Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

The Neyland Explosion.

News
Cite
Share

The Neyland Explosion. CAUSE STILL A MYSTERY. MOST PROBABLE THEORY. GREATER PRECAUTION ADVISED. SYMPATHY WITü. THE RELATIVES. The origin of the recent explosion at the Neyland Gas Works, whereby a young wnmsn, i\1;s of Law" renny, and her three-year-old child werf hnmerl to death, still remains a mystery. At the adjourned inquest iiaiu u.1 the Oddfellows' Hall, Neyland, on Monday, the theory which found favour, was that the application of the brakes to a locomotive near by, caused friction which produced a spark and caused the ignition with all its terrible consequences. Mr T. W. Rowland was foreman of the jury, while Mr Rqlph Oliver, assistant locomotive superintendent, Neath, represented the G.W.R., and Mr Edgar White, inspector of factories, was also present. RELUCTANT TO ADMIT THEM. The first witness was George Mathias, uncle of the deceased woman, who said he accompanied Mrs Mathias and her child down to the Gas Works in order that the child might inhale gas fumes in the hope of effecting a cure for the whooping cough. Garret! wus reluctant to admit them, but they were eventually shown into the pump room, where they remained until Mr Fry's arrival. On explaining the object of their visit, Mr Fry told them they could have a look round, and took them to the condensing house, showing them the hydro-carbon box on the way. After explaining how dangerous an explo- sive was the hydro-carbon when the lid was off, Mr Fry went away. At that time Garrett was attending to the boileis. Some three minutes before the accident occurred Garrett opened the valve and turned the lid round. After the explosion he really did not know wha,t happened. He saw the woman in flames fall to the ground, and he rushed off to Charles-street for help. How begot there, and back again to the works, he could not recollect. He himself was burnt about the right hand. He was not smoking. Fry had cautioned them against smoking, nor did he notice anyone smoking on the premises. He had not smoked for sometime before he entered the premises, and there was no danger from hot tobacco in his pocket. He did not notice where the flash first occurred the flames seemed to come from behind him. The Coroner I take it that during the three minutes Garrett turned the cover back, the top cock was turned on as well ?—Yes. And the fumes were coming out all the time ?—They were running out. In answer to a juror, witness said he burnt himself in trying to divest the woman of her burning garments. FOREMAN FRY'S STORY. Edward Fry, foreman of the gas works, told the court that he accompanied Mathias and party through the works, and showed them into the oil gas department. ] He did not tell them where to stand. They merely came to walk round in order that the child might smell and inhale the gas, and there was no danger at all in the position he left them. Witness added that about 20 minutes afterwards Garrett came and told him that the woman was on fire. He noticed that the lid of the hydro-carbon box was open, but when he went round at first it had been shut off. He denied having showed Mathias how it worked. The Coroner Mathias says that you showed him how the thing worked, and that you told him not to smoke or do anything of the kind ?—No. It was the best thing you could have done ?-I warned him against smoking when he came through the yard. In reply to Mr White, witness said he knew all about the oil-gas, and that there were in the reservoir two substanccr-gas and liquid. The liquid had to be periodically turned off. He was given to understand that Garrett, being an experienced man, knew the nature of the liquid. It was Garret's business to attend to it. A person might be standing in the fumes without knowing it because the vapour settled on the ground. If this vapour is so heavy the tendency would be for it to settle on the ground rather than rise ?—It all depends on how the atmosphere is at the time. If this cock were on for a considerable time, it would gradually extend to the railway ?-It all depends on the direction of the wind. There might be friction between the engine and the rails, giving rise to a spark ?-I think it is possible. That would fire the whole mixture. It would fire at a distance of six or seven yards from the source ?-Yes. We are not supposed to take any the within six or eight yards. Further questioned by Mr White, witness said the explosion might have been fired by a spark or from the boiler fire. Mr White You are liable to an explosion every time the cock is turned on for half-an-iiour ;-It is quite possible, but it has never occurred before. There is thon some deficiency iu the arrangements?— No answer. Is that so or not. If you turn this cock on for half-an- hour and this highly explosive mixture is about, and a person knocks fire out of his pipe it would cause a blaze ? —Perhaps it might be advisable to ke"p the lid on. The Coroner: Why do you want to open the lid at all ? —To see how the liquid is running. The lid need not be kept open for more than a minute. EXPLOSION MIGHT OCCUR AGAIN. The Inspector remarked that if the lid was to bo opened for any length of time it would certainly bo needed, for an explosion would surely occur there again, The flash of this hydro-carbon was as low aa 77 degrees, which meant that it was highly dangerous stuff. DID NOT OPEN THE LID. I The next witness was George Frederick Garrett, who appeared with his arm m a sling as a result of the acci- dent. He sail be lived at No. 64, Lawrenny Street, Neyland, and was employed at the Gas Works. He had had ten years experience of the work he was at present engaged in. He remembered the deceased and her child arriving at the Gas Works on the 17th September. "I showed them into the local gas works," added the wit- ness, who at times was visibly affected, and told them to wait until Mr Fry returned. Then I went round again to see if everything was all right, and I found them sitting in the exhaust house. I did not see them again until they came to the retort house with Mr Fry. They stayed a little while and then went out again, and I did not see any more of them until I went to let the carbon back into the tar tank. Coroner You did not bring them there. If anybody brought them there it must have been Mr Fry ? Witness I cannot say. I saw them there. Were you talking to them there r-I cannot say. I turned the valve on. You opened the lid first ?