Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

27 articles on this Page

(iUAUi'LU 1 i

News
Cite
Share

(iUAUi'LU 1 The Ge:.er»l Qni»rt«r Se.-si.ms of tll" IVaco for Ih county ?ttjurn.ti?u were Ut'Ul on rhL)?'.?\?.t?t)' C()Ilu?y if tll. Newbot-oiigli au?i m!t?atr.tt?[)"-?utwc!'fL?ntt't-n:hyu. i\hj>v tlw Hou, V"ugla" Pt-nuaut,tbeHuu. T. J. vVymi, William Butk?('yUu?es.E-q. M.I' the Rev. Thomas X?n'iii 'Villiams, the U\Jv. Cmou WYlJII\J WIlli: \Iaj"r 1 'WiUiiHn?,Capt.?n M!tthew, C?('t.dn)'tatt,?rM'har, R.Uoyd Edwards. T. Love JunesP."Ty,H. Beaver Roberts, C. J. S?mt.auu, Uwen Evans, ao'i J. D. White- bead, Esqra. The following were sworn the GUAND JURY. Mr Richard J. Davids, surveyor, foreman Messrs John Davits, com merchaut, South Road; EIward Humphreys, hotel keeper; Jolm Jackson, sur- veyor; Henry Jonathan, hatter; Owen Jones, diai)er L, Lewis, (tral)er John Moreton, hotel keeper; Robert B. Owen, draper; Edwin Price, wine merchant; Richard Rowlands, wine merchant; Joim Richard Roberts, maltster; John Thomas, agent; Owen Thomas, merchaut; and J. Williams, gentleman. The noble Chairman briefly charged the Grand JurJ" and remarked that there were altogether four indict- ments to be laid before tliera, btit three related to one person, charged with shoplifting, the charge against the other prisouer beiug for passing a counterfeit florin. There was consequently no necessity for him to detain them by any remarks upon the cases. UTTERING COUNTERFEIT COIV. I Elkn Brown, 4'J, described as a hawker, was indicted for uttering counterfeit coin to Robert Williams, at Bangor, on the 13th of August last. Mr J. W. Hughes appeared for the prosecution Mr E. G. l'owell for the prisoner, who pleaded not guilty. Mary Oweus, servant to Mr Wiiliams, landlord of the Menai Bridge Tavern, Bangor, said she recollected the prisoner with her husband and another man coming into her master's house on the evening in question. They had three glasses of ale and the prisoner paid for them with the florin produced. Witness took the coin to her master at the bar, and he gave her Is 7.Jd change, which she gave to the prisoner. Subsequently and almost immediately after, when her master weut to give change to a person for a sovereign, he detected that the coin was a bad one. No money had been taken at the bar between the time of the pi isoner paying the florin and the detection that it was counterfeit. W itness went to look for the priaouer and she was gone. Afterwards when the prisoner was called in she denied that she had given witlle," a florin and said it was a sixpence. She had made uo objection to the change when it was brought to her. Cross-examined: There were three rooms in which persoua were drinking when the prisoner was in the house there were tive people in the parloor where the prisoner was there were two strange sailors she pot the coin ou the table in the bar; it she were not in the way to carry beer to the parlour her master would take it himself. Mr l'owell handed the witness a genuine coin, and a.ked her if that was the same as the prisoner gave her ? She said it was not, but that it was tl it like that. Crosn-examination cuutillued; Had been in Mr Wil- liams's employ about a week before this; had pi-eviou-ily been in service at the Ship. The prosecutor said the last witness had brought him the florin produced. He laid it ou the table and gave the girl the change out of it for three glasses of ale. Afterwards some gentleuiin wanted change for a sove- reign, and he (uot the prosecutor himself) found the coin was a bad one. Witness had not uut ttie florin in his pocket nor mixed it with other coin. It had not been on the table half a minute. Pimliug that the prisoner had given his servant the coin he weut after her, and she said she hid not. given the florin but a sixpenc lor the beer. He did not tell her that he would not press the charge if she would give up the money she had received in change. Cross-examined There were some other two-shilling pieces besides this in the change he gave for the sove- reign did not know the mau to whom he gave the change did not go out of the bar while the florÍtI laid on the table; no one but the. gentleman who changed the sovereign was in the bar with him during that time. To the Chairman—Never lost sight of the coin while it was on the table. Mr Powell-Did you have your eye on it all the time ? Witijes-- Y es,as far as I know. Knew the prisoner to be the wife of a haw! • who 1 a 1 ii\ el in Hanger for many years could not oay whether they were honest people-bad never heard anything agaiust them. In answer to Nlr Hughes, the witness said the coin was not now in the same state as it was when paid to him the man w ho changed the sovereign put it be- tween his teeth and bit it. I'.C. (Jiiflith Thomas deposed to taking the pris Juer into custody. On her way to the bridewell she said she was very sorry she had passed the coin, but she had had it in her possession a long time, and had taken it asgood money. To the Chairman-No other bad money was found upon her. o one else was present when the conveisation took place; the prisoner had had a little drink,butwas sober. The girl Uweus recalled said, there had been a g iod deal of drinking in the house during the day iu question. Mr l'owell addressed the jury on behalf of the prisoner and then contended to the court that there was no proof that the coin was a bad one, and that consequently there wis no case tojgo to the jury at all. The Cii.tit iiiau- If yoti entertain any doubt upon that we had better seud for Mr Morgan to prove