Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

14 articles on this Page

---'---LLANDUDNO POST OFFICE…

News
Cite
Share

LLANDUDNO POST OFFICE THEFTS. STARTLING DISCOVERIES. POLICE COURT PROCEEDINGS. ACCUSED COMMITTED FOR TRIAL. For about six months continual complaints have been received of articles missing from the Llandudno Post Office. In some oases certain articles appear to have been taken out of packages, which have been duly de- livered, but without the full contents. In other instances, the packages have been missed altogether, and never reached their destination. All attempts by the local staff to solve the mystery proved fruitless, and a few weeks ago a special clerk from the Lon- don General Post Office and a detective of the Metropolitan Police, attached to the Post Office, were sent down to Llandudno to investigate the matter, with the result that the caretaker of the Llandudno Post Office was arrested. The accused, John Spencer, is about 50 years of age, and is a mamed man with six children, and his wife resides at Werring- ton, near Peterborough. He was employed as caretaker at the Llandudno Post Office, which position lie had held for nearly two years, prior to which he had held respon- sible positions under the London and North- Western Railway Company. He had been a petty officer in the Royal Navy, and had served his Queen and King for upwards of 22 years, and had always borne an excellent character throughout his career. Some months ago he applied to be removed to Bolton Post Office, where there was a vac- ancy for a caretaker. He was in receipt of a pension of £25 a year. His wages as care- taker was £1 per week, with an additional 5s a week for attending to the coastguard bell, thus making his weekly income about 35s. Upon his arrest a fortnight ago he was brought up before Mr William Bevan and remanded. THE CASE FOR THE PROSECUTION. The case came on for hearing at a special Police Court, held at Llandudno, on Friday, before Mr Wilicam Bevan and Dr. Spinther James. As the matter had excited consider- able interest in the district, there was an unusually large attendance at the Town Hall when the case was called. J. B. Altanson appeared for the pro- secution, and Mr W. Cprbett for the ac- cused. Mr Allanson, in opening the case, said he appeared to prosecute on behalf of the Post- master General. He intended bringing two charges against the accused the first one would be taken under section 26 of the Post Office Act of 1837, which dealt with the du- ties of Post Office servants. Under the sec- tion, he would be charged with stealing & silver cigarette case, and some cigarettes, which were in the case. Mr Corbett, interposing, said he wished to make an application before the case pro- ceeded any further. When the accused was arrested the police had taken from him the sum of J68 lOs, and he now asked that the money be returned, to enable the accused to provide tor a proper defence, so that justice could be done. The Post Office authorities were not in want of the money; whilst the accused sadly needed it. Mr Allanson said he was sorry the applica- tion had been made then, as he might have Something to say on the point later on. He suggested that the application should be made at a later stage of the proceedings. Mr W. Bevan suggested to Mr Corbett that he should mention the matter at the end of the hearing. Mr Allanson, continuing, said that the accused was charged with stealing on or a' out July 2nd last a silver cigarette case, containing a quantity of cigarettes, OJ! of a letter packet from the Post Office. The accused was a man of good character when entered the service of the Post Office at ^Llandudno, on March 4th, 1905, and then -dade the usual declarations before a justice of the peac-e. For his duties as cleaner and porter he received JE1 per week. He also received 5s a week for attending to the coast communication call bell, in connection with the coastguard station, which duty necessi- tated his being on the premises alone from 12.30 a.m. to 4.45 a.m. He had no right really to enter the room where the letters Were kept, sorted ready for delivery next horning, although he had access to it. In June last, Mr W. W. Peck of Bolton, a Visitor staying in South Parade, lost a cigar- ette case on an excursion to Bettwsycoed. A man named Williams, of LLanrwst, found Jt, and after seeing circulars offering a re- gard, he posted the cigarette case to Ro- berts, Clovelly, South Parade, Llandudno, which was the address given on the cir- cular. He delivered the packet to Miss Ro- berts, the sub-postmistress at Llanrwst, but {jot seeing the promised reward forthcoming he wrote to Mrs Roberts, South Parade, ijlandudno, and had a reply, stating that the packet had never arrived. Serious com- plaints had been made since last December about things being lost at Llandudno Post Office, with the result that William Thomas j^dwards, clerk at the General Post Office, London, was sent down to Llandudno to in- vestigate the matter. On October 11th Mr ^awards, in the presenoe of Mr J. Wyard, the Llandudno postmaster, and Mr Calde- cott, a detective iq the Metropolitan Police, the accused, and told him that various 'hings were missing, and asked if he had any information about them, to which he that he knew nothing. He was then asked if he had any objection to his room and box being searched, to which he replied that he had not, as it was not likely a man with his good character and in receipt of a