The North Wales Chronicle and Advertiser for the Principality

Domestic Intrlligntff. Several r"g-¡tl1f'1;h, both of cavalry and infanlrv have received 01' Vis to prepare (111' Vmbarkiny fn Ireland. The troops thcl" will be augmented In several thousand men. (JEz.t, IlEGhTRY BIf,I.rr, W. ¡;t'n1;\m is about to attempt what 3tr. Campbell lias failed to accomplish, to carry a Bill to establish "a d<nc rnl Re!lislrgof all Deed £ nnd Instruments relallllg to J'calllro(Jt!lty in England and Wales." The case of the right of the Corporation of Li verpool to levy rolls and dock duties, was decided on Fri.lay in their favour by II verdict in thc Coun or King's Bench. At the Court and Levee held at St. James's Palace on Friday, his Majesty rcccived the Ad-!icss oe the Convocation of tile Clergy. Thc Archbishop of Canterbury rearl thc address, which was ol consideiable length, and the Kin returned a gracious answer. Among the dignitaries of the Church also present oil the occasion were, the Bishops of Lmdon, Landaft; Winchester, Bangor, Lichfield and Coventry, Hereford, Bristol, and Chichester; the Dean of Westminster, Anh- deacon Watson, &c.&c. Thegeneral presentations at Levee, afterwards held, were very numerous, though principally of military and naval officers — The Duke of Cleveland and Sir It. Acton were also presented at this levee FRENCH NOTIONS OF THE NEW PARLIAMENT.— The Courier de VEurope says—" English reform, in many points, resembles our revolution of July. The elections in England, like ours, have thrown into the House of Commons a considerable num- ber of legal men, and men of letters, whose barren loquacity replaces the weighty and substantial elo- quence which characterised the parliamentary dis- cussions in the time of Pitt, Fox, Burkc, aud Lord Grellnllc Thc prolongation of the debatc nn the Address is a proof of our assertion. It was a kind of review of the new orators, who were all eager to take up their position." The subscription at Bristol in aid of the Irish Clergy, very nearly reaches the munificent sum of £1200, The Mirror IIcwspaper of that city, in corroboration of the statements already made pub- lic, respecting their distressed and persecuted con- dition, gives the following extract of a letter from a beneficed Clergyman, in the South of Ireland "Since I last addiessed Vall, we have hcell in much affliction about my pai-isli. Disturbances, little short of open rebcllion, have taken place.- The lives of my curates have been in imminent llgI.es f n;b of '¡¡:lleJlIite:illnlt I liberated whether they should not burn nue of them alive, and this within a few yardsof his rt<<or. Had not I most providentially been removed from that part of the country previously, my curates seem to have little doubt that I should have shared the fate of Fergu.-on and Whitby. The Clergy, particularly the incumbents, have been obliged to fly, and many of them are in extreme destitution. If f were to say that hundreds were liring on potatoes and salt, covered with debt, and without decent clothing for themselves and their families I should be stating but a small part of the miseries in which the Clergy of the Established Chinch are involved." u OF PROMISE "1' M VUU.IA.CF.— At the Win chestcr Assizes on Tuesday, an action for breach of promise of inaniage was brought by a farmer's daughter possessed of some property, and named Hooper, against a tea-traveller Ramell Allies. In March, 1831 the plaintiff was 23 years of age, and the defendant (who was about the salllc age) met her at her aunt's house- at Winchester. He after- wards paid his addresses to her, and finally told her mother that lie wished the marriage ceremony to take place in January, 1832. Previously to the ar rival of the day, however, lie took advantage oi the confidence reposed in him, and seduced her from the path of virtue. In September, 1832, she became a mother. He then refused to perform his promise. Since the rupture he had made no inquiry after the mother or child, nor had he made any disburse- ments towatds the expense of maintaining either. The defendant appeared in Court to conduct his own case; but he merely said, he did not think any of his observations would have any effect with the Jury-Verdict for plaintiff-Damages, oue hundred and fifty pounds.

