Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

Haverfordwest Petty Sessions.

News
Cite
Share

Haverfordwest Petty Sessions. A PARENT'S OBJECTION. DISSATISFIED WITH THE METHOD OF TEACHING SCRIPTURE. The Haverfordwest Petty Sessions were held on Monday, before the Mayor (Mr Isaiah Reynolds), Messrs T. R. Dawkins, T. M. Phillips and C. C. Saies. 40.- FINE. Albert Williams, late ot Dark-street, was sum- moned for having been drunk and disorderly in Cartlett on June Otb. Defendant denied the offence. P.S. Parry told the court that at 10.50 p.m. on Sunday, June 6th, he saw defendant drunk and disorderly in Cartlett. Williams was making use of very bad language all the way from the Queen's Hotel to the Carmarthen Arms. He was warned by P.C. Richards that if he did not behave himself in a proper manner he would be locked up. Witness remarked "There's a chance for you to go home, and Williams then walked away. In reply to D.C.C. James, witness said that pre- vious to this he had seen the defendant at the railway station accusing a young man of stealing 30s from him. At that time defendant was making use of bad language and causing a disturbance. Witness told Williams then that he did not believe a word he had said. P.C. Richards was also called as a witness. He mentioned that when he warned defendant about his behaviour, the latter went away with a young man named Harry Morgan. In reply to the Clerk, witness said the defendant was very drunk at the time. Defendant: Why didn't you lock me up? Witness Because you went away and said you would rather go home. Defendant was sworn, and said he had been in Tenby all that week and came home on the Sunday morning. He bad a few drinks during the day, and in the evening he met a lot of Milford men who tried to "do" him out of a few pounds which he had in his pocket. He held 30s out in his hand, and some- body swept this away and stole it. He ran after the men to the railway station with the object of getting the money back. Defendant added that the police "could not have had him fair," and so they tried to catch him like that. He called it a shame. There was no need for it. Cross-examined by D.C.C. James, defendant admitted having had a few drinks during the day. He had the last drink just before this affair arose. He could not say how many drinks he had during the day. As to the charge of using bad language, he denied any disorderly conduct of this kind. It was true that some civilian asked him to go away, but that was because he knew the police were on his track. j Asked whether lie had any witnesses, defendant said he had not. He said that the young man Harry Morgan was unable to appear. The Mayor, in announcing that a fine of 10s in- elusive would be imposed, said that defendant had been already warned that the next time he came before them he would be sent to prison without the option of a fine. They were reluctant to send him to prison, and had, therefore, decided to give him another opportunity. It was useless, however, to repeat these fines time after time, and the next occasion on which be was convicted the sentence would probably be one of imprisonment. The bench trusted that this warning would have the desired effect. DRUNK AND DISORDERLY. Frederick Davies, plasterer's labourer, Milford Road, was summoned for having been drunk and disorderly on June 5. P.C. Richards said that at 11.30 p.m. on the night referred to defendant was in shipmaai's Lane shout- ing at the top of his voice. Defendant was in the company of other men, and these all went away on being requested. Defendant, however, said he should remain there for the whole night. But he subsequently left. Defendant was drank at the time. Defendant denied that be was drunk, or that be behaved in a disorderly manner. P.C. Wheeler was called, and said that on the same night he saw the defendant drunk at the top of Dew Street. He spolie to defendant and another man who was with him, and asked them if they had seen P.C. Richards. Defendant I told you I saw him in Shipman's Lane. P.C. Wheeler: You did say something about Ship- man's Lane. Defendant said that when P.C. Richards came on the scene he asked what the h- are you making this noise for ? You had better go home." Cross-examined by D.C.C. James The constable told us to stop singing. I did not refuse to go away. Defendant called as a witness a young man named Thomas Williams, who denied that Davies said to the policemen that he was not afraid of the b- uniform, and that he would like to run them. In reply to the Clerk, witness said he did not think Davies was drunk. A tine of 2s (id and 10s 6d costs was imposed. HIS FIRST OFFENCE. Richard Walters, hawker, Portfield, was fined 2s Hd inclusive for having been drunk and incapable on June titli. The case was proved by P.C. Richards who said he met defendant lying down drunk near the Cemetery Lane, Portfield. John Herne, hawker, Freystrop, was summoned for having been drunk and disorderly on the Merlin's Hill. P.C. Wheeler said defendant was lying dawn on the footpath, and on being spoken to he became very disorderly, making use of very indecent and profane language. A fine of 10s and 8s (id costs was imposed. FURIOUS DRIVING. John Llewellyn, groom, Shipman's Lane, was summoned for furiously driving a horse and trap on June 2nd. P.C. Richards told the court that defendant was driving the horse and trap up Dew Street. At the entrance to Shipman's Lane Llewellyn was accom- panied by a man named Griffiths who led the horse a little way up Milford Road. On Griffiths leaving defendant stood up in the trap and commenced beat- ing the