Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

6 articles on this Page

TOWYN.

News
Cite
Share

TOWYN. WAR NEWS.—Since the departure from the town of Major Hindes, who received telegrams every evening of the progress of matters at the front, there has been a dearth of war news here after the arrival of the daily papers, which of course come late in the day. A number of friends have joined together and now the telegrams are exhibited every evening at the Market Hall. GOOD TEMPLARS.—The ordinary meeting was held on Friday evening, the Chief Templar (Mr J Maethlon James) presiding. The following were elected officers :-Chief Templar, Mr J M James; lodge steward, Mr J Ilar Davies vice-templar, Miss Hughes, Merton Villa chaplain, Mr A H Jones; Marshall, Miss J Davies, Arfor terrace see, Mr D 0 Jones; financial secretary, Miss Daniel; treasurer, Miss S A Parry. SAD DROWNING FATALITY.-This occurred last Week to a young man from this town named John Charles Sambrook by being washed overboard B.M.S. "Sheldrake" in tempertuous weather off Cromarty, North Scotland. Since he joined the Royal Navy he had obtained an excellent character as a seaman of promise and was moreover well-liked by officers and men. He was 22 years of age. The > Sheldrake was a gun boat, at the time protect- mg the North Sea Fisheries. LOCAL LAW CASE (DAVIES V EVANS).—Mr Justice Cozens Hardy, in the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice on Saturday, had before him this action, by which the plaintiff, Mrs Davies of Towyn, Merionethshire, sought specific performance of a contract by the defendant to purchase land in Radnorshire for X485 and a dwelling-house in the county of Montgomery. The defendant was Mr Daniel Evans, a solicitor, of Brecon.—Mr Gatey, for the plaintiff, said the defendant bad paid deposits on both contracts. The defendant had been given further time in which to put in a defence to the action, but he had not done so. The purchase of the properties was to have been completed on the 29th September, 1899.-Mr Justice Cozens Hardy granted a decree for the specific performance of the Contracts, in accordance with plaintiff's claim. A DISTINGUISHED MUSICIAN.-Professor Hugh W Owen, head of the Ada Conservatory of Music, Nor- mal University, Ada, Ohio, was born at Bodgodfan, near Towyn. He began his musical career very early in life, for he conducted choirs when he was 14 years of age. He now holds twenty-one certifi- cates in music, his twentieth certificate being for the advanced course and the last for the graduate course. He graduated at the University where he is now professor of musio and where he has eight teachers of well-known ability under him. After his graduation, he crossed over to England, and Was for a time at Aberystwyth and London for a long period. He studied in different subjects of music under Mr David Jenkins, Mus. Bac., Aberys- twyth, Dr McNauth, Dr Rebuke, Mrs Margaret Watts Hughes, Professor A Rook, Professor Ven- ables, Professor Proudman, and others on the Con- tinent. After completing his studies, he returned to America where he was engaged for a time as teacher at the Normal College of Middlepoint, Ohio, at which time public attention was drawn to his abilities as a musician. In 1895, he was appointed by the authorites of North-Western Normal Univer- sity in Ada as head professor of music and from that date he has rapidly advanced in his profession. PETTY SESSIONS.—FRIDAY. Before Messrs Humphrey Davies (presiding), Marmaduke Lewis, and H Haydn Jones. A CORRIS RAILWAY CASE.—Evan Griffith, Salem Cottage, Corris, eruard on the Corris Railway, summoned John Williams, quarryman, Abercorris, for having refused, on the 14th day of April last, to deliver up bis ticket when requested to do so. Robert Edwards, quarryman, Braichgoch-terrace, Corris, was also charged with a similar offence on the 26th ult.-Mr Jenkins, (Messrs J Rowlands and Jenkins, Machynlleth) appeared for the complain- ant's company, and Mr Woosnam, Newtown, defended.-It was decided to take the cases separ- ately.—Mr Jenkins, in opening, said the summonses Were taken put under the Railway Regulation Act, 1889, section 5, which provided that every passenger should, when asked by an officer or servant, produce or, if so requested, deliver up a ticket showing that his fare was paid for; or, in the event of his not doing so, give his name and address. In default, he would be liable to be fined a sum not exceeding 40s. He, (Mr Jenkins,) did not anticipate any difficulty in showing the cases to be within the meaning of that section. It was neoessary that tickets should be shown to officials in order to facilitate railway work, and the fact that Parliament bad legislated on the point was proof if proof were necessary. He hoped the Bench would inflict such a fine as would act as a deterrant against such practices in the future.— Evan Griffiths said on Saturday evening, April 14th, he was on duty as guard and ticket oollector. The defendant, John Williams, had a ticket in his hand but he refused to deliver it up when requested to do so.—Cross-examined Did not know that defendant had booked at Machynlleth for his returu journey. The reason defendant gave was that he had a right to a seat which he alleged he did not get.—Reex- amined Defendant was properly accommodated.- Mr Woosnam denied that there was accommodation for his client.—J R Dix, manager of the Company, was then called and said that on the 14th April, he saw John Williams in the train. He asked him to deliver up his ticket and he refused. There weie only two in the compartment. Defendant persisted in his ref usal.- Cross-examined: This was about 300 yards below Corris. He went through the train at Machynlleth and found there was room for the passengers. The company contracted to carry the defendant to Corris, and, as a matter of fact, it did do so. He did not think they were bound to pro- vide sitting accommodation.—Mr Woosnam Men are not cows.—Witness No :—Mr Woosnam Cows do not want to sit (laughter).—Witness But they are not put in the same compartments (renewed laughter).-Mr Woosnam, addressing the Bench for the defence said his client had had to stand from Machynlleth to Esgaergeiliog. The contract between the parties had, he maintained, been broken, inas- much as seating accommodation had not been pro- vided in conformity with the law.—John Williams, the defendant, said on the date mentioned, he booked from Machynlleth to Corris. The train was full, and he had to stand in the corrider.- Cross-examined The train was full before he went in. The guard brought a lady in after him and found accommodation for her. Did no know whether she stood or not. Did not see sitting room in any other compartment. His reason for not delivering up his ticket was that he bad not had the accommodation to which he was entitled. Re. examined He told the guard that that was his reason for not giving up his ticket.—In reply to the Bench, defendant said he had shown the ticket to everyone else who had asked to see it.—The magis- trates thought, although a technical offence had been committed, that they had better dismiss the summons.-The case against the other defendant was then proceeded with. On the 26th April, Edwards refused to deliver up his ticket when asked, giving as his reason that he would do so when the train stopped. When they arrived at Corris he gave the ticket up. Cross-examined There was some friction about smoking. Defendant told witness that there were ladies in the smoking compartment, but, on inspection, he found tbera were no ladies there.—Mr WoOsnam submitted that this was a trumpery case caused by bad blood between the parties. He, therefore, asked the Bench to dismiss the case. The magistrates found that a technical offence was committed, and fined defendant 6d with 9s costs.

ABERGYNOLWYN.

ABERDOVEY.

BARMOUTH.

DOLGELLEY.

[No title]