Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

49 articles on this Page

-J BELGIAN MURDER MYSTERY,…

News
Cite
Share

BELGIAN MURDER MYSTERY, REMARKABLE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST A LADY. SUSPICIOUS DEATHS OF NEAR RELATIVES. SENSATIONAL CASE. ANTWERP, Monday.—The celebrated Belgian murder mystery, known as the Joniaux case, came before the Assize Court here to-day. The trial, which is expected to be a protracted one, has excited the keenest public interest all over the country, owing to the sensational nature of the charge, and the circumstances under which the 'facts of the case came to light. Madame Joniaux, a lady of fifty-one, in a good social posi- tion and well connected, is charged with the murder of Mdlle. Leonie Ablay, ber sister; M. Jacques van den Kerchove, her uncle; and M. Alfred Abl.xy, her brother. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASI, which the mystery attaching to it, and the social position of the accused, have combined to render it of engrossing interest, are briefly these A daughter of Genera! Ablay, the, accused married first the well-known bibliophile and historian, M. Frederic Faber, by whom she had a daughter and, secondly, a widower, named M. Joniaux (chief engineer to the department of roads and bridges in Antwerp). Although involved in debt, she undertook to pay the premiums on insurance policies for 30,000 francs and 40,000 francs respec- tively effected on the life of MdlIe Leonie Ablay with two Swiss and Dutch companies. These policies, which were in favour of Mctlle. Faber, daughter of Madame Joniaux, were signed at the r-nd of December. 1891, and the beginning of January, 1892, and on the 25th February Mdlle. Ablay died iiornewhat suddenly in Mdme. Joniaux's ouse in Antwerp. In March, 1893, M. Joniaux van den Kerchove, a rich manufacturer of Shent, and ex-Senator, died suddenly from what was described as an attack of apoplexy immedi- ately after a dinner to which he had been invited by M. and Mdme. Joniaux. In February, 1894, M. Alfred Ablay, who bad come to Belgium from Paris to sue one of his sons for the means of support, died suddenly also at Mdme. house. His life was insured with the Gresham Company for 100,000 francs, Mdme. Joniaux paying the premium. On the initiative of the manager of the Gresham Company the authorities here took the matter up. THE THREE BODIES WEaE KXHOMKD. Traces of poison were found in the intestines of M. Ablay. They consisted of some particles of Toorphine. Mdme. Joniaux, it was known, had caused some morphine to be purchased the aight before her brother died. Since her arrest Mdme. Joniaux has emphatically protested her nnocence. When the court assembled this morning, under the preside ncy of M. Holyoet, there was a crowded attendance of parsons who had obtained admission by ticket, and represen- tatives of the Press, both Belgian and foreign, were present in great numbers. M. Servais, Advocate-General of the Brussels Court of Appeal, appeared as Public Prosecutor; a.nd M. Graux, ex-Cabinet Minister and' a well-known member of the Brussels Bar and M. Hendricks, of the Antwerp Bar, appeared to conduct the defence. When tha prisoner was brought in at 10.30 she walked with faltering steps between two gendarmes, and was extremely pale. She wore a black dress and black bonnet trimmed with jet. Mdme. Joniaux replied to the usual formal questions in a feeble voice, stating, in reply to the President, that she was born a Malines in 1844. The jury was than con. stituted, four extra jurymen being sworn in view of the expected prolongation of the trial. The reading of th& indictment lasted an hour and a half. During this proceeding the prisonsr was deeply moved, and appeared OVERCOME BY A SENSE OF HER POSITION. The indictment recapitulated at the outset the manner in which three relatives ot the accused met their death, and stated the circumstances loading up to the arrest of Mdme. Joniaux. After mentioning names of the accused's relatives, it dealt exhaustively with the financial position of M. and Mdme. Joniaux, pointing oub that for many years she had been involved in tue most complicated system of borrowing in order to live up to her position. It referred in this connection to anonymous letters received by various relatives of the accused, threatening to brmg about scandal in connection with, among other matters, the drowning of Lionet, the second son of M. Alfred Ablay, who was supposed to committed suicide in October, 1890, unless certain sums were paid as the price of silence. These letters were declared by experts to be in the hand- writing of the accused. The indictment nexb dealt with the question of assurance, pointing out that Madame Joniaux was anxious to obtain a dowry for her daughter,ana was engaged in effect- ing assurances m her favour at the very time she wasborrowmg money on the representation that her daughter would, when of age, inherit a large fortune. The remainder of the indictment was largely devoted to a refutation of the theory that Alfred Ablay committed suicide. The Public 1 rosecutor applied for leave to pub in evidence documents relative to the preliminary inquiry which he had personally conducted, and this was agreed to Sir Graux, counsel for accused, asked whether witnesses for the defence had been subpoenaed, and the Pablio Prosecutor replied in the affirmative. After the names of the witnesses had been called over the court adjourned forlnnoh. The sitting WAS resumed at a quarter pa.st two, when THE INTERROGATION OF THE PRISONER by the president of the court was begun. The President: You are accused of having successively poisoned your sister, Leonie Ablay, in 1892 the maternal uncle of your husband, M. Jacques van den Kerchove, in 1893 and yonr brother, M. Alfred Ablay, in 1894.-Prlsoner; It is absolutely false. Your sister, Leonie Ablay, was at your house a few days prior to the betrothal of your daughter, Mdlle. Faber ?—My sister often came to my house. M. Jacques van den Kerohove was invited to ttmner at lour house in March, 1893. He diod the following morning 1-1 beg pardon. He died on the following day at mid-day. Your sister Leonie Ablay died on the 25th of February !-My sister came to attend the be- waa ™y daughter and her marriage, which Tn tl010^ She died on the 25th. Th« H/Jv!• ^0U a^tr'Dutp your sister's death ?—■ vrr or diagnosed her illness as influenza. doctor's v™t '-No0 h,un the f°°casion of ,the trnsfcwnri-k»T one °f my servants, a attended my^ter'aiTI) • 16 she *h° Mv sister vAri 1„ ? ° °'ock In evening, f r Dr Rue'lte ami 1 conv^'s'vo attack. I sent WaS h6 Wh0 °rdered *PPU" found traces of S £ h7ne° in^the0 mt^tin ™I SSEoDr°Ptg ab°Qt that- 1 had begun tl DEATH OF PRISONER'S BROTHER. withSE?'.?? interrogate the prisoner AbiavT t0 *th? death of her Brother, M: Alfred S d 5UfcLthaC M- Ablay first called together w.fhVh3,11 • few ,ater heweut, Brussels. T* Pr«oner, to soo Dr. Max at brother's h«/W,i asH prisoner whether at her Molitor £ hLh she ubad nob incluif^ of Dr. neas?