Welsh Newspapers
Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles
6 articles on this Page
LLANDILO PETTY SESSIONS.
LLANDILO PETTY SESSIONS. SATURDAY—Before Messrs A. S. Stepney- Gulston and G. H. Strick. ALLEGED WILFUL PERJURY. Superintendent W. Picton Philipps charged Margaret Davies, of the New Inn, Llandilo, with committing wilful and corrupt perjury in a Sunday closing case, heard on the 27th of July last. Mr R. S. Lewis, solicitor, appeared for the prosecution, and Mr J. W. Nicholas, for the de- fence. Mr R. S. Lewis, in his address for the prosecution, said that the defendant was a wit- ness for one John Davies, who had been charged before their worships by P.C. John Harries, with being on certain licensed premises on Sunday. In the evidence which the defendant gave 611 that occasion, she stated that she did not order beer on the day in question for any person at the Red Lion; that she did not pay for any beer; or that she saw any one supplied with beer. John Davies was fined for the offence, and a summons had been issued since against the de- fendant for committing wilful and corrupt perjury. Without detaining their wonhips further, he would proceed with the case. Lewis Bishop said that he was the clerk to the justices for the Llandilo Petty Sessional Division. He produced the information laid by P.C. John Harries against John Davies. It was laid before Mr A. S. Stepney-Gulston on the 8th of July last. In the information, P.C. Harries charged one John Davies, for that he the said John Davies, on Sunday, the 16th of June last, at the pariah of Llandilo fawr, during which day {>remises licensed for the sale of intoxicating iquors by retail, situate in the said parish of Llandilo fawr, were required under the pro- visions of the Sunday Liquor Closing Act, 1881, to be closed, was unlawfully found on certain premises of one Mary Davies, licensed for the sale of intoxicating liquors by retail, situate in the said parish of Llandilo-fawr, contrary, &c." On the 27th of July, the day on which the case was heard, the information was amended by substituting Mary Davies" for Margaret Davies." The defendant was a witness in the case. She was sworn to give evidence as a witness for the defence. Witness had got the minutes of her evidence. She then swore that she had never seen beer, or men drinking it." Those were the only minutes which he had down of her evidence. They did not include the whole of her evidence. He remembered nothing more than what was down. He had not the least recollection of any thing else. He had some vague idea of the de- fendant's having said something about 6d., but he really could not say now what it was about. Cross-examined by Mr Nicholas-As a rule I take down the material points. The exact worda on my minute book are that Margaret Davies never saw beer, or men drinking it." Re-examined by Mr Lewis-I did not antici- pate any proceedings of this kind when taking it down. P.S. John Harries said-I am a sergeant of the Carmarthenshire Constabulary, stationed at Llandilo. I was the complainant against John Davies in the case in which the magistrates' clerk has referred to in his evidence. I was present in this court on the 27th July last, and heard the evidence given in the case. I gave evidence myself. I was present when the defendant was sworn and examined. The statement read from the minute book of the evidence taken, so far as it goes, is correct. Defendant gave further evi- dence in the case. I remember being in the neighbourhood of the Red Lion Inn, Caledfwlch, kept by Margaret Davies, on the 16th June last. .1 was there at half-past four in the afternoon. What occurred at that time gave rise to the case to which I have referred. I was concealed about 15 or 20 yards from the front door of the Red Lion. I was on the off side of the road, and could clearly see the front door. I was near enough to hear the conversation that took place there. I saw the defendant going towards the front door of the Red Lion. She was coming from the direction of Llandilo. David Evans, John Davies, and Wm. Williams were near the Red Lion when defendant arrived. Defendant went into the Red Lion, and the men stood on the outside by the front door. Another man joined them in a couple of minutes. The men were close around the door. I cannot say how far the defendant went into the Red Lion. Shortly afterwards a quart jug and an empty glass were brought out of the house by the servant girl, which she gave to David Evans. I saw the contents of the jug poured into the glass, and divided between the men. The contents looked like beer. When the beer was poured out defendant was in the doorway. The landlady was in her company. The men were immediately around the door-step. The defendant was talk- ing to them while they were drinking the beer. One of them drank her health, saying in Welsh, lechyd da i chwi, Mrs Davies." Further, David Evans said, Years ago we were courting, Mrs Davies." David Evans also thanked her, and hoped that she would not be long before coming that way again. Those worda were spoken as the defendant was leaving. The defendant must have seen them drinking the beer. Cross-examined by Mr Nicholas-The men were ttanding three or four feet from the door- way. He remembered witnesses saying in the case against John Davies that the men stood three or four yards away from the doorway when they had the beer. Mra Davies was in the doorway when David Evans drank her health. He did not see him drinking, but he overheard what he said. Witness was twenty-five yards away. (Here Mr Nicholas specially appealed to their wor- ships that the witness should disclose the place in which he was concealed. He was tied hand and foot, and could not proceed further, unless he knew that fact. It was particularly impor- tant that he should know it. The witness having made a written statement to the Bench as to the place in which