Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

9 articles on this Page

FIRST EDITION.

Detailed Lists, Results and Guides
Cite
Share

FIRST EDITION. (The following appeared in onr Second Edition of last twkj. -r- DENBIGHSHIRE QUARTER SESSIONS. FH.IDAY.L L'L.3- The court met this morning at .en o CIOCK ior iue ?- Bp? ? the crinlillill 0 of the county when there wcrcprcsí'nt Thomas Hughes, Esq. ,Ystrad, (Chairman); n h,1 I 'ATP Chirk Castle James Maurice, ?'- 5;; I Co? ToUi'iiIiain, Bc?- House R. Milo, Wq" Emrtlii P. H. Chambers, Esq., Mysmeir- ??" ? ? ?  Esq., P!as C.pt. Wyn. ?''?nh.i.h-; Rev. E. J. Ow? L!auf?.;K. G. Tnlmson 'Ksn., 1??'?'Y?'? Col. MaddocuS, Glauy wem ?n?.I ?aiu?ri?, ES(h M.P" ?Uttae?u; R. O. Mousdale, Esq., Llanrwst. The following gentlemen were sworn on the C;¡:A:D ,In:¥. I- 1 I Mr Isaac Clarke, stationer, Km 11111, (loren.anj David Edwin Davies, grocer, Ruthin EA'.vard Edwards, ironmonger, Ruthin Edward Edwards, draper, Ruthin Henry William Edwards, publican, Ruthin Joseph Holland, builder. Ruthin Charles Jones, shoemaker, n.hhill Evan Jones, ironmonger, Ruthin Hugh Jones, fanner, GarLligynan John Jones, agent, Ruthin John Jones, puMiean, Golden Hart, Rntlim Hob-1-t Griffith Joyce, watchmaker, Ruthin William Lloyd, draper, Ruthm Joseph Maude, confectioner, Ruthin Thomas l'itrry, ltitiliiii Evan Roberts, Castle-street, Ruthin John Simon, draper, Rutliin Michael Turner, f<irm«.-r, Gelli nella. The Clerk of the Peace read Her Majesty s proclama- tion agafnst vice and immorality. CTIARGK TO Till) GIJANI) JUltt The learned Chairman proceeded to address the gen- tlemen of ihe Grand Jury,—He said there was net on the calender a greater number of persons for trial than is usual at this time of the year, and it was a source of satisfaction to him that they did not present any features of violence-they were mostly petty thefts, with which they would find no difficulty to deal. Having very briefly reviewed a few of the cases to come under thcir notice, he (the chairman) was sorry to say that the gaol was fuller row than it had been for a very long time, kut the prisoners underwent a short period ot incarcera- tion, under the summary conviction's Act, with those remarks he woiilcl (lisiiiiss them to their duty, and re- quested them to return to court as soon as fclisy found a bill against one of the prisoners to enable the court to proceed with the business. NOTICE OF MOTION*. Mr E. H. Griffith, the county treasurer gave notice el motion that at the next court of Quarter Sessions, lie would move for an increase of salary. The foreman of the graud jury having brought in a true bill for STEALING FliOXI THE PERSON. William Bellington, (2:;), Joseph Williams, (22), nnd Thomas Bitliell, (15), surrendered to their bail, and were arraigned for trial on the charge of stealing from the person of John Shone. Gresford, one half sovereign, one crown, three half-crowns, and other money, on the 5th December. All the prisoners pleaded Not guilty." Mr Hilton appear for the prosecution, and Mr Sweten. lain for the prisoners. Mr Hilton stated the details of the case, and called the prosecutor, John Shone, who having been sworn deposed to 1)0. returning from Wrexham, on Saturday night, the 5th of Decembar last in company with the prisoners, in Thomas Williams the butchers cart. When near to Pantyrochain, the prisoners commenced pushing him about, and then Bitliell and Williams held him down, and Bellington took the money out of his pocket, viz., half a sovereign, one crown, three half-crowns, and a two shilling piece. The three prisoners then went out of the cart, and up the Borras road. He came out of the cart, and told Til- ston the driver that he thought they had robbed him. He went home. He saw the prisoners next day, when .the money was offered him, which he declined taking .Tiecawe he had given information to the police. He ultimately received the money which lie handed to P.C. ZLawlcy. Mr Swetenham rigi( cross-examined this w.'txess, from whom it was elicited that he and prisoners were in drink. He did not call Tilston who was a big man, Tie feared Tilston would be more inclined to assist the