Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

18 articles on this Page

BEER AND POISON.

[No title]

PRO-BRITISH MEETING: A SUGGESTION.

AN EA8THAM BANKRUPTCY.

CHESTER TRAMWAYS.

News
Cite
Share

CHESTER TRAMWAYS. Sir,—I should like to say why I support the new tramway scheme. First of all, of course, for a Penny ride. Secondly, because I think that it will bring trade to Chester and improve the city all round. Thirdly, because I think it will help to pay the rates by assisting in the letting of the targe houses on the outskirts, which, being1 highly rented, contribute so considerably towards the rates of the city. Fourthly, an electric tram Service will facilitate the getting about from place to place, and create new work for the working- tuan. Fifthly, because I think the scheme is a ing one, and will be no loss to the city rates.- Yours. &c., „ TRAVELLER. Sir,-Will you allow me as an owner and rate- Payer in Chester a few lines in your paper to Urge on your readers a careful consideration of this matter before they make up their minds to Vote in favour of the tramway scheme? The city now stands pledged to an expenditure of £ 60,000 or so for sewage works, and it behoves us carefully to consider what will be the result of piling on our city debt as we are in this and ■other ways. The tramway scheme, apart from all Parliamentary expenses and from the inevit- able extras attendant on the carrying out of such Projects, is put down to cost £160,000 and your readers will have noted that neither the Mayor tior any other of the advocates of the scheme would commit himself at the town's meeting to, any definite expression of opinion as to the ulti- mate total cost, and in this they shewed a oon- fciderable amount of prudence. Nor would they Commit themselves to anything definite as to the Probable annual expenditure in connection with electrical power, or wages, or other inevitable °UIlfeel much* indebted to Mr. Storr for having demanded a poll, and am glad that the rate- Payers should have a chance of expressing their opinions. To them I now appeal, and I ask-Do We want electrical trams? Are they worth the Cost? Can it be believed that they will pay their forking expenses? I do not ask whether they Will in addition to this produce enough to pay • £ 6,000 or £ 7,000 per annum or more to cover interest on borrowed money and sinking fund. Who wants a tramline, say, up George-street? The entire length from end to end of the city, Elven including Saltney, is only about 2 miles, and most of the traffic will be for lengths of only a mile or less. Where is this traffic to come W« are told we must bring the city up to date." If we were to attempt it I venture to think we should ruin it. We are proud-not of its modern appliances-but of its antiquities, and We might as well ask the Romans to whitewash the Colosseum as try to modernise our city, and in so doing disfigure our old streets and quaint buildings. If we are to do it we should not stop at electric tramways, which are only fitted for towns With broad, straight streets and magnificent distances." We should take down our old Walls, Which could be done without expense, as the materials would pay for the removal, build up the "Rows" with the stones, take down the 'Cathedral, pension off the Dean and Chapter, 'nd then—dispose of our empty houses as speedily as possible, before the advent of the New Sealanders to gaze on our forlorn remains. If the Council are committed to the purchase v of the existing trams no great harm is done; let them lease them to a private company. They Will then be the landlords, and can see that the concern is managed in a reasonable way and for i the benefit of the public.-Yours faithfully, RATEPAYER. TO THE EDITOR. Sir,-l was glad to see, the letter of your cor- respondent of 5th inst. The word of warning Cannot be too emphatically addressed to the Citizens of Chester at the present time. We are All in favour of the Corporation's taking over the ttaraways, but we do say that there is no reason Why the Council should rush at once into a large Expenditure to introduce big extensions and new Methods of working. All these things may be Necessary in time, but the time is not yet—-at 'oast not if any regard is to be paid to the financial ^art of the proposal. Anyone visiting other towns, take Oxford and Plymouth as cases in point, finds tramways laid at great expense unused, and that through streets and districts far more thickly populated than the suburbs of Chester. Now is Chester going to put down tramways and gain experience after- wards, or is it going to be wise beforehand, and only adopt them in the very heart of the city, leaving extensions to a further day? What may be a desirable ideal may not be profitable to carry out in practice. From the Fountain, Boughton, to the junction of Parkgate and Liverpool-roads— from the Castle to the General Station, are the main arteries of the traffic in Chester. The numbers using the omnibuses do not warrant any further developments at present. The numbers in the trams at Hough Green do not pay wear and tear even at a threepenny fare. There are un- profitable trams as there are disused railways, and Chester is not rich enough to afford the luxury of electric trams to such ideal suburbs as Filkin's- lane. The ratepayers should not allow themselves to be hurried into an expenditure of tens of thousands of pounds until they have obtained some experience of the cost of working the present trams.—Yours truly, FESTINA LENTE. Chester, Dec. 13, 1900. Sir,—With all deference to the writer of the notes in your last issue may I ask space in your columns to reiterate the opinion I expressed at the so-called meeting of ratepayers that if ever there was an occasion when one was justified in demanding that the question under consideration should be submitted to the judgment of the rate- payers, that occasion arose on the evening of Tuesday week, when the meagre attendance at the Town Hall, consequent no doubt upon the inadequate public notice and the inclement weather, reduced the proceedings almost to a farce? Let us see how the matter stands. Wisely or unwisely, the Council have decided to give £18,000 for a few miles of old iron rails and for some stabling and buildings which the citizens certainly do not want. They then proceed to promote a Bill in Parliament to extend the tram- ways, to work them by electric traction and to raise the necessary funds. It is generally sup- posed that when such measures are promoted some estimate is prepared by responsible experts of the extent of the works and the capital pro- posed to be expended. But no amount of per- sistent inquiry could induce the Mayor or the other speakers to give any reliable or definite information on these most important points. In fact it was a case of giving the Corporation a blank cheque. When, very early in the proceedings, an appeal was made to the Mayor to consent to an adjourn- ment it was refused, but when the resolution was forced through, and carried by the votes of the members of the Corporation, resulting in the demand for a poll, then a member of the Corpora- tion is put up to propose an adjournment. Fortu- nately this suggestion was seen through, as was the utter absurdity of holding an adjourned meeting, which the Mayor ruled could not even disouss the resolution he had previously declared carried. The adoption of electric tramways is a matter that very seriously affects the ratepayers. What- ever the respective opinions may be as to whether the venture will pay its working expenses or not, one point is very clear, and that is the very heavy additional burden cast upon us to provide the annual sinking fund of some £ 8,000, to say nothing of the anticipated deficit in the first few years. It is absurd to compare Chester with Liverpool, or Southport or Blackpool. Chester is a quaint, old-time show-city, in which a system of electric tram cars, with their jangling bells and the hideous accompaniment of posts and net- work of overhead wires, is an anachronism to which I fervently hope those ratepayers who have some regard for the old city will never assent. At all events the question is now plainly before them, ft question which, in the opinion of many ratepayers (who by letter and otherwise have ex- pressed their hearty concurrence in the demand for a poll), is by far the most important ever submitted to their judgment. As to the cost of the poll, which was made such a bugbear by Councillor Lowe, even the absurdly extravagant figure mentioned by him would be money well spent if the ratepayers can save the city the reckless expenditure to which they are about to be committed by the dominant members of the Corporation.—Your obedient servant, F. STOBB. 19, The Groves, Chester.

DEPOPULATION OF PENRHYN. .+

A NARROW ESCAPE.

[No title]

Advertising

MARRIAGE OF MISS U, M. LYLE…

NORTH CHESHIRE.

[No title]

INEW BOOKS.

ftbe grms anb Folunteers.

[No title]

! QUFEN SCETOOL (OLD GIRLS)…

Advertising

A KHAKI ORDER FOR LIVERPOOL.