Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

12 articles on this Page

———————b' Œ\V CHAPEL, Clh:::inm-STIŒEl'.…

WREXHAM BOARD OF GUARDIANS.…

[No title]

[No title]

JtUAiiUiN UtlilltLlIJSJ).II…

[No title]

WUYH MARKETS.u I  l???v?t?r…

bAiN X.K u r L O.-x ITIL)AY.…

[No title]

CHlSSiJiK, AND HUIjx JttKiALJ…

Advertising

WREXHAM COUNTY COURT. I Trrwniv…

News
Cite
Share

;Vi, • ■ ..unit .uditio't .-inyl'il'i.; lll;e ltas v.i.en it was w :Ii I, 4'1laL¡I':] tq rro\Op 1Ia! 'li- Ji.trst. II.-sV.ilM to prove Ihs p U ,'r f'" fact. <r the dt:fciiec. ??! ?& V; rcxham a 1,,0\\110 r S'1\ It Fair the horse was seta by -M— Sidebolt,-)Ili. It was ti then in good condition, with no unsoundness about it 0 with the exception ct the bony enlargement which had t) nrjved of 110 detriment to it. It was taken to Middle- t, I' and used in fetching coal, going to market, and also 7 .on a U w ,1 one occasion to Manchester with a party to the Races. p It was shamefully abused, one sore on the back alone b measuring nine than a f.) -t in diameter, as shown by the b rue,. 0 pattern <m ta)-i 'e. iNt. I wuuid .tjte that the ti I ore wad then a vary v .lujl-1 -• on but -h(-ti he saw her j, in oil the 1 lib of Juiie, at Cu, iwys he did not know je her she was so reduced and altered, and he told the „ plaintiff so at the time. Knowing the mare to lie a good N ;1 e he purchased it himself at the safe at Midil eton ir fur £ 16 10i 6<1. and after curing it he sold her again to Mr. Samuel Gnrside, a farmer living in the neighbour- £ hood for CIS. The niare was now in first-rate condition, 8, the owner not hein willing to part with her under 30 h guineas, as he considers her the most Valuable animal he a; ever had in his stable. He should also be able to prove rE that the farmer of whom Mr. Astbury had bought her }, had had her for five yeais, and that she was a good, Bound, j- and useful animal all that time, and when he sold her at tl Pwllheli. The mare having thus been in sound health III t?re and after the p!a!ntiH'had her, he concluded a that the poll evil was caused by Ht-usuage of him and 'A his servant men. He then called as witnesses—Mr. b John Williams who sold the mare to Mr. Astbury, ti Mr. Samuel Sidebottoin, who said he never knew h i bea-t so cruelly treated or a better mare; Mr. a Gariide who has her now and would not sell her cj under oO guineas; Mr. Thomas Roberts, who worked 1} her for week at Uaerwys previous to her going to Mr. w Ashbtiry's Mr. Edwards, sort of Mr. E l\vard.<, veterinary di turgeen of Caeru-ys, and student in a college in Edin- X har^h, who stated that lie had known poll evil to have }n developell itself in days in one ease, although it takes w jenerally about three weeks. The dist-sse. he said, wa5 J] a l ways caused by external injuries. To rebut the evi- tE dence of the last witness, Mr. itymcr (iiiilc I Mr. William Billing, who said that lie v. us a veterinary surgt-on pruc- hr ti.ing t V.'reiharn. lie knew the nature and treatment if 0l'p"!levil- The tiiin- iviii(-h would elupse before the o formation of pus depended ;,it, grther Oil the nature of the injuries and the condition of, tile Inilli;il. It lu;lv be formid in ten '¡II\, < r it war take two months.—After a remark fto-n Mr. Kymer, his Honour said that the last witness had giveu his evidence ia a ILI(lit satisfactory 11 I '.1 III m?nnrr. He then teYicw?th?-? hine o! tin; evidence, )'' niakiif; so:i:e very scvriv o'l-ervaLiDi.s on that of Ihe *l PW[Ititf. H'' should have to h'ok at the facta in er.n- m ntction with the law, and as '.he h»>r«i! was not returned ?'' in mulling hki- the mndilion it had loen sold, n-.r m a ta reasonable time and as it doubtful whether the poll 111 evil Wus not eaused by the eiuel v.ii;:il ouds which the n1 plaintiff Iiad in his sc-raee," he should give judgment for (;1 the ileienja:.t with eosts. notimi what tl:e 111 ii,tter wili aili,,lzr,L iiz,,y be 1. arn. li„i„ the fact tliat the v, cujtiufthe wiUiusses ukmeat the previous couit amoun- w ti.