Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

24 articles on this Page

QUESTIONS FOR THE JURY.

News
Cite
Share

QUESTIONS FOR THE JURY. The! Cbroner, m eumming-up, said 'the in- quiry was an important one, but it could be ntirrowtd within a smaill compass. There was one fea-turs of this ease which was not. .prcs.ent in the majority of such c-a-3,-the aibscnee' of marks 01 violence on tie body of tthe child. The iew excoria- tions -tlhere wema might have been inflicted aocxlenta.ly. Of course, the girl must have known that she. would shortly be a motheT, and It was clear that no pieparaticms had been made for the child. 'ihe doctors had come to the undoubted decision that the child had had a ooparate existence from sts motheT, but nie was probably not -piolongcd. It wad not enough, legally, for the child to have biea-Uud or cried, but it must be proved that it had a separate existence. 'I,h,e question for the jury was the responsibility of the mother. Did tlaey think she did what she ought to have m regard to the baby s bir*th was it's Did tlaey think she did what she ought to have ill regard to the babvs biath; -was it's death dID to tins c-uipable negligence of the me*n>?r, and were its <uances of living Lessen- <id Dy the negiect of the mother in taking proper precautions? The evidenoe showed, that tho motlier did ndt tell anyone until the Ledy S u inr i n b^nde n t had her suspicions aroused. If thfs jury found that the child had died owing >11 > the cuipablc negligence of t-:i,2, motiher, they should commit her on a daarge of menslaught».xr, but if the evidence not sufficient to justify the charge of manslaughter—that the birth came on c-ad- d-fiijy, and that ahe did not know vitia-t was going to happen, and that she merely tried to conoeal tho birth, the verdict should be dt^atili 'by misadvciatur*?. Tiiia J ury r<»pli<ad to tho queti tione put H:o them as ioLows:-Did the Jncothrir do ti sho mig^lJc have doner-No. Wctre the tihiid's chances of living n^gJected?—Yes. Was the moUher cul/pably negligent?—No. TSie Foreman lexpiained that the general verdact was thtfLt the child hd a pepara-te texLstenci?, and that thie motCier was nef lirAent but;, not criminally negligent, ° The Corooier: Not sufficiently negligent to make it criminal. That does not amount to criminal neglect, -and therefore tihe vcrdict is that the child died of an 1sadventure. The Coroner's jury has- nothing to do with conceaj- mcat of birth. 1. The Fcceman.: We did not consider that tlite negt ect was sufficient to coavict.

GOLF.-'"|

- GREAT ORME GOLF CLUB V.…

A REMARKABLE HAIR TONIC.

ARMY SCOUTING IN NORTH WALES.

LLANRHAIADR SHEEP DOG TRIALS.…

Advertising

FESTINIOG BOARD OFI GUARDIANS.

ABERGELE ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION.

[No title]

LATEST NEWS.

MR BALFiOUR AT EDINBURGH.…

THE AGRICULTURAL ORGANISATION…

CONWAY JOINT HOSPITAL BOARD.

[No title]

LORD MIDLETON AND THE PAYMENT…

----CONWAY FISHERY BOARD.

' THE EHYL DROWNING MYSTERY.

LLANDUDNO AND DISTRICT FIELD…

GWYDIR UCHA CHAPEL.

DEATH OF A CHILD AT LLANFAIRFECHAN.-

"&OKRY FOR WHAT HAD HAPPENED."

[No title]

Advertising