Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

47 articles on this Page

BOER WAR SCANDALI

News
Cite
Share

BOER WAR SCANDAL I COMMISSION MEETSI Mr. Brodrick's Evidence I W.O. STAFF "WORKED TO DEATH." The Royal Commission which has to deal with the report of General Sir William Butler's Committee upon matters connected with the supply of stores to the Army in South Africa assembled to-day in the Lord Chancellor's Court at the Law Oourte. The president is Mr. Justice Farwell, and the commissioners are: Sir George Taubman Goldie, Field-marshal Sir George White, Sir Fra.ncis Mowatt. and Mr. Samuel Hope Morley, ex-Governor of the Bank of England. The terms of reference are to report upon all the circumetancee connected with con- tracts, sales, and refunds in South Africa upon the conclusion of peace, and upon amy previous transactions which may throw light upon them; and, further, to report upon the responsibility of the persons concerned whether in this country or South Africa. Shortly before eleven o'clock several counsel with briefs came into court, one of them being Mr. Norman Craig. Mr. Brodrick took a seat at the solicitors' table prior to the arrival of the Commissioners. The President firet read the terms of reference. A statement was next made by the Presi- dent as to the method of procedure. Hesaid that certain persons who considered them- selves aggrieved had applied to be heard by oounsel. They were prepared to allow par- eons who thought themselves oonoerned to attend, or to be represented, each one by one legal adviser, but they could not allow people to appear by counsel, to address the Commission, or to object to evidence. This was an inquiry, not a prosecution. The examination would be conducted and ques- tions put by the Commissioners. The Com- missioners would, however, consider any a-pplioa/t/ion at any time later as to re-calling witnesses to clear up points. As Mr. St. John Brodrick was about to be sworn, Mr. Norman Craig (barrister) rose to speak. The President: I have said we oaainot hear counsel. Mr. Craig persisted, but the President re- plied that he had already pointed out the course of procedure. Mr. St. John Brodrick waa then sworn. Examined by the President, he said'be was Secretary of State for War from November, 1900, to October, 1903, and gave a short out- line of the arrangements of the War Office with regard to supplies to South Africa. He went on to say that while the war was on Lord Kitchener sent him a communioa/tion, to the effect that matters of great responsi- bility were devolving upon him with regard to finance, and he desired a financial ad- viser. Therefore, one was eeDit out. That was the firet check adopted. The President: That was while the war was going on. Mr. Brodrick: That was in 1901, a year and a half before the war ended. It appeared that purchaises of large ordnance stores at Cape Town had been made unwisely. These disclosures made it desirable to send out an audit committee. It waa very difficult, went on Mr. Brodrick, to get men for the work. Between 1901 and 1902 there was no brancfh of the War Office which was not literally Worked to Death I The officers needed had to come from the finance branch. It was the heaviest worked branch excepting the contract branch. It Was brought to my notice (continued Mr. Brodrick) that during those two years two lnen died from overwork, two others lost their reason, and the number invalided was very large. They were engaged constantly till late hours every night, the whole of Saturday, and in some cases the whole of Sunday. Replying to other questions, Mr. Brodrick Went on to say that he had in these circum- stances to obtain the services of Mr. Seed, an officer who had retired, and WhQ went out, accompanied by Colonel Morgan and others, in 1902. nhie Colonel Morg-an, he thought, had no connection with the one in South Africa. Un-til the war waij over it was impossible for them to  aMc.k. The oanteens in South Africa w ?? nxma?ed by omoe<M6 for the benefit of men. and it transpired that there had b.eell a pront on it of C700,000. Lord Roberts  ?? this waB such a, laj?e aum that he (Mr. Brodrick) ought to know of it, parbicu- ?arly seeing tha.t it did not belong to the troops there, but, to a large extent, to men brought away. Although this was not Government money, the circumstances were to special that an inquiry into the manner in which the canteens were conducted was thought desirable. Mr. Flyma (wtho was appointed to investigate) reported that there had been am avoidable loss of something like R,100,000 of public money. The President: Not public money. Mr. Brodrick: No, I beg pardon, canteen money. Witness went oo to say that the names of certain officers comserned were brought to the notice of the OonMaj^nder-in-Chief. Wit- ness thought it possible the master should '11(> one for a court-martial. Lord Roberts tl)()k the opinion of the Lord Advocate- general, who was of opinioa that a oonrt- lr)iartia,l could not take place, and the officers censured. Sir George White: Did the legal adviser of the Commander-in-Chief consider that there "as not sufficient evidence for a prosecution ? ilr. Brodrick: He was of opinion that, a.1thoug1]lt there had been grea-t miscalcula- tion and unwisdom in purchases and sales, there was nothing to support a. prosecution, or which would affect the honour of the officers concerned—Colonel Morgan and "Mother. The President: Were they both ceneured by L,nrd Roberts ?—Yes; in one case for want of Proper control, and in the other case, 4 far as my recollections go, for contravention of the regulations by employ- ment of relations. The other officer referred to wag Major Barton. In Colonel Morgan's  the objection was that he had allowed "?s brother to be an intermediarv in certain '"ontracts. The case passed to the military ^de, and the Commission would have to call fvidence from that side if further partiou- :\rs were wanted. ): Sir Francis Mowatt (looking towards Sir dwa,rd Ward. Permanent Under-Secretary ff State for War, who sat at the solicitors' lible): Perhaps Colonel Ward can answer he questiop. Were these two officers whose narnes have been mentioned censured by the Corn mander. in-Chief. Sir Edward Ward: They were both cen- tred, for want of judgment in one case, a.nd In the other for the employment of relations. Mr. Brodrick went on to reply to the views In the Butler report as to how public JBoney might have been saved by a different method of handling stores than that adopted. Witness said that if f^ilians had been sent out they would have "een at sea. It was quite inconsistent with "is duty to quarrel with Lord Kitchener on such a matter. The President: Then you agreed with Lord ^itehener, and not with Colonel Butler? You bad not any officers to spare for this work, and you oould not send out civilians without detriment to the public service? Mr. Brodrick: It was impossible for me to Quarrel with Lord Kitohener upon matters in which he was (Proceeding.)

