Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

13 articles on this Page

MAESTEG MYSTERY.

News
Cite
Share

MAESTEG MYSTERY. SAY STONE GINGER." WHAT WAS IN THE GLASS? DOCTORS CALLED IN. Concentrated penetration by the Magistrates and others, and the skilled analytical judgment of two Maesteg medicos, were brought to bear upon a sealed drinking glass, and the micro- scopic quantity of fluid it contained. Was it stone ginger, or was it intoxicating? That, in brief, was the issue in the adjourned case at Bridgend Police Court on Saturday, in which John Isaacs, alehouse keeper, of The Swan," Maesteg, was charged with an offence between 1.30 and 6 o'clock on the 18th ult., in contraven- tion of the Liquor Control Order. Defendant pleaded not guilty. Mr. Harold Lloyd ap- peared in his behalf. Sergt. Frank Evans deposed: At 4 p.m. on Saturday, the 18th of last month, in conse- quence of complaints, I, in company with P.C. Alfred Williams, in plain clothes, visited the Swan Inn, kept by the defendant. We entered by the front door, and went into the bar. We •aw four men round a email table tossing a coin in the centre of the room. A man named James Martin, standing close to the counter, was in the act of drinking liquor of the colour of beer from the glass produced. The landlord was standing in front of Martin, and facing us, and there was also a man named John Rees inside > the counter. Immediately he saw us, the land- lord made a jump, and tried to take the glass from Martin's mouth. Martin held the glass, and I sprang forward and took possession of it from the landlord. Some of the liquor was spilt on the counter, some inside, and some on my clothes. When I took possession of the glass, Rees, who was still inside the counter, shouted, Say stone ginger." The landlord said, "Yes; it is stone ginger." I tasted it, and so did Williams, and we found that it was beer. The landlord came round from inside I the counter. He made several attempts to knock the glass out of my hands, and said, "It is stone ginger." I handed the glass, and what it contained, to P.C. Williams. When I told the landlord the glass contained beer, he made anidther attempt to snatch the vessel from me, and saying "It is stone ginger." He asked to be allowed to taste it, and I gave permission. I asked Martin why he drank beer during prohi- bited hours. He replied, "I will say nothing I now; I will tell no lies." The landlord, when told that he would be reported said, "Stone I finger is it." I asked him, if he still had any doubts, to come to the Police Station for the liquor to be examined. He came ,and Inspec- tor Sansom, who was there, examined the glass. He told the landlord "it was beer." The land- lord said, Oh, I want a doctor. I want Dr. Sinclair." We went to Dr. Sinclair, who said what was in the bottle might be beer or stout, but it was "certainly not stone gin- ger." Not being satisfied, we consulted Dr. Bell Thomas, who came to the Police Station, and having examined the glass, he also agreed it was certainly not stone ginger, but either "a mix- ture of beer and stout or light stout." He used these words, "I won't take an oath and say it is beer, but I will say it is intoxicating liquor." The glass was sealed in the presence of the de- fendant. > » In answer to Mr. Harold Lloyd, the Sergeant said the fluid in the glass was of a dark colour, Quite different from stone ginger, a bottle of which he produced, and poured out a sample, -to, prove that it was so. He had no doubt it was malt liquor, and not one of the "mysterious v concoctions" sold as substitutes. Witness had tasted "football stout," and was certain this was not football stout. There was "plenty of flifierence" between that sort of stout and or- dinary liquor. Defendant, from start to finish, •emphatically said it was stone ginger. Mr. Harold Lloyd:, Dr. Sinclair said he couldn't give an opinion?—Nothing of the sort. Didn't the landlord say it was not Martin's glass?—Nothing of the kind. Dr. Bell Thomas said it might be football stoutr-Nothing of the kind. Witness was cer- tain what the liquor wa fe, as he both tasted and ..melt it. By Mr. Harold Lloyd: I don't drink port wine. (Laughter.) Mr. Harold Lloyd: Only teetotallers drink port wine. (Renewed laughter.) At the close of the case for the prosecution, Mr. Harold Lloyd called witnesses for the de- fence. The first was the defendant, John Isaacs, who said the glass produced was not Martin's, but another glass that had been stand- ing for some time on the counter, for how long he could not say. He was moving the glasses when the police entered. He did not know what was in the particular glass; but "only -stone ginger the boys had had." He did not remember trying to knock the glass out of the police officer's hands. Dr. Sinclair said "he couldn't make out what it was, and he did not fcnow what it was." Supt. William Davies: If this is not the glass, why did you go to the Police Station, and ask Inspector Sansom what it contained? Why didn't you say, This is not the glass"?—Why Should I tell the inspector. The Supt.: Did you ask DT.fiell Gliomas yes- terday to come down and give evidence on your hehalf ?—No. Did you ask for a certificate?—Yes. And did he say he certainly thought it was in- toxicating liquor?—Witness: You can read for yourself. The Supt.: You don't wish to read it?-No. The Supt.: He is satisfied it is intoxicating liquor. He cannot say whether it is beer or porter. Martin was called, and swore that he was drinking "hop bitters" when the police made their appearance. Further evidence for the defence was given by John Rees, Howell Prosser, and David Wil- liams. Finally, the Bench imposed a penalty of £ 5. Summoned for "consuming beer," Martin said **he had no beer." He was fined J01.

Advertising

I NANTYFFYLLON COLLIER'S DEATH…

Advertising

I MAESTEG SECONDARY SCHOOL.

---MAESTEG. ,, I

GARTH. I

Advertising

POTATO DISEASE.I

MAESTEG MAN'S -AFFAIRS.I

Advertising

ISHOPWORKER'S HOLIDAYS.

Advertising