prisoners than him. P.C. Lawley deposed to apprehending the prisoner Bellington, and described. a race he had with him. He afterwards apprehended the two other prisoners. John Roberts, labourer, Grcsford, deposed that the prisoners came to him on the Sunday following the rob- bery, and asked him to take the money to Shone, and Said it was a drunken job, and they were sorry for it. lIe went to Shone and said if you get your money you will be satisfied. Shone replied that he would, and be verv glad of it. He then gave the money to Slioae, and Shone canis with h:m to Gresford to stop Lawley born taking the prisoners. Mr Swetenham submitted to the court that fhor* was no evidence of felonious possession of the money but the court ruled that there was a case for the jury. Mr Swetenham then, in an able manner, addressed the jury on behalf of the prisoners. Roberts having been recalled, said in reply t* the chairman that he did not go to Lawley with Shone. Shone having in evidence said that he did. The learned c hairman then summed up, and put it to the jury whe- ther they thought it a drunken frolic, or whether they actually stole the the money, intending to devote it to their own purposes. He blamed the prosecutor for not calling Tilston, the diiver, to give evidence, who would -show whether the money was found in the cart as had ."been stated, that the case was not before the court in a satisfactory manner, and that ought to weigh with them, it had weight with him. The jury after a brief consultation, returned a verdict iOf not guilty." Mr Hilton said that the man Tilston was brought be- jfore the magistrates, but he was so drunk, that he could -:give no evidence. Mr Swetenham and the court concurred that Tilston nought to have been brought to-day. The men were then discharged. STEALING CLOTH. I Thomas Wood and John Wilson pleaded guilty to the llllrge of having stolen a piece of cloth of the value of 16s., the property of Thomas Hughas, of Llangollen, on the 1st of January, 1864. Sentenced to one month's imprisonment with hard "labour. STEALING A PURSE AND MONEY. I William Hodgkinson (17) alias Reuben Hodgkinson, Also John Dakin, pleaded not guilty to a charge of having stolen a cotton purse and 1-is. Gd., the property and money of John Price, at Llangollen, on the 30tli of December last, while in his employ. Mr. Swetenham appeared for the prosecution; the prisoner was undefended. John Price, sworn, deposed that he was a boatman, and hired the boy a few days before the robbery was cammitted. He asked to leave the boat, but did not retbrn. He gave information to the police. The cotton puree produced he identified as his property. P.C. Evans deposed to apprehending the prisoner, and the purse and new articles of clothing now produced were in the boy's possession. Mr. Bynner, draper, Llangollen, deposed to selling the prisoner a pair of trousers, handkerchief, cap, &c., which amounted to lls. lid. He was paid by the boy with half a sovereign and two shillings, out of which lie returned him a penny. The articles produced by the police officer were what the witness sold to prisoner. t The boy, in defence, said that he found the purse on the bed. and had not taken it out of his master's pocket as he had sworn. His master wanted him to steal turnips for his donkeys, and when he refused his master went and stole them himself. After an admonition from the chairman, the lad was sentence I to three months' imprisonment with hard litbour-one week in each month to be spent in solitary confinement. STEALING STEEL PUNCHES. Jatnes Owen, Thomas Roberts, William Prince, and William Rogers, surrendered to their bail, and were ar- raincd for trial, the former on the charge of stealing steel punches, the property of the new British Iron Com- pany, the latter three for receiving the same, knowing them to be stolen. James Owen pleaded guilty to two indictments for stealing. The others pleaded not guilty to the charge of receiving. The facts of this case are fresh in the memory of our readers, a lengthy report of them hav- ing already appeared in our columns. Mr Trafford (instructed by Mr Acton, of Wrexham), appeared for the prosecution. Mr Swetenham (instruct- ed by Mr Johnson Roberts, Chester,) appeared for the defence. Mr Trafford having stated tha case for the prosecu- tion. recited the chief facts of the case, showing that the prisoner Owen, who stole the punches would be called *,0 relate the circumstances under which they had been *ow«e to the other prisoners, and he would be able to prove that they Im.,v, the. to be toles. Witnesses 'ould be 11 d 'Would be caiiea t,, p,,k as to character; such a course 'Was highly expeaient in cases ? doubt, but in a case I ?