—As anyon«a«io of Ablay's ilU certainly, whah WOU,d have done» 1 illness. It wag^f nature of my brother's anxious. Perfectly natural that I should be brother?83eath* ^°W6d 4ine.-I believe J t°J?,son'nK Wlth mor- dsath, after three w^V^er died a natural You took out an inaur»r> J: in your own inter^E on your sister's life Kerchove, again, was Jacques van den perty you expected to in\VtTleN^0falPro- 5id U expect to inherit quarter. Your brother had in*"re<3 hi# ii{0 f0_ benefit to the extent franca. iJbre- over, after the visit of th e^anuning magistrate yonr house, you J?'n ?°onments to disappear?—Thoy were papers of do important., tradesmen's bills, „ Did M. Joniaux not tolbe jn reference to the inquiry 1 the lew6 anxious, and there was no neceesity to tell me to lake the matter coolly. Certain papers have, however, aw»ppeared, particularly certain bills of exchaDfif* • don'b remember. 1 tbe dat Yet you remember quite accurately *o* dates whsn these bills fell due, for you wrote to creditors asking for their renewal, 9?n* tracted fresh loans. At the death of your brother your debts amounted to 150,000 franas ?-"Wneir .^bdr, my first husband died, he left me saddled with debts amounting to 200,000 francs, And most of which were unsecured.. How much?-! am relying upon facts brought out by preliminary inquiry. It has been proved that at one period vou had debts amounting to 216,000 francs!—I repeat that my husband spent an immense amount of money. PRISONER'S FIRST HUSBAND. Did your first husband lead a fast life ? Was be extravagant ?—No but he ispent a great deal of lney on hie library and in travelling about. now, did you not help bo spend at least p rt of that sum of 216,000 francs ?—-In no way my needs and my tastes were vpry humble, I TV!I soIe,y to the housekeeping. ,v^ ?cli.T husband control the household expen- itur» .—No, I behaved very badly to him, and I confess it publicly. I concealed from him the greater portion of debts I bad when I married 1U' ,"V ere you not at ono time on the point of break- in„ o your marriage with M. Faber ?—If my Inarrla¡:e was 0,1 thù point of beirij; broken off, it account of M. Faber's relations. f-OKethJ-°^iather ^ofc ,nvite you to go and live you uyour husband in his house, where. «" have had board and lodging for geio>» win and 1 refused, because I could not B^'thmy mother-in-law. Mrt of woman to let "ne upper band ?—I don't know. Did not M. Faber's relations think you d a II bad temper -It was to her hairdresser that biy mother-in-lpw said that. Papers in the case include numerous documents in which there are erasures and other alterations. These alterations are in your handwriting and were made by you.—Not all why do you say that; they were all made by me ? You stated in the course of the preliminary in- quiry that in 1872 yonr husband was out of a sltua- tion. Now, from 1872 onwards. M. Faber held an appointment as secretary and clerk, with a salary of 2,000 francs which, together with allowance lie had from his relations, mado an income of 3,000 francs (£120,)-Prisoner: I don t remember. At this period your brotbar lodged with you, and what did he contribute to the famllyex- penses He paid the rant of che house. PRISONER'S DEBTS. The President proceeded to question Madame oaiaux in great dotail in reform)ce to various debts contrae.ed by her, and in regard to a variety ot "iiancial operations in which she took part. £0 this tedious interrogatory prisoner for the most part replied by affirmative signs of the head. You have stated that M. Faber's expenditure was exorbitant, but it appears you used to buy handkerchiefs at 6f. n-piece. These debts, there- fore, were not all of M. Faber's creation. They were joint dbts of your household, and fell upon you after your husband's decease.—I was not aware of it at the time. Maitre Hendrickx (counsel for the defence) at this stage applied for access to the list of debts imputed to ldme. Joniaux, and upon which the President's interrogatory was based. The Presi- dent assented. In course of further examination on the subject of her liabilities, prisoner, who appeared fairly calm and self-possessed, replied sometimes by affirmative nods, sometimes by the laconic remark" It is possible," and at other points by strenuous denial. In answer to her disclaimers the President pointed out that the questions he addressed to her were borne out by the papers in the case.—Prisoner That is im- possible. A MARRIAGE CONTRACT. The examination next turned upon the marriage contract between Mdme. Joniaux and her first husband, from which it appeared that under it she became proprietress of two unfurnished houses. Prisoner stated that both of those bad to be sold to satisfy creditors. Th* PresidentDid you not through your solicitor request Mdme. Faber, your husband's mother, to after her will ? M. Faber, sen., had left his wife half of his property absolutely, and the income of the'other half.—Prisoner If my legal representative said thut, he may have made a mistake. I should have preferred such a request through niy husband. Mdme. Faber did not wish to share her pro- perty with her son, fearing that you were too extravagant ?—I don't think so. Mdme. Faber, on th" other hand, has said she made proposals—arrangements with her son?—I don't know anything about that. That must have been in 1S80 or 18811— lb is possible. You pretend M. Faber's library cost a good deal of money ? Now, an examination shows it is only worth 3,500 francs.—I meant to say my husband had set apart a sum of at least 50,000 francs for :the:maintenance of the library and for the cost of his journeys. In 1885 you drew up no list of your liabilities, and you found that in Maroh that year they amounted to 33,000 franco. Why, at that period, did you conceal the real state of your affairs^?—I don't remember how matters stood then. The President pointed out that though Faber had spent 29,000 francs in bringing out his book, "La Theitre Frawjais en Belgique," he had realised 22,000 francs from its publication, so that the net loss was only 7,000 francs. The hearing was adjourned at half-past 5 o'clock. -Reuter. HER LIFE WAS ALMOST THAT OF A CONVICT. ANTWERP, Tuesday Evening.—The second day of the great poisoning trial has been full of inci- dents and deeply interesting. Madame Joineaux has maintained her reputation for nerve, and the nnmher of her admirers in court has decidedly increased. Tuesday was monopolised by the president of the court. At times the proceedings became an exciting dialogue. The president pur- sued his pitiless cross-exammation of the prisoner upon the facts of the case. At the close of the examination the prisoner said almost tearfully, In facb for the sake of others I have led for many years a terrible drudgery my life was almost a. convict's life." At the prisoner's request the court adjourned till to-morrow.—Central JSTcws.

