Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

31 articles on this Page

ILONDON LETTER.

News
Cite
Share

LONDON LETTER. {.FFIOM OUR LONDON CORRESPONDENT.] [SPECIALLY WIRED.J LONDON, Tuesday Night. THE PROGRESS OF BUSINESS. The Government have not made much Out of their incursion upon the rights of Private members and the unprecedented os- tablishment of morning sittings within the fourth week of the meeting of Parliament. was six o'clock this evening before the House resumed Committee on the Army Estimates. Even then any expectation of progress was frus- trated by the appearence of Mr Swift acN eill with questions of the right of Sir Lewis Pelly, Mr Burdett Coutts, and Sir John Puleston to have taken part the other day in the division on the vote for the ^lombasa-Nyanza Railway. This delay has given the last touch to the farcical character of the debate on the Army Estimates. What everyone concerned Mn the subject is thinking of is the evidence given before Lord Wantage's committee. With that still withheld, it is felt to be idle to talk about the Army administration, and though a good many speeches have already been delivered, there is no one to listen to them, whilst men like Lord Itandolph Churchill stand aside, declining to take active part in the proceedings. THE ARMY ESTIMATES. If the Government imagined that they ould gain anything either in the way of time, or in surcease from criticism by keep- ing back the Wantage Committee evidence they have already discovered their error. The debate has dragged on much as usual, alld will appropriate a good deal of Thurs- day's sitting. When it is over they will still be face to face with the graver situation brought to light in the report: of the com- mittee. That will be the great field day for the Army critics, and it might have been over by this time had the Government hurried forward with the printing of the eidence. Now one, or perhaps two, nights will be required for its discussion. HOLDING ON TO THE LAST. This constant and accumulating mis- management of the business of the House adds to the growing dissatisfaction in Ministerial ranks, and to the strengthen- lng of the desire for an end to be put to the present unsatisfactory state of things. The Government, on the other hand, are more than ever resolved to hold on as long as possible. To quote the emphatic phrase of an eminent supporter, they will hold on to the last minute of the last hour of the last possible day." That is their hope and intention, but there is always the risk of accident. They may at any moment be defeated in the division lObby, and the necessary appeal to the country be sprung upon them before they have time to turn round. In spite of this they will risk everything to postpone the evll day, the result of the London County Council elections having brought home to them the conviction that it will be difficult for any time to be worse than the present. THE BIRMINGHAM WATER BILL. Mr Chamberlain's championship of the Birmingham Water Bill was regarded with Some trepidation by its anxious supporters. t is recognised that the mere fact of his advocating any particular or line of Conduct is sufficient to close up against it the ranks of considerable sections of jttembers of the present House. The pro- bable action of the Irish members was in Particular regarded with profound appre- hension. It was felt that they would be certain to vote against a measure for which he was personally concerned, nor was this expectation falsified, all the Irish Members in the House when the divi- sion was called going against the Bill. It was feared that if they had noticed that the Bill was on the Orders they would have issued a strong whip, and polled every one of their men in order to defeat it. Doubt- less they would in the good old days, when the Irish party was united and Mr Biggar was one of its moving spirits but times are changed, and there is very little spirit left in the divided party for little spurts of that kind. The Welsh members made an animated resistance, and were un- expectedly joined by the London members, Who complained of breach of faith on the Part of supporters of the Bill, but the Government and the Conservatives loyally mustered to the support of their ally, and the second reading was carried by an over- whelming majority. EARNED HIS REWARD. It will be news to many people outside Windsor to learn that only from yesterday's date shall we have a Duke of Argyll in the House of Lords. That is, however, the