HOUSE OF COMMONS, Tin RSDAV FEll, 81 DISTURBANCES IN IRELAND. Mr. SHEIL could not disguise his apprehen sioiis that there existed a predisposition nnfavour | able to the cause which he had risen to plead.— The Hon, Member went illto a history of all the evils entailed upon Ireland for centuries, depre- catcd the measures of coercion proposed by the hill, and was satisfied in his own mind that the powers to be given by this measure were uncalled for. lie contended that the resnlt of parliament ary inquiries, particulnrly Sir II, Vi viall's evidence before the last committee on Ireland, proved, that I" if the tithe qnestion were settled, tranquillity would be restored and secured, in spite of agita ;tors;" that the secretary lor Ireland could not have read such aiid that an appeal to the laws, the effects of anuther special commission, ought to be tried, before courts-martial and sus pension of juries (recommended by none of Un- reports) weie proposed for the adoption of Par- liament. After a long speech, in which lie de precated the introduction of martial taw, the tI"II, Member concluded by saying the Itidll lion, Se cretary for Ireland had staked his office and the offices of his cnlleaues on carry ing the b¡¡¡-Ihal was, he put the cxistence of the administration 01> the point of the sword. He hoped, howeier, the\ would pause before liberty was taken lY' in Ire land. Could they hereafter defend liberty for :ngland They wou'd lose their v;u?a!;t;K'? When the wheel of official fortune went roun and those who »e.c now at the top found them- selves at the bottor J might not -o ne mirister come to the House aud say be hall a uwasnre 10 propose for England, copied from one that h,d been passed for Ireland 5 Might they not be asked to annihilate trial by jury? to incarcerate discussion; and in lieu of the legal trihllnals (If the country, to enact the legislation of the Horse Guards, and the judicature of the camp? For your own sokes, I call1ln you tll pause j-with th., same blow that strihs our liberty to the core, you commit suicide on "OUr own. Mr. MACAULA Y strongly supported the mea sure, and resisted delay as unnecessary the evi dence of its necessity was manifest to all mankind, though he admitted the severity of the bill.— Agitation was the C1use of all the outrages in Ireland, and unless that was suppressed, and the volunteers brought within the pale of the law, all hopes of tranquillity must vanish. The report of the addresses of the latter body was fraught with the grossest deceptions, lie believed the Irish volunteers had elltcred upon the principlv of the Jacobin club, and, if not interfered with by go veroment, they would pursue it to the end but was the House to tremble before their irresponsible authority ? Was it for this that the people had been appealed to by the reformers of England?— He would say in a few words of a sporting prince on oncoceis on of danger in the narc ft*' -lain the ¡¡"n a1d sh..n wc be devoured ))yth? w.»]f?" ifIII'tÎle penph struggled against the highest and proudest ari>loeracy iu the wodd. to he subjected bv another oUyvchy w hich had sprung up, that h id no iLIlt t power hut what iMermd fr.,m ?u!w)!y?r(!)..t?i<).?"r-.?f)'-sn).?"-? t1^ mi a-ure, knowing that in doing so he was I thereh. supporting !ilwrty; f>rh!vrt\ could only he vaJuabJ so long as it c.mld pro cct life and property "ïom I'l1m¡.n, or from irresponsible tribunals. Mr. ROMll.LY spoke at considerable length, and with much la'e't, agiisxt the bill, for which he th"iight no IWIlve necessity; ha "pen made out. While le,islatin against the turbulent ,><11 disloval, was it "(it fitting that :he peaceable pf)rti1I1 of the community should Iw loiati..jjc,1 with tile measure proposed (or suppressing theen ? Mr. CAREW thought some plan of coercion was neecssary, anti denied that agitation had its origin 1'1'0111 the grievances of irelaud he attributed it to individual motives. Mr. CLAY, who addicssed the House at some length, said that measures of conciliation unv worc imperative than severity, and that he could not consent 10 put Ireland out of ihe pale of the constitution, Mr. F. O'CONNOR was sure that all the agita- tion produced in Ireland originated with the Right lIon. Secretary himsclf- he had promiscd to give a measure for abolishing tithes, which he had not fulfilled, and to that was to be attributed all the tumult that had taken place. Mujor BEAUCLERK said, the measure would bring ruin on the country, and eventually on the hcads of ministers. He considered courts martial the worst of courts for political offences. Ministers were supported by a well dressed majority, but the people were against the measure. He asked, was the coi.stiiution to rest upon swords and bayonets ? The measure would excite hatred in Ireland. If he were an Irishman, he should tell ministers that if thcy passed it in that House, he should not obey them out of it. Lord EBRINGTON was satisfied from the cha- racter uf ministers that they would not ask for ad- ditional power if it were not necessary; and he hoped that the well disposed portion of the inha- bitants of Iieland would be found to rally round the Governrncut"flilC country, in support of liberty and social order,-Adjoll"l1ed.

