Welsh Newspapers

Search 15 million Welsh newspaper articles

Hide Articles List

15 articles on this Page

i THE F-BAJJDULENT MANAGER…

News
Cite
Share

THE F-BAJJDULENT MANAGER AND: TliE TIME8"$EFENCE OF THE !L CRIJLINAL. Three months ago -a Mr. Wilkinson, the manager of the Joint-Stock Discount Company, was tried and con- victed at the Central Criminal Court on a charge of having fraudulently applied to his own use two cheques, value £ 4,860, the property of the company, of which he "was manager. The defence oil the trial was that the one cheque for < £ 4,000 was givjen for shares purchased in his name, but which were to be handed over to the company eventually the i £ 860 cheque, it was contended,' might have been given "in the hurry of -business. The Times in their money article, the other day, endea- voured to defend the manager, whereupon the Pall-maW Gazette took up the question very strongly, and in their issue of the 16th of April said:- "Even if Wilkinson's story-were true-andthe 'jury who tried the case disbelieved it-he was guilty of great dishonesty, whether he-was legally guilty of thel't'or, not. He took £ 4,860 which didaiot belong* to; him in oitler to pay his own private debt on the ichanOO ,that Kleman would repay him. What right had he to do anything of the, sort ? This was substantially-.stealing with a hope of replacing the stolen goods. "Now," continued ithe Pall-mall Gazette, "there appeared :in the money .article of yesterday'sTi])es.all article which appears to us to represent with ^lamentable accuracy the tone of morality which unhappily prevails ;at-present most extensively in the commercial world. A large number of London merchants, including 'represeii- tatives of the most solid city firms wholly unconnected with speculative operations/have taken up Wilkinson's case, and have tried to get him pardoned. A memorial; -was sent to the HOllle 'Office' for, a free,.pardon on the! ground of ivroii-ftil conviction.' The Home -Office refused to interfere. The solid firms hereupon petitioned, /the Queen for a pardon, and we ane itold that,each' name has been affixed only after a careful ihvestigatibn of the arguments brought foriWaTdtorthrow lighten the case.' Of course there is .nothing to be said to this.. If the solid firms really believe .that an innocent man has been convicted, if their experience of life leads themto the conclusion that 'the contents of the petition presented by the accused to the Queen, together witlitlie several af-fidavits in support of it,' were entitled, to so much credit that they ought to overweighthe verdict of the jury and the opinion of the Home Office, and if they further think it decent to ask the Queen in deference to their opinion to overrule the judgment of a court of law, .and to reject the advice of her responsible Ministers^ ;>Ve can only say, that the solidity of these eminent firms thtlst be due Itd some other cause than the good judgnrent- or discretion) of their mGfiibers. Still they are entitled to >thsiif opinion that Wilkinson was innocent, and,if they ase of that opinion it is right and natural that they should wish him to be-pardoned. 3JhjB.-part of the article which appears to us disgraceful is ^he-estimate which, it discloses, on the part of the mercantile,^yorld and. on the part of so influential a person as the of the Times' City article of the character of this mam. 'Such,' we are told, 'is the belief in liis. personal honesty that if Ie were free to-morrow, lie would find a large number of the -best people in the 'City ready to trust him as heretofore, so far as the absence of any fear of intentional misappropriation might be concerned and it is added, with a simplicity which we fear is not ironical—! Entertaining this View, it is a most satis- factory feature of Ei-iglish character that so many, in the face of the unhappy position, in which the prisoner stands, have come forward to avow it;' Going back a few lines we find this sentenceWhether Mr. Wilkin- son was deserving of five years' penahservitude for his mad mismanagement of the Joint-Stock Discount Com- pany is a question which might have a serious bearing on the personal position of a very large number of other persons in London,' and this is followed by these notable considerations. The solid firms which believe in Wilkinson's personal honesty, and would trust him as be- fore if at liberty, feel that it is very unlikely that in a matter of 9860 he would have run the risk of penal servitude, as well as of leaving his large family in utter destitution,' when he might have appropriated X100,000 or more had he been so minded, and this in a way to render punishment impossible.' Moreover, he did not run away, but avowedly remained to meet every inquiry.' From all this it appears to follow that the City editor :of the Times regards it as natural xthat the best firms in the City should feel, and as honourable to them that they should Mow the feeling, that a man who is admitted to be guilty of .'mad mismanagement' of the affairs of a company which paid him £3,000 a year salary and C25,000 in hardca,sh for the goodwill of his business, is likely -to be personally honest, and that so long as he does not steal ClOOiOOO or commit his crimes in so glaring a manner as to make it impossible to set up any plausible defence even before a London jury, he is entitled to treat with contempt the notion that he could be capable of stealing such a trifle as £860. In short, the solid firms and their advocate in the Times are wholly dead to the doctrines which some other parts of the community devoutly believe, that a reckless speculator, a Inyad mismanager' of other people's money, is a Z, gambler of the worst and most dangerous kind, and that a gambler is as such next door to a thief. Whether Wilkinson stole this- particular money or not-and there seems to be every possible reason to believe that be did —his whole life and conversation for years was one gigantic fraud, 'and the writer in the Times who talks of his mad mismanagement' ought to be the last man to doubt the fact. The money which he so madly mis- managed was not his own, but the money of the share- holders and when he threw it about in all directions his object was to carry on operations which do not seem to have differed substantially from those of a gambling- house on a large scale. The public at large are apt to believe that if a man goes to a hell he need not be sur- prised at getting his pocket picked. The solid firms are of a different opinion. Let the supper be sufficiently hand- some, let the sums on the table be large enough, let the master of the establishment wear sufficiently good clothes) and have a pew in church, and they will tell you that you need not be the least afraid. Suchamanwillbefartoo fine a gentleman to take a few bank-notes or a watch. He never cheats any one for less than £ 5,000. He has a wife and family to maintain, and you don't suppose he would allow them to run the risk of his 'having to be tried at the Middlesex sessions arid, to be pulled about by a coarse policeman. True, he may be indicted for keep- ing a gambling-house, but he would at once have the I indictment removed into the Queen's Bench by certiorari would employ the most eminent counsel to defend him, and would not think of running away from his bail so long as there was a chance of ftis acquittal. If by acci- dent you should happen to find your pocket-book in I his pocket you might be perfectly certain that the cir- cumstance was purely ac ei,detI that even if sus- picious there was doubt enough about the matter to make it desirable that he should have a free pardon if a jury were vulgar enough td Ijoniie't him of larceny.

",1,",--- ---THE EARL OF J)ERBTS…

It;"i=_-=,,-.""J.!!":":' I)AIIA…

-.. JfORE GAROTTING,

"I( , THE MGWN-DRIRETISY STRIKE:':;

A CLERGYMAN FINED FOR DRUNKENNESS..…

.---_ VIOLENT OUTRAGE ON A…

1'(_-F:. REVOLTING OFl E \T'R,;''''..

TJ-TE,WIC-T < TillE, WIOKEDNESS…

---' .THE Q uE, Ey Y,S EASTER…

J_------: STRANGE ,DEATH THROUGH…

,-_"--.?IM ■DROTTTNED IN THE…

---_------BORROWED SERMONS?:

[No title]

Advertising