case. The student of contemporary history will search in vain through the division lists or Order Book of the House of Lords for the name of the personage who, whatever may be his demerits, is certainly one of the most ornate of living Parliamentary debaters. They will come upon one Baron Sundridge, little suspecting that is the alias of the McCullum More. But so it is. Princess Louise's father-in-law has hitherto been a duke only in the Scottish peerage. In the peerage of the United Kingdom he was simply Lord Sundridge. Henceforward he will rank as duke in the peerage of the United Kingdom, and will be duly installed as such in the House of Lords. To the vulgar mind this will not seem to import any great change, but it is understood to be a prize for which Lord Sundridge has long yearned. If enquiry be made why it should be placed in his hand just now, the only answer can be that it is a reward for his assiduity and vehemence in abusing his old chief. The Duke is of no Particular account in political life. His carefully prepared orations in the House of Lords are listened to with a certain pleasure and admiration for their intellectual keenness and their l'hetorical effect. The Duke is, indeed, one of the last of the old school of Parliamentary orators left to us, but as far as practical use to the party he supports is concerned his chief recommendation is the vehemence and virulence with which he attacks Mr Gladstone and all his works. This service performed for six years has been estimated by Lord Salisbury to be worth a dukedom, and so Lord Sundridge is happy at last. MRS OSBORNE'S CASE. Arrangements have been made for. the hearing of the case against Mrs Osborne to be taken on Thursday. Sir Charles Russell appears as leader on her side, but his duties Will not be arduous, or the case prolonged. Mrs Osborne will pleacty guilty, and Sir Charles Russell's efforts will be confined to pleading for a mitigation of the sentence. AN INCIDENT BEFORE SUSPENSION. The Scotch members loyally came down at the evening sitting to make a House for Mr Marjoribanks, who had the first place on the paper with a comprehensive reso- lution on Scottish fisheries. The chief demands of the motion were introduction of the representative element in the Fishery Board, and the establishment of District •Fishery Committees. Mr Marjoribanks preached chiefly to the converted, for with the exception of Mr Balfour, the Scotch Solicitor-General, and two other Ministers on the Treasury bench the seats opposite were untenanted. Sir Richard Temple, it is true, occupied the corner seat on the front bench below the gangway, and Baron Dimsdale sat half hidden in the shadow of the gallery behind. But both hon. members were asleep, and could not by any stretch of imagination be called auditors. Mr Swift Macneill had obtained from the library a number of books, variously estimated at from six to nine. With the assistance of these he made a speech that brought the sitting up to twenty-five minutes to seven, leaving just a quarter of an hour for anything else that might take place before the suspension of the sitting. Sir John Puleston, Mr Burdett Coutts, and Sir Lewis Pelly each had their say, agreeing that at least they had meant no harm. In accordance with usage, the Chairman ordered them to withdraw whilst the debate went forward. This evidently came upon them as a surprise, and their slow departure in single file was watched with uproarious laughter and cheers from the Liberals. It was, more or less, good fun, but it was death to the prospects of making progress with the Army Vote. The Bittin was suspended before this question Was disposed of, so it will come up again the I first thing on Thursday.

Advertising

THE TRAGEDY AT CANNES.

SAD DISASTER AT SEA.

FOREIGNERS IN CHINA.

THE GRAND DUKE OF HESSE.

STRANGE DISAPPEARANCE OF A…

MR BOTTOMLEY'S APPEAL.!

LIBELLING A MUSICIAN.

SHOCKING DISCOVERY IN A DRAIN.

THE OXFORD SCANDAL.

COAL WINNING IN THE OGMORE…

FALL OF A SCAFFOLD.

TO-DAY'S vVEArrHER, 4.30 A.M.

Advertising

HOUSE OF LORDS.—TUESDAY.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.—TUESDAY.

THE FUNDS OF THE IRISH PARTY.

THE SINKING OF THE GLAMORGAN.

LLANELLY HARBOUR COMMISSION.

A WELSH SECRETARY IN TROUBLE.

EXTRAORDINARY CASE OF SUICIDE

Advertising

MR T. A. WALKER'S CLAIM DECIDED.

THE STRIKE IN THE BUILDING…

NEW YORK PRICES.

- LOCAL COMMISSIONS.

COUNTY COUNCIL ELECTIONS IN…

GLAMORGANSHIRE.

CARMARTHENSHIRE.

THE FATAL COLLIERY ACCIDENT…