he was concealed, their worships permitted Mr Nicholas to ask him the question). tr The witness said he was sequestered in an old vacant outhouse on the opposite side of the road to the Red Lion Inn. The place adjoined David Evans' premises. Witness got a key and opened the outhouse. He had bought the key. Witness had previously examined the lock. The vacant cowhouse was 15 or 20 yards away from the Red Lion. Another person and the witness were concealed in it. Witness took notes while the other was looking on. Witness remembered being examined by Mr Nicholas in John Davies' case. Witness did not then say that he was looking on and the other person taking notes. Witness did not have his eyes on Mrs Davies the whole of the time she was at the front door. Witness could clearly see her. There was a hole in the building through which he could see her. It was an old opening. It was there when he first went there. Witness coulck see clearly through it, and hear also what wap taking place at the outside of the Red Lion. Witneaa saw froth on the jug. Witness could not say that it was beer, but something of the colour of beer. He oould not say whether it was beer or tea. The defendant said that which was false when she said that she never saw beer or men drinking it. The defendant, witness believed, was in the doorway of the Red Lion when the jug was brought out. The quart was emptied near the doorway. Witness did not remember saying in John Davies' case that it was emptied by the window. Witness could not say whether they drank any of the quart before Mrs Davies came out. Witneaa was not aware that the defendant went upto the Red Lion to enquire about a lost coat. Witness had not taken much trouble in the case. Witness had been up twice since by night. John Davies had been in his house since 11 o'clock of that morning. Witness had asked hiak in, William Williams was there also at his invitation. Be-examined by Mr Lewis-The witness had no reasonable doubt in his mind that the quart contained beer. Mfcrkaret Davies, sworn, said she was the land- lady of the Red Lion Inn, Caledfwloh, and a widow. Witness remembered the 16th June last. On the afternoon of that day witness saw the defendant (Mrs Davies). Witness saw her in the passage of the Red Lion. She first saw the defendant passing the window, and she went out And met her in the passage. Defendant said that she had lost her husband's coat, and did not know where it was. Defendant just then saw the coat hanging in the passage, and she said, This is the coat." Witness then asked her if she did not know it was there. Defendant said "No." Defendant got excited, and asked what she should I give for it. Witness replied nothing. Defen- dant then said, Give the men on the outside a drop of beer." Witness then told her servant girl to take a quart of beer outside. She took the beer outside to the men. Witness believed she took it out through the passage. They were standing near the doorway somewhere. David Evans and John Davies were two of the men. Witness saw them passing the window. Witness did not take particular notice as to Wm. Williams. She did not notice whether the girl took the quart of beer out or not. The defendant gave her 6d. Witness refused to take the 6d for the coat. Witness thought she took the 6d for the quart of beer. Cross-examined by Mr Nicholas—Witness did not see the quart of beer taken out. She stood talking to the defendant with her back against the door. Witness told the servant girl to take the beer out. She could easily pass the defen- dant without the defendant noticing her in the passage. Witness pressed the defendant to take a cup of tea. Defendant said she was going to her sister's, and wished witness good bye. Witness did not remember accompanying the defendant to the door when she left. Witness did not remember hearing anything about the drinking of health. Witness did not remember any con- versation. By Mr S. Gulston—Witness could not say what the width of the passage was. Witness felt certain it was a yard and a half where the defendant stood with her. Witness was not prepared to say anything about the conversation referred to by P.S. J. Harries. John Davies said that he was a labourer, and lived at Penlan, Caledfwlch. Witness remem- bered the afternoon of Sunday, the 16th June last. He was near the Red Lion Inn, Caled- fwlch, then. David Evans, William Williams, and David Evans, junr., were with him. Witness saw the defendant on that afternoon. It was somewhere about four o'clock p.m. Witness was sitting on a wall close to the Red Lion. The defendant came up to David Evans and asked him if he knew who had come with her husband from the Llangadock fair. Evans answered "Harriett, Oefntyresgob." Witness said Perkins, Dolau." Witness asked the defendant if she would like him to go to the Dolau to ask Perkins if he knew anything about the coat. Defendant said she would be glad if witness did so, and would pay him for his trouble. David Evans said he thought he knew where the coat was, and that it was in the Red Lion. Mrs Davies (the defendant) then said in Welsh to David Evans, Come on to the Red Lion to look for the coat, and to see whether there is a chance for a quart." David Evans, William Williams, and witness then went on with the defendant to the Red Lion. The defendant went into the passage of the Red Lion. The landlady met her there. Witness and the other men were then standing about three or four yards away from the door. While they were standing there a quart of beer was brought out to them. Witness believed it was the servant girl who brought it. David Evans took the beer from the hands of the person who brought it out. Evans gave it to witness, and witness divided the beer. The defendant was inside the passage when they were drinking the beer. The defendant was close by the front door of the Red Lion. After the beer had been drunk, witness