Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

3 articles on this Page

THE DIOCESE OF PETERBOROUGH…

News
Cite
Share

THE DIOCESE OF PETERBOROUGH AND ITS CATHEDRAL CHURCH. BY THE VEN. W. H. HUTTON, B.D. THE Church Congress meets again at Leicester after an interval of thirty-nihe years. It meets in a city which has in- creased enormously in size and in im- portance during that time. Leicester is full of life, and the activities of the Church there were never greater than they are to-day. We all hope that the county may soon form a separate See. A Commission appointed by the last Bishop of Peterborough reported unani- mously in favour of the creation of a Bishopric of Leicester. At present financial difficulties stand in the way of the realisation of our hopes. But there can be little doubt that a beginning will soon be made, and that Bishop Glyn will help the present Bishop to the utmost of his power in the necessary foundation of the scheme. The union of Leicester with the See of Peterborough is quite modern. Till 1839 it belonged to the vast diocese of Lincoln, alld the Bishopric of Peterborough, founded by Henry VIII. in 1541, con- sisted only of the counties of Northamp- ton and Rutland. The union has hardly had time to become firm, and the counties are so different that, even if population had not increased so greatly, it is not likely that it would ever have been close. Peterborough, though so badly placed for a diocesan centre, has exercised a great influence on the diocese; and Leicester can never have felt that it enjoyed its proper consideration, though the Bishops of recent years have certainly striven to the utmost to give it promin- ence, even to the oolmparative disadvan- of other parts of their See. The his- tory of the See of Peterborough must of necessity find its chief interest in its Bishops; and its Bishops have lived at Peterborough, though, as Bishop Magee 6aid, its position is but that of the stalk in relation to the pear, the huge diocese, Which depends upon it. Some years ago, in the somewhat un- enlightened days of the now vigorous S.P.C.K., a series of diocesan his- tories was published. That of Peter- borough, which is not even dated, is one of the worst of them all There really could hard4 ibe a worse book of the kInd. Facts and dates, which, tiresome though they sometimes are, are after all essential to the understanding of history, ape conspicuous by their absence." Historical criticism is equally to seek. Irrelevance is rampant. One '\Vould think that the most conspicuous figures in the Church history of the dio- Photo Frith. The Choir—Peterborough Cathedral. cese were Latimer (who happened to be born in Leicestershire, which was not then in the diocese at all), Mary Queen of Scots (who died in the diocese, but was not a member of the English Church), Charles 1. (who was defeated, and i imprisoned for a short time, in the county of Northampton). If anyone wishes to study the history of the diocese of Peter- borough, he had better avoid the S.P.C.K. history. Very different, though all too brief, is the excellent article by Dr. G. F. Assinder in the Dictionary of Eng- lish Church His- tory, which will certainly be read before attending the Congress of 1919 by all sensible persons who possess that most useful book (and every sensible person does 1). But even the learned Dr. Assinder, being doubtless more of a lawyer than a historian, has been misled by legend. The Peter- borough insets in the English Chronicle have led too many folk astray. If I may quote former words of my own, the meaning of which I could not, I think, express more clearly, I would say this about those early tales: A legend grew up that Peada, Ealdoman of the Middle Eng- lish, and Oswin, .King of the North- umbrians, the brother and suc- cessor of Oswald, the hero saint, were concerned in the endowment of the great Abbey of Me d ehamsted.' They may, indeed, have said, after the fashion of the time, a word of approval; but all the grants of j land supposed to have been made then to the abbey are certaiiil, spuri- ous, and the earliest of such grants probably goes no further back than King Edgar's day, 300 years later. There is an earlier grant, though, from iEthelred, King of Mercia; but can it be be- lieved ? Certainly there was a high flight of forgery when the monks in- serted in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle a .magnificent privilege from Pope Agatho and dated it 675." (Since I wrote this Photo Russell. THE RT. REV. THEODORE WOODS, D.D., LORD BISHOP OF PETERBOROUGH.

PRESIDENTS MESSAGE TO "CHURCH…

THE DIOCESE OF PETERBOROUGH…