Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

14 articles on this Page

PAITISH COUNCILS. I —"— '

News
Cite
Share

PAITISH COUNCILS. I —"— (Fro?n tite Cowii,,ils' Gazette.') The Case for Control of Highways by Parish conncik-Since the passing of the Local Govern- _t Act, 1894, the question of the maintenance and ontrol of parish highways has been the subject of nC}j controversy in rural districts, nnd has been dis- W gsed by a large number of Parish Councils, practi- Cally the whole of which have declared that the pre- sent system is both expensive and unsatisfactory. Maintenance of Parish Highways.—The Act of 1 QQ4 During the debate in the House of Commons „ the Local Government Act cf 181)4, a great deal f argument took place regarding this subject, but in the end Section 2U of that Act was passed. By this section all the powers, duties, and liabilities of High- ly Authcrities were transferred to the Rural District Council, power being given to County couileils, if they thought fit, to suspend its opera- tion for a period of three years. 3fanv members urged that the control and manage- t 0f highways other than main roads should be "laced in the hands of Parish Councils, and in cases P here there were no Parish Councils in the hands of Parish Meetings. It was also nrged by some mem- bers that the management of highways should not be listurbed, but should continue to be exercised by or8 appointed by the parish. Unfortunately Neither of these arguments prevailed. It must be remembered that Highway Hoards have been found to be expensive and not efficient, and the tendency of the past 20 years has been to dissolve these bodies and to give each parish the control of its own roads by the appointment of highway surveyors. It is con»equently obvious that in so far as it took A from parishes the control of their highways, dtransferred the power to Kural District Councils, *h reby practically re-establishing Highway Boards oder another name, the Act of li?D4 was really a re- actionary measure. The Objections to the Present System are brielly these: Firstly, that it is costly and cumbersome; secondly, because the levying of a Highway rate as general expenses by a Rural District Council is »ure to be unjust and inequitable to some at least of the parishes forming the district, as the areas are not coterminous; thirdly, that time has shown that Highway Boards were a failure, and the cause of much injustice fourthly, that in those cases where parishes still retain the management of their own highway the work is carried out more cheaply and efficiently than in places where the control is vested in District Councils or Highway Boards; fifthly, because the control of highways is precisely one of those matters with which Parish Councils and Farish Meetings are from their nature well qualified to deal. We will consider these points in the order in which we have named them. The Question of Cost.We have said that the management of highways by Rural District, Councils is more costly than it would be in the hands of a parish Authority. In the first place, we may point out that a District Council cannot, by force of cir- cumstances, have its expenditure so fully under con- trol as a Parish Council can, the area in most cases being too large forthe members to exercise any personal supervision over the progress of the work. It must also be remembered that the District Council as a whole has not as much interest as the Parish Autho- rity would have in keeping down the expenditure in IL any particular parish. We are convinced that this is one of the principal causes of the excessive expen- diture which is said to have been incurred in many localities. There still remain to be considered several points which have considerable bearing on the ques- tion of cost. The District Council must have an efficient staff under them. If the district is a large one, there must be at least two surveyors and one or two assistants, to say nothing of several fore- men. All these gentlemen must be paid a fair salary, and in many cases an allowance for trap hire and other incidentals. Then the District Council must have a steam roller (and a building to put it in), tool sheds, and possibly stables, and possibly other .,e buildings. Also we must not forget that the extra work entailed by this Council becoming tho Highway Authority means that the Clerk's salary must necessarily be increased. A good deal of stationery, to0) Will be needed, nnd numerous other small matters, which though trivial in t ves, 111 mean additional expense. Another point of still greater importance is the cost of road material. It is not to be expected that a District Council can search through the district for stones or gravel in small quantities at a time. Consequently the have to invite tenders for the supply of sufficient to maintain the whole of the roads in their district for 12months. This means a cost per load ranging from 5s. to 10s., and to this must be added the expense of carting, which, if the district be a large one, is not by any means a small item. Of course, many districts con- tain gravel pits, but even then a considerable sum has to be expended in conveying it to different parts of the district. We now come to the cost of putting the material on the road. In the first place, the surveyor has in many cases to travel a long distance to inspect the road, and to decide what quantity is necessary to put it in thorough repair thereby incurring expense in traps, train-fares, and other ways. When this has been done, labourers have to be brought from considerable distances to do the work, a foreman being employed to superin- tend it. This, again, entails extra expense, as the foreman and men have to be paid for the time occu- pied 10 getting to the neighbourhood where the work is to be done. If it is found impossible for the sur- veyor to travel the whole of his district in one day to pay the men and obtain their signatures, a further expense is incurred owing to the employes having to walk a considerable distance weekly to meet him, and consequently being kept away from their work. Now let ns see what economies would be effected by a parish having the control and management of its own highways. In the first place, a paid sur- veyor would not be wanted, as