Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

16 articles on this Page

Tl--...,..s.."'1:.'f"!!'";:;'..,ø:-:o-"""!""'rY."'=.,.-.......4''''''..'…

News
Cite
Share

Tl .s.1:f" .ø:o-rY.=.4 MONTGOMERY SHIRE MID SUM Hi:B I A t 3 The a£s'z;; for the County o. llciitgom, ry -C--a held in Newtown, on Friday last, before -i u -tioe 1 Sir J. C. Matliew. His lordship arrived by tip mid-day train, and was met at th" tit¡¡,'ion by <11'- High Sheriff, Edward Davies, Esq., Plas Dmam (who wore a levea dies.) accompanied by r-b chaplain, Rsv. Morgan Joii"9, LLandmam, G. D- Harrison, Esq., Under-sheriff, the Chief-const tbie, R. J. Hughes, Esq., and a posse of p ;!ice After a short visit to his Lordship's lodgings, the Court was opened, and the following g uticmeu were gworn upon the grand jury Arthur CI arles Humphreys-0 ven, it,sq., Richard Edward Jones, E-q., Colonel Heyward-Hey > ard. Sir Thomas Gibbons, Frost, R. J. Edmunds, Esq., Abraham Howell, Esq., Samuel Powell, Esq., Morris Charles Jones, Esq Captain Johnes, Edmund Buckley, Esq., C. W. Whitiey-Oweii, E-iq., Thos. J. Hounsfield, Lq Hugh Lewis, E.^q Captain Beadnell, Edward Bernard Proctor, E-q., John Smout, Esq., Captain Westby, Colonel HudJleston, 1\/f,I. T-Tt-»m !.Vivcx\r<a TV«n_ iUAiUU 1 J 1 There Iteing no criminal cases, his lordship, in addressing the graud jury, said he had pleasure in COngTatalating them, all they often been call- gratulated before, upon th" condition of tneir coui ty. It was an honor to the county, aad a triumph of tne law, that since the last ass zes there w. < no appeal to that tribunal. No doubt it was incoll Yllie. t lor ma.ny of tetIl to attend at tt¡a,t time, but it would at least give them the opportunity, of which they would prooably avail themselves, ot excbangiug their views upon mattara of local, and oven Imperial interests. It had been stated tnat the ho.ding of assizes, when there were no pusoners, was a waste of time. The question had now beau settled, and equal attention wou.d, in future, be pud t* t-aoh county. In deference to the clamour for the economising of time, the experiment had been tried of grouping several counties. That had been unfavourably received by the authorities, and the judges, after deliberation, had determined to go back to the ancient ways. He thanked them lgr their attendance, and dismissed them from the service of the Court. The High Sheriff, in honour of the occasion, presented his Lordship with a pair of white gloves, which he graciously accepted. There was but one civil case entered for trial, and this was tried without a jury. COOKE V. COOKE. This was a case in which George Cooke, farmer, Winton, Chirbury, claimed .£95, money lent, from his brother Robert Cooke Shelve Farm. There was a counter claim of .£68 brought by defendant against plaintiff. Mr Marshall, instructed by Mr E. M Jones, appeared for plaintiff, and Mr Colt Williams, instructed by Mr H. S..Newell appeared for defendant. George Cooke said defendant was his brother. He lent him £ 3 12s. tid. in 1888. Did not remember date, but it was in Welshpool. Mr Vaughan was sueing defendant for a beer account, and he lent him the money to pay. He also lent him .£50, £ 3 5s., JB13, and < £ 9, at different times, tie also lent him <6li'to help him to pay rates and taxes. His brother bad been a rate collector, and he advanced him jjl3, as he was behind in his payments. He had bought oat3 and tvheat from his brother at an agreed price. Last October he went to his house, drawn UD a promissory note for X115, which was the amount then due to him. He did this at his brother's wish. The defendant said he thought it was more than he owed, but he had no book. He received X20 from him that day. Some days after the defendant came to his house, and on being asked to sign, said he was in a. position to pay up if he could only sell at Bishop's Castle fair. He promised if unable to well, he would sign after the fair.