*d lo i ] •>. 1 ta CLAUSE T. V.VI OIIAN.—Mr Aithur Cl;irke, the plain- pi tiffin this action, is an accountant in Wrexham, and was kl formerly assessor of the property tax for the township of tu Elton conjjintlp with Mr. William Orloril. The ap- P' pointment was alleged to have taken place in 1853, and P' the action was to mover £ 3 18s. 5d. said to be 8] due tj the plaintiff by the defendant Mr. W. Wynne v laughan, the colIu< t'T of taxes in that township, at 3d. I Be in the pound for the whole amounted collected in the cl years 183<. 4, 5, and C. Mr. T. B. Acton appeared for m the pbinliff'. and Mr Uridgman, ?f Chester, for the defen- dim. Mr. John Bury, Mr. Orford, ami Mr. Butler, the ?° receiving otueer ol taxes men gave evidence. Mr. Bury stated that as the assessment extended over four years, the plaintiff was entitled to receive the poundage during that time, and Jlr. Butler proved from his books what the amounts were. Mr. Orford said he was not aware 1 that Mr. Clarke had been appointed assessor conjointly 4 with himself, but he had employed him to make out the assessments, tur which he agreed to give him the whole of the poundage. As the plaintiff was not prepared to I prove that he was legally appointed in wr:ting, his c Honour viid fit! must be non-su'ted—the proper person 10 me being Mr. Orford, whose appointment had been It proved. Nonsuited accordingly, At the termination of this case it was seven o'clock, and i his II inimr then proceeded with the summonses on the u judgment, after which the court was adjourned until 10 s o'cluck the following day. EDxrSDH, t The court opened this morning at the appointed time, t and the fullowing cases weie then heardt EVANS V. ROHEUTS.—1Ti.is was an action to recover money for clothes supplied by Mr. Evans, Queen-street, v Wrexham, in 1854, to Mr. Joseph Roberts flour-dealer, f Wrexham. As the clothes were had during the time "v when the defendant was under ag e and was living with hit fatier, his Honour said he must give judgment for ( defendant. C CHARGY OF FALSE I.MpnrsoNiiE.vr.—Joxr.s v. ED- I *AHDs.—'This action was brought to recover the sum of j ?, the alleged damage dOOJ to the plaintiff in July last, a by fa!se imprisonment in the Wrexham bridewuH. Mr! E. Pugh staled the ce for the plaintiff. On Wcdncs-? s day, the first bfJuiy. the defendant, Thomas 1J war9. of I the Mos., JMt his watch from out of his bedroom in his t cottage. The plaintiff lives in a cottage about a quarter t of a mile otf, and works on the coal bank at the West- t minster Colliery,only a few yards distant. Be was on in- ( tirnnte terms with the defendant and his wife, and called t at the house occasionally, as a friend. At about ten 1 (•'clock on the night the watch was missing the defendant ( called at the house of the plaintiff (whe was in bed) and whether he hail seen Mary Ann Salisbury or Tom l'ugh about the premises when his wile took him his dinner-which he had not. He then told him that his watch had been stolen sometime during the day. There was nothing to prove that the plaintiff had anything to do with with it, and nothing was said to him about it unui the rnday morning following, when defendant and I KC, Hammond went to him at his work, and after hand. v cuffing him took him to the Wrexham bridewell as a u prisoner. From theie he was taken before -Air. Meredith, 1, of l'ciitrebyehan, who. after finding that no charge could B be substantiated, discharged him at once, telling the v policeman at the same time he hoped he would not bring i tl such a case before him again. Tho mail wa- a quiet, n decent man, and had been in his pit-sent employment f.)r l sit yeirs, and as there was really no grounds of a charge v "inst i1iIDi nor any reasonable suspicion that he st ilL- fc the watch, the present action was brought for false i- v prisnnment. The plaintilf and Mr. D. Williams, t v man at the W.iminster Colliery then gave their evideuco a and detailed the