heard David Evans say Thank you, Mrs Davies, and I hope you will not be long before you come up here again." Witness gave up the glass and the quart to Mrs Davies, of the Red Lion. Cross-examined by Mr Nicholas-All the beer had been drunk before the defendant came out. When drinking the beer they were close to the door. They were opposite the door. Witness remembered the case against himself in which he gave evidence on the 27th July last. Witness then said that he was 4 yards away from the door when he drank the beer. Mr Nicholas here pressed the witness as to which of the statements was the true one. Witness answered that the present one was the truth (laughter). Witness confessed to having said what was not true in the first case. The defen- dant had her back to the road when they drank the beer. The defendant was then about a yard and a half or two yards from them. William Williams said that he was a platelayer, and resided at Caledfwlch. Witness remembered the afternoon of Sunday, the 16th of June last. Witness was by the Red Lion then with the others. The defendant spoke to him and said, Come on Davey, it there is a chance of a quart I will pay for it." They went on to near the front door of the Red Lion. They had beer. The servant, directly they got to the Red Lion, brought out a quart of beer. They were stand- ing by the flag at the front of the door. The defendant was then talking to the landlady in the passage. There was about two yards between the defendant and the door. David Evans, before he drank the beer, wished Mrs Davies (the defendant) "good health." Witness did not hear the defendant say anything in return. By Mr Stepney-Gulston—David Evans said Good health to Mrs Davies. By Mr R. S. Lewis-David Evans said, Thank you, Mrs Davies, I hope you will not be long before you come up again." Cross-examined by Mr Nicholas—Witness had a part of the quart. Witness saw the defendant go into the Red Lion. The defendant came out as they were finishing the quart. The defendant came out in almost four minutes after the quart. David Evans gave the beer to John Davies, Penlan, who divided it directly afterwards. They had finished drinking the quart before defendant came out to the passage. Witness saw the defen- dant in the passage. The defendant's back was to the door. The defendant saw the beer brought out through the passage by the servant girl. Mrs Davies, the landlady of the Red Lion, saw it too. Witness did not hear the landlady give her evi- dence on that day. The only chance, as far as the witness knew, which the defendant had of seeing the beer was when it was being brought out through the passage by the servant girl. Witness could not say that the defendant saw any of them drinking the beer. Elinor Williams said she was the wife of the last witness, and lived near the Red Lion on the same side of the road. She remembered seeing her husband and others drinking beer by the Red, Lion on the 16th of June last. Witness was then standing on her own door step withut six or seven yards of the door of the Re LjAn. Before the quart was finished, witup." saw Mrs Davies, of the Red Lion, and the defendant coming out- side the door. Witness could not say whether they spoke to each other or not. Cross-exam^ed by Mr Nicholas—Witness did not see. tite beer being brought out. The first thyifr witness saw was the beer being divided, and; the men drinking a glass each. Before they were Quite finished the defendant came out. One glass, cuvided the beer. Witness could not say who had the first glass. David Evans had the last glass. It was yesterday that witness had been first asked to give evidence. Superintendent Philipps asked her at Llandovery to do so. Wit- ness believed her husband had told him some- thing previously about the case. Mr Nicholas, in an able address for the de- fence, pointed out the many side issues in the case, and also the entire absence of motive on the part of the defendant. The Bench, after a long deliberation, said that they did not question the evidence for the prosecution, but owing to the fact that there had not been sufficient evidence to them that the de- fendant had seen the men drinking, they would have to dismiss the case. The case occupied several hours in the hearing, and the result was greeted with some applause in Court. USING A CARRIAGE WITHOUT A LICENSE. James Francis Baker, of Llansawel, Inland Revenue officer, charged Margaret Harries, of Brynmelyn, Llandilo-fawr, farmer, with the above offence. Mr J. H. Taylor, Supervisor, Carmar- then, watched the case on behalf of the Excise, and Mr J. W. Nicholas (solicitor) appeared for the defendant. James Francis Baker, Inland Revenue officer, Llansawel, said that on the 21st June last he saw the defendant using a carriage on the high road, near Capel Isaac, in the parish of Llandilo-fawr. It was an ordinary spring car. Witness had not seen the offender since. Cross-examined by Mr Nicholas Witness reported the case to the Supervisor on the day the offence was committed, which was on the Llandilo June fair day. The defendant was returning from the fair with her son in the trap. Witness stopped the trap and asked for the license. The defendant said she had been carry- ing eggs to the market. There was no name on the trap. Witness felt positive of that fact. Witness had no communication since with the defendant. Witness had merely reported it. By Mr Taylor—Defendant told him there was no name on the trap, and witness saw none. Mr Nicholas, in addressing their worships for the defendant, said she was not liable to take out a license. Mrs Harries (the defendant), her son, and her servant girl, would prove that there was a name on the trap, viz., "Margaret Harries, Brynmelyn." On the morning in question defen- dant had been using the carriage to convey eggs and cheese to the Llandilo fair. His (Mr Nicholas') witnesses would say that the carriage