horse until it galloped away at a terrific pace. The Clerk That is to say be endangered the safety of the public. D.C.C. James mentioned that Mr James Adams, the owner of the horse, said the animal was very bad mannered, and that the boy had difficulties with it. In this case, however, the horse was led round the corner before the boy commenced to beat it. Defendant had been cautioned before. The Mayor: I don't think a boy ought to be in charge of a horse of this kind. The boy was said to be 17 years of age. Defendant was fined 5s with 7s Gd costs, and the Mayor took the opportunity of stating that the bench were of opinion that all defendants ought to personally appear in court to defend their cases. If they did so the penalty would probably be lighter. WANTED THE BEER RETURNED. Arthur Richards, Quay Street, was summoned for obtaining liquor from the Mill Inn on June 2nd, and for attempting to obtain it from the Salutation Hotel, on June 7th, he being on the black list at the time. Defendant admitted having had the beer from the Mill Inn, but denied having attempted to get it from the Salutation HoteL He merely asked if they would give him a glass of beer at the Salutation. P.S. Parry said that on the evening of the date referred to he and P.C. Wheeler met the defendant on the New Bridge. He was coming from the direction of the Salutation Square and was carrying a bottle of beer. Defendent handed him the bottle of beer, but declined to say where he had had it. "Were you asleep" asked Richards in a taunting manner, and witness saw it was useless to ask him any more questions. Subsequently witness and P.C. Wheeler went to the Mill Inn, and asked Miss James if she bad supplied beer to Arthur Richards. She said she had, but that she was not aware he was on the black list. Witness enquired if she had received a notice that Richards had been placed on the black list, and, looking around, she failed to see one. Witness told her that she was liable, and Miss James expressed regret for what had happened. Richards You nearly took the bottle out of my pocket. I paid the 2d, and did not have the beer. That is bard lines. (Laughter). In answer to the Clerk, defendant admitted having bad a bottle of beer, but said I didn't steal it." Presently Richards, still eyeing the bottle of beer in the sergeant's hand, asked "Am I to have that beer any time, sir?" (Laughter). The Mayor We have taken a lenient view of your case, and you will be fined Is in each case without costs. We believe that the people who supplied you should be proceeded against. Richards Will you allow me to have that bottle of beer, sir? (Laughter). The Mayor: Don't go to public houses again, because they are liable to be proceeded against for supplying you. P.S. Parry having thrown the beer into the street, returned Richards the empty bottle. A DISSATISFIED PARENT. i A 1 -1 David Evans, mason, Milford lWad, was sum- moned for failing to send his child to school. Mr Rees, attendance officer, informed the court that defendant's boy was la years of age next birth- day, he had reached standard four, and had been absent 83 times out of w times. Mr Rees added that in this case there had been correspondence between the defendant and the Education Office. He made no report, nor had he called upon the defendant. Defendant: How many times have you been to my house about my children ?-I don't remember ever being there. Defendant: I remember your being there twice- once by mistake and another time to apologise. Mr Rees That is quite right. Mr Rees added that until recently the attendance of this child was full time. The Clerk: He has never been here before. Do you know what the matter is ? Mr Rees: He wishes this child transferred from the Provided to the Non-Provided School, and the Authority consider it a capricious removal. Defendant: I consider that by an Act of Parlia- ment I am at liberty to send him anywhere. The Attendance Officer produced the correspon- dence which had taken place with regard to this matter. The first letter was from Mr T. C. Rees to the Clerk to the Education Committee on the question of granting the defendant a transfer certifi- cate. Mr Rees, headmaster of the Barn Street Council School, laid the case before the Authority and asked for their views. He stated that the application appeared to him to be a frivolous one, for, as was well known, Scripture was taught regularly and systematically throughout the school. On April 10th, Evans wrote to say that he was not at all satisfied with bis boy's learning." Another reason for his wishing to have the transfer certi licate was that no Scripture was taught" in the Barn Street Provided School.—In reply to the Education Authority, Mr Rees wrote stating that there had been no friction between the defendant's boy and his teacher or between him and any member of the staff, and defendant's application for a removal certificate was the first intimation he had received on the subject. At present the boy was in the street.—A letter from the Clerk to the Education Authority to the defendant was also read. Defen- dant was told that his assertion that no Scripture was taught in the school was untrue, as half-an-hour daily was devoted to the subject. If defendant wished to persist in his desire for a transfer, the Authority would be glad to have his reasons.