THE WYLDE GREEN POISONING.

NEWPORT SCHOOL BOARD.

COMPANY PROMOTING,

BLIND LOSE A BENEFACTOR.

DIED AT HIS POST.

SUICIDE ON THE THUNDERER.

GOTHENBURG SYSTEM.

CHEPSTOW DISTRICT COUNCIL…

THE ELY SCHOOLS, CARDIFF.

CARDIFF HEALTH COMMITTEE.

, A FASTING HEN.

Advertising

GREAT WESTERN COLLIERY FUND.

——————————— HORRIBLE CHARGE…

UNION AMONG CARDIFF NONCONFORMISTS.

ROMANTIC MARRIAGE OF AN M.P.…

ARREST AT LORD WOLVERTON'S…

MR A. J. BALFOUR'S VISIT TO…

FELLED THE TREE AND THE GROCER.

DISMISSED HIS SHIP FOR DRUNKENNESS.'

Advertising

OUR COUNTRY COLUMN. ;0 ---=.

=============j RAILWAYMEN'S…

EVEN THE WORKHOUSE SHUT.

Advertising

WALES v. SCOTLAND.1

MR BUDD AND THE WALES v. ENGLAND…

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

DEFAULTING TRUSTEES.

OFF TO GIBRALTAR.

------'---ROBBING HIS CORPS.

Advertising

LINGFIELD MEETING ABANDONED.

OFFICIAL SCRATCHINGS.

------NEWMARKET TRAINING NOTES.

HUNTING APPOINTMENTS.I

Advertising

[No title]

SHANKS'S "CHAMPION BRAND."

CARDIFF PROGRESSIVE LIBERALS.

NEATH BANKRUPTCY COURT.

FATAL GUN ACCIDENT.

Advertising

IALBION COLLIERY DISASTE&

LATEST MARKETS.

FUNERAL OF AN OLD CARDIFFIAlf.

[No title]

Advertising