-like the Present, character ouiy ?*? t. ?grayate the or,,Iuct -ol the prisarion. I James Woodhall, was the first wi tness called who des I cribed the uses of the punches, and iden^'fied punches produced as the property of the New British Iron Com- pany. P.C. Rose produced punches ident-fied by last wit- ness, Lwo of which he had from Willi.aui Prince, three from Thomas Robert, two others from Thomas Ro- berts, and s;x from William Rogers. He deposed to getting them from the prisoners and related what trans- pired at the time which showed that each of the pri- soner s knew Owen got them at the New British Iron Works, but Owen persisted in saying that they were found among the scrap iron, layiag about the yard. Edward Tudor and Godfrey Jones gave corroborative evidence as to the iaelliy of the punches. James Oweu was then removed from the dock to the witness-box to give evidence against the receivers. This being the case for the prosecution, Mr Swetenham asked the bench if it was necessary f.)r him to address the jury. There was only their own admission as to receiving the goods, but there did not appear to him any evidence to show guilty knowledge. The Chairman concurred with Mr Swetenham, and directed the jury to return a verdict of not guilty." Mr Swetenham here said, that some of the most in- fluential gentlemen in the parish of Ruabon, including Sir Watkiu's mincral agent, the post-master of Ruabon, Mr Bradley, for many years agent of the Plaskynasam Works, 1111(i others who had come to give the men the best character possible. The Umirman-Therc, is nothing against the men bat their own words tJ the police, which cannot im- ply guilty knowledge. The three men were then discharged. The case for the defence was admirably managed by Mr. Swetenham. James Owen was sentenced to six months' imprison- men with hard labaur. EMBEZZLEMENT. John Dyke was sentenced to six months' imprison- ment with hard labour, for embezzlement. HOUSEBREAKING. Robert Jones was sentenced to six months' imprison- ment w?h hard labour, for housebreaking. NIGHT POACHIXG. Cornelius Davies and Edward Roberts surrender- ed to their bail, 011 the charge of being with fire arms on laud in the occupation of John Iloskell, Esq., of Glascoed, and unlawfully beating and WOlliHling I Thomas Jones with sticks, on the 2th November, 18Gi>. Mr Ralph, appeared for the prosecution, and called Thomas Jones, gamekeeper to Mr Iloskell, who occu- pies land in Brymbo, called The Ruck. On the 29tli Nov. at little after eight o'clock heard the report of a gun go off twice, and afterwards within ten yards off, heard another, and saw a flash go oft". Made for the spot, and saw Cornelius Davies; took hold ol him, and said he must go with him. Edward Roberts came out ef a bush and was going to strike witness w'th a stick, and told him to loose Daves, Witness told Edward Roberts that perhaps he was as good a mn. as he, when Roberts struck witness on the forehead a severe blow, and both prisoners beat him very much in the face, and 113 begged of them not to knock his eyes out. There is a road passing about 200 yards off, when he heard some voices. He then got up and ran after them, and came up to Edward Roberts who was hiding in the fern, and a severe struggle ensued, when Roberts called out for Cornelius. Witness was obliged to take Ro- berts off because he was so severely handled. Both men went off in the direction of home. It was a fine moonlight night. His head was bad for a week and could scarcely see. He bled freely. By Mr Swetenham-Knew Davies very well, but did no know his name. Mr Roskoil shoots but little