-No, sir. You say you turned the valve on ?—Yes, and the car- bon flowed down into the tank. You did not open the cover ?—I am positive that the cover was on. You did not touch the lid r-Ko, sir. Is the lid opened sometimes to make an inspection ?— We open the lid to see the state of the tauk. Did you not do that this day?-No, si,- I knew that the tank was empty. Was there any vapour coming from the closed lid ?— There was a certain amount of leakage. There is a certain amount always leaking. How long had you turned the tap on before you heard anything ?—I cannot state. A PATHETIC STORY. I I Was it five or ten minutes i—iNot so long as that. Honestly, I cannot say. I stood back and in a little while there was a flash. Did you hear anything before you saw the flash ?--No, sir. Was there any engine passing ?-There was an engine passing. Then the witness related a pathetic storv of the occurrence. "After I saw the flash," he said, "I saw Mrs Mathias staggering back against the condensing box. I went to her assistance and got her to her feet and laid her outside the first set of doors. Finding the heat too great I was obliged to leave her, and I then went and closed the valve off by the tar tank." Coroner: How was the lid then ?-It was still shut, sir. The witness added that he then closed the valves throughout the building and informed Mr Fry that the woman was on fire. Afterwards he went through the condensing house with Mr Fry and saw a number of men round Mrs Mathias. MIGHT HAVE IJEEN DRIvEN IN BY THE WIND. I Have you formed any theory as to how tniB gas was ignited ?-No, sir, I cannot say. On oath I never saw a match struck and never heard a match struck. Nor did I see anybody smoke. I don't believe Mathias was smoking. You know yourself the danger of this gas r- Yes, sir. The witness said that the flash which he saw came into the condensing house, and it might have been driven in by the wind. Coroner It is only fair to you that I should say that other witnesses stated that the Jid was open ?—No, sir. Are you sure that you might not in a moment of for- getfulness have left it open?—The fact that the flame spread when the lid was on is sufficient. George Mathias said, Garrett opened the valve and turned the lid round, and in about three minutes there was an explosion "—I am positive that the lid was on. It is stated that the flame started behind the woman ?— How could that be when the woman staggered back ? He added that the top of the tank was never opened. He swore positively that the top of the tank was on. Replying to the Inspector, the witness stated that he thought the fire originated at the top of the tank. He was positive of that, because he saw it. Inspector In that case there would be a sign of charring at the bottom of the tank ? Witness No, sir Upon being pressed by the Inspector on certain points the witness said, I cannot tell you anything more than what I have told you. I was there, and ought to know something about it." WHAT THE DRIVER SAW. Evidence was also given by William Llewellyn, 98, Cambrian Road, driver of the locomotive that was in the vicinity of the scene of the accident. He said that he repeatedly passed the gas works with his engine in the course of the day. When the explosion occurred he wan about 17 yards away from the gas works. He did not see a flash, but he heard a report. He then saw a woman come out of the gas works with her clothes all on fire. He immediately stopped the engine and rushed to see whether he could not stop the fire. He went to the engine room and secured a sack which he threw over the women's head. All her clothes covering the lower part of her body were burned. A PROBABLE THJSUUX. Norman Davies, a fireman, testified that he saw a flash. The engine was moving at the same time. Coroner: There would be friction between the wheels of the engine and the rails ? Witness Yes. Which might cause a spark? -It might. The engine, he added, was proceeding slowly, and whilst it was in motion the witness saw a flash. The next thing he saw was a woman rushing out of the GM Works with her clothes all on fire. THE WOMAN'S INJURIES. Dr. Tolputt described the deceased's injuries. He found her lying en the metals juat outside tbe Gas Works. She was practically breathing her last She had been scorched all over, her head being the most seriously burned part of her body. She died in his presence. NO ONE CENSURED. The Coroner said that Norman Davies supplied the most clear theory as to how the explosion occurred. No doubt the engine was responsible for a friction which might have caused a spark. The Coroner referred to the contradiction between three of the witnesses. Perhaps in a moment of forgetfulness Garrett might bave left a i Aid open, and it was for the jury to consider whether he 1was guilty of any negligence of which they ought to take cognisance. Ho did not think they could attach blame to Garrett in auy way. THE VERDICT. The jury returned a verdict that the deceased was killed ltv an explosion accidentally caused, and on behalf of his colleagues the Foreman expressed deep sympathy with the bereaved husband and the parents.

Neyland Council.

NEYLAND NEWS.

: COMING EVENTS AT NEYLAND

I THE BUTTER-MAKERS' -OPPORTUNITY.

HAKIN BRIDGE.

!;MILFORD HAVEN NEWS.

PEMBROKE ROYAL GARRISON !…

RUDBAXION.I

BROAD HAVEN.I

'IiMr. Owen Philipps at PembrokeI…

[No title]

APPROACHING EVENTS.

Advertising

THE VICAR OF MILFORD ON TEMPERANCE.

Portfield Fair.

BUSINESS NOTE.

Do -You Kn-ow ?-

Family Notices

j viSITING, WEDDINQ & MOURNINd…

I Dates to be Remembered at…