Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

30 articles on this Page

IAFTER THE PICTURE SHOW .-———;

News
Cite
Share

AFTER THE PICTURE SHOW -——— OGMORE GIRL GETS ORDER. At Bridgend Police Court on Saturday, Bea- trice Burridge, Ogmore Vale, summoned Her- bert Tucker, assistant repairer, Ogmore Vale, to show cause, etc. Mr. Harold Lloyd, Cardiff, was for complain- ant, and Mr. Sidney Jenkins, Cardiff, defended. Mr. Harold Lloyd said complainant was just over seventeen years of age, and lived at Og- more Vale. She made the acquaintance of de- fendant by going to the Workmen's-hall pic- tures to get a little relaxation. On Xmas Eve, 1913, when she was there, defendant, who was 10 years her senior, spoke to her, and after that defendant was in the habit of walking home with her. Intimacy took place. At the end of August complainant left that part of Ogmore Vale, and went to her sister's, where the child was born. In December she wrote him a letter but received no reply. In the early part of the y f year, complainant's sister saw defendant, and he then made a total and unequivocial denial of the allegations. He did say, however, that he • had not spoken to the girl and had never walked with her. Defendant had appeared throughout to have acted in a very cunning and crafty manner, and he submitted that in view of his denials sufficient corroboration would be to show that he had been in the lane at the back of their houses at about 11 o'clock at night. Complainant, in evidence, said the child was born on the 12th February, and defendant was the father. She first mada his acquaintance at the Workmen's Hall, Ogmore Vale, where she used to go nearly every Saturday night. He used to take her home. Familiarity took place On one occasion, when a picture was put on the screen at the Workmen's Hall, defendant turned round and made a suggestive remark. Mr. Jenkins: Your brother works in the same stall as defendant?-In the same pit. Did your brother know of it?-No. And when he did know of it, he did not tell this man what he thought of him?—No. Mr. H. Lloyd put in the letter sent by com- plainant to defendant. It commenced: "Mr. Tucker, Sir," and in it complainant threatened to take the baby and leave it at his lodgings if he did not reply to her letter. She concluded, U Yours lovingly." Mrs. Alice Wareham said she had seen the parties in the lane at the back of their houses at between 11 and 11.30 one night. Maud Holtcombe, a friend of complainant's also gave evidence, and said she had been in complainant's company on the Blackmill Road "with defendant and another young fellow." You are very friendly with complainant?— Yes; she is my aunt. Elsie Perkins deposed to having seen the com- plainant and defendant together at 11.30 at night. Mrs. Elizabeth Kettle, complainant's sister, said she saw defendant. He denied that he was the father, or that he had been out with the girl. He said he would not marry the girl, nor admit the paternity of the child. Mrs. A. Bonting and Mrs. Ethel Rolls also gave evidence. Mrs. Jones said she went to the hall with complainant, and defendant made use of "smut." Because of that she did not speak to complainant any more that night. The next morning she sent for complainant, and advised her to have nothing to do with defendant, as he had no respect for her. Defendant, on oath, denied paternity, and said he saw no reason to answer the letter sent him by complainant, because he had seen com- plainant's father and saw no need to deny it again. He used to speak to complainant occa- sionally if he met her on the road, and used to pass on. Mr. Harold Lloyd Tell me the names of some other girls you have spoken to on the toad?— I don't remember talking to any other girls. Do you remember being at the picture show on the night referred to by Mrs. Jonese-Yes. '¡, Did you make use of the expression they say you did?—No; they must have made a mis- take. Mrs. Wareham said she saw you near the lane trying to drag the girl along; she is mis- taken ?—Yes. Mrs. Jones and Miss Holtcombe say you used smut" in the Workmen's Hall; they are mis- taken—a polite way of putting it?—Yes. Complainant, who says you used the words in the hall-she is a liar?—She is mistaken. Oh, thank goodness, they are not all liars- they are all mistaken?—Yes. The Bench made an order upon defendant to contribute 3s. 6d. per week and pay costs, ,j £ 3 19s. t >

WYNDHAM CROSSING. i WYNDHAM…

IORATORIO iT PENCORD.

I WRECKAGE WASHED UP. I

» COWBRIDGE SIFTINGS. J ?…

*********************** **…

[No title]

[No title]

OGMORE AND GARW URBAN DISTRICT…

BRIDGEND COUNTY COURT. t

I.CAERAU.I

NANTYFFYLLON. I

r OGMORE VALE.r

BLAENGARW.-1

FFORDDYGYFRAITH.I

[No title]

MAESTEG.-

Advertising

fLETTERS TO THE EDITOR. I

REFORMATORY BOYS FOR FARMERSI

I- 1TO THE KAISER.

TONDU AND ABERKENFIG. I

,LLANBLETHIAN.I

I ALLEGED :HOSEBREAKING j…

ICYMRODORION DUFFRYN AFANI…

I "COULDNA' HAE FACED THE…

I LLANTWIT MAJOR..I

PONTYCYMMER.

NANTYMOEL.

OGMORE AND GARW URBAN DISTRICT…