rItIDAY. I IlUSH COERCION IHLT. lIfr. II, BULWER opened the resumed discus- sion, maintained that no adequate rounds were laid for the Bill, aud that the existing powers and laws ought to be tried before such extraordinary powers as were now asked were demanded. 'Sir GEORGE GREV said he should give his reluetaut consent to this Bill; but be did so be- cause he believed it was absolutely requisite to strengthen the hands of the Government. Mr. 1). W. II A R VE Y strongly condemned the Bill, and declared that, if passed, twelve months would not dapse before a similar measure for Eng. land would he attempted. Lord J. RUSSELL defended the Bill.—Mr, H. GRATTAN opposed it,-The ATTORNE Y -liE- NERAL supported it. Sir ROBERT PEEL advocated the proposed measure liS absolutely necessary to suppress thc ex. isting system of outrage and agitation in Ireland. He said, if we refuse thus to act, the alternative to Ireland will indeed be dreadful, and the inevitable result to that country must be a state of things in which every foundatillu of civil society will be sub evei y rule or moral justice reversed, in which there will be no puuishuJeut except for innocence, and no security exeept for triumphant crime, I "The question then was, whether he should vote for tile iutroduction of the new law, or arrange himself under the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Tennyson), who had crected his standard on this occasion. (Reiterated laughter.) If the Right Hon. Gentleman had depicted on his standard the motto of'Trial by jury,' 4 Stand by the constitu- tion,1 or British law or death if there had been an) thing of an inspiriting kind, he might have been tempted to joill him, But when he exhibited so uuromantic a motto, that the bill he read a first time this day fortnight' (laughter) -when be merely *uid tarry (I I I ot us waiiauotner fortnight' (laul(hter)-he must excuse him. Sup pose thc matter was postponed to that time, what were thev 10 do ? To see whether remedial mea. sures would have any effect? (Laughter.) Had not the Right Hon. Gentleman a detail of the crimes perpetrated from 1829 to 1832 ? llid no reine. ial measures passed in the mean time ? There was reform (hear); there was extinction of tithes, (hear); yet these remedial measures had no effect, for the "y ear 1832 was the worst of all. Did he expect such wonderful change in the course of a fortnight ? (Laughter.) The Right Hon. Gentle man invited thclII to stand still for a short inter- val on the banks of a turbid current (hear, from Mr. Tennyson), and in the hope that in a few days the stream would be less stieaked or discoloured, it would not prove that the law was not necessary; but if in the course of those few (Iuvs murder and rapine increased, we were depriving of protection those who wrre entitled to claim it. He (Sir R. Peel) would pass tlicsti-cain whilst there was time; he would vote for this Bill, in order to secure to the poor of Ireland that protel.tin" ,,hieh the law did not give. Lotus be resolute. Let ns nnt he suspected i" Ireland of want 01' eneigy alaI linn lies", and he would answer for the result. The parage was practicable now; a want of rcsolution might do'-e it for ever. He referred those who lonbted of the policy of this course to the re cords of crime before them What was the answer to th" astonishing fact, that in one year an in one prorÎntc there had been 15-6 murders and attempts at murder; 19 burnings; aud 1827 nurglarics and attacks on uouse* ? I hese were his jn>'i;i;vt on of suspending tbc ordinary "'1\ how co »!d I", tlJink that the people of Ireland conld he better off by persevering in the existing la\\? One hilI: Ired and ninrty-fonr mUI" rs! Why, great batl es had MI great victories had been achieved h\ i; i- country, at a less expense of human blood. Wear, hear.) The battle of St. Vincent 1111 bt en gained at Ie's eost of life (hear;) tiie sanynVa-y bombardment of Algiers had canned less i< ■ life (hcar;) ,e had roiled ha()c.)n-.cd).