had never been used except for carrying goods to market. In the form sent by the Excise to the defendant, which was an 1888 one altered -to 1889, she was in such a case allowed an exemption, and no blame could surely be attached to the defendant for following and carrvinsr out its 1IõõI'. II;1II instructions. David Harries said that he was the defendant's son, and resided at Brynmelin. Witness remem- bered the 21st June last. On that day witness met the Inland Revenue officer. Witness was in a market carriage then. There was a name on it, viz., "Margaret Harries, Brynmelin, Llan- dilo." The officer did not ask the" Ïtneaa if there was a name on the carriage. The officer did not look around the carriage for it. The name had been put on the carriage about February last. It had been clearly put on the back part of the carriage. It was in white paint. Anyone walking behind the trap could see the name, Margaret Harries, Brynmelyn." It was about 1t inches in size. The trap had never been used except for conveying goods to market. Witness had used it for that purpose on the morning in question. Cross-examined by Mr Taylor-The letters were nearly It inches in height. The officer made no enquiry for the name. Witness could swfear they were not put in since the officer made the com- plaint. Witness pointed out the name oik the carriage on Friday last. The carriage had not been used in January without a name. Th& carriage had a seat with a rail in the back part of it. When the officer met the carriage there were eggs and cheese in it. The carriage was not one ordinarily used about the farm. Letitia Williams said she was a servant of the defandant's, and lived at Brynmelyn. Witness knew that the defendant took eggs and cheese in the trap to the fair. There was a name on the trap, viz., Margaret Harries, Brynmelyn, Llandilo." Witness had seen the name on it previous to the 21st of June last. The name was on the back part of the trap; just on the bottom of it. It was in large letters. Witness had been at Brynmelyn for nearly two years. Witness could not exactly say when the name was put on. Witness had not seen it used for any purpose, except for carrying goods to the fair and market. Cross-examined by Mr Taylor—The name was painted on the carriage. It was not written on and attached to it by a piece of tin. Witness could not say when the name was painted. Wit- ness felt sure it was before the 21st of June last. Mr Taylor having replied, their worships dis- missed the case. TRESPA8SING AFTER GAME. John Bye, Pistillbach, near Llandyfane, a gamekeeper of Lord Dynevor's, charged Francis Richards, Ammanford, haulier William Davies, Bettws, collier and John Evans, Bettws, engine- driver, with trespassing in pursuit of game. Complainant said that he was a gamekeeper in the employ of Lord Dynevor, and lived at Pistill- bach. On Saturday, the 21st September last, between 3 and 4 o'clock in the afternoon, witness saw the three defendants beating the furze ground on Pistill farm. They had three grey- hounds, a spaniel, and a setter. Witness made towards them. When they saw the witness they started off at a quick walk. Witness followed, and overtook them. Witness asked them why were trespassing, and who had given them per- mission. They said the tenant had given them leave. The farm is called Pistill. Witness asked two of the defendants for their names, viz., John Evans and Wm. Davies. Defendants said they hoped that he (witness) would not sum- mon them. Witness said he would have to investigate the matter. The defendants, who said they had permission from the tenant, but that the tenant refused to come forward to prove it, were fined 10.:5 each and costs. DRUNKENNESS. P.S. John Harries charged Theophilus Davies, New Inn, innkeeper, with being drunk on his own premises. Fined 5s and costs- Several other cases were heard and adjudicated upon.
LLANDOVERY PETTY SESSIONS.
LLANDOVERY PETTY SESSIONS. FRIDAy-Before Mr Edward Jones (in the chair), Colonel Jones, and Mr George Jones.
ALLEGED ARSON AT LLANDOVERY.…
ALLEGED ARSON AT LLANDOVERY. The prisoner, James Jonos, charged with arson, was again brought up, and the interest taken in the case was keener than ever. The hall during the hearing was crowded to suffoca- tion, and the keenest interest was taken in the evidence. The affair has during the past week been the chief topic of conversation. Mr Thomas, in opening the case, said their worships might remember that the prisoner was remanded on Friday last, till that day, on a charge of aiding and abetting one John Davies, to set fire to a certain stack of hay, the property of the prisoner, James Jones, landlord of the Castle Hotel, Llangadock, with intent to defraud the London Fire Assurance Corporation. It would be proved that the prisoner effected an in- surance in this corporation in 1886, and in May last this rick was burned, and prisoner sent in a claim for 240, loss sustained by burning of the said rick. The insurance company made the usual investigations, and paid him RW. It would further be proved that the prisoner paid these men certain sums of money for setting the rick on fire.. He submitted that if he could make out a prima fade case, they would have nothing to do, but to commit the prisoner for trial. Before proceeding to cross-examine the two witnesses, J. Davies and W. Williams, on the evidence given by them at the last court, Mr John asked that the witnessses with the exception of the inspector to the insurance com- pany, be ordered out of court. This was agreed to. The Clerk (Mr J. Thomas), then read over the depositions, after which Mr John cross-examined the witness, John Davies. Mr John to witness—You are a brother-in-law of the prisoner, James Jones, I believe ?—Yes. Mr John-What time of the day or night did you set fire to the rick of hay ?—I can't say for certain. It was after night. Mr John-What do you mean after night ?