it. Mr Powelt-It is to) late, my lord the case for the prosecution has closed. Mr Hughes There is a second count for obtaining money under false pretences. Mr l'owell quoted Archibold to show that these should be proof of baseness. Mr Hughes contended that there was no necessity for proof under the count for false pretences. Mr Powel! pointed out that in both counts there was the same allegation that the coin was bad, and there was nojpio if in support of tha'. The Chairman said the common sense of the jury wc-ula tell theui that the coin before them was counter- feit. The Court considered the point for some time, and j then decided that the case should not go to the jury. The piisouer was thereupon discharged. SHOPI.IFTI.NQ AT LI.i.MiEIUS. Catherine Griffith, 35, dressmaker, was indicted on three charges for stealing goods, the property of G. P. Griffith, hhmael Davies, aud John Hughes, at LlaobPris Mr J. T. Williawi on beb tlf of the prisoner pleaded guilty to the three charges and urged in extenuation that lie had hitherto borne a good character, aud that she had be-n already in prison three mouths. Mr l'owell, fur the prosecution, said he was instructed to recommend the piisoner to mercy. The Court sentenced her to three months hard labour upon each charge. COUNTY BUSINESS. Mr 3. T. Williams presented a petition from the in- habitants of the parishes of Llaubelr and Caerhun, praying that the aftditionatpotiee.whieh had been there located in consequence of the riots some tiuie since, be taken away. The places were now (luid, a/ltl the ratepayers felt the burden imposed upon them very heavily. The Chief Constable, in answer to Lord Penrhyn, said there hid been no damage committed or violence attempted since the formation of the police district. Mr Uulkeley Hughes a-ked whether, if the walls which had been p died down were attempted to be rebuilt, there was likely to beany renewal of the outrages? The Chief Constable thought not; the people had been plainly told that if there was, they would have to piy very heavily for it in the shape of a renewal of the addi- tional police rate. M.r Williams said that several of the walla had actually been rebuilt. Lord l'enrhyn: And have not been tampered with Aince ? Mr Williams: No. A witness was called to speak b the truth of the alle- gations contained in the memorial. In answer t,) Mr H oghes, the Chief Constable said there wort, two additional constables maintained at the expense of the district. He believed that no further outrages need tie apprehended. Mr Lbilkeley Hughes, upon this assurance, moved, and Major Pennant seconded, that steps be taken to remove the additional police force from this distiict. Lord Penrhyn read a letter which had been received from Mr Secretary Hardy at the time of the formation of the police district, in order to show that alteration, varia- tion, or unforniatiou of the district coul,l be made with the consent of the Secretary of State. The Chief Constable said he did not wish to take upon himself any responsibility that there would be no further outrages. The motion was agreed to. THE BATES. In answer to the Chairman, tho County Treasurer (Mr Powell) sild he had a large sum of money in hand ou the general county rate. A police rate would bo re- 11' The Chairman asked whence the sum iu hand on the gaol account CAUIC ? Mr Powell said it was the balance of the loan. He i -d r eived 4"J,000 and with the exception of the glance lie had paid it away to tho contractors and for other Puri) es. Lord Peurh) n asked the total amount of the loan ? Peace (Mr Poole: said iil.»KM, of ha 1 AH i ,i.. •■]. s u I he loiiud that theie was only a b ilai;ee j of .'out fl os )'IIJ:1UlIIg'. The Chief OoustubU*. n;iid avato.it u-nm ] II b. I !I would lie for police purooses. There W;is it ba'atice of jCilK) aheady due for clothing. Himself aud Mr Powell had given a bill at two months for tuis. The court granted a rate of 11(l in the X. With regard to the special police district it was stated that there was a balance due of 1113, and the Chief Constable saiJ if tho police were continued he should require t: 50. The Couuty Treasurer supposed that if an immediate answer were obtained from the Secretary of State, ap- proving of the withdrawal of the police from the district no rate might be required, and that the balance due might be met in another way. Lord Penrhyn and Mr Uulkeley Hughea doubted whetber the Home Office would answer the communi- cation very liuriietlly and the Chairman pointed out i li:tt if no special rate were made now, the district would pay no rate at all. Would it not be well to make a special rate of the same amount as the general police rate ? The suggestion of the noble lord was agreed to. DRUNKENNESS. I It was remarked upon the Chief Constable presenting his annual statement of crime to be signed by the Court, that there had been a large number of convic- tions for drunkenaess and Lord Penrhyn (Mr Bul- keley Hughes concurring) suggested that, while not blaming the constabulary, the police should exercise greater discrimination in appreheuding drunken persoua POLLING DISTRICTS. I I The Court was engaged a considerable time in map- ping out the county into polling districts. lr Powell and Mr Williams made applications on behalf of several places, and some discussion eusued. Eveutually tho Court divided the county into eight polling districts, which will be duly a,lvertised and published, as directed by the Act of Parliament. [See Advertisement in an- other coluinu.] The Court then adjourned to Saturday, the 28th of November.

[No title]

- - - - - - -THE SOCIAL SCIENCE…

[No title]

IPORTING INTELLIGENCE-=

I BY ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH

ILIVERPOOL COlm MARKET.—TUESDAY.…

I CHESTER MAUKKT.-SATTIIDAY.

IBIRMINGHAM CORN" -MARKET..

IWORCESTER CORK MARKET.—Saturday.

[ LOSDOS TALLOW MARKET.—MONDAY.

LONDON" HOP MARKET.—MONDAY.

LO[)O SEED MARKET.—MONDAY.

I BIRMINGHAM CATTLE MARKET.—TUESDAY.

CARNARVONSHIRE AND ANGLESEY

DENBIGHSHIRE U'JA!.TERSH?IO?.…

IShipping Emtlltgenu.

IREVIEW OF THi; BRITISH conx…

I BOU,UPHRF,Y, MOOKE, &'-C<>'íI.…

IBAXtxOR MARKET.-FRIDAY..

I DENBIGH MARKET.—'WEDSKSDVY.

IGLOUCESTER CORN"

I LODO PROVISION MARKET.-MONDAY.

I METROPOLITAN CATTLE MARKET.-MONDAY.

IGOVERNMENT FUNDS>—THURSDAY.__

LONDON AND NORTH WESTERN"…

Advertising