Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

9 articles on this Page

ST. DAVID'S DIOCESAN CONFERENCE.

News
Cite
Share

ST. DAVID'S DIOCESAN CONFERENCE. III.—ITS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. [BY DANIEL WATKINS.] The present helpless position of the Conference is due to this Committee, which studiously neglects to perform its most primary duties, whilst it arrogates TO itself powers that do not necessarily belong to it, and invariably uses such powers to minimise, if not entirely destroy, the value of the Conference as a representative body. Ir", first and foremost duty should be to pixniue eacn member with a copy of the Constitution of the Conference itself, with particulars of its functions. X./ tho absence of such particulars no member know what powers and privileges membership is supposed to confer upon him. When I was first advised of my election I was foolish enough to think that after election it becamo me to know what my duties were, and to consider how far I could as a member, further those Church reforms that 1 knew to be near and dear to many of those J was supposed to represent. I, therefore, in my innocence, wrote to the Secretary of the Confer- once for a copy of its constitution, etc., when I was informed, to my great surprise, that there was no cory a51 I required. I was further informed that tho Conference, as at present constituted, was the slow growth of 26 years (at present 28 years), and by a number of resolutions passed at various times throughout those many yeais, that the resolutions were to be found scattered amongst tho annual reports for all that period, covering in all about 1,500 pages of small print. In other words this meant that no member knows what his duties and privileges are, and more, that it is no business of his either to know. It looks too much as it delegates are to bow down and worship the Ditrnitaries and their nominees, and generally do as I hoy are told. Connected with the Conference arc to be found a number of Committees and Boards to which all administrative work is transferred by tho Confer- ence. There arc also a. number of Diocesan Socie- ties which present reports to the Conference. The questions that naturally arise out of such a state of things are, what the respective duties and powers of these bodies are, and in what relation do they respectively stand to the Conference? In other words, what are they empowered to do, and what control has the Conference over them. They, the representative members of the Conference, cannot possibly know, for in the first place they are not in possession of a complete set of repoi is, and were they to secure them is it likely that any member would periodically peruse 1,500 pages of print to find if there could be anything in them bearing on the points he might have from time to time in his mind. That such a farce should have been continued for 28 years is no doubt incredible to all persons who have had no experience of the Church. Who has joined a Society, Club, or Conference, outside the Church, without being provided, on joining it, with a. copy of its rules, etc? Some cf the Committees, Boards, and Societies' mentioned present reports to the Conference, whilst others as far as I can see never do so, and of those that do report, they will do so one year but not another year. Possibly, all this is in accordance with resolutions to be found some- where amidst the 1,500 pages of the annual reports, but should not each member be provided with in- formation so necessary to enable him to judge how far these bodies perform the work supposed to bo entrusted to them? What is tre natural result of all this? Nothing less than that each Committee, Board, or Society is a law unto itself, knowing that the representative members dare not challenge its action or want of action, as they do not know any- thing of its duties or powers and have no means of '■■"•y In- i', a. JWltfeSJ for ■surpri«a..tj>'»tk IJ10"1 representatives, under such circumstances, find one Conference more than enough for their taste, and that however much representation may bo extended the necessary "five shillingscs" to clear expenses are disappointing. Neglectful as this Committee is in one direction, it is just as objectionally active in other directions,. where its services would be willingly dispensed wtth. When the time comes to elect committees to do the administrative work of the Conferencq this Com- mittee is all life, and arrogates to itself the duties that are generally entrusted by other bodies to a Nomination Committee cirefullv elccted for the pur- pose. Its first and foremost act is to always re-elect itself without trace of bashfulness at such an un- pardonable act of self-assertion, and when that is completed proceed to elect all other committees, and in the course of election practically ignore throughout the 400 and more representative- of the clergv and laity, whoso gathering tho Conference professes to be. The Executive Committee itself. which so completely iUie Conferences is supposed to be comprised of 15 clergymen and 15 laymen, but being a law unto itself it elects 16 clergymen to 15 laymen. The 16 clergymen in- clude 2 Bishops, 1 Dean, 4 Archdeacons, 2 Canons Residentiary, 2 Honorary Canons, 2 Rural Deans, and 2 plain incumbents, with the Principal of Lampeter College as an addition to strengthen, it i, ay be the schoolmaster element on it. When it is borne in mind that all the powers of the Conference are directly or indirectly vested in these gentlemen. it j, evident that the scat of all power in the Diocese still remains where it always has been- with the Dignitaries-and entirely undiminished notwithstanding the Conference. This may be duire right, but if so why ever go through the farce of periodically convening the Conference at much loss of time and money to so many innocent laymen who can ill afford either? When saying this I have not overlooked the fact of 15 laymen being also on this Committee. But the 15 are the choice of the Dignitaries, and they are not froing to commit suicide in their favour more than" in favour of the Conference. Two of the 15 are ex-offieio members, in itself a guarantee õf respect for ecclesiastical authority; two nominee members of the Bishop—absolutely obedient; three elected by the Committee from outside the Confer- ence. I shall express no opinion on these last, as .i.„v aro a class of committee-men unknown outsi e opera and St. David's Diocesan Conference, and mv knowledge of either is too limited to generalise from their special experience. The Dignitaries having scoured the Diocese, for addi- tional dead-weights to themselves on the Col11- in have eventually mustered >uni- mitree appear to na c courage to allow eight representatives of the jv'oplc to bo prwent «»■ ,h«ir > -eerim! L( onlv 8 to 23 thev can do noth.ng V.n: a train I ask: » there SC"S° 'f'f [,l"> 1;,itv o, the Diocese to go to the trouble of e ec.n, i. 4.- « f™. the Conference, and then 250 representatives for tn i „r and influence in connec- fill ill the places of power aim 1 it with nominees of the B.shop- a,„w e» .V-e a-e not enough to go round to allow »hat is ,o'thin-' better than a ^-constituted Commute, o ,h, Con/erencc to go out into the h.ghw, and ,,vov»y,of the Diocese and br.ng m whocer the, ,s long as they keep the peop e's reprcsenta- fives from all positions of power an ,n the 250 representatives returned to t e on eren e the laity cannot provide more than eight men Uww to on this Committee, is it no more than time to disestablish and disendow a Church that produces such poor results? If more than ei-ht are qualified, what justification has tli Co tnUtcc for appointing non-members on tin, an. other Committees to the eraluMm of qualified ret resentatives? This Committee elected in the incredible fasuton bribed assumes the oontrol of every^ng connection with the Conference. It v.rtuaU, elects all other Committees, arranges all the business of the Conference, chooses all topics for discussion; and appoints all the principal speakers. Against its wishes nothing can be done, with irs support almost anything. But in what sense can it be called a Conference of the representatives of the Clergy and Laity of the Diocese, when these representatives cannor suggest cr do anything except with the approval of the members of this Committee, brought together, goodness knows how, and responsible to nobody but themselves. Is it to defend a system such as this, that the laity are asked to rally round the Dignitaries to oppose disestablishment and dis- endowment? Many laity are beginning to question the advisability of doing so, and is it a matter for surprise? ADDITIONAL ARTICLES. 4. Diocesan Fund (next week). 5. A Diocesan Committee—eI?crion and meetings. 6. A dual rolo. 7. The Democrat an Autocrat. 8. The Serfs d the Conference. 9. to be free.

[No title]

HUNTING APPOINTMENTS

SILVER WEDDINGS."

CARMARTHEN BOROUGH EDUCATION…

LLANDYSSUL

LLANDILO

NEWCASTLE-EMLYN

NOTES OF THE WEEK.