— Was it 12, 1, 2, 8 or 9 o'clock I Somewhere about 12 o'clock. Mr John-How far do you live from the place where the rick was ?—About 5. miles. Mr John-And am I right in saying that you came straight to where the rick was when you set it on fire ?—Yes, sir. Mr John-Where did you meet Mr Williams ? —In the Red Lion, Caledfwlch. Mr John-He went with you ?—Yes, sir. Mr John-Didn't you see James Jones at all that night 1-No, sir. Mr John—You said you saw James Jones at the Victoria Inn, at Llandilo ?—I saw him on the road before I went to the Victoria Inn. Mr John—How long was that before the rick was set on fire 1-lndeed, I can't say. Mr John—Might it have been a week or a fort- night ?—I can't say, I am not sure. Mr J ohn—Might it have been a month ?—I can't say. can't say. Mr John-Might it have been two months ?— No, 1 don't believe it was. Mr John-It was on a monthly market day you saw him ?—Yes. Mr John-Had there been a monthly market between the time you saw him, and the time you set the rick on fire ?—Indeed, I do not remember, sir. Mr John-Very well. You had no talk with James Jones afterwards, after the first talk, un- til the rick was set on fire ?—Oh no, sir. Mr John-You know something about ricks of hay, don't you ?—Yes. Mr John—What would you say was the value of the rick ?—I can't say, sir. Mr John-What do you think 1-1 do not want you to pledge yourself to a shilling or so ?— Indeed, I can't say. Mr John-Now, do you think it was worth £ 60 ?—I can't say. Mr John-This is not the first time you have been in a police-court ?—I was never before. Mr John—You never stood in this particular dock or at Llandilo ?—Not for something of this sort. Mr John-I don't ask for something of this particular sort ? I ask you as a fact 1- Yes, I have been in court. Mr John-And the magistrates thought fit to fine you for something or other ?—Yes, for drink- ing a glass of beer. Mr John—How many times have they fined you ?—Only once. Mr John-You are rather fond of a drop of beer ?—Yes, I like a glass (laughter). Mr John—Had you been drinking the night the rick was set on fire 1-Yes, I had. MrJohn- Were vou sober I-No. sir. Mr John-I think you were fined between the < time you saw Jones and the time the rick was set i on fire ? Am I right ?—No, sir. Mr John-But you had been drinking between times 1-Ye& Mr John-And had been pretty well on ? aughter)-No, air; I only took one glass when I was fined. Mr John-I have never seen a man yet who was fined for drinking more than one glass of beer (renewed laughter). Do you remember the time you said Jones spoke to you in Llandilo at the Victoria Inn ?—No, sir; I have not taken the time down. Mr John-I don't ask you if you have taken the time down. Do you remember being at the Victoria Inn ?—Yes, only to go to Mr Bishop. Mr John-And remember the time you set the rick on fire ?—Yes. Mr John-Had you been drinking between these two times at all ? Mind 1 don't ask you if you had been before the magistrates-No, air. Mr John—You have have been a teetotaller -between the times ? (laughter).-I can't say. Mr John—You have been in the service of Mr Richardson, of Glanbrydan 1-1 have been work- ing for him. Mr John-How long ?—A year and a half. Mr John-Let me ask you a question or two about that. While there did you tell the keeper that a farmer was poaching ?—No, sir. Mr John-And didn't the keeper watch the farmer to your knowledge ?—No, air. Mr John—Didn't he find that the farmer was yourself ? (loud laughter, applause, and cries of Silence")-No. Mr John—And didn't Mr Richardson think that the leis" farmers" he had about him the better, and gave you the "sack?"—I had the sack (hear, hear, applause, cries of Order and "Silence.") Mr John-Very well, that's enough for me. Are you very friendly with your brother-in-law ? -Yes. Mr John—Don't call him an old D-" and names of that sort? (laughter). -Never. Mr John—I have nothing more to ask him. Mr Edward Jones-Do you examine him, Mr Thomas ? Mr Thomas-I have no question to ask. William Williams, the next witness, was cross- examined as follows Mr John to witness-You- helped about aetting this rick on fire ?—Welsh, if you please. Mr Edward Jones-He gave his evidence in English last time, didn't he ? Still, if he desires it, let him give it in Welah. Mr John-He wants a little time to think, your worships, before he answers what I ask him. Cross-examination continued-You were with John Davies when he set fire to this rick of bay 1 -Yes. Mr John-You went with him to help him ?— I did not know what he wanted with me until I went up to Llangadock. Mr John-Where did you meet him 1-At the Red Lion Hotel, Caledfwlch. Mr John—How far away is the Red Lion?— About 31 miles. Mr John-And you say. you didn't know what you were going there for till you got to Llan- gadock ?—I did not know until I got to the field by Carregsawdde gate. Mr John—What did he say he wanted you to go with him for ?—He askei me to go with him as far as LIangadock, where he was to get half-a- sovereign with his brother-in-law, James Jones, and that if I went with him he would giro mo half-a-sovereign. Mr John—Did you go to the brother-in-law, James Jones, at all ?—Not that time. Mr John-And then you and he went to the rick and the rick was set on fire ?-We came to the rick, sir, and John Davies told me to go to the road and to tell him if anybody was coming. I told him that there was nobody coming, and he set fire to it. Mr John—What time was it that the rick was set on fire ?—It was from 1.15 to 1.30. Mr John-Was it on the 19th 1-1 don't re- member the day of the month now. It was on a Sunday morning. Mr John—Have you ever been in a police court before, either as a prisoner or as a witness ? -Yea; I was once at Llandilo for drinking at the Red Lion on a Sunday. Mr John-Did you ever nearly kill a man of the name of John Jones, of Tyrissaf ?