Pension would take the things. However, When his box was opened, a mass of things found, and amongst them was the cigarette case. In addition to the articles discovered in the box there was found 8 10s, for which Spencer could not account. ine accused gave the address of his wife as The Green, Werrington, near Peterborough, where a large quantity of goods were found, about which enquiry had been made at the £ Ost Office, and for which the officials had been searching. Mr Corbett objected to the mention of any other goods, as the accused was only charged with two thefts. Mr Allanson said that he could prefer a dumber of charges, but did not think that tho county should be put to the trouble and Expense of formulating a number of charges. Ahey would take two only, the other things ere merely mentioned as showing the ex- tent of the depredations alleged against the Recused. He did not think that it was any- I huig m the accused's favour to state that to his unblemished character he had oeen plaoed in a position of trust, and had betrayed that trust. THE EVIDENCE. Joseph Wyard, postmaster at Llandudno Produced the official declaration made by the accused, dated 4th March, 1905, prior to s being appointed office cleaner and porter at the Llandudno Post Office. His wages £ re £ 1 per week, and later on he received "a per week for attending to the coast com- munication call bell. It was true that he «*me to Llandudno with a very good char- In reply to Mr Corbett, witness said he Sieved be had six references when the ac- cused was engaged, which were all excel- ent Waiter Winstanley Peck, of 21, Cleee's- Little Hulton, Bolton a chemist, was j* Vi called, and said that he was coachinc huA I dlstnct about the end of June. He ad then a cigarette case, and identified it as ne one produced in court. At the time he JW?* rfc, he, W,aS afc Clovley, S>uth ] Llandudno, with Mrs Roberts. He and f £ ° aase,,bet,?,e<if1 Be"wsvcoed station culif i rr and a"erwards cir- handbills offering a reward. The it °-Sarettes. He had not seen °°urt thIT day WSS produced in benKViiHaLm °.weTn, WilIiams> Prescot House, thaf l •Jre?& Llanrwst, greengrocer, said on! i the cigarette case as the ittjPasted at Llanrwst. He had found C Bettwsycoed. On the evening 0f the nnj Ju'y he wrapped the case in notepaper it nWIot^-a note explaining how he found ■Ui«3 Ja<WMe!?od to '/Roberts, Cloveley, Qdudno, the ends being securely fasten- 8ealed,J ,He, took ifc t0 Llanrwst and fixecJ a penny and a half- 'j»t stamp on the label, and wrote: ttenw don't stamp on the package He • the P^et to Miss Roberts, the 0 postmistress at Llanrwst. J Mr Allanson: You did not register itP- No, sir; I wish I had done. You see you took such care that it got lost?—I did not want it to get lost, sir, for fear I should be blamed. I am sorry I did not register it for the sake of a few pence. Joseph Wyard (re-called) said that if the packet had been posted at LlanrwBt on the 2nd July, at seven o'clock, it ought to have arrived at Llandudno Post Office at 10 p.m., the same evening, and would remain over- night at the Post Office, and be put in its proper place for delivery next mining. John Spencer was on duty at the Post Office that night, and would be there alone from 12.30 a.m. to 4.45 a.m., but he had no busi- ness in the room where the packet would lay. He, however, had the means of getting into the room if he liked. In the ordinary course, the letter would be sent out at seven a.m., to be delivered by the postman. Mr Corbett: Are we to understand that the rooms were left open for the man to walk about at night? Witness: There was no necessity for him to go in. His duties between 12.30 and 4.45 were simply to attend to the call bell. Mr Corbett: Had he access to other rooms ? Witness: Yes, to all the rooms. Mr Corbett: Then, none of the rooms are locked up at night? Witness: No; it was his business to be on the premises, and to take care of them. Francis Roberts, Cloveley, South Parade, Llandudno, said that neither on the 3rd July, nor since that date, had she received a letter containing the cigarette case, but had a letter from William Owen Williams with regard to it. INVESTIGATIONS AT THE POST OFFICE. William Thomas Edwards, clerk in the General Post Office, London, stated that he was the prosecutor in the present case. He was instructed to enquire into complaints made with reference to property lost in passing through Llandudno Post Office. On the 11th October, at Llandudno Post Office, in the presence of the postmaster and De- tective Ralph Caldecott, he saw the accused, and told him who he was, and that he was making an enquiry with regard to loss of letter packets passing through the Llandud- no Post Office. The missing packets con- tained razors, watches, brooches, rings, and other things. He asked the accused if he knew anything about them, to which he re- plied, "No." He then asked if he had any Post Office property in his possession, and he again replied, "No." He was then asked if he had any objection to his room and box being searched, to which he replied that he had no objection, and said that he would not do anything like that, as he had a life pen- sion. He then went with the detective to Spencer's room, and saw that officer find a large number of articles, and amongst them the cigarette case. When asked where he got the case from, he said that it sent him by his sist-er. He (witness) then told the accused that he believed it had been stolen from a postal packet, and