pailieulurs—the plaintiff admitting that I hv 1 ai I,i-eri iiii,.i i.,ioned in Stalfurd gaol gome ten years f, f .r a iii i;Lii, for not paying a fine of 10s. inflicted on t lui by the magistrates The defence went to prove that I there w(.rc rtMgunahlc ground s fur suspicion. Tho wife c dCp"ed that the plaintiff was in the habit of calling at e her imuseiive or six times a-day, and sometimes asked for >1 IvlUethin t.) i!rink and sometimes for tobacco. On the 1 'rnn.g in ?.ttsuon, bç called at U o'cloc k and bad some a ij¡jn ?ud u?u ?mo tobacco, no also saw where sha r P14cud the tobacco-b?x. She then wont fur water to a ] *Mi and iuuked the door, putting the key uudi?r some rag:! on it lunch by the rain-tub. The plaintiff saw ] *lit-'ie she put the key, as he was close by at the tirue, a ikiid u-a. to her. Site left the house at ten lIIi. f nUks to twelve, to take her husband's dinner to the I rynma.lv works, and passed the plaintiff on the bank, who told her to make haste or she would be too late, j She returned about one o'clock and found that the key < had been shi'ted, and was in the door. On examining g A J"6 t^ she found that I foz. had been abstracted, but she missed nothing else, not thinking of the watch z upotairs. When they were g..ing to bid at night, how- ever, her husband missed it and asked hr whe.e it ? as. Se then told him antheeireumstanc.s m?ounectiuu 1 with thle D ptdtntHf, and he (her husband) went to his ) boue to talk about the Mattur, and to ask if h.- had seen '"yo?'dy there .iuric? her absence in the .niddte <? the j J he had not. Hhc saw the watph by the bed at ten ml.Y l'utes to twelve, and she Lad not left the house at aU that day only to take the dinner. Subsequently the plaintiff explained to her husband that it could not have L*L*ri hiin that stole it, inasmuch as he had come to his wrk at ten Dlinutc to one o'clock, through the wood, J! a man named Edward Roberts. He, however, was But pr?tnt in court. Roberta denied that he did come "f h.m He then told the cirtum?ancG to the police, who t(k;k him in charge Her husband's tale was •uh! a""all>' the SMmf, only he denied having given him in ?Brge—he merdy told the police, and said that be had cau?e f..r Impicion. When the p?ice and the defen- daut êearcbcd the plaintiff's house they did not find the watch .,r anything else improper. He certainly sus- peeted him before, as some one had burst in the door, 1 Six ucek a ago. and stolen some of his tobacco, lIe had IllIt mentioned this to anyone, not liking to damage his eliardcter. From the following conversation, *f\er it appears that he had other grounds for sus- niri Un Did yon not consult a fortune- >'ou not consult a fortune- kuer 011 the su ject before you tojd the police ? Defen- dan I Iii-I not. Mr. Fugh Did you not go to a n to turn the Bible in oidi?r to diacover the thief? r» I did cn Thursday niht. Mr. Fugb Well, TnT wi '1,J it m'-n?—please tell his Honour. De- fZ,t"t: '"?? ??' fur it turned on him. (Much 1„. ter' Mr. Pugh But how did you do it—how did it 1^ u'0r Defendant: It turned n?ht, I tell you—you Mt to humbug me, I think. (Continued laughter.) Mr, ilugl, Did you read a chapter ? Defendant: No, I c4ulltit read but a t'ilrt was read, and I held the key. (ltoar of luughtt,-r.) Mr. l'ugh: What part of the Bible va ■' defendant: I cannot tell; and then added, 111 you put u.e in a passion. I dare soy you know all ab,ut it, and I did it to set- whether I bad a proper sus- P\CI\JIl, I:hJ t¡,11 J'ou it pointed to him. His Honour her. .j 'atiin I 1 -1 s scen*' Ul,<1 "Iter 1* G Hammond was pf where he went to. He did not know w h et h er it was IHE SCHOOLMASTER ABIIOAD.