— Cross examined: When he gave his brother the JE3 12S. 6d. he put it down in his book (produced). Mr Vaughan was not present. The printed datt-s ia the book were altered. He had bought a lot of old books. The £ 3 5a. he lent was for tithes. The.£11 he lent him was entered in another book. It did not state what year. The .£13 he lent him was for rates. He did not scratch anything out of the book. Four bas of oats were had, and eignt bags of wheat. The wheat was bad in two lots. His brother did not deoline to sign the note, but said he would like time to consider. Had bought a bull from him and paid him A23 for it in his house, when Thos. Pugh was present. Had no receipt. His brother did not pay JJ14 from tha sale of a mare in Welshnnnl iu <*ndcre he/ft.T'OTdBkttt before that Court, tor such an beeQ settled in the au action which shou^miQat;on cQat^d. A to county c«urt\^ 70 aheep {0r a fortnight on a farm the aec-uffhehaa <u s v tQ_ His brother sold which defeniiant fleven bags of oats, and four another time, all of which he paid for Did not have 109 ewes on his brotner s iaua last year, but had 70 sheep on a field ot turnips. There was a clover field adjoining, and a clover jitack in it. He gave hia brother netting to pre- JervQ the stack from the sheep.-Re-examined: His brother made no counter-claim until this action was brM"hCooke, wife of plaintiff, said she remembered defendant coming to their house and talking about sinning the promissory note. He would not sign then, bat promised to do so after Bishop s Castle f«.ir even if there were oi ly £ 5 left unpaid. TwmasPugh, farm bailiff, said he was present when p'aintiff paid defendant for the bull. The defendant Sober. Cooke was then examined, and denied having received the sums of J3 12s. 6d., m qa aad £ 11 from his brother. Had received a ■am of £ 9 or £ 13, but could not say which, as he keDt no book. Had two bags of oats and four bags 5 wheat from him. Had never asked his brother to draw up any note, but said he would be in a position tZlittle at any time. Tne bull was sold in W elsh- tool by his bt other for him for £ 23 and he had not received the money. The understanding was that t.,i on towards the debu. He took a mare to We'.shpool and sold it for £ 14,, and handed thf money to his brother His brotuer s ewes had been on his f,¡,rm for about four months, and had the ran of the farm. T hey had fed off a stack of clover which was open to tbem.-C.oss-examined: Had made no cla m against his brother until this action WM commenced. When his brother and Pugh came for the bull no money passed. Had paid Mr Vaughan • claim for beer, but could not say where the money came from. Had been rate collector, but was never ohort of m ""ey to make up his payments. Mrs Cooke, wife of defendant, said she kept her husband's armey in a box upstairs. Her husband hiod givün her no money on the day on which the bull was taken away, or on Welshpool fair day when the mare w-is C).d. lIe always gave her the money when he r- ceived it, and she keut it until he had need of it. The netting did not keep the sheep from the clover s acs. Annie ■ ke and Albert Cooke, daughter and son flf defendant, gave corroborative evidencd on some OIBenjapii'8Corfield and E. Potter said the charges made by defendant in his counter-claim for keep were fair and reasonable. The Judge sa d the counter-claim was most, unaatisfacrory, anu gave judgment for the plaintiff on both chill and counter-claim with costs. This oouolu-led the business of the assize. The doors of the Court had to be olosed during a Dart of the bear,nz of the case on account of the deafening uproar which greeted the anuouncoment of the result of the borougha election.

Advertising

TUEGYNON.

ESGAIKGE! LIOGr.

ABEHHAFESP.

THE ELECTION IN THE MONTGOMERY…

THE ICOUNTY NOMINATION. I…

« ;-THE CONTEST IN RADNORSHIRE.

Advertising

NEWTOWN. 'i

IWELSHPOOL.

LLANIDLOES.

CAERSWS.

LLANBRYNMAIR.

[No title]

POLITICAL NOTES.