him- self. The wood belongs to Mr Roskell, and are paid for looking after the game for him. A river runs through the wood, winch divides the counties of Denbigh and Flint. We were in Denbighshire. By Mr Ralph—The cap was found where the struggle had been. Peter Griffith, Frith-hall, was next called, and a letter was sent to the court stating his inability to be present. William Matthews lives near this wood, and heard three shots let off before he went out. Peter Griffith came up to him as he was going out, and heard a noise of scuffling and quarrelling, and recognised the voice of Thomas Jones, bit no other. Cross-examined by Mr Swetenham—Found no gun except Thomas Jones's. Mr Ralph asked for Peter Griffith's depositions to be real, which was opposed by Mr Swetenham, on the grounds that no docLor's certificate could be admitted as evidence. Consequently the depositions were not read. Edward Bradshaw, gardener to Mr Roskell, was in the wood on the night in question, when he saw Jones, who was tying a lianderchief round his head, which was bleeding. Robert Jones brought a lantern and they found a cap. Was in the same place about a week afterwards and saw pheasant's feather with blocd. This being the case for the prosecution. Mr Swetenham (who was instructed by Mr John Jones, ^Yrexham) then addressed the court, contend'ng that it was essential to the offenca for which the men were indicted that it should be proved that they were armed with guns, while there was no evidence what- ever of that nature. Mr Ralph contended that it was not necessary, and cited a case where it was held that it was sufficient, hen a flush had been seen go off, and the men afterwards taken without being aroused. Mr Swetenham pointed out the difference between the case cited by Mr Ralph, and the one before them, for they hd no evidence to show they had fire arms in their possession. The Chairman here said it was a question for the jury to consider whether the men were armed or not. Mr Swetenham then addressed the jury for the de- fence, and called. John Jones, sinker, Nant, who deposed that he saw Jones on the night of the row, and that he told wit- ness and two other men that he had been fighting with three men. Witness asked him if he knew the men and he replied that he did, but refused on being asked, to give their names. A good deal of amusement was created by Mr Ralph's cross-examination. Joseph Griffiths lives about a mile from Mr Roskell's, remembers the night of the row. Davies is a carpenter and lie was at his shop having a handle put on a pick, at the very time it was alleged that he was at the wood. John Davies, father of Cornelius Davies, remembers the night of the row. He witness was at his class meet- ing at Chapel, he left home soon after six, and returned near nine o'clock, when his son was at home. BJ the Court-The house is about a mile from the wood. John Jones, lives with the prisoner Roberts' father. Remember the njght of the row, and remember making up his master's horses, prisoner was with him at the time ass; sting him. Never lost sight of the prisoner all day, they supped together and went to bed together at nine o'clock. Thomas Roberts, prisoner's brother, corroborated last witness. By the Court-There is a mile and a half from the wood to their house. John Edwards, farmer Peter Bellis, and Jonathan Pugh, spoke to the good character of both prisoners as being free from poaching and rows. This being the case for the prisoners, Mr Ralph re- plied. The learned Chairman then summed np. The jury consulted together and retumned a verdict of Not guilt. I NO TRUE BILLS. I The indictment against Daniel Drake and George I Kennedy, for obtaining goods under false pretences at Cerrig-y-druidion, was ignored. Two indictments, charging Thomas Roberts, the younger, with embezzling various sums of mohey from his employer at Llanrwst, was also ignored. The Court rose shortly after seven o'clock. Counsel in Court-Messrs. Swetenham, Ralph, Igna- tius Williams, Hilton, and Trafford.

CORRESPONDENCE.

Family Notices

THE IRON TRADE.

I LONDON SAYINGS AND DOINGS.

I ---THE PARIS CONSPIRACY.

Advertising

IMARKETS.

[No title]