Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

24 articles on this Page

NOTES ON NEWS.

News
Cite
Share

NOTES ON NEWS. Decidedly the most disturbing statement yet made on the subject of food consump- A DISTURBING STATEMENT. tion is this by captain Bathurst: "Returns re- ceived from the Master Bakers' Association show that in the areas to which they refer the average consumption Of breadstuffs per head in March was 61b. per week and not 41b. as suggested by the Food Controller." Before accepting this -Statement as fair for the whole country it would, of course, be necessary to know ex- actly what are the "areas to which they refer," but there is probably no reason to assume that the customers of members of the association eat more bread than the customers of bakers outside that association. In the absence of more comprehensive statistics, therefore, we may perhaps take it that the average consumption of bread- stuffs per head is somewhere in the neigh- bourhood of 61b. per week. If that is so it ,would be idle to deny that the situation is critical. It means that the great majority of people are largely exceeding the scale of rations laid down by Lord Devonport when he put the nation on its honour. The average of 61b. per head is higher than it was before the war. It is well known that large numbers of people have loyally responded to the Food "THE STAFF OF LIFE." Controller s appeal, and have reduced their con- sumption to his figure, and in many cases con- siderably below it. we nave, tnen, me position that there must be many who for one reason or another have ignored the appeal, and arc eating much more than tbe 6th. average. One of the reasons for this is undoubtedly the difficulty, so far as the poorer people arc concerned, of obtaining substitutes for bread. Potatoes can scar- cely be got, and the price of other substi- ,in tea is prohibitive for those with small incomes. Bread for a very large majority of the people of these islands is literally the staff of life. It is practically the only thing they can get. Nevertheless, the e&rt to reduce consumption must be made, and the responsibility upon those who can obtain the substitutes is the greater, to reduce their own consumption of wheat flour products to the lowest pos- sible limits in order that there shall be the anore for those who cannot in the present '(Conditions do without it. It is true that the unusual demand for those articles of food which are available A CLEAR DUTY. as substitutes for bread- stuffs has increased the price of these things very largely, but the jfiaving of breadstuffs is a vital necessity, and all those who can possibly manage it must make the best of the fact that their food will cost them more. Anyhow, it is better to spend more money now, and even to eat a little less, than to run the risk a little later of their being not sufficient bread for the population. While the duty of the fairly well-to-do is clear enough in this matter, the responsibility also lies heavily upon all, even upon the poorest, to do what they can. There must be less bread eaten, and the reduction will have to be effected either voluntarily or by compulsion. I While stress has been laid upon the duty Of those who can afford it to use substi- CONTROL OF DISTRIBUTION. tutes for wheat flour, it must be conceded that in many cases difficulty has been experienced in ob- taining them. It is not only a question of •cost, but of supplies. It is not of much use urging people to use rice flour, maize :flour, or barley flour if, when they go to the shops, the tradesmen say that they have none of these things in stock. This is a matter to which the Food Controller might very well devote his attention, as also to that of sugar, many people being quite unable to secure the half-pound per head per week which is permitted by the scale of rations. There can be no properly effective food control without the control of distribution. At present no housewife who secures a supply of the articles named in one week can have any assurance that she will also be successful the next. Then if there is to be anything to eat in the house she is compelled to buy wheat Hour, which she is asked not to purchase if she can possibly help it. Her answer is that she cannot help it, and there is no denying that she has a good case. This position will almost certainly grow worse, and it ought to be dealt with without fur- ther delay. It is really worth making the effort to s)revent the necessity of adopting the EVILS OF TICKET SYSTEM. bread ticket system. That system has not been such a great success in Germany that we should assume it would be satis- factory in this country. It would mean an army of officials and inspectors, the filling up of official forms, queues waiting outside the bread shops, and many other things which the people of this country, always impatient of official supervision, would find peculiarly annoying and irri- tating. It would almost certainly bring Other evils in its train, such as an illegal traffic in the tickets, forging of tickets, personation at the issuing offices, and so on. People with long purses who have disregarded appeals to their honour would not be above trying to get more than their share at the expense of others. Differen- ,tial treatment with regard to rations would be extremely difficult to arrange, and the poorer classes would suffer be- ,cause the tendency would be to put every- body on the same level, while the better off would still be able to supplement their ration with bread substitutes and the poor would not. It looks very much, however, as though we were within six weeks or less of the bread ticket system—unless the con- sumption is reduced by voluntary effort. It is no longer possible for people to say that they had not realised the need for MOBILISE THE SHIPYARDS. economy in food con- sumption. We live by the sea, and the latest Ad- miralty return shows that the German submarines are taking toll of our shipping to an alarm- ing extent. We still believe that a way will be found to defeat German hopes; but in the meantime, our duty, the duty of the people to eat less bread, is plain. The duty of the Government is no less clear. The problem, as Mr. Lloyd George has said, is one of ships. Mr. Archibald Hurd puts the case plainly in the "Daily Tele- graph. He says: If the people are to be fed in the months that lie ahead even on a modest basis, the sure guarantee rests in the mobilisation of our shipyards and engine-shops with a determination to beat all records. If an effort is made, with the full support of the War Cabinet, there is no reason why in the next twelve months we should not complete 3,000,000 tons of merchant shipping, without inter- fering with the Admiralty's essential pro- gramme. During that period the United States should be in a position to send to sea at least a million and a half tons. Any- thing less than the maximum output of the two countries spells economic disaster, if not worse."

[No title]

WEST AFRICAN CUSTOMS. I

[No title]

I IN LIGHTER VEIN .

FIGHTING MEN'S CRESTS.I

NO MORE RACING.I

[No title]

NO WATER TORTURE AT DARTMOOR.

POSTPONED CALL-UP.

THE CALLING-UP OF DOCTORS.I

[No title]

[No title]

I HUMOUR -OF -THE WEEK.

[No title]

IHURRICANE OF SHELLS IN 10…

THREE YEARS FOR A CENSOR.

AIRMAN KILLED NEAR HIS HOME.…

OBJECTORS ATTACKED. I

THEIR SECOND MEETING. I

THRILLING FIGHT OF TWO AGAINST…

FATAL CINEMA PANIC. I

FOR HER INTERNED HUSBAND.…

[No title]