Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

6 articles on this Page

TO THE EDITOR.

News
Cite
Share

TO THE EDITOR. FIR—Having in my last shewn Ihe-centum- cd and steady resistance of the Britons lo Ro- man oppression, down to the time of it remaius to add somewhat more, so as to bring the subject down to the time of the re- puted Gildas. The notices, as to this inter val, which are to be found in Roman history, though not very abundant, are still sufficient to prove, that the Britons did not now dege- nerate from the noble spirit of their prede- cessors. It appears from the words of Tacitus, in the preface to his histories, viz. Perdomita Bri tatitilaaudstatitua missa," Britain wholly con- 'ipicrccf was immediately losl that whatever had been the success of Agricola it was merely temporary. This is again confirmed by Spar- tian, who in his account of the leign of Adrian says, it was found that Bntanni teneri sub Romany dilione non polerant.The Britons could not be kept in subjection bp the Homans. tiven when their strength was diminished by their contests with him, and they withdrew to their natural fastnesses, in vain had Adrian built the Picls wall, for they soon recruited their strength, and in the reign of Commodus, they recommenced, says Dio, a war to the" greatest extent. In the time of Severus, pro- bably in the hope of breaking the power of lhe Homans, the IJritons appear to have join- ed Albiaus and Herodian, when-narrating the fate of the battle of -I^ons, attributes the severity of the contcst chiefly to THEM, and adds, for the Britons are not inferior to the lllyrians in greatness of courage, or eagerness of conflict in battle." A testimony in as direct opposition as words can make it to that of, their calumniator. Nor is it less so I hat Se- verus, when grown old in arms, and habituat- ed to victories in all other parts of the than known world, was ambitious of adding to his titles that of Britannictis ii(i(i I)t)-stedg is 'of his greatest glory, that dying he left Britain t3 .1 tranquil. It might have been such tranquil litv as the Romans conferred, the tranquillity of desolation but it was given al t he ex pcnce of the lives of fifty thousand Romans, who perished partly by the attacks of the Britons, and partly by sickness. With Carausius and others, the Britons were again in arms; nor did they cease, till by the union of Constan lius with Helena, a legitimate power in Bri- tain was vested in this family. When another family succeeded to the empire, the Britons appear not to have acknowledged the succes- sors elected by the foreign armies for, in the reign of Valentinian, they were again in op- )osi position to the Romans and the boasted ex- ploits of Theodosius extended not here beyond a temporary cessation of warfare in its con- sequences. Soon after Max cd hy the Britons as of the family of Consiuu- tine, became the rival of Theodosius, and having been unsuccessful, has by the parti- zans of li-is rival been, as usual, spoken unfa- vorably of; but most of all by the spurious Gildas who not content with accusing him alone, calls him Germen plantations ama- rissimas." .4 shoot from a most bitter slock. Whether-by this stock was meant the family of Conslantine, or the British nation, the as. persioll is equally disgraceful to the author of it. He must, had it been the real Giidas, have had so vile a disposition, as to be uu, worthy of liis own, or any other country.— Y d, even in what he says of Maximus, he proves that the Britons were not at that time a divided people, since he acknowledges that all the Britons who bore arms followed Max- imus into Gaul and in my mind this fact proves, that their motive must have been their considering him as tile legitimate succes- sor to the throne of Constantine ,• and if so that Grutian was an usurper. Far however be it from me to vindicate Ihe conduct of Maximus, if the charge of perjury wa!! jtlsL- If it was so he is gone to appear before his judge. But to proceed with this supposed Gildas. Granting that Britain, by being thus drained of its was exposed to the incursions of the northern nations is it true that the Bri- tons remained liable to be trndden under foot by them, even to his time, andappureally m.tP}li longer 1 Thc words are "Diiabusprimum gen- j tibus—calcubilis inultos slupcl gemetque per annos." Is it true, that when the Romans departed, the Brilons did not defend their cotifill*v ? Let JJostmus answer the flagitious- falsehood. He says, that the look- up arms, and facing the danger, freed the towns from the attacks of the II riN (I (I the other gallic government, following thc,=\ EXAMPLE of THE BRITONS, set themselves free in like manner, and having expelled the Ro- man governors, settled their own form of go- vernment as well as they were able. Now t It is was written of that very time wl. •_■!•, the letter of Agidius is referred to; a letter which your correspondentileems authentic. Authentic j" though there never was an Agidius thrice Con. sul (the title of the person to whom it is ad- dressed) though it does not specify by what Britons it was sent. whether aboriginal or Britons,or Britonised Romans; though neither time nor place of ils being written arc men tiouetl, and though it has no other authority than the spurious Gitdas While that of Zosimus remains, such authenticity will not 1 imagine, be much more acquiesced in than your correspondent's idea ol strict propriety. I know the name of ÆtillS kas been prefixed .to this letter, bat so have those of A "iiitts and t.quitius,& it isol asiiUlecoiisequence which, as it is of probability that it had any founda- tion whatsoever ia truth The restghtece to, and conflicts with, Ihe Saxons were too well known to be much tam- pered with it was, for him, who had described the Jhil OilS as incapable of either in former limes, to account for the laf ler and he dexterously ascribes il to a mo- tive, which might work equally upon the Saxons certainly a good olle in i tseif: that is, piety, and ltrust it had its share. But it is not very easy to believe,- that in all their pre- vious distresses it bad been neglected, and the change at once so sudden and so effectual as to have merited the success tlt;tt folik)WCkl.- An individual mn-v be suddenly reformed hy great chance, but a whole nation is not so.— The victory of Baddou hiM -could not however be denied all that could be done was to assign a cause, and to jmit the specification that the Britons were the conquerors. Your correspondent says that I have charged the spurious Gildas with omitting ibis battle. Iu this be has mistaken rer-y words. What J charged him with omitting islhe information 41 that the battles of Arthur were fought in the spirit of the ancestors of Ihe heroes of Baddou hill that is, that the like spirit had distinguished the Britons from the days of Cassibelan to that lime. That it did so, I trust I have now sufficiently proved, fro HI the successive historians of Roman affairs, who, "partiat,conduct be so to the Britons.— Though,the detail, forced upon me, has been necessarily long, it will not I hope be unin- teresting to others, and 1 trust will prove that t, indignant at a malignant and base calum- niator of the British name, I have asserted Ihe l?e,, of what he has written, the assertion the con- trary nndthatl am-no-less justified in refus-; i ing any degree of credit to whatever rests on the credit of one so decisively the enemy of he Britons, and so determinate in his study to detract from that character of zeal and spirit in the defence of their country. If in this respect, so little liable to mistakes, were even tradition consulted, he is so faithless and so slanderous, upon what principle is it possi ble to believe that he is less so in others? Is this angel of darkness where there is the light of history to discover his true nature, to he thought an angel of light, when his path is through a region which frequently is obscure ? Censures in the same strain and in the same spirit, by the same writer, must abide the same decision. In the history of this writer they are calumnious those in the epistle can-, not consistently be thought less so, were nothing more known. For the present I leave him to the sympathetic veneration of your correspondent, and am, Sir, Yours, &c. P. ROBERTS. Oswestry., 28th Jug. 1813. -.t-

GRECIAN ANTIQUITIES.

AGRICULTURE.

REPORT :

[No title]

TIDE TAP-tt fOR THE ENSUING…