Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

14 articles on this Page

MORE LIGHT ON SENGHENYDD

News
Cite
Share

MORE LIGHT ON SENGHENYDD Theories of Expert Wit- nesses. The Cause of the Explosion The Coroner'a inquiry into the cause of the Senghemydd disaster was continued on Thursday last, when for the first time during the inquest, one of the witnesses asked to give his evidence in Welsh. This was Edward Edwards, a repairer. Mr Sankey (for the Coal owners' Associa- tion) took him along with some difficulty ia preliminary questions, but when asked respecting gas on the Lancaster level the witness replied in Welsh "I must speak Welsh; I cannot follow him." Mr Sankey "Wales for the Welsh. Whenever a man wants Welsh let him speak it." A Juryman It is very wall known that Mr Edwards is very Welshy. Mr Sankey Certainly. Let us have au interpreter. The Coroner (Mr David Rees), who is a noted Welsh scholar, then ated as in- terpreter, and the witness, in reply to questions, described the system of logg- ing and timbering. After some close-cross-examining, Mr. Nicholas (for the Miners' Federation) re- marked to Edwards "I am requested to tell you that you did most excellent work after the explosion." The Witness I always do my best at timea, and I speakthe truth as nearly as I can. In answer to Mr Thomas Richards, M.P. (secretary of the South Wales Miners), the witneaa aaid he considered the roof in the Mafeking swamp M being the worst in the colliery, which was due to a double squeeze, namely, from top and bottom. MORE ADMISSIONS. The witness admitted that in the course of removal of timber much duet was brought down. A number of other witneses of a s imilar character were called, relative to the dusting of the roads, and one stated that six or eight tanks containing about 250 gallons of water were used. The tanks were taken along and, the plug being released, labourers followed with buckets or shovels and splashed the wateT along the roadways. Mr Thomas Richards So you ha c'e over 1,000 yards to cover with 1.5)0 gallons of water. That is about a paJ! >n and a half per yard. Do you consider that sufficient? The witne&s did not at first reply, which caused Mr Richards to put a sub- sequent question "Are these roads very dusty ?" The Witness Well, there are plenty of el-mners theTO. The witness added that if the road.? were left for a week they would get dry and dusty, but he would not ad-mit that this occurred. SPARKS FROM WIRES. One of the witneseea, a repairer, ad- mitted that sparks were omitted from the electric signalling wires, when brought into contact by his fingers. More in- ter-so sparks, when'signalling, were made by scraping the wire with a knife, the hook of a lamp, or file trevor. Llewellyn Mort, majiager of the Fern- bill Collieries, who accompanied Mr Leonard Llewellyn during the explora- tion of the Lan:iaater level described how he found the upper portion of a lamp in the relighting lamp station, which he produced. There was a piece of paper inside, indicating that the cwntr vds evidently in the act of clean- ing the The oil-well of the lamp was found some time later by Mr Watte Morgan (the Rhondda miners' leader, who played auch a conspicuous part in the exploration work). Mr Nicholas successfully objected to the witness giving evidenca upon this, as he was not present. TECHNICAL EVIDENCJD AS TO I CAUSE. The technical avidenoa u to the cause of the explosion and the damage created waa given by Mr Frank Llewelyn Jacobs, a well-known mining expert and agent at the Welsh Navigation Colliery. He stated that since the explosion he had spent many days at tho colliery and made observation. Mr Sankey What, in your opinion, is the seat of the explosion at this colliery ? The Witness I have come to the opin- ion that the seat of the expkJeioD is be- tween No. 1 north cut and the lamp station and to bring this down to a point near the lamp station. I have come to that conclusion becaus* I ind that the lamp station ia a oent-re from which a great number of rcsvd* radiate, and along there road* then* ia evidenoe of the force travelling from that eentre. Mr Sankey Now what is your theory as to the cause of the explosior-haw it happened ? The Witness I believo that a fall oc- curre-d on the Main West Level between the No. 1 north and the lamp station, this liberatl-d a quantity of gas which was carried to the lamp station, where there was a nakod light. I know there was a naked light there because the oil part of a lamp wtjt found some distance away, and in the other part of the lamp there was a bit of paper, as though the owner was in the act of cleaning the glass. Further, there were two men found at this point, which s hows that one, having lost his light, ha.d gone back to the relighting station to have it relighted. WHAT THE EXPLOSION DID I The witness, in anawer to ftirthernileg- tions by Mr Sankey, deacribad the indi- cations of the force of the explosion. He enumerated instances where doore were blown down from one direction and where the timber was baspattared on the one side with splinters and chips of stone. Near the lamp station, too, there were ity.ii' on ti<)rL s of the timber" being burnt aind bodies scorched. Dislodged timber, too, was ail lying in one way, showing tho direction in which the foroo travelled. Generally, the force WM inwards, and tho f.Wt that whole journeys of truus wtro derailed, thatseta of timber and beams were carried ponro diftM> x- av.-ay, and haulagei engines seriously damaged, all indicated that the violence of the blast, was immense. In one ir- í fetanc-e the body of a man had b, i) blown to the kp of eoigine.   n -mgine. Mr Sankey It h/is been suggested that there might have been a spark enrs d by the signalling wire being pressed tf gether or by a. file being put against one. t I want yon to tell me what is your view as to whether the trams were likely te be wanting a signal, or as to whether the journey was in such a position that a signal was neoesaary. I NO SIGNAL GIVEN The witness described the position of the journey and said that he found that the signal wire connected to the engine did not extend to the incline. It did not join tthe signals going to the drum. He added I am sure the incline signal would not be working, because the man whose duty it was to attach the empty journey at the bottom had not done so, and there was no coal on the top of the incline to work the empty journey up. Therefore there was no necessity and no likelihood of these signals wires being in operation at the time of the explosion. Mr Sankey referred to the theory that the explosion originated on the Mafeking Hard heading. Would the witness, in that case, have expected the two doors there to have been blown in two different directions ? The witness replied that if the explos- ion came down the Mafeking heading he would have expected the doors to be blown the same way, and the force travel in the direction of the face. The inquiry was adjourned until Satur- day, and the jury afterwards were given a demonstration by Morris Roberts, one of the firemen who was examined, of the way in which he detected gas in the. roof cavities by inserting his lamp on the end of a 9ft. pole, and seeing if there was a cap on the frame. When this was demonstrated before thr; jury, Mr Thomas Richards questioned whether it was feasible for the witness to see the cap at the angle which would be available underground. Roberts, however, submitted that where this was not possible he would stand up- on some material which would enable him to do so.

I FRIDAY'S PROCEEDINGS

MINERS' RELIEF FUNDS I i

WELSH STEEL WORKERS' WAGESI

... A^ ^ ^W-?,-ETHI COUI ARCHWAETHI

I FOOTBALLI

RUGBY.

Advertising

Swansea Barmaid's Breach I…

———————--

[No title]

Advertising

IINEFFECTUAL.

SUPERHUMAN.-I