asked him if he had any explanation of his possession of it, and cautioned him that anything be said might be given in evidence against him. He replied that he deferred saying anything. Accused was then given into custody. He gave his wife's address as The Green, Wel- rington, Peterborough. On the samo day he (witness) communicated with the police there. The things found by the police were the contents of missing packets extending from December Last. The complaints were most numerous in July. Detective Ralph Caldecott said he was present when Mr Edwards interviewed the defendant and he corroborated his evidence. He also identified a large parcel of articles, of which he had a long list. Sergeant Ed. Williams, Llandudno, stated that on the 11th October, 1906, he arrested the accused at Llandudno Post Office on a charge of felony, and charged him with stealing the cigarette case produced. In reply he said, "Yes, I understand." THE SECOND CHARGE. Mr Allanson said that the second charge differed slightly from the first, inasmuch as in this case the accused would be charged with stealing from a postal packet whilst in the first case he was charged with stealing the whole packet. He apologised for the absence of Mr John Haynes, a solicitor who was one of the witnesses, and would be called at the Assizes, but could not be pre- sent that day as he had to attend the Quar- ter Sessions at Spalding. Mrs Lynch, who resided with her brother, Mr Haynes, at Queen's Lea, Teddington, had come to Llan- dudno on a visit, and stayed at the St. George's Hotel. When she arrived she found that she had left some jewellery on the dressing table at Queen's Lea, and --the wrote to Mrs Mills, who ivas ca»et«ker at Queen's Lea, and asked her to forward cer- tain articles on to her. The articles in- cluded two gold chains, to which were at- tached very old, valuable gold seals, and two gold keys. When the package arrived at the St. George's Hotel, Mrs lynch noticed that it had been tampered with, and as the seals and keys were missing, she wrote to Mrs Mills, stating that all the goods had not arrived. Mrs Mills would state that all the articles were done up in a packet, and handed to Mr Haynes to post. The seals and keys were found in the accused's box, attached to a less valuable chain. W. Thos. Edwards repeated the evidence given bv him in the previous case, and stated that the accused told him that the seals and keys belonged to his father. Helene Lynch, of Queen's Lea, Stanley- road, Teddington, Surrey, said that from 28th July to 17th August she was staying at the St. George's Hotel, Llandudno. She came there from Queen's Lea. She left on the dressing table two gold chains and two seals. She identified the seals and keys, but said that the chain was not hers. On August 2nd, a postal packet was delivered to her at the St. George's Hotel, Llandudno, and she then noticed that the letter had been tam- pered with. When she opened the packet she noticed that two seals, two keys, and two brushes were missing. The envelope was very dirty, and had been fastened down with gum. Mary Mills, of 5t- Bramley-street, Wal- more-road, North Kensington, stated that from July 27th to August 17th, she was em- j ployed by Mr John Haynes as caretaker of Queen's Lea, Stanley-road, Teddington. Mr Haynes was a solicitor, and resided at Queen's Lea, with his sister, Mrs Lynch. In consequence of a letter received by her on July 31st, from Mrs Lynch, who was then at Llandudno, she took two seals, two keys, attached to two gold chains, from Mrs Lynch's dressing table, and made them up into a package, ahd gave them to Mr Haynes to post. She identified the articles produced as the ones she had packed up. In a day or two afterwards she received a letter from Mrs Lynch, stating that some of the articles were missing. Accused, on being charged, pleaded not guilty, and reserved his defence. APPLICATION FOR MONEY REFUSED. Mr Corbett applied that the gum of JB8 10s, found in the accused's box, should be returned to him for the purposes of his defence. Although the charges might look serious, he pointed out that both charges were practically the same. The accused had a wife and six children, but none of his rela- tions or friends were in a position to assist him in raising the necessary money for his defence. He, therefore, applied that the J68 10s should be handed over so that he could be properly looked after at the Assizes. Mr Allanson opposed the application, for the reason that as they knew the accused was about to leave the country, there were still a number of things that had not been found, and ho had reason to believe that the money now applied for was the proceeds of the sale of articles still missing. He thought that the question should be submitted Co to the Judge at the Assizes to see what he thought about it. If the accused could not pay for his defence, he could make an ap- plication to the Poor Prisoners' Aid So- ciety. Mr W. Bevan said that the accused would be committed for trial to the Assizes on both charges, and no order would be made as regards the money found. We understand that the case will be tried at Carnarvon Assizes to-day (Friday).

[No title]

Llandudno Betting Case. »--11

A WHOLE FAMILY BENEFITS.

[No title]

St. Asaplf Board of Guardians.

SWIMMING GALA AT RHYL.

JUDGE MOSS AND UNPUNCTUAL…

[No title]

----LLANDUDNO RATEPAYERS ASSOCIATION.

5EQUEL TO A LLANFALRFCCHAN…

LAANDUDNO TOWN IMPROVEMENT…

A LLANDUDNO BURGLARY, --

Advertising