—No, air. We fought and quarrelled and punched each other as you see men who quarrel do. Mr John-In consequence of the quarrel you had to pay John Jones a 210 note.—No; 29,,sir (laughter). Mr John—So that you were on the wrong side of the hedge, although differing 21 on that occa- sion 1-1 don't know about that, sir. Mr John—I have no more to ask you. Mr Thomas then proceeded to examine Mr W. H. Greey, Inspector of Insurance for the London Insurance Corporation, and was about to ask him if the prisoner had insured any of his property in that company, when Mr John interposed with the remark I object to that. My friend is going to ask as to the insurance policy in writ- Ing. Mr Thomas-Mr John has the insurance policy. I have an office copy of it. Mr John-I still object, sir. Mr Greey-What doea Mr John object to ? Mr John-I am not here to tell you what I object to. Mr Thomas-The original policy I underatand is in the custody of the prisoner. Mr John observed that he would allow his friend to make a point. It war this To prove a document, it must be there in the possession of his friend. If not, and he did not give him notice to produce it, he was not entitled to give secondary evidence. Mr Thomas said it was unnecessary. Secondary evidence would do. Mr John held that it would not do. The Chairman-At the beat or the worst it is only a matter of adjournment. Mr Thomas said that he did not see his friend at all until that morning to give him notice. It appeared that this policy covered more property than the rick of hay. In support of his point, Mr John quoted the work of a leading authority on criminal law to the effect that it must be proved by the document itself, but if it is shown that it is lost, destroyed, or in the possession of the prisoner, who had had notice to produce it, other evidence might be given of its existence. His friend could not get over that. The Chairman-Do you press that, Mr John ? Mr John-I do, your worships. Mr Thomaa-Are you prepared to produce it ? I give notice now, Mr John. Mr John-Certainly not. The Chairman remarked that, after what Mr John had read, it appeared that the policy muat be produced. After some further remarks, Mr John ask their worships not to adjcurn the case, but to say that his friend had failed to make out his case. The prosecution had had a whole week to make out their case, and he urged the Bench that the convenience of himself and the prisoner be considered as well as theirs. Mr Thomas said that the prisoner was entitled to hold the policy because it covered a greater amount of property than the rick of hay, and suggested an adjournment till the following day (Saturday). Mr John asked their worships, if they did adjourn the case, not to do so to the following day, but to do so till that day week. It would mean a great loss to him, as he would have to throw over other appointments to attend. The Chief Constable was proceeding to make some remarks, when the Chairman asked who prosecuted in this case 1 Mr Thomas replied that it was the police authorities. The Chairman-Then I don't think we can hear the Chief Constable. Towards avoiding an adjournment, a remark was made as to the expense that an additional journey would involve for one of the witnesses for the prosecution, as it would entail his coming down again from London. Mr John observed-I am not going to save the prosecution one atom of trouble. In the additional light which was thrown on the case by the cross-examination by the wit- nesses, Air John urged the Bench to lower the amount of the security for bailing the prisoner. The application was refused, the Chief Con- stable remarking that if anything was done the amount should be increased, and not decreased, as suggested by Mr John. THE LICENSE OF GRIFFIN INN, LLANGADOCK. Mr J. W. Nicholas, Llandilo, made an applica- tion with reference to the Griffin Inn, which is situated in the parish of Gwynfe. Mr Nicholas said that at the last Llangadock sessions, held on Thursday week, an application was made for the renewal of that license, which application was adjourned to the next Llangadock sessions, which would take place on the 17th. As the license would expire on the 10th it was necessary that he ahould now apply for a temporary renewal till the 17th, when the application would again be made to the magistrates there. Col. Jones said they refused to grant the present tenant a license at all, and had warned him that he could only sell till the 10th. Mr Nicholas observed that he had written to the magistrate's clerk here enquiring into the circumstances of the case, and had read the reply which he had sent. From that he understood that the case had been adjourned. CoL Jones did not believe it was adjourned at alL If his memory served him true it was positively declined. The Chief Constable was understood to say that the present tenant had a license up to the 10th only. On the 17th application could be made by a fresh tenant no others. Mr Nicholas asked if he was to take it that he had been misled by that letter, which stated that it had been adjourned to the next sessions. Col. Jones—Yes, to the next tenant. Mr Nicholas asked if he was to understand that the license had been refused to the present tenant. Col. Jones—Certainly. Mr Nicholas did not know that. He applied that the license should be allowed for these few days. They had the power to do that. The Chairman said that neither he nor Mr G. Jones knew anything about the case. Mr Nicholas was believed to say that he knew nothing too. He asked the Chief Constable if he objected. The Chief Constable replied that he was given to understand that he was not to have a license at all. If that was the case he (the speaker) and everybody else was powerless. Mr Nicholas—I have told their worships that they could grant it to the landlord. Col. Jones-It is adjourned for application by a new tenant. Mr Nicholas—You would not grant a temporary licence to the owners. t Col. Jones-No.