—At the Marlborough There is an old custom m this parish for the church- | cretious, e"" to u, k ,r. T' Ul, al l h er° Wtru ,L,a;1"nflb l d suspicions the motion of the an i ma l w h ic h quic k ened his hrain into Po l icc-court, on Monday, J. Cross, who described himself wardens to go roun d the churc h and get a co l lection dur- a m a m a m a. a m a. m a n. p m. p. ai ,p mj p si1 (p. m. p. ui a m p. m. p. ui. ^rw aud uMdoubted elUcacy 111 Coles OX A*Uft, Bilioua AtTec- the i l ^i f !r be fore a ma g istrate, and that both aetivity, or the variety of obj ects that he passed in quick as a sc h oo l master, was c h arged ,wit h bein g drunk on ing service, just before the sermon, which is distributed r HESTER « J° <J 1" 10 10 11 10 Vis' 7 ss 5 i« turns, Consumption. Uuurlitua, Ueiwrnl Gout. Cun- Ooihin llantan the policeman hail done their duty and succession thatimparted to him ideas; but this he knew Sunday evening, and beggmg m Oxford street. Police to some very poor and deserving obj ect or obj ects, signi- saltney I Msai j !•••• „J stipation, ludwostion. Liver Complain t s,ltheumitiiaui, acrufu- o-mere. A erdiet for the defen d ant with costs. that he a l ways returne d home after the ri d e, with his constable Outred proved that the defendant was drunk fied by the wor d "pauper" in the Will. Tho bread use d Pulford 8 ;10 2a 3 33, 5 38 8 7 1ft it 5 31 la, Utoew, Z JSmsOlfOUKB0 —Th Lhl! ^KTrlN°.—C.tsso.v v. WoODiv.utD BKOTHEBS. sermon composed and arrnnged in the most perfect order, ,iat 11? varwus persons. He heard the to be so given until a year or two since, and the baker — — 8 o "«5 5 4 "ii tJ1 S 1? —• 15 oj 549 which accompany eaeh box.—Sold at l». 14a., as. 9d., aud Vp 3 ^Uwas a'i action to recover £ 12 10-. being a half- ready for de l ivery, without the aid of pen, ink, or paper defendant boast that he had spent 10s. that day in beer, was paid by Ellis. He, however, failed at that period MRKXUAM 8 50 9 35 10 0 1 • 4 a Mi 8 -• 1) 4-. 6J., by all Dealers in Patent Medicine*. Waol^u otpoi. ul., rJ iel w due on ^'e 29th of September last, to the He could not help taking exception to one point in his The defendant, who assumed an air of in j ure d innocence, and became a parish pauper; and thus the mone y was Uh03 —4I 10 "-i7 1148 I 4 14 4M 612 839 lo «; c 22. Bread-street, l*maou. U» J7 lSS Ca8s,'n. for the house known as Offa Cot- fnend (Mr. Lock wood's speech. ) He was not going to and made use of ver y fine language declared, on his hon- irrecoverably lost, and the chanty ceased. Huabcm ••• 9 „ ,0 53 -•> .•• „ 6 is 10 50 6 1» "Tvnrr.w i oV queai f yr'L l aV'! d The de fendants did not ra i se any be severe in his criticism hut he regretted to find that our, he never solicited eleemosynary" aidI from any (Concluded.J pollen Road i!! I- I S 11 11 Itt J 37 frS « £ » M 2 6 !» ?hev r i "810 ll>« amount of rent, the defence being that his iriend had suc h a stron g an'.ipathy to Ireland. Uvangbemg It «as monstrous that a man of education chir l l | 9 18, 11 312 1 8 9 "T^ AYE v. METGALF.-KAYE'ciWCIiSUJiLL-S PILL«.- AU- i Urrcn d 'rcd U,e house up to MissCaasonin (Laughter. ) Tho doctor then entered into an elaborate hke himse l f, livmg m one ol IWe fi l b ert's Model Lod- BOUKSE avMBLi«G AND 6UICIDE.-AU AmencaD, nam- Preesgwyn 925 io"o n l' s iV 'l" ? 8 45 4 «1 « 38 8 « n s tL* «• T = ( 18o6, and consequ.ntly had no right to pay rent, description of the delightful physical an d improving gmg houses, should be obnoxious to police interference ed Edward D- some time ago arrive d m Pans, Oobowen ••• y 15 9 50 ll O la 0 a lu 4 «| 5 0 6 2H 9 5 £ a^ m ous I'mTtaUoifot i» a j i CV WlU f "1'0'unint,r,'8iinsdecf»ils;but the following commercial aspect of Ireland. The good which had re- and tliat property, as valuable to him, as were the posses- an d took up his resi d ence in an hotel in the Rue fc euve St. OsWKsrRY wriv ••• 9 3»io lu it 25 li 23 4 44, 5 20 6 4s 9 2 1 i8| « 3» the mmiiu, Joim Kaye, JSsq., or Uai^ou Half, near iiuduer.- Tn OUI I HHJ of it as tfiven bv the tiiflVrent witnesses suited from the ..rnnm h ere d Estates Bill whieh had 810113 Marquis ot Wesimmster to that personage, Augustin. He em b ar k e d in Bouise speculations, and, was, "> V hit lint-ton — — — ••• J,1 i8 — 5 1 ii — „ S i? — f, !