—In reply to this, defendant wrote to Mr George to the effect that his son Alexander had been from school for a month in consequence of the refusal of a transfer certificate to the Barn Street Non-Provided School. He had applied to the Director of Education to know why such a certificate was not granted, but failed to obtain a personal interview. He had also written to Mr Sketch, the chairman of the Board of Education—(the Clerk Mr Sketch is not that yet)- (laughter)—to know why his application had been refused. He added that other parents were granted a transfer certificate without difficulty. To this letter, Mr George replied that if the appli- cation was renewed at the end of the school year, the Authority would, be prepared to consider it. Mean- while if he did not send his child to school, the defendant was informed that proceedings would be instituted against him. A final letter was received from the defendant insisting on the transfer, stating that his reasons for such a step had been given in writing, and unless he had a reply before the following Tuesday he should bring the matter before the Board of Education. Defendant added that he had now laid the facts before the Board of Education. The Mayor Not Mr Sketch? The Clerk enquired as to the principle on which transfers were granted and refused. He could not see anything in the bye-laws about it. Attendance Ofticer There are instructions in the code about it. He added that the Board of Education advised them to prevent capricious removals during the school year that would be detrimental to educa- tion. The Clerk: What is the statutory authority for these provisions ? The parent must send his child to school unless there was a reasonable excuse for non-attendance. The question was Had the parent any statutory right to send his child to any school? The Mayor: There must be a reasonable excuse for a transfer. Defendant said he happened to be at home at nights last winter. He told his boy to get home- lessons. These lessons consisted of decimals—he believed they were decimals-or fractions—he did not know which (laughter)—and sentences. He helped his boy through the sentences, but he was unable to help him in his sums. But when he asked his boy to do a simple sum-such as compound sub- traction—the boy knew nothing about it. A boy who could not work these sums, he added, had no business to be in the fifth standard. According to his educa- tion the boy ought to be in standard three, and he alleged the boy must have been neglected. J In reply to Mr T. R. Dawkins, defendant said his other children had been in the National school, and his oldest boy and girl came out at thirteen, having reached the seventh standard. This boy, he main- tained, was two standards in advance of where he ought to be. The Clerk What about the religious education ? Defendant I say there is no scripture taught there at all. The teacher stands up reading the bible. My son has no bible to read, and how is he to follow the teacher ? Defendant added that there was no prayer in the school morning or night, and the children came out worse than beasts of the field The Clerk Mr Rees says that half-an-hour is given every morning for scripture examination. Defendant argued that it was impossible for the children to follow the lessons unless they were provided with bibles. The Mayor: It is like a preacher in the pulpit. Defendant said he had sent the boy to the National school, but the Headmaster would not admit him without a transfer certificate. He called on Mr Rees personally, and Mr Rees said he did not have a certificate, I told him," added defendant, "that he is supposed to keep them in his desk." The Mayor You must admit that scripture teach- ing is given in the Barn Street Council School half- an-hour each morning. Defendant: I cannot. There is no man that will convince me of it. According to the way in which it is taught, I cannot admit it. The Mayor Have you been there when it is taught?—I have been told by my son, and I can believe him as well as Mr Rees. Have you spoken to Mr Rees personally about it ?— When I went over to see him about it personally he threatened to send for the police. You know the standard of this school is very high? -I sball not send the child to Mr Rees's school any more. I have a perfect right by Act of Parliament to choose the school where I shall send him. The Mayor remarked that no regulation was laid down, but a child could not be transferred from one school to another without a reasonable excuse. In answer to the Clerk, defendant said he did not make up his mind to transfer the boy until shortly before Easter. The Mayor was informed that the defendant's boy was the lad who was before the court a fortnight ago on a charge of stone throwing. In reply to the Clerk, the Attendance Officer said he was not aware that any communication had been received from the Board of Education with regard to this specific case. Neither did he think that the School Managers had had the case under considera- tion. The bench adjourned the case for a month to enable the Provided and Non-Provided School Managers to consider it. Defendant What is my son going to do for another month ? The Mayor He must do the same as the last few months. Defendant: That is not good enough for me. Let us have fair play. The Mayor You can send him to the Barn Street Council School for another month.

I-"71- - - - I IA Gruesome…

--_- - --Trinity College,…

I National Eisteddfod.

Haverfordwest Town Council.

Bethesda Church Anniversary.1

[No title]

! Haverfordwest Improvements.

FORTHCOMING AUCTION SALES.

I Local Wills.

MILFORD HAVEN NEWS.

IDates to be Remembered at…

- - -_- -Neyland Urban Council.

!NEYLAND NEWS.:

II PEMBROKE ROYAL GARRISON…

- - -....- -. Boose Petty…

APPROACHfiNG EVENTS.

Family Notices

I I VISITING, WEDDING & MOURNIN(I…

Advertising

I New Postmaster for Haver-…