Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

14 articles on this Page

FISHERY INQUIRY AT CARMARTHEN.…

News
Cite
Share

FISHERY INQUIRY AT CARMARTHEN. I Seine Nets v. Coracle Nets. I Mr A D Berriogton held an inquiry at the Carmar- then Guildha'l, last Monday, on behalf of the Board of Trade, wiose sanction bad been asked to a bye-law, passed by the T'HVV Boarrt of Conserfators, and which was as f >1 ows :—" Tbat no seine net be used in the river Towy, above an ImaiCioary l,ne drawn from the north side of Pilro,ih Brook to the Barrel Post, on the opposite, or sooth si le of the said river. And any person acting; in contravention of this bye-law will be liable to a penaltv, not exceeding L5 for each offence." The River ComervatorB were represented by Alderman T Jenkins (chairman), and Mr Morgan Griffiths (clerk); while tne ca-e of the coracle men w*s stnted by Mr D Lewi*, a Con-er vat or, and the Ferryside fishermen a case w.,s stated by Mr John Williams; Mr D E Stephens (Trawsmawr) appearing on the same side. ) Colunel Gwynne Hughes ana Mr Lewis (Gasworks) were also present Mr J Burgess, hon. seo. Carmarthen Amateur Angling As c'atioa, also attended, and the -case, from the angler's point of view, was well put by Mr S' Vincent Peel, and Mr Herbert Peel, (T,ili.triti). Tbe Inaoec'or (Mr BEirrington) said the bye-law which he read bad been objected to by the fitihermen of Ferryside, and so he had come down to hold an inquiry irt the w bole qnekstion He asked who supported the proposed bye-law. Mr Morgan Griffi, hs said they took qaite a neutral position. Mr David Lewis, who, no doubt, would be familiar to him (the Inspector), in the olden days, Appeared on behalf of the Carmarthen fishermen, and Mr Jonn Williams, of Ferrjsvie, was present in the interest of the fishermen of th,t district. Mr Lewis then stated that the coracle fishermen made a representation to the Board of Conservators concern- ing th* unprecedented decrease of fish in he Towy, and the board, lifter carrjf al inquiry,onanimoosly decided that it was doe to the use of same nets, and a resolution was pused in favour of the proposed bye-law. They did not with to prohibit the Ferryside men from fishing in public waters, but, coming so high up the river with their nets, th-i fisl Lai decreased immensely, and there not one-eigth of the quantity which they had formerly. The cause of this, as tie stated before the Inspector in 1887, and before a committee of the House of Commons, was the ue of s-iine nets which came too far up the Tiver. In 1883 there was 13 tons I cwt. of fish sent from Carmarthen. Mr Stephens—Where did you get those figures ? Mr Lewis stii from th stationmaster and he was oilf dealing with Carmarthen. For the last two years, in 1893, the quantity was 3 tons 4 owt 3 qrll, and in 1894 It wis only I t,n 18 cwt 2 qrs, so that there was over ten tons of fish less sent from here since the i Ferrys da fishermen cime up to Black Pool. When th"y cama to Atltywaddon he proposed a bye-law then -that no seine net should be used higher th-sit a point half a mile below Pilroatb and no coracle net lower than the river Pilroath. The Inspector—Yoa have taken the returns as to the &h sent avay for the laat two years. Mr Lewis e-tid he had, but the stationmaster would eome up 10 show they were correct. The Inspector said they had it in the Board of Trade statistics, aud had the returns for some years back. They were got from the railway companies. Mr Stephens wished to put some questions to Mr Lewis. The Inspector asked who he appeared for, as he must take one aide or the other. Mr Stephens said he was one of the members of the Board of Conservators and was against the proposed bye-low. k^Mr Lewis in reply to Mr Stephens, said the nrat year he a niced the d crease of flabl was after 1887, but the seine nets went up in 1884. He attributed the Aoicreaqe to them. He believed there waa a decrease ia the coracle nets from 82 to 36. Mr Morgan Griffiths -In 1887 there were 20 seine nets; in 1888. 21; in 1889, 21; in 1890, 17; in 1891, 12; in 1892, 10 in 1893, 16 and in 1894, 16. Mr sttphon-3-rhan you attribute toe deoreaso in the fish to the decrease of the seine nets P Mr Lewis-No, I don't; there are 46 lea coracle nets. Mr Morgan Grii ffhs gave the figures of these. In 1887 there ..ere 52, taere were 52 in 1891, 47 in 1893, and 36 in 1894. The Insp ctor—I think when I was down here in 1885. there were 62. Mr Lewis, examined by Mr Stephens-The ooracle men can fish at all times, but not through the ebb. The men with seine nets fish anywhere, except from Ferry- aide to Blackpool. They fish the shallows as far as tiny can. Toe season had something to do do with the number of fish, but he attributed the great decrease to the sea nets, not to the corsole nets. There had been a continuous deline in the quantity of fish from 1887. The greater portion of fish sent by rail would be salmon and sewin. About half the quantity taken would be sold here. He would swear no fish were sent from Cardigan to Carmarthen, other than that which he had accounted for. The coraoles can fish for eight or ten miles, starting at Absrgwili and going down to Ferry. side; that would be never 16 or 16 miles. He would restrict the use of the seine nets to the water below Pilroath. so tha. they would have six miles to fish down to No 3 buoy. They could fish in the eituary. Now, in the spring tides they swept the river, so that the fidh could no' Teach the upper water, and that was the reason the fish decreased. No doubt, a considerable auaotitv of fish