself up to P.C. Corbett on the previous day as a deserter from the 15th York East Riding. The prisoner, who stated that he had enlisted in 1875 at Hanley, and deserted two or three years ago from Jersey, was remanded till Monday.

I COUNTY MAGISTRATES' COURT.

District News.

[No title]

SPORTING.I

[No title]

[No title]

FAIR WHITE BAUDS; I

- - -'' -, -'- -...- .. -HOUSE;…

THEE CLOSING OF CHESTER PRISON.

—————-w--———— i[BY TELEGRAPH.…

THE CHARGE AGAINST LORD ST…

THE QUEEN.

iAN ENGINE DRIVER CUT TO PIECESI…

m ■ LIVERPOOL COUN ?MADHE'Ptj

ILONDON CORN MARKET. I

[No title]

Advertising