TREGARON SHEEP DOG TRIALS.…
TREGARON SHEEP DOG TRIALS. These trials were held on the Talbot Hotel land at a place called Drysgol, a place admir- ably suited for the day's proceedings. The officers were Field stewards, Messrs John Jones, J.P., Cilpyll; S. Jones, Llanio Fawr R. Lloyd, Penybont; E. Rowlands, Ystrad Caron W. Morgan, Talbot Hotel Robert Lewis, Park and Rowlands, Cwrtmawr Farm timekeeper, Mr D. G. Williams, Pencefn; starter, Mr W. Jones, Ochor; judges, Messrs J. Hughes, Llanarmon, Llangollen Vaughan Davies, Tanybwlch, Aberystwith; and D. Davies, Velindre, Lampeter. The mode of procedure was as follows :—Three sheep were let out from a pen half a mile distant from the competing dog. The dog was let loose, had to run and bring the sheep to where it started from, and put them through a set of polpo ahout two yards apart without any assistance. Then about 15 yaido distant fium that set were other poles fixed more closely to- gether than the first. The man having charge of the dog could help in putting the sheep through these, and so he could in penning. The time al- lowed to each dog was 15 minutes for dogs entered in the second class, and twelve minutes for those in the first. SECOND CLASS. The second class dogs ran first. There were eleven dogs entered for competition, and they ran in the following order Prince," a young black and white dog, eleven months old, the property of Mr J. E. Jones, Cefnwyddrug, Machynlleth. It succeeded in getting the sheep through the posts, and penned them in fourteen minutes. "French," a three year old black and white bitch, the property of Mr John Evans, Caenewydd, Tregaron, after spending a lot of time before seeing the sheep, drove them over the hill and could not succeed in bringing them back. Mag," a two year old black bitch, belong- ing to Mr Morgan J. Thomas, Seren, Ysbytty Ystwyth. After some difficulty it succeeded in putting the sheep through the posts, but time was called before the sheep were penned. Mag," a sharp looking young bitch, one and a half year old, failed to pen the three in time. Undoubtedly, with a little more training, this bitch will be able to accomplish some capital work. Waliaoe," a black dog, belonging to Mr John Jones, Nantstaiwen, Breeonshire, was more successful at the pen than the previous dog it succeeded in fulfilling the conditions, and penned the two in 14.1 minutes. Moss," a three-year-old black dog, proved very unsuccessful, though it was evident that it had received some good training. The next dog, March," belonging to Mr Hugh Williams, Derigaron, succeeded like the last-mentioned in scattering the sheep. Fleet," a red bitch, eighteen months old, the property of Mr David Roberts, Esgergarthen (shepherd of Mr Jones, Cilpyll), a controlled dog, soon saw the sheep, brought them down in a body, succeeded in getting them through the posts, and penned them with but a little difficulty in 14 minutes. Bradlaugh," a black and tan dog, two-year- old, the property of Hugh Davies, Lluest, Cwm- twroh, made a very bad start, and, after a second ohance was allowed it by the judges, it had to return without even sighting the sheep. The judges awarded the prizes as follows :—1, 22 10s, Fleet," D. Roberts, Esgergarthen 2, £ 1 5s, Mag," T. Price, Bwlch 3, 12s 6d, Prince," J. E. Jones, Machynlleth 4, 7s 6d, Wallace," John Jones, Nantstalwen. The judges gave as maximum marks 70, of which the first dog received 62, the second 47, third 46, and fourth 37. THE OPEN COMPETITION. By the time this competition commenced the weather was glorious, and the number of spectators had greatly increased. The first dog to enter the lists was Hero," a black and tan three-year-old dog, belonging to Mr T. Jones, Claerddu. The dog when let loose instantly ran up towards the sheep pen. The sheep, taking fright, ran over the summit, where the three sheep were joined by the other three which had got away in the previous competition. It got the six sheep through the set of poles in an excellent manner, but before the sheep were penned time was called. On the whole this dog showed very clever work. The second dog was Fleet," a two-year-old red dog, the property of Mr D. Roberts, Esger- garthen. On being let looae it rah up the ascent with the greatest speed, rounded the sheep well, but scattered the three. By some good work it succeeded in getting them again together. It kept at some distance from the sheep throughout. This dog was not at all successful at the poles, and had not succeeded in getting bis sheep through when time was called. March," a brindled dog, five year old, the property of Mr John Jones Nantstaiwen, suc- ceeded in doing its work in very good style. It kept the sheep well together, obeyed its master well, got them through the posts without much difficulty, and penned the sheep in 12 minutes. This performance was greatly applauded by the spectators. Nero," a black and tan three-year-old dog, belonging to T. Jones, Claerddu, made a very poor show, could not get the sheep to start towards home, and eventually scattered them in different directions. "Frenh," a three-year-old black dog, the property of John Evans, Caenewydd, Tregaron, made even a poorer show than Nero," for it could not even eye thevheep. Rose," a three-year-old black and tan bitch, the property of Mr Evan Williams, Tregaron, brought the sheep down hill in very good style. The dog put the three sheep through the. pen without difficulty. At the pen the dog worked admirably, but did not succeed in putting the sheep in custody within the specified time. Bonnie," the DroDerty of Mr T. Jones, Llanafan, Breeonshire, succeeded in getting to the sheep, but scattered them in different direc- tions. The same misfortune happened to Wal- lac," Mr Jones' (Nantstalwen) dog. The next dog, Lady," belonging to Mr J. E. Jones, Machynlleth, was more successful. It made a good start, did some capital work on the summit of the hill, and got the sheep towards home well. It proved successful at the posts. At the pen the dog worked cleverly, and it was clear that he had received some good training. The other two dogs were up to the average standard of the dogs competing that day. The work done by the dog of Mr Price, Bwlcb, was very commendable. The names of winners in the open class were i., the following :-1, t5, "Wallace," Mr