a Highway Com- mittee, appointed by the Parish Council or Meeting, consisting of about three members, could be formed to look after the roads and the clerk to the Parish Council could pay tho men eack week, and keep a watchful eye upon them to see that they did their work. In the latter case, it would be necessary to slightly augment the clerk's salary but we venture to say that there are plenty of fanners who would gladly look after the men free of cost, as a means of keeping down the rates. We know of scores of parishes in which surveyors appointed by the parish have looked after the roads without receiving one farthing remuneration, and we confidently assert that in 49 out of every 50 Parish Councils and Parish Meetings gentlemen could be found to do so again. But even assuming, for the sake of rlpl- ment, that an addition is made to the clerk's salary, it would be trilling and, on the other band, there would be no charge for trap hire or incidentals. Tfo steam roller or buildings would be required. As to materials, where parishes have maintained their own highways, the practice has been for the farmers to supply stones and gravel at a nominal cost. In fact, where the surveyor has been a farmer, be has generally supplied them from his own farm. Another advantage accruing from the appointment of a farmer as highway surveyor lies in the fact that during the quiet time in the winter months he will generally be willing to allow the parish'the use of his horses and men for carting pur- poses at a nominal cost, while if he should happen ° a pit on his land he may be willing, as has usually been the case, to supply gravel on Ter^t 77 *rms" Orally being a large rate- £ -"ti f hn.rcrpfl mral*-v not to his interest to make h'8 L Tor,m.»P the question of cost, if Paris i f a,'nej their own highways there would 6e n° A V enders T con'racts no steam-roller, no need for expense of carting material from one parish into another, and no need for a paid surveyor. As to the labour employed, the farmer could employ his own men to put the material on, and charge the parish a very moderate sum for doing so. Jn most parishes the employment of one or two old men to scrape the roads and to occasionally mend them in worn places would be sufficient. In nine cases out of 10 these men, if they were not employed at road work, would be receiving out-door relief from the Guardians, and so putting the parish to unneces- sary expense; Tbe_ Present System Inequitable.—Take the £ union which one parish, which we may rat«able value of, say, £ 10,000, with roaas extending 0v«r two mile?. Tjvhile another, a ratable value of £ 5000, with 10 niiles ?, ron s* omoe :the contributions of parishes to the common h.ghway fund of the district are calculated according to rateable value, the [parish of A, although its road mileage only equal to a seventh of that of B, has to contri- bute twice as much to the district fund. It would be difficult to find words strong enough to characterise the absurdity and injustice of a system under which such a state of affairs can exist, and yet cases such as that we have referred to are by no means of rare occurrence. There are, indeed numerous instances to be found all over the countrv, as we shall be able to conclusively demonstrate by the aid of tables which we have had prepared, and which will appear in a subsequent article. But even when no such a startling anomalies exist with regard to parochial contributions, it is obvious that one of two parishes, though fairly equal as to rateable value and mileage, may still differ from the other in the chnracter of its roads to such an extent as to render it altogether unjust that both should have the lamo financial burden. For instance, one village may have roads which, from their topographical situation, are frequented by a large amount of traffic, and so make heavy demands on the common fund for repairs and maintenance while the ether, being, say, in an out-of-the-way agricultural district, may .eqiure the expenditure of a comparatively trilling amount for these purposes. It is evident that while these parishes have to pay the same amount for highway maintenance they do not get anything like an equal return for their money, whereas, if they managed their own highways, each would expend a sum pro- portionate to its particular requirements. As it is, parisheswhich, fora variety of reasons, require but a small sum for road-maintenance, have, to all intents and purposes, to pay for the repairs in parishes where a large amount is needed. Yet another cause of contributions pressing unduly heavily under the present system on some parishes as compared with others in the same union, arises from the differences existing in the soil and materials of which the roads are composed. In one parish the sub-soil may be of chalk, while in others it may be of clay or gravel. These differences, as is well- known, have a great bearing on the frequency and extent of the repairs required, and consequently on the amount which has to be disbursed in each case from the common fund. A. parish having roads with a gravel sub-soil will probably, therefore, require a considerably smaller expenditure than one with roads having a subsoil of chalk or clay, while it may nevertheless have to make an equally large-or even larger—contribution to the common fund. There is still another point to be con- sidered in this connection, and one which we approach with some reluctance. It is an open secret that it is by no means an uncommon thmg for certain parishes to be favoured by the District Council beyond their fellows, be it owing to their representatives having a preponderating iniluence on the Board or from other causes. We do not believe that Rural District Councils would intentionally allow themselves to treat the respective claims of parishes in their unions in other than an impartial manner, but there can be no doubt that there have been many instances of parishes being unequally treated with regard to the expenditure on highways.

THE CUP OF SORROW.

THE PUBLIC EXECUTIONER'S ASSISTANT.

HEAVEN ON EARTH.I

THEIBDUCATION BILL.

THE TRANSVAAL.

[No title]

--WILLS AND BEQUESTS.

IW—W—W—» OPERATIONS AGAINST…

[No title]

- GREATER BRITAIN. -

[No title]

MARKET NEWS. j --

EPITOME OF NEWS. -