-??.nfe(ht;.?;)?eha.dr?)e<t and hope al (lie hd, 1 I< of a nsaco with less expense of human lire, (Heir) There wa. snmcthing animating in the iiI. a of a battle; but, good God, whitt hortid recollect oilS haltllkd the mind \\lJich had witne^fd a murder. Would the House hear with him a little while he mentioned one fact for the pui pose of shcwing how feeble an idea was cllmerc,1 of the distracted stale of socidv in Ire. land, when it rested even upon the number of in dividual illslallees or IIInrùcr? It would serve to shew the fearful anxiety, tt", extremity of moral suffering, which for weks and months previously to assassination haunted the victims of outrage.— How many, ala,! had heen compelled, ill conse- quence of I'cccivin:; nuticcs of their intended assas- sination, to fly far from the scenes which associa- tion had endeared to them, or submit to pay the forfeit of their obstinate attachment by their !ircs I I The fact he was ahont tH mention would serve also fo prove what extraordinary energies the human :ni I c%,e as it eXIsts in the lowest grades of o cietv, ..I:la\¡le of whel liw imme iate prospect or doath l presented tn tt. lie recollected a mall, a resident in the county of Clare, wiio came lu Dublin for the purpose 0' giving him (Sir It Peel) information respecting 1he p rJ1et,-pjJrs nf a (Tr- ta1n outrage. Now that wan, though liP was fnllv convinced that he wa marked out for Ihe ven geanceof the friends IIf the person Ilc had hern the mean of bringing to j,¡:1icl" yet the stron g desire he felt of revisiting Jd u;,tJ\e s PHt, ami embiacing hi "ife and child, overcame tu n 111:1 suleration of personal security. IJ" (Sir H. Peci) knew the mnuV danger, and earnestly advised him Hut to gu; his advice, jiowever, was not acecpte and slime week s after the m m had taken (fl) his abode with his f;fI)a\" ,111 attack \1" madp upfin his house by nine or eleven IUd! who, after unu h deliberation, had come with the deadly < termina- tion] of immolating their innocent victim, ub", after so many weeks nf impunity, had begun 1n flatter himself with the idea that the danger averted, and that ht, miirht at fengtii »e"t ill (TU J'ity. How vain were his flnticip;:ti,)1ts! Thry attacked the House while he w, asUep ihev hroke opell the door-"aJJetl ollt the man they lIIurdercd hilll with pitchforks and this bloo y nork did they peipetrate ill the hearing of his wile and child,—a child only nine years of age! Xo-v let the house mark what he was about to relate, While her husband was jet in the struggles of death, the mother took the child, and, placing it ill a recess by the fire place, sho said-,u"h was her heroic fortitude-u<1 her almost incgfdihlo sdr possession, even with the frightful cries of her expiring husband dugiug ill her ears she said to her infantYou hear thc erics of your dying father. Ice,taiiily be tb" next vi,:tim When they have murdered him, they will murder me too; hut I will struggle with thclII as long as I an) ablc, in order to give\ou time fo do wlHit j place ynt1 here for. lily last act sh,dl be to put this lighted turf upon the hearth. j)., ymi by its glare, mark the faces of the murderers. Mind vou watch them narrowly, that you may be able to tell "h" they arc, and so avenge the cruel death of your parents." (It is impossible to describe the sematinn which this narration produced upon the House.) As the unhappy woman said, .0 it fell out. The mur. derers, after completing thrir bloody work upon the man, barbarously murdered the woman als,),- After a short but unsuccessful struggle with the ruthless miscreants, she was dragged from the cottage, and inhumanly slain upon the bleeding bodv of ber husband. Bnt the "hild had carefully obeyed the last injunctions of its mother. —had closely scanned the faces of the able to identify thern,-Hud by the evidence of that child, corroborated by other evioec.ee. five of the wretches who committed this horrid deed were eon vietcd and hanged within a month after the per petration of the crime. (A burst of applaus.)