A CENTURY OF BUSINESS. I

[No title]

BLOW FOR THEG.W.R.

I"HELD UP" AT DINNER -

"A MONK WOULD BE"

BURYING THE B0YS.| I BURYING…

REDISTRIBUTION.I

I Heavy Cardiff Failure I

[WELSH COAL FIELD — I

j Sergeant's Wife's Story

! "TICKLISH, NOT TENDER."I

FAILURE OF A BARGOED REPAIRERI

Advertising

EXCITING ROATH PARK INCIDENT…

Advertising

AT THE INFIRMARY.

MARKSMEN at BISLEYI

TO CORRESPONDENTS j

Advertising

[TO-DAV'S. CRICKET.

I MONMOUTHSHIRE V. BERKSHIRE.

I SCOTLAND V. AUSTRALIANS.…

I GENTLEMEN V. PLAYERS. I

I SUSSEX V. _LANCASHIRE. I

I KENT __V. WORCESTERSHIRE.-I

HAMPSHiRE V. YORKSHIRE.I

I M.C.C. AND GROUND __V. DERBYSHIRE.

ST. MICHAELS V. SENGHENTDD…

I SPORTING N EWS.I

NEWMARKET MEETING. I

I i NEWMABKET SCBATCHINGS.…

Advertising

Trade and Shipping.

I SHIPPING CASUALTIES.

I LONDON FINANCE.|

LOCAL FINANCEI

Family Notices

Advertising

Submarine Disaster

FEMALE FAGIN'S WORK

MAESTEG HOUSE COAL

Advertising

BLACKMAIL ?

DIVORCE STORIES.

"DESTRUCTIVE" COLLIERI

.-I iBARRY BOYS IN AN ORCHARD