Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

17 articles on this Page

*■"»<, J.. • 1 11,1 ■—. rrr—'…

News
Cite
Share

*■"»<, J.. 11,1 ■—. rrr—' PROCEEDINGS IN FARLIAMEM1^ TUE EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY BILL: J In the HOUSE OF LORDS, on Jan. 29, there was a fairly large attendance of Peers to consider the Commons' reasons for disagreeing with their lord- ships' amendments to the Employers' Liability Bill/ upwards of 150 being present. The Earl of Morley occupied the woolsack in the continued absence of the Lord Chancellor, and the Earls of Kimberley and Rbsebery were again amongst the absentees. On the order for the consideration of the Commons4 reasons, the Marquis of Ripon, at the suggestion of the Duke of Devonshire, briefly stated the-Views of the Government. Neither of the further, amendments of which the Earl of Dudley and the Earl of Cainperdown had given notice seemed to the Government ta be of a character to remove their objections to the alterations which had been made in the bill. He therefore mov.ed that their lordships should not insist upon the Earl of Dudley's amend- ment permitting contracting out of the Act when the employer contributed an adequate, proportion to a mutual insurance fund for the purpose of providing compensation for the workmen. The Marquis of Salisbury commented upon the fact that the Government had not advanced any reason in support of the attitude which they took up. The Opposition were the advocates of the freer dom of individuals and freedom of contract, and they would steadily and firmly resist measures, which would condemn workmen to litigation instead of to agree- ment, which would diminish their resources, and which would create permanent causes of difference and quarrel between employers and employed. The silmee-of the Government showed that thev were not acting on their own instincts, and that they were the victims of a dire necessity and the slaves M a cruel •organisation. Lord Stanmore and Lord Farrer having also opposed the motion, the Marquis of Ripon reiterated the opinion of the Government that the bill would not have the effect of destroying the existing mutual insurance funds, and cited the recent speech of Mr. Laing, the chairman of the London, Brighton, and South. Coast Railway Company in support of that contention. The workmen who 'supported the llarl of Dudley's amendment did so only because they feared that if the bill passed as proposed by the Government it would destroy these funds whilst, on the other hand, the vast majority of workmen throughout the country were warmly in favour of prohibiting contracting out altogether. On a division, the motion not to insist upon the amendment was negatived by 125 against 22. The Earl of Camperdown then moved a series of amendments to the Earl of Dudley's contracting-out amendment. The first, which empowered any workman to release himself from the agreement upon which the insurance fund was based by giving due notice, was agreed to. The second, fixing the minimum compensation in case of death at the amount of two years', wages, gave rise to some dis- cussion, in the course of which the Marquis of Ripon expressed the indifference of the Govern'- inent to these amendment^, and the Duke of Devon- shire complained (^f the refusal of Ministers to render the JIouseany assistance whatever in its endeavours to meet the objections whicH: habeen urged;bt the Home Secretary in the House of Commons. Even*- tuaJTy' the amendment was -withdrawn, but a further amendment was adopted fixing the amount of the employers' contribution to the mutual insurance fund at not less than one-third, instead of one- fourth,. as required in the original amendment. The sub-section with reference to the certification of the fund by an actuary approved by the Board of Trade was struck out, and a hew proviso, moved by the Earl of Dudley, inserted, under which, in case the, insurance fund was insufficient to provide the agreed compensation, and the employer was unwilling to make up the deficiency, the agreement would be considered void, and the workman be entitled to the same remedy which he would have had if he had not entered into it. A proviso, moved by the Earl of Cam- perdown, that entering into such an agreement should not be made a condition of engagement, and a proviso, moved by the Earl of Dudley, that the Board of Trade should not certify in any case where the ordinary course of the business or employment was such that by reason of frequent changes of workmen it was not possible to ascertain the free opinion of the Workmen employed, were also adopted, the latter being extended, at the instance of Lord Monk Bretton, to cases in which only a small number of workmen were employed, who, by reason of their limited number, might easily be coerced. The Earl of Dudley then moved that their lord- ships do insist upon their original amendment as amended. If the reason given by the Commons for disagreeing with the amendment was the true reason, there ought to be no difficulty in coming to a speedy settlement of the question, inasmuch as the amend- ments now made obviated the danger of the arrange- ments not adequately providing for the protection and compensation of the workmen, which was the ground assigned by the Commons for not agreeing to the amendment. Lord Stalbridge observed that Mr. Laing's speech, which had bCl;n, referred to, did not, represent the views of his co-directors of the London and Brighton Railway, who were unanimously against him. The Marquis of Ripon said it would be the duty of the Government to consider the amendments which had been made but in his judgment they did not afford any satisfactory solution of the question. The motion having been agreed to, the amendment of Viscount Cross relating to notice being given in the case of seamen intending to claim compensation, with which the Commons had disagreed, was con- sidered. The Marquis of Ripon moved that their lordships should not insist upon the amendment, and Viscount Cross, in view of the reception of the amendment in the other House, reluctantly assented to the motion, which was agreed to.

ILLNESS OF THE CZAR.

BURGLARY AT AN EMBASSY.

.PUBLIC MEN ON PUBLIC MATTERS.

THE MONSON MODELS.

THE MATABELE WAR.

DEATH FROM CAT BITE.

! THE MILITARY RIOT AT CHATHAM.

n,,;I-SAD SHIPPING DISASTER.

[No title]

THE PRINCESS OF WALES.

CONFERENCE OF CONSERVATIVE…

EPITOME OF NEWS.

THE INDIAN VICEROYALTY.

" A THEATRE DESTROYED BY FIRE.

ISCENE IN THE FRENCH CHAMBER

[No title]