- That chilli was for some years aftcrwaids under hi., (Sir nohert PeePs)protection. (Cheers ) What the. he would ask, were the consequences of the existence of sueh a state of society ? Why. that all law must be paralysed where scenes such as he had described prevailed, and every moral rcstraint must ,.e at an eud. In Ireland, the horror which inevery other country attends the perpetration of minder seemed almost extinct. They had heard, in the figu- rative language of eloquence,of the most inanimate parts of nature being moveil at horrible crimes; hut eveu those feelings of superstition which often led to thc detection of murder appeared tc1 have little or no effect in Ireland. All mora] checks- all restraints were removed. Could it, then, be denied that some measure like that introduced by his Majesty's Ministers was necessary for personal security in Ireland? (Hear, hear.) It had been aske(1 by what means wa, evidence to bc procured ? lie would answer be restoring personal sd\1"ily. It had been asked how would theconr s martial lie able to procure it? By changing, he would answer, the relative position of the two parties. When the energy displayed by thcGovernmcntbcgan to strike terror into cowardly heaits,—when the innoci-nt man beg-an to feel assurance and coinage, then, in- deed, the political atmosphere might be saia to have undergone a change; the relative position or the parti, s, he repeated, wou'd be altered, tb" one re, ceiving an accession of confidence, the other a leel ing of depression. (Hear.) Now if, umler the present circumstances of the country, the Govern- ment refused to act with clue energy, what would be the consequence :-what the alternative > One universal chaos of society, in which thc very foun- dations of eivillifc wonl.1 be subverted, every rule of moral justice reversed, no punishment except for the innocent, nnecnritJ hilt for triullIphant crime." (The Right Hon. Bart, sat down amidst the loudest cheers. ) Mr. RUTHVEN then moved the adjournment of the debate, which was opposed by Lord Altlmrp.— The house diricled twieeon the question of adjourn- ment, and the numbers were, Oil tile first division —For tljk! aiijoiii-niticitt (is-aainstit 166-iiiajoi-it.v 319. 3fr. LLOYD theo spoke in opposition to tl)e Bill, and a motion for adjourning the debate was again put by Dr. Baldwin. Lord ALTHOKP not again ohjccling to the motion, the debate was accordingly adjourned to Monday.

BiXOlii'Oil'if. The SPEAKER took thechairata quarter past twelve o'clock, when Mr. Lya!l presented himself Rt the table, and took the oaths and hi, Stat as nile of the representatives of the city of London. KSTAULISJI !•;I) CLLL UCU I "AlE. Lord II GROSVENORpresented a petition (of which he had given notice) from rertain inha it. ants of the city of Chester, connected wilh ti, Principality of Wales, praying an inquiry inf the statc "f thc church establishment in that narr of the country. The Noble Lord sai l, that al though the petition was signed by only of the inhabitants of that city, he believed* it contain ed tne sentiments not only of a majority of th.it city, hut (If a large lTIajorit.y uf the in\):¡itanb of ale.. generally. He trusted thc House would nllo" hiu, briefly to state what the petitioners complained of as grievances. lie believed that it was pretty well known to mostof those present that the Principality of Wales was divided into three districts, over* hich the spiritual jurisdiction was given to the Bishop of St. David's as to the southern distiiets,and over the northern districts the Bishops of Bangor and St. Asaph presided. In North and South Wales the sitllation an<J "OIHJitif111 of thc church establish- ment was very different, as in the North the church was rich, while ill the South, (111 the contrary, it was rather poor. The petitioners complained that the great tithes were for the most part paid to tho bishops deai s,and chapters nf St. Asaph, Lichfield and Coventry, and Chester, and that the livings were principally in the patronage nf hishops or t connected with the Principality of Wales, ant the consetlneJJn was that they were bestowed upon gentlemen 'eligible certainl"y m poilll of education.) the f.iendsof thc palrolJ<whu had no feeling in common with the people,who did not even understand their language, and who did lint confer 111'011 the", the hooll of residence. The petitioners further sLlte" that two thinls of the small tithes nereis the hands of lectors and