• 6 3a tjoi.j, is solo prot>i letor.) iiie UoreuUant is miW 111 coiumemeut J* 1IW, Mr. should bj left unguarded and exposed to the dcsi is of 4,e £ „.w l d g. d .ueees. 1,„ r. ,1,. 1..L f™ d.„ = J» » j*» I" 1 S^|S = •= "SSS"?HB1S SARTT—' gT J 80(1 Mr. Oliver, accountant, W rcxham, was cn- served a number of new ecelesiastioal structures: one him. at once to prison for seven ua y s. found looked. Mr. D was fonnd sealed ia an m-n„h am ,rri ••• 7 Ss j w «o!u 40 01J O a jad 4 43 6 42 7 1» 8 S°:i» « |I025 » «i 9 4 verumeiit stamp, aud-j s.' 'x lie bjgnature' ana coin of arum of bv Af iraw UP aD agreement in writing, to he signed from its elegant design he inJerred belonged to the Es- Sir Richard Dundas will we have no doubt, be duly armchair, with his brains blown ont. No report of any Biruungba dep MS 8 0 u 42 l 512 to 2 30 a 30 5 20 7 5| 7 20 jo a| o»o the proprietor, on the directions euclised witli each box. J^ Casson and Sin C. Woodward, and in which tablished Cuurch- hw oS included in the forthcoming patent as First sea Lord, firearm had been heard, and it appeared that he had Leami06ton ,7 37 9 33 I™ > « •" g .J ;■ 3 I 65 Oliver ^ward waa to have a lease for five years. Mr. more modest pretensions. Upon inquiry ho found that he Clarence Paget, C. B., is at present confidently apoken of made use of an air-pistol, which was found lying by hi* j doa 11 so i l 10 Z 5403505 40 540 8 5 10 3510 35 5 0 6 40 London. aid so, but when Mr. Lester took it to M.r Wood- waa mistaken, and that the more stylish structure be« as the Junior Naval Lord. side. ill 1 II to i!ri it t'iti). Mr. Woodward took I inlareli but in a short time th erwarcs, fllltlillt; that it was too tar from the quarry at ar 1' llc St.-itt a letter to Mr. Lert'u-, informing him ta it, and asking permission to sub-let the house to a ov rd party, which was allowed on the condition w Lt the party were approved of by the plaintiff. ot e house wa3 let by the defendants to Mr. Brook ],-way Smith, of West Bromwich, who had turned out he t an indifferent tenant, as he left the house in very R. I r. pur, and Mr. Woodward in deht. Up to this time l'e parties in the present action had agreed pretty well, so t now arose a cause of difference. When Mr. Smith feI  ?.c?i parnes were put in, and at fast Mr. Moss got rig ?(!ssion. The hotMC was in a m.) state of repair, and 1 Ir. Letter applied by letter to Mr. Woodward to put it i repair according to agreement. The cost of doing so as calculated by Mr. Hughes, builder, of the Ailwy, at t! 7 10s., and Mr. Woodward promised to pay half of this iin, if Mr. Moss would pay the other. The money, owever, was not paid by either party. Mr. Woodward atel that he had promised to pay £4, towards the Jpair, and get Mr. Smith to relinquish all claim to the ouse. if he himself should be allowed to do so, und to let 11 Ir. Moss be the bona pie tenant. Mr. Lester denied ai lit any such agreement was entered into or made, but Jmitted that something to that effect had taken place in 11 conversation between them. Mr. Woodward did get fl rr. Smith to relinquish his interest in it (if he had any) a ut nothing more camo of it. Moss went away in a short me and left the house doors and gates open, so that the ouse is in a sad state of dilapidation, and the premises (together in a shameful state The question to be de- ided by his H- nour w s whether the agreement between 1< le parties v.is binding, andalso whether Mr. Woodward ai a yearly tenant or five yearly one. His Honour deci- wl that he was liable to pay the rent, and remarked that liss Casson had been used most disgracefully, 'having er propeity let from one to the other in that sort of it ay. He then gave judgment for plaintiff with eosts, 0 ir. Blickton appeared f ir the defend ints, and woiked up F .1 j.. J great tnet. w I" ue l'n<:tJ Will great tflCt. n It was now halfl'a¡; two o'clock, and us hi? Honour B id to go to St. Asapli that evening, several other large not important cases were made remanents for the next I nut. tl,