Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

21 articles on this Page

HOLYHEAD COUKTY COURT.

News
Cite
Share

HOLYHEAD COUKTY COURT. TcJKf-DAX.—Before his Honour Sir: Horatio Lloyd. A CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY CASE. :Mr. T. R. Evans applied for. costs on behalf of his client, Henry Parry, coach Latin at Penrhos.who was represented by him at Menai Bridge, when the case had not been reached. It VI as now witlidrawn by the company. The company was in a very flourisliing condition, the shareholders having plenty of money, and his client 11Id been put to a deal of trouble and expense.—Mr. E. G. Roberts maintained thnt the society was fully represented at Menai Bridge,and that the object of attempting to get the case adjuurneu for hearing at Holyhead was to have a ''scene in the gallery." The chairman of the society was present on each occasion, but was not prepared to attend at the caprice of the defendant, arii the case was accordingly withdrawn.—His Honour said he would make no order. ADMINISTRATION ORDER REFUSED. Robert Jones, butcher, 5, Herbert-street, Holyhead, applied for an administration order, -offerin,- to pay 5s. in the L. The case had been previously heard at Llangefni and Menai Bridge. -Mr. T. R. Evans opposed the application, as the liabilities exceeded £ 50. The application was accordingly refused. ACTION FOR GOODS SUPPLIED. J. Bulkeley, 2*, Llainfain, Holyhead, claimed from Hugh Jones, Tyddyn-du, Valley, 3s. 61. for goods sold and dtlivered. Mr, E. G. Roberts appeared for the plaintiff.-An order was made for 2s. per month. REFUSING TO PAY. William Hughes, Tanybryn, Holyhead, a shareholder in the Welsh Co-operative Society, had been entered into court for the balance due on his shares by instalments of 5s. per month. As defendant refused to pay, Mr. E. G. Robeits on behalf of the society, had issued a judgment summons against him, and his Honour now made an order for the instalments due, payable in a month, or fourteen days in default. NOT EXCESSIVE. Hugh Jones, Jew-street, Holyhead, sued David Jones, Treddaniel, his brother, to recover a sum of money for board and lodgings, and also for cutting liny.-NI r. E. G. Roberts, for the plaintiff, stated that the defendant, being out of employ- ment, Cdme and stayed with plaintiff, who was a fireman.and the father of a large family. The arrangement was that defendant should pay 5s. per weak, and this included washing, a charge which could not be said to be very excessive.— David Jones, the defendant, deposed that he had paid 45s. to his brother's wife.—Mr. T. R. Evans contended that the money having been once paid it was unjust to claim it again.—Judgment for plaintiff for S3 19s. 6d. WOULD NOT BE SWORN. Joseph Williams and Son sued Mrs. Calligan, Baker-street, for a balance of coal account. Defendant, on entering the witness box, declined to be sworn, stating that she had never taken an oath and never would.-His Honour allowed her to affirm.- I)ef endant first admitted the pape s produced relating to the debt belonged to her, but afterwards denied any knowledge of them. The debt was not properly owing.—An order for 4s. a week was made.—Defendant left the witness box stating that they would never get a farthing from her as long as they lived. SISTER VERSUS SISTER. Mrs. Margaret Williams, Upper Park-street, Holyhead, sued her sister, Miss Elizabeth Peters, Market-street, Holyhead, claiming under the wili of their deceased brother. John Peters, that the defendant, as executrix, should transfer to the plaintiff, as trustee, H: shares in the Holy- head Gasworks, and claiming the dividend upon the same since the death of their brother in 1882, the shares having been devised under the will in trust for the plaintiff's son, who is still a minor.—Mr. E. Ilonoratus Lloyd (instructed by Mr. T. R. Evans, Holyhead) appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. J. Bryn Koberts, M.P. (in- structed by Mr. J. Lloyd Griffith, Holyhead), for the defendant.—It was contended, on behalf of the plaintiff, that the shares were devised to the plaintiff, in trust for her son, and that, there- fore, she was entitled to have them transferred to her, and to have the dividend, which was to be applied for the maintenance of her son.—The defence was that th" shares were only devised in trust for a limited period, and consequently that the defendant had no right to transfer them, but that she, as executrix, should have control over them. Also that they were devised under the will itself to the son, and not to the mother, to be coaveved to the son on his attain- ing his majority. With regard to the dividend, it was contended that the son had his education and clothing free, and that the plaintiff had declined to give any statement of expense.-Ilis Honour deferred judgment.

HOLYHEAD PETTY SESSIONS.

OUTRAGE ON WELSH TOURISTS…

•MYSTERIOUS DEATH AT PORTA!…

MR. LABOUCHERE AT AnEl- !…

Advertising

"IN.DAEKESr ENGLAND."'

AN AMUSING INCIDENT.

PRIZEFIGHTERS FINED.

[No title]

Advertising

STORMY WEATHER.

A RAILWAY OFFICIAL KILLED.…

DEATH OF SIR RICHARD BURTON.…

MURDER AT CARDIFF.

EXTRAORDINARY DEATH.!

[No title]

Advertising

FASHIONS FOR NOVEMBER. j

[No title]

Advertising