John Jjnes, Nantstalwen 2, 22 10s, Rose," Mr Evan Williams, LlysEinon, Tregaron 3, 21 10s, "Robin," Mr D. Lloyd, Blaenant, Llanfair- Clydogau highly commended, Lady," Mr J. E. Jones, Machynlleth; commended, Magy" ■> Mr T. Price, Bwlch. THE DINNER. ned, v 7 At six o'clock a good number sat down at the Talbot Hotel to a splendid dinner prepared-in their usual style by Hoat and Hostess Morgan. The chair was occupied by Mr Davies, J.P., Felindre, Lampeter, while Dr. Lloyd acted as vice-chairman. Among others present were Messrs Davies, Troedybryn, Llaudilo W. Jones Ochor; T. Evans, Rhydyronen Alderman R. Lloyd, Penybont; M. Morgan, Union Work- house Evan Williams, Llys Einon Councillor Evan Rowlands, Ystrad Caron T Price, Bwlch D. Jones, Bryneithinog J. Jonea. Bryneithiuog D. J. Williams. Pencefn John Jones, J.P., Nantstaiwen; Hugh Arch, Great Abbey; J. Hughes, Llangollen J. Roberts, Aberayron R. Lewis, Park Evan Jones, butcher J. Williams, Pantyfedwen; D. Lloyd, Blaennant; W. Row- lands, Cwrtmawr Farm Morgan Jones, road surveyor; W. R. Hall, Aberystwyth; and Philip Rhys, Tregaron. After the cloth had been removed, the toasts were proceeded with. The Chairman proposed the toast of "The Queen and the rest of the Royal Family," which was drunk with musical honours. The next toast was The Judges." Mr J. Hughes, Llangollen, in responding, said that it afforded him more than ordinary pleasure to come to that part of the country and. to witness the great advance in agriculture. There n, were, he said, hopeful signs everywhere. Refer- ring to the day's proceedings, he said that unsuccessful competitors need not be in the least discouraged. There was always a great amount l. l. i :n r,. Ul iuuft agau iM-Mien in competitions, tie nad been pleased with the work done during the day, but would like to see one alteration made in training dogs, & he would throwout the hint to all shepherds present. In this part of the country it was the custom to teach dogs to bring the sheep to the shepherd. That, no doubt, served the purpose, but it necessitated the keeping of two dogs. He would like the same dog trained to bring the sheep to the shepherd as well as to drive them away froni him. Several shepherds that day had shown that they possessed good lungs, as nearly all the competitors resorted to shouting to the dogs but it was his (Mr Hughes's) opinion that it would be worth while to work the dogs with the aid of signs and the use of the whistle. The judges were unanimously of this opinion. Mr Davies, Felindre, another of the judges, in responding, said that he was very grateful to the committM for having chosen him to act as judge at the third meeting of the Tregaron sheep dog trials. He could conscientiously say that if any felt that any unfairness had been shown in award- ing the prizes, he assured them that it was not due to any personal feeling, but to their (the judges') ignorance. The Vice-Chairman (Dr. Lloyd) proposed the health of The Successful & Unsuccessful COm. petitors." He thought that though some had received prizes their dogs had not yet reached perfection, and he hoped that shepherds woald act in accordance with the valuable hinta given them by Mr Hughes. Mr John Jones, shepherd, Nantstaiwen, Breeon- shire, responded, and said that shepherds had expended a great deal of time ana labour in getting their dogs to work in the manner they had done that day, but he hoped that by the next year's meeting the dogs would have reached nearer to the goal of perfection than they had this year. Mr D. Lloyd, Blaenant, also responded. Mr J. Roberts, Aberayron, sang Bageiles yr Wyddfa in excellent style. The next toast was that of the Officers of the Society," and with the toast were coupled the names of the energetic secretaries, Messrs M. Morgan and T. Evans. Mr Evans, in responding, said that the little work he had done as secretary afforded him great pleasure. He did it as a duty more than any- thing else, for he felt that it was the duty of every townsman to further the interests of the town he lived iu. Mr Morgan also said that the work had given him great pleasure. He hoped that the Society would thrive every year, and that next year the Society would be in a position to give larger prizes than were given that day. The Chairman proposed the health of The Treasurer," Mr D. J. Williams, Pencefn. who responded. Mr Tom Jones, Talbot Hotel, sane The old Arm Chair," the company joining in the chorus. The next toast was that of The Press," with which was coupled the name of Mr Hall, Cumbrian News, who suitably responded. The Vice-Chairman proposed the health of the Host and Hostess," and Mr Morgan responded.
FISHGUARD. J' ,
FISHGUARD. J' OPENING OF THE LITERARY INSTITUTE.—The movement for establishing this institution was started a month ago by Mr B. Tlomas, of Ken- sington House, who having canvassed his resi- dents, called a general meeting, at which the project was cordially taken up. An executive committee was appointed, who elected Dr Lawton- Swete as chairman Mr W. S. Jenkins and Captain W. Williams vice-chairman; Mr W. J. Vaughan treasurer Mr E. Thomas and Mr E. Williams, secretaries. In response to circulars soliciting support, the following gentlemen have become patrons and donors :-The Bishop of St. David's, Mr A. Morrison, of Wyndcliffe, Good- wick (donation of £ 5; annual subscription, £ 3 ;) Mr J. Worthington, Glynymel (donation, £ 5) Mr H. Worthington, Glynymel (donation £ 1; annual subscription, ci) Mr H. Worthington, Goodwick Dr. W. Williams, Dr J. M. Owen, Mr H. Owen, and the Rev. T. G. Mortimer. The premises consisting of four rooms, are con- veniently situated in Main-Street, and are light, airy, and lofty, and command an extensive sea view. The committee has, for the first quarter confined itself to the supply of newspapers and magazines. Should the funds justify it, a library will afterwards be added. The subscriptions to constitute membership are 2s and Is (labouring class) per quarter. The institution was formally opened on Tuesday by Mr J. Worthington, and a concert in aid of the funds was held in the evening, presided over by Mr H. Owen.
Advertising
CHLORO-LINSEED Cough Lozenges, post free, 7d. Of Chemists. LINUM CATHARTICUM PILLS, agreeably aperient, 9id, Is lid., 2o Od. Of all Chemists. I LI.A\-4