was taken in the upper waters by farmers and p)aohere. The sewm were exterminated here. He did not wish to bar the seine nets, so that the Carmarthen men might fish, but to have a resting place, because the seine net# were destructive nets. Sea %ets were 150 yards long, while coracle nets were iiom 15 to 20 yards, and 2 feet deep. He knew nothing about pike, but he belie-ed they did like young salmon. That would not acoooot for the deorease; there were pike there before he was bom (laoghter). He did not k now an) thing about pike. The Iospector- Why do you choose Pilroath as the boundary, because it is just in the mouth of the river P Mr Lewis-I should propose PHglas, which is half a mile farther down, because there the river becomes very narrow. Mr Morgan Grifriths -1 think the man with the seine nets have been in the habit of coming up higher than in day* lione by ? Mr Lewis-Yes, they have just below Blackpool. They are continually coating up, and pay no attention to oui restrictions. The Inspector-Have you any witnesses P Mr Lewis-No; the fishermen told me to represent them. The Ferrysde men made a net to catch shad, and now, like the sewin, they are exterminated. In reply to further questions, witaess said they used to fish for shad with ooracle nets, and take fish up to 41bs. Now they could not take any owing to the wholesale destruction of fish. Mr John Williams, Ferryside, was then heard. He said the last witness assigned only one reason for the destruction of fish. Anyone acquainted with the river twenty year* ago would scarcely know it, so altered was its course from Ferryside for five or six miles. That h id been the main portion of the fishing ground for the last twenty years. At neap tide, when the banks were covered, the fishermeo must either go home or go up the river, because when the wind waa blowing a gale they could not fish unless sheltered by the banks. The coracle men bad the shelter of the land from one end to the other. Therefore, it was very hard if they could not have the chance of fishing below Ferryside,and very bard if when it was blowing a gale they could not go up the river. As to the quantity of fish sent from Ferryside, there was no fish salesman in Laugbame or Kidwelly, and all that was not sold in those places went to Ferryside. As to the fishing there was less, as the channel was divided into half a dozen different streams, and so the force of the main stream was weakened. The Inspector-Dothey fish the river as much ? Mr Williams—No, they don't. They are limited to a small space, and if we were confined to Ferryside it would tie scarcely worth while to have anything to do with seine nets at all. By Mr Lewis He never saw the river swept with their nets, but he had seen herring nets drifting. By the Inspector-They fished with the seine nets mottly when the tide was in. They would begin an boar before high water, and leave off one and a half hours after high water. When they went ap the river they do not go for her than a mile below Blackpool. He had never seen a seine net at Blackpool in his life. They could not go higher up thsn Half-way rock, and that was three-quarters of a mile below Blackpool. By Mr Lewis-Re had never known them to take a ihot at Pilglas and Ooohybsrlys and drift with the tide. There wa no space to do it, and the nets would get entangl.d among the roots and stumps of trees. They had tiied Cochybarlys but could not drift the nets. By Mr Morgan Griffiths-They did not average more than three hauls each tide. Mr St Vincent Peel gave evidence as to the scaroity of fish in the upper waters. He fished the Towy for trout early in the snring, but caught scarcely any emolts, not more than three or four in a day. Com- paring the last and previous years with 1869 and 1870 he said that formerly the smolts were a nuisance, and would come two or three at a time to take ^his bait. Sr WiHia-BS said that the small quantity of water, and the pollution of that by sewage, were enough to drive the fish out of it. Mr Herbert Peel also spoke to the scaroity of fish in the Towy, and he attributed this to over-netting By the Inspector-The increase has been going on for the last three or four years. By Mr Stephens—He had little experience as to the seine nets and coracle nets, and his evidence as to them was only hearsay. William Davies, Ferryside, said that though lis: hours had been taken off the time allowed, the fish bad gone on decreasing. There had not been a large quantity since Jubilee year, 1887. That was a good year all round. Mr Lewis was referring to the last inquiry, when, The Inspector said: If .you go back to the old time, I must remind Y08 that the Ferryside men won the day. They got a bye-law made in their favour, and tten wben you came together here, the two sides agreed, They said, We will give up the advantage we have o^tnined, if you win agree not to have any more fighting, and leave things as they are," and so the bye-law was dropped th-n. Yon must not complain i>f t hem for they behaved very well. The Inspector then thankt-d those who attended the inqu ry to give evidence, and said he would report to the Board of Trade, and they would decide as to what should be done.

I DISTRESS IN CARMARTHEN.

CARMARTHEN TOWN BALL. I

CARMARTHEN DISTRICT COUNCIL.…

,WHITLAND TOWN AND DISTRICT…

THE HARFAT POST-BAG.-I

" SILLY BILL Y'S " NOTES.…

I WHITLAND.

RAILWAY TIME TABLE.—MARCH

CARMARTHEN, CARDIGAN, ABERYSTWYTH.

CRYMMYCH ARMS, NEWPORT (Pent.),…

I NARBERTH, TENBY, PEMBROKE.

ILLANDILO, SHREWSBURY